Now for the Slaughter

· Saturday, March 20, 2010

Excuse me, but it is embarrassing — really, embarrassing to our country — that the president of the United States has again put off a state visit to Australia and Indonesia because he's having trouble passing a piece of domestic legislation he's been promising for a year will be passed next week. What an air of chaos this signals to the world. And to do this to Australia of all countries, a nation that has always had America's back and been America's friend.

How bush league, how undisciplined, how kid's stuff.

You could see the startled looks on the faces of reporters as Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who had the grace to look embarrassed, made the announcement on Thursday afternoon. The president "regrets the delay" — the trip is rescheduled for June — but "passage of the health insurance reform is of paramount importance." Indonesia must be glad to know it's not.

The reporters didn't even provoke or needle in their questions. They seemed hushed. They looked like people who were absorbing the information that we all seem to be absorbing, which is that the wheels seem to be coming off this thing, the administration is wobbling — so early, so painfully and dangerously soon.

Thursday's decision followed the most revealing and important broadcast interview of Barack Obama ever. It revealed his primary weakness in speaking of health care, which is a tendency to dodge, obfuscate and mislead. He grows testy when challenged. It revealed what the president doesn't want revealed, which is that he doesn't want to reveal much about his plan. This furtiveness is not helpful in a time of high public anxiety. At any rate, the interview was what such interviews rarely are, a public service. That it occurred at a high-stakes time, with so much on the line, only made it more electric.

I'm speaking of the interview Wednesday on Fox News Channel's "Special Report With Bret Baier." Fox is owned by News Corp., which also owns this newspaper, so one should probably take pains to demonstrate that one is attempting to speak with disinterest and impartiality, in pursuit of which let me note that Glenn Beck has long appeared to be insane.

That having been said, the Baier interview was something, and right from the beginning. Mr. Baier's first question was whether the president supports the so-called Slaughter rule, alternatively known as "deem and pass," which would avoid a straight up-or-down House vote on the Senate bill. (Tunku Varadarajan in the Daily Beast cleverly notes that it sounds like "demon pass," which it does. Maybe that's the juncture we're at.) Mr. Obama, in his response, made the usual case for ObamaCare. Mr. Baier pressed him. The president said, "The vote that's taken in the House will be a vote for health-care reform." We shouldn't, he added, concern ourselves with "the procedural issues."

Further in, Mr. Baier: "So you support the deem-and-pass rule?" From the president, obfuscation. But he did mention something new: "They may have to sequence the votes." The bill's opponents would be well advised to look into that one.

Mr. Baier again: So you'll go deem-and-pass and you don't know exactly what will be in the bill?

Mr. Obama's response: "By the time the vote has taken place, not only will I know what's in it, you'll know what's in it, because it's going to be posted and everybody's going to be able to evaluate it on the merits."

That's news in two ways. That it will be posted — one assumes the president means on the Internet and not nailed to a telephone pole — should suggest it will be posted for a while, more than a few hours or days. So American will finally get a look at it. And the president was conceding that no, he doesn't know what's in the bill right now. It is still amazing that one year into the debate this could be true.

Mr. Baier pressed on the public's right to know what is in the bill. We have been debating the bill for a year, the president responded: "The notion that this has been not transparent, that people don't know what's in the bill, everybody knows what's in the bill. I sat for seven hours with—."

Mr. Baier interrupts: "Mr. President, you couldn't tell me what the special deals are that are in or not today."

Mr. Obama: "I just told you what was in and what was not in."

Mr. Baier: "Is Connecticut in?" He was referring to the blandishments — polite word — meant to buy the votes of particular senators.

Mr. Obama: "Connecticut — what are you specifically referring to?"

Mr. Baier: "The $100 million for the hospital? Is Montana in for the asbestos program? Is — you know, listen, there are people — this is real money, people are worried about this stuff."

Mr. Obama: "And as I said before, this — the final provisions are going to be posted for many days before this thing passes."

Mr. Baier pressed the president on his statement as a candidate for the presidency that a 50-plus-one governing mentality is inherently divisive. "You can't govern" that way, Sen. Obama had said. Is the president governing that way now? Mr. Obama did not really answer.

Throughout, Mr. Baier pressed the president. Some thought this bordered on impertinence. I did not. Mr. Obama now routinely filibusters in interviews. He has his message, and he presses it forward smoothly, adroitly. He buries you in words. Are you worried what failure of the bill will do to you? I'm worried about what the status quo will do to the families that are uninsured . . .

Mr. Baier forced him off his well-worn grooves. He did it by stopping long answers with short questions, by cutting off and redirecting. In this he was like a low-speed bumper car. In the end the interview seemed to me a public service because everyone in America right now wants to see the president forced off his grooves and into candor on an issue that involves 17% of the economy. Again, the stakes are high. So Mr. Baier's style seemed — this is admittedly subjective — not rude but within the bounds, and not driven by the antic spirit that sometimes overtakes reporters. He seemed to be trying to get new information. He seemed to be attempting to better inform the public.

Presidents have a right to certain prerogatives, including the expectation of a certain deference. He's the president, this is history. But we seem to have come a long way since Ronald Reagan was regularly barked at by Sam Donaldson, almost literally, and the president shrugged it off. The president — every president — works for us. We don't work for him. We sometimes lose track of this, or rather get the balance wrong. Respect is due and must be palpable, but now and then you have to press, to either force them to be forthcoming or force them to reveal that they won't be. Either way it's revealing.

And so it ends, with a health-care vote expected this weekend. I wonder at what point the administration will realize it wasn't worth it — worth the discord, worth the diminution in popularity and prestige, worth the deepening of the great divide. What has been lost is so vivid, what has been gained so amorphous, blurry and likely illusory. Memo to future presidents: Never stake your entire survival on the painful passing of a bad bill. Never take the country down the road to Demon Pass.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

veritaseequitas

"The president — every president — works for us. We don't work for him. We sometimes lose track of this, or rather get the balance wrong. Respect is due and must be palpable,"

All of the elected officials including this miserable excuse for a president, work for the American taxpayers, voters and general populace. Where is the respect they should be showing us who foot the bill to keep everything going? That is lacking in the most glaring way.

In the last paragraph of her column Miss Noonan ascribes some sort of "future time regret" that the liberals will feel when they realize the monster they have created with this disgusting health care bill has destroyed our nation. She gives them too much credit. The current administration cares for nothing but its own agenda which is the creation of a totally socialist country dependent upon big government for everything. They know perfectly well what they hope to accomplish with this naked power grab and real, viable health care reform has nothing to do with it.

These people do not deserve the respect of the American people and should not be in office. I hope and pray that the mighty hand of God will remove them soon.

Posted March 20, 2010 at 8:22:41 AM


Greg Welch

How is that HOPE 'N CHANGE working out for you now Peggy?????? Pre 2008 Nov. election. Isn't it great that we have a new refreshing, well spoken , articulate , quick on his feet TELEPROMPTER to explain the DETAILS to us?????????????/

Posted March 20, 2010 at 10:34:31 AM


Dean from Ohio

Peggy Noonan, from October 30, 2008, is quoted below. Being wise is being able to see a pit before falling into it; she is not wise:

"The case for Barack Obama, in broad strokes:

"He has within him the possibility to change the direction and tone of American foreign policy, which need changing; his rise will serve as a practical rebuke to the past five years, which need rebuking; his victory would provide a fresh start in a nation in which a fresh start would come as a national relief. He climbed steep stairs, born off the continent with no father to guide, a dreamy, abandoning mother, mixed race, no connections. He rose with guts and gifts. He is steady, calm, and, in terms of the execution of his political ascent, still the primary and almost only area in which his executive abilities can be discerned, he shows good judgment in terms of whom to hire and consult, what steps to take and moves to make. We witnessed from him this year something unique in American politics: He took down a political machine without raising his voice.

[...]

"Whoever is elected Tuesday, his freedom in office will be limited. Mr. Obama is out of money and Mr. McCain is out of army, so what might be assumed to be the worst impulses of each—big spender, big scrapper—will be circumscribed by reality. In Mr. Obama’s case, energy will likely be diverted to other issues. He will raise taxes, of course, but he may also feel forced to bow to a clamorous base with the nonspending items they favor: the rewriting of union law to force greater unionization of smaller shops, for instance, and a return to a'fairness doctrine' that would limit free speech on the air."

Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:48:46 PM


Ileana

Oh, Peggy, how you were singing Obama's praises! Now you are having buyer's remorse? It is too little, too late! Your messianic president is just a clay figure like the rest of us with power given by the delusional individuals who thought/think that socialism/communism is the answer to their prayers. I am sure, you will like your Messiah even more when he is done with "useful idiots" like you.

Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:16:18 PM


TrueNorth

"What has been lost is so vivid, what has been gained so amorphous, blurry and likely illusory."

Spoken just like the precious princess you are, Peggy. Let me assure you, Peggy, that the great unwashed 0 so long without access to the kind of privilege you take for granted - view something such as, oh, chemotherapy for example, as something other than "amorphous, blurry and illusory."

Posted March 20, 2010 at 8:04:36 PM


kev

Glenn Beck may well be insane. I, apparently unlike you, am not qualified to make that call. However, if not for Beck, there are many things that those of us who don't take the time to research before we vote would never know about this president. And Van Jones (you know, the ADMITTED communist) would probably still be one of his closest advisors (he undoubtedly still is, but at least he is no longer on our payroll, at least not directly). Apparently Beck's handicap, if I may use that word, didn't prevent him from seeing through this president at the outset, unlike some people who may not be so afflicted. I am not a rabid Beck fan vut with all the misinformation and lack of information coming from their side, we need people such as Beck.

Posted March 20, 2010 at 9:42:00 PM


Wanda

Glenn Beck runs circles around you with candor, American pride and spirit and oh by the way understands this bill is unconstitutional which you don't want to write about! Take a lesson from the insane one and you might be worth reading.

Posted March 20, 2010 at 10:43:54 PM


John, WIS.

What baffles me the most about you Peggy, is that you were Reagans' speech writer....(or something to that effect).

Not to leave out, that during the 08' campaign, you were content to believe that Obama had some real potential in leading this country.

When so many in the media were warning everyone who would listen, pointing out all of the things that Obama was, what he believes, and what we could expect to see if he won the office......you were blind to it, including impugning those who did not support him.

Now, it's the opposite.

Though many agree with you on this piece that you have written, and it is commendable, it does make one question as to how you could have been so blindsided by this man, who now holds the oval office.

You might want to reconsider the information that is out there.

Posted March 21, 2010 at 5:08:01 PM


Ileana

If Glenn Beck appears insane to you, Peggy, you are much more of a liberal than I thought. Unlike you, Glenn Beck has accurately predicted every development economically and politically in this country for the past three years, while you swooned over Obama with the rest of the compliant, fifth column media.

It is too bad that people like you, who were supposed to be vigilant, chose to laugh at and ignore us.

Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:57:48 PM


Craig

Thanks to all the readers comments that revealed to me the history of Peg. I was not ready any of her post back in 2008 so I had no idea how she felt about BO.

The students are becoming the masters. Is it so?

Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:03:12 PM


C L Brown

There was a time, years ago, when I found Peggy to be worth reading. Then, apparently, she started thinking of her as one of the "elites." Her vile, hateful commentary during the last election cycle pushed her over the edge, as far as I'm concerned.

Apparently, she enjoys the "cocktail party circuit" among the "elites" and has chosen to sell her soul (figuratively or literally, who can say?). It's not uncommon for that sort of thing to happen, even to the best of us. Power (or the ILLUSION of power, for that matter) corrupts. Peggy Noonan has been corrupted, and is no longer worth paying attention to as a result. But I'm sure that the "right people" invite her to all the "right events," which I'm sure is what matters to her now.

Peggy, in her oh-so-holier-than-thou-because-I'm-an-elite tone, is attacking Mr. Beck in the same fashion that she attacked other people who point out the remarkable lack of clothing on this particular Emperor. Yet, in this very column, when she MAY be beginning to realize how easily she was FOOLED... repeatedly... by the vicious, corrupt, manipulative liar currently sitting in the White House (and by the support mechanism which chose him, groomed him, and now feeds him lines through his teleprompter... or does anyone REALLY think he's actually the one making the decisions?), Peggy derides one of the few people who saw, and told us, about what was really going on.

Peggy... you ignorant *#$#. (With apologies to Jane Curtain.)

Shall we do a line-by-line, item-by-item evaluation of YOUR opinions, your predictions, your commentary, as compared to what's really happened, and of Mr. Beck's opinions, predictions, and commentary?

Let's see... Peggy is consistently WRONG. Her views fail to match with the reality which even SHE must now start to acknowledge isn't what she oh-so-dreamily "wished upon a star" was going to be the case. Mr. Beck is consistently CORRECT. His views, comments, etc, have been proven consistently accurate.

Peggy - views don't match with reality.

Glenn - views do match with reality.

So, Peggy... which one of the two of you is "insane?"

Peggy, even in her worst moments, knows that Beck isn't "insane." But she said that because it will win her invitations to another round of "the right parties" on the local cocktail circuit.

She's totally sold her soul. And thus, she's not worthy of our attention. Let her fade away, and pay her no further attention.

Posted March 23, 2010 at 11:41:14 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund