Family History Haunts Romney

· Tuesday, January 10, 2012

At the 757th Republican debate over the weekend, Newt Gingrich zinged Mitt Romney for attempting to portray his decision to forego a re-election race in Massachusetts as reluctance to become a lifetime politician. " . . . Can we drop a little bit of the pious baloney?" Gingrich taunted, observing that Romney's poll numbers were dropping in 2006, and he was eyeing a presidential run, which he did indeed make in 2008.

True enough. Romney's explanation was transparently self-serving and contrived. That said, Romney cannot hope to compete in the phoniness league Newt Gingrich belongs to. At that level of play, candidates dare to suggest that they take huge retainers from Freddie Mac in order to offer advice "as a historian," and commit serial adultery because "partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate."

Still, most of the time, when Gingrich speaks, his audience has a sense that they are watching a thoughtful person spontaneously expressing his views. When Santorum speaks, the listener doesn't wonder whether he's checked the reply with his pollster. With Romney, the feeling is more like pressing the buttons on a jukebox.

Ask about defense and the "military second to none" disc slides into the player. Ask about the economy and the "businessman" record slips into the slot. Such competence is not easily attained, but the effect over time can be numbing, rather than inspiring.

Gingrich and Rick Santorum have advanced the process by highlighting this vulnerability of Romney's. Like New York Republican Thomas E. Dewey, nominated for president in 1944 and 1948, Romney seems to be the candidate from central casting. Dewey, commented Alice Roosevelt Longworth, "looks like the little man on the wedding cake."

It isn't that Romney lacks the ability to think on his feet. When reporter Andy Hiller asked a series of questions on gay rights culminating in what he clearly imagined was a gotcha -- "When is the last time you stood up and spoke out for increasing gay rights?" -- Romney parried with "Right now."

Something is causing to Romney to play it too safe. Without straying very far into armchair psychoanalysis, it is worth examining the experience of the candidate's father, George Romney.

A popular three-term governor of Michigan, the elder Romney was the odds-on favorite to challenge President Lyndon Johnson in 1968. Romney had proved himself a success in business when he took over the failing American Motors company and turned it into a profitable company. His margins of victory in Michigan were commanding and included 30 percent of the black vote. Handsome, honest and unpretentious, he was admired throughout the Republican Party and the nation. In 1966, a national poll found that 54 percent of respondents preferred him to the sitting president.

But in the course of a single afternoon, the Romney campaign became a national joke. As Theodore White told it in "The Making of the President 1968," Romney, who had a tendency to revise his previous comments and positions, told a radio host that he changed his mind about Vietnam. The way he phrased it proved his undoing. Referring to a trip he had made, Romney said, "Well, you know when I came back from Vietnam, I just had the greatest brainwashing that anybody can get when you go over to Vietnam. Not only by the Generals, but also by the diplomatic corps over there . . ." He went on to explain that upon his return he had done his own study of the nation "going back to World War II" and concluded that the war was not necessary.

You might suppose that the anti-Vietnam press corps might have approved of this demonstration of independent thinking. But Romney was, after all, a Republican. Moreover, as White makes clear, he was a particular kind of Republican -- naive, innocently moralistic and old-fashioned -- qualities that the liberals in the press were inclined to loathe. Within days, the "brainwashing" quote was everywhere. Eugene McCarthy added a cruel but amusing quip that no brainwashing was needed, as "a light rinse should have been sufficient." Romney's polls tanked. He was finished.

Mitt Romney seems determined never to let his guard down, never to permit a slip that could prove fatal. His extreme caution is psychologically understandable but may prove politically costly in its own way. Trying too hard to avoid mistakes is itself a mistake. People want to vote for a person, not a robo-candidate.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Daylo

Oddly, the press and the usual pundit seem to want to ALWAYS bring up the fact that Newt has been married and divorced, cheated on his wife, etc., etc., etc...

It would appear that the ever moral press has always brought this to OUR attention, hoping beyond hope that we will (as conservaties) turn away from Gingrich. Yet, these same people never bring up the Democratic morals of Bill Clinton. The Democrats forgave Clinton. If the Democrats can forgive Clinton, I believe conservative should be able to "forgive" Newt. Actually, it is not OUR place to forgive Newt. We look at the man and his past accomplishments and we look at our future without this man who can lead us out of this depression and horrible road to nowhere we are on with Obama and we should leave the forgiving of his "sins" up to God. People cannot forgive Newt. Only God can do that. That being said, I think that Newt is the most intelligent of all of the candidates. The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac account is also beginning to be very tiresome. Newt was a consultant. The fee was decided upon by the government run entities who paid him. Yet, I see no demonization of the demonization of these entities who agreed upon that fee. It is always Newt. It is the same old tired crap over and over and over and over. Deliberately trying to ruin Newt's chances at a bid for the Presidency. I must ask...."REALLY, Why don't you want Newt in this position>?" Because it is not what you are saying here.

Romney is VERY FALSE. He hides his arrest in 1982 when he defied a park ranger who told him not to launch his boat into a Massachusetts water area. He was arrested, but with his money had the charges dropped and the records sealed. Now they have come to light. Spoiled brat or poor little rich kid. Both?

Posted January 10, 2012 at 11:54:19 AM


Howard Last

Don't forget Romney's main family history haunt is that he is a RINO, just like his father. The only good thing you could say about Romney's arrest in 1982, he was using a boat and not a car.

Posted January 10, 2012 at 12:31:12 PM


Howard Reed

Hello America,

What should worry every Republican concerning Mitt Romney and any other Republican politician that is elected in Massachusetts, is that the state is the most socialist in the union. Vermont is a pencil thin close second. Mitt Romney, Scott Brown, they show their RINO progressive colors soon after the election.

You know what though . . . either one of these Mass socialists is a far cry better than Commie Obamy Yo Mammy. This guy sets the measure for what is extremely bad for our nation. Like the rest of the far left Kleptocrats, he is in it bring down our way of life and party hardy at the taxpayers expense like there is no tomorrow. Bam was born to suck the public tit.

The Turban Torpedo

Posted January 10, 2012 at 6:34:51 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund