We Just Don't Understand

· Saturday, August 28, 2010

All presidents take vacations, and all are criticized for it. It's never the right place, the right time. Ronald Reagan went to the ranch, George W. Bush to Crawford, both got knocked. Bill Clinton even poll-tested a vacation site and still was criticized. But Martha's Vineyard—elite, upscale—can't have done President Obama any good, especially following the first lady's foray in Spain. The general feeling this week was summed up by David Letterman: "He'll have plenty of time for vacations when his one term is up. Plenty of time."

The president's position is not good. The past few months have been one long loss of ground. His numbers have dipped well below 50%. Top Democrats tell Politico the House is probably lost and the Senate is in jeopardy. "Recovery summer" is coming to look like "mission accomplished." The president is losing the center.

And on top of that, he is still a mystery to a lot of people.

Actually, what is confounding is that he seems more a mystery to people now than he did when they elected him president.

The president is overexposed, yet on some level the picture is blurry. He's in your face on TV, but you still don't fully get him. People categorize him in political terms: "He's a socialist," "He's a pragmatic progressive." But beyond that disagreement, things get murky. When you think about his domestic political decisions, it's hard to tell if he's playing a higher game or a clueless game. Is he playing three-dimensional chess, or is he simply out of his depth?

Underscoring the unknowns is the continuing question about him and those around him: How did they read the public mood so well before the presidency and so poorly after? In his first 19 months on the job, the president has often focused on issues that were not the top priority of the American people. He was thinking about one thing—health care—when they were thinking about others—the general economy, deficits. He's on one subject, they're on another. He has been contradictory: I'm for the mosque, I didn't say I'm for the mosque. He's detached from the Gulf oil spill, he's all about the oil spill.

All of this strikes people, understandably, as perplexing. "I don't get what he's doing." Which becomes, in time, "I don't get who he is." In an atmosphere of such questioning they'll consider any and all possibilities, including, apparently, that he is a Muslim. Which, according to a recent Pew poll, 18% think he is. That is up from 11% in February 2009.

Liberals and the left are indignant about this, and angry. For a week all you heard from cable anchors was "PEOPLE think OBAMA is a MUSLIM. It's in the POLLS. How do you EXPLAIN it?" Every time I heard it, I'd think: Maybe it's because you keep screaming it.

Some of the reason for the relatively high number of people who believe he holds to one faith when in fact he has always said he holds to another, is the steady drumbeat of the voices arrayed against Mr. Obama, that are arrayed against any modern president, and will be against the next one too. But surely some of it is that a lot of people are just trying to figure him out. In that atmosphere they'll consider everything.

When the American people have looked at the presidents of the past few decades they could always sort of say, "I know that guy." Bill Clinton: Southern governor. Good ol' boy, drawlin', flirtin', got himself a Rhodes Scholarship. "I know that guy." George W. Bush: Texan, little rough around the edges, good family, youthful high jinks, stopped drinking, got serious. "I know that guy." Ronald Reagan was harder to peg, but you still knew him: small-town Midwesterner, moved on and up, serious about politics, humorous, patriotic. "I know that guy." Barack Obama? Sleek, cerebral, detached, an academic from Chicago by way of Hawaii and Indonesia. "You know what? I don't know that guy!"

He doesn't fit any categories. He won in 2008 by 9.5 million votes anyway because he was a break with Mr. Bush, and people assumed they'd get to know him. But his more unusual political decisions, and the sometimes contradictory and confusing nature of his leadership, haven't ameliorated or done away with his unusualness. They've heightened it.

The fact that the public doesn't fully understand or have a clear fix on the president leads to many criticisms of his leadership. One is that a leader must show and express the emotions of the people, and he's not very good at it. But I doubt people want a president who goes around emoting, and in any case it's not his job. What people really want, in part, is someone who understands their basic assumptions because, actually, he shares them. It's not "Show us you care!" it's "Be a guy I know. Be someone I get!"

The president is a person who knows how to focus and seems to have a talent for it. But again, his focus is on other things. When a president and a nation are focused together on the same things, the possibility of progress is increased. When they are focused on different things, there is more discord and tension. Mr. Obama's supporters like to compare him with Reagan: 18 months in he had difficulties in the polls too, and a recession. But Reagan was focused on what the American people were focused on: the economy, the size and role of government, the challenge of the Soviet Union. And on the eternal No. 1 issue, the economy, Reagan had a plan that seemed to make sense, in rough terms to try to cut spending and taxes, and force out inflation. People were willing to give it a try. Mr. Obama's plan, to a lot of people, does not make sense, or does not seem fully pertinent, or well executed.

Mr. Obama seems to be a very independent person, like someone who more or less brought himself up, a child with wandering parents, and grandparents who seem to have been highly individualistic. He is focused on what individually interests him. He relies most on his own thinking. He focused on health care, seeing the higher logic. The people focused on something else. But he's always had faith in his ability to think it through.

Now he's hit a roadblock, and in November's elections he will hit another, bigger one. One wonders if he will come to reconsider his heavy reliance on his own thoughts. His predecessor did not brag about his résumé and teased himself about his lack of giant intellect, but he had utmost faith in his gut. By 2006, when he had realized he had reason to doubt even that, he flailed. The presidency has a way of winnowing you down.

The great question is what happens after November. The hope of the White House, which knows it is about to take a drubbing, is probably this: that the Republicans in Congress will devolve into a freak show, overplay their hand, lose their focus, be a little too colorful. If that meme emerges—and the media will be looking for it—the Republicans may wind up giving the president the positive definition he lacks. They could save him. The White House must be hoping that a year from now, people will start looking at the president and saying "Hey, I do know that guy. He's the moderate."


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

roxi

He's a puppet. Puppets don't think.

Posted August 28, 2010 at 9:39:16 AM


Greg Welch

Ms. Noonan, Barry knows exactly what he is doing. He got you to write nice articles about him. That worked. It is all there to see and read about him. It's too bad the mainstream media, pre 2008 and now, is ignoring all the warning signs. The obit of our country will be started off like this, " Who knew what this Pres. was really like, and why didn't someone say something to warn us? "

Posted August 28, 2010 at 11:51:15 AM


Bill

Peggy, you are a useful tool for the progressives. You have carry water for this fraud. If it weren't for Reagan what would your legacy be?

Posted August 28, 2010 at 9:27:21 PM


Dr Tim

The President is like a mental patient he believes in his own mind that his presidency is great.

Posted August 29, 2010 at 11:41:09 PM


Earl

I prefer the Occam's Razor answer to all the murkiness - he is simply not competent, is a narcissist and an ideologue. I know this seems simplistic but it really is the answer. He was thoroughly unqualified for the job as was evidenced not just by his employment history but by the performance reviews. He has a messianic complex and assumes that the world revolves around him and will comport to his desires just by the force of his persona. And finally he is not a socialist but is a big government statist and that ideology is more important to him than anything else, including a second term at a job he clearly disdains (bit loves the perks). The sooner we get him on the lecture circuit making $300K per speech to any group that wants to hear an anti-American message the better.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 11:40:15 AM


daniel Comerford

Oh but we do understand - Barry is a total socialist/muslim - he is doing exactly what he told us he would do - transform our country from a democratic republic to a socialist state - rember Nov 2 - 'THROW THE TRASH OUT " DAY

Posted August 30, 2010 at 12:17:47 PM


Cindy

We understand perfectly and that is what has you in such a snit. People such as you, Ms. Noonan, helped elect the socialist-in-chief because you were appalled those of us not in the "elite" would actually prefer Sarah Palin to a supposedly brillant (hah!) Obama. I saw you on television behaving in a snide manner towards Palin on more than one occasion. With "friends" like you, conservatives do not need enemies. I suspect President Reagan is now spinning in his grave.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 12:40:16 PM


Billy Bob

Peggy said: "can't have done President Obama any good".

We say it's time the peasants deal quickly with President Louis and First Lady Marie Antoinette.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 12:49:39 PM


Nellybelle

Peggy, how I have loved you over the years, but you are as slippery as any liberal could ever dream of being. This is not to mean you are liberal, it is just that you mimic them by demonstrating column after column that you have a soft, squishy, malleable core. Do you know who you are when you look into that mirror every morning? Face facts, Peggy, you have no idea whatever in the world, what you say.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 1:14:43 PM


WLB

More and more, I think I was right in 2008 when I worte somewhere that Mr. Obama strikes me as a latter day Huey P. Long, but without the flamboyance.

That is, I believe he is a populist in the sense that he tries to pass himself off as the friend of the "little man," willing to take on evil "big oil" or big whatever in order to spread the wealth. Or in the words of HPL, "put a chicken in every pot, a Ford in every garage." In both cases, it is/was mostly a charade, performed to enable him to gain power, wealth and the perks of office.

I perceive that both men were/are willing to use anything or anyone to advance their pursuit of power. In Mr. Obama's case, it appears that religion is a perfect example. It seems obvioius that he only joined Rev. Jerimiah Wright's congregation in order to gain "street cred." How else can one explain Mr. Obama's statement that he sat in the pews for 20 years without hearing anything untoward? If true, he must have been thinking of other things whenever he was in church. If false, his cynical use of the church is apparent.

Similarly, what to make of his life long effort to define himself as a black man when the truth is that he is half white?

I've heard that he considers himself a "blank slate" upon which voters may project their hopes and wishes thinking that he will gratify them and therefore vote for him. Isn't that the essence of populism?

In sum, their guiding principle is simply to do whatever is necessary to gain power and wealth. Mr. Obama may very well be content to be a one term president because by then he will have gained all the power and wealth he desires. The well being of his fellow citizens is not really a concern of his, I suspect. History has shown that it certainly wasn't one of HPL's primary interests.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 2:15:13 PM


bob t

Peggy,

Obama is executing the office precisely as he intended. He is totally focused on what he personally thinks is "saving the people" (progressives always think they have the solution to save the people). He is doing exactly what he said he would do while campaigning, and if could get it done in 90 days, he would be playing golf. I suspect he sleeps well, has low blood pressure and is in a relaxed state of mind.

Next year, he will begin to show signs of stress as he finds the roads around the White House will be closed to progressive traffic.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 3:50:45 PM


Dantes

"He focused on health care, seeing the higher logic. "

Wow, no wonder Peggy was conflicted about Obama; she still is. What, exactly, was the higher logic he was seeing?

Posted August 30, 2010 at 5:39:29 PM


Bob McDougalt

Obama was elected by the ignorant, many of them are educated now.

Posted August 30, 2010 at 6:04:32 PM


Phil

It is the progressives who have devolved into a freak show. Noonan and her ilk have season tickets. Or have they just gotten on stage themselves?

Posted August 30, 2010 at 6:25:00 PM


Pat

Now she realizes the error of her ways, but where was she during the election when we all knew he was hanging around terrorists. Now he gets to surround himself with them in our house. Still can't watch Peggy on TV because she won't hold her head up straight. Isn't that part of good posture?

Posted August 30, 2010 at 7:11:47 PM


Tom Brazil

Why, Ms. Noonan, do you list our current president with the title 'Mr.' and not do the same for the others? Read your post!

Ronnie, as Nancy always referred to him, deserves the 'Mr.' or 'President' title much more than the present pretender!

Even 'Bad Boy', 'Slick Willie' Clinton deserves it more. He, at least, watched the polls and acted in accordance with what they told him. The present guy acts in accordance with what his ego tells him.

Are you afraid you'll be branded a racist if you don't call Obama 'Mr.'?

Let's deal from the top of the deck!

Tom

Posted August 31, 2010 at 4:43:01 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund