Options
A Mind-Changing Page
· Friday, June 18, 2010
Sometimes you can read a book that will change your mind on some fundamental issue. Rarely, however, is there just one page that can undermine or destroy a widely-held belief. But there is such a page-- page 77 of the book "Out of Work" by Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway.
The widespread belief is that government intervention is the key to getting the country out of a serious economic downturn. The example often cited is President Franklin D. Roosevelt's intervention, after the stock market crash of 1929 was followed by the Great Depression of the 1930s, with its massive and long-lasting unemployment.
This is more than just a question about history. Right here and right now there is a widespread belief that the unregulated market is what got us into our present economic predicament, and that the government must "do something" to get the economy moving again. FDR's intervention in the 1930s has often been cited by those who think this way.
What is on that one page in "Out of Work" that could change people's minds? Just a simple table, giving unemployment rates for every month during the entire decade of the 1930s.
Those who think that the stock market crash in October 1929 is what caused the huge unemployment rates of the 1930s will have a hard time reconciling that belief with the data in that table.
Although the big stock market crash occurred in October 1929, unemployment never reached double digits in any of the next 12 months after that crash. Unemployment peaked at 9 percent, two months after the stock market crashed-- and then began drifting generally downward over the next six months, falling to 6.3 percent by June 1930.
This was what happened in the market, before the federal government decided to "do something."
What the government decided to do in June 1930-- against the advice of literally a thousand economists, who took out newspaper ads warning against it-- was impose higher tariffs, in order to save American jobs by reducing imported goods.
This was the first massive federal intervention to rescue the economy, under President Herbert Hoover, who took pride in being the first President of the United States to intervene to try to get the economy out of an economic downturn.
Within six months after this government intervention, unemployment shot up into double digits-- and stayed in double digits in every month throughout the entire remainder of the decade of the 1930s, as the Roosevelt administration expanded federal intervention far beyond what Hoover had started.
If more government regulation of business is the magic answer that so many seem to think it is, the whole history of the 1930s would have been different. An economic study in 2004 concluded that New Deal policies prolonged the Great Depression. But the same story can be found on one page in "Out of Work."
While the market produced a peak unemployment rate of 9 percent-- briefly-- after the stock market crash of 1929, unemployment shot up after massive federal interventions in the economy. It rose above 20 percent in 1932 and stayed above 20 percent for 23 consecutive months, beginning in the Hoover administration and continuing during the Roosevelt administration.
As Casey Stengel used to say, "You could look it up." It is all there on that one page.
Those who are convinced that the government has to "do something" when the economy has a problem almost never bother to find out what actually happens when the government intervenes.
The very fact that we still remember the stock market crash of 1929 is remarkable, since there was a similar stock market crash in 1987 that most people have long since forgotten.
What was the difference between these two stock market crashes? The 1929 stock market crash was followed by the most catastrophic depression in American history, with as many as one-fourth of all American workers being unemployed. The 1987 stock market crash was followed by two decades of economic growth with low unemployment.
But that was only one difference. The other big difference was that the Reagan administration did not intervene in the economy after the 1987 stock market crash-- despite many outcries in the media that the government should "do something."
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Harvard Political Review notes: "The Patriot Post is leading a surprisingly well-organized charge into the world of Internet politics." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Jeff Jacoby: What's So Good About a Long GOP Primary Fight?
- Chuck Colson: Komen Caves: An Object Lesson for All of Us
- Edwin J. Feulner: Mauling the Military
- Burt Prelutsky: Numbers Don't Lie, Liberals Do
- Michael Barone: Box-Checking Obama in a Liberal Cocoon
- George Will: Bailing an Ocean With a Thimble
- Peggy Noonan: A Battle the President Can't Win
- Burt Prelutsky: Heroes & Goats
- L. Brent Bozell: Obama Courts the Glitz Elite
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Chuck Colson: Judaism's Sexual Revolution: God's Plan for Sex
- Arnold Ahlert: Unions and Occupiers vs. the Super Bowl
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!





















Duke of Earl
Dr. Sowell,
Thank you so very much for the proof that government intervention is the last thing that SHOULD EVER happen (at least, to restore economic stability). This proof flies in the face of everything Keynesian and Rooseveltian. This proves the liberal leftists are wrong. However, proof of being wrong is just another attack by the racist, right wing terrorist fanatics out to destroy the country by returning it to its roots.
Besides, we all know that the left is correct because they feel our pain.
Duke
Posted June 18, 2010 at 8:41:29 AM
Jack
I am a conservative republican wholly on the side of the tea party movement. With that said, while the author could be correct in his conclusion that government invervention caused the great depression, his magic table on page 77 is certainly no proof of this.
The arguing about what caused the Great Depression still goes on today but most agree that it was a variety of causes including the stock market crash, systemic bank failures across the nation, drought conditions in the Mississippi Valley, and yes the Smoot-Hawley Tariff.
But looking at a table of unemployment and trying to draw a cause and effect line straight to the tariff is simply not possible. I believe in limited government, but let's not go beyond the pale to absolutely no government.
Posted June 18, 2010 at 12:06:43 PM
Aaron Ashcraft
Dr. Sowell:
I have read every book you have written. This is an opportunity to thank you for your concise thoughts and for defending capitalism, which has provided economic growth & opportunities for upward mobility in America as well as other countries around the globe.
Like you, despite being born into a family with very limited resources, my three brothers and I each earned a university education and had successful careers, thanks to good parents and the opportunities available under free enterprise.
Posted June 18, 2010 at 12:28:21 PM
Aaron Ashcraft
Dr. Sowell:
I have read every book you have written. This is an opportunity to thank you for your concise thoughts and for defending capitalism, which has provided economic growth & opportunities for upward mobility in America as well as other countries around the globe.
Like you, despite being born into a family with very limited resources, my three brothers and I each earned a university education and had successful careers, thanks to good parents and the opportunities available under free enterprise.
Posted June 18, 2010 at 12:35:03 PM
Mike McGinn
Outstanding point, Mr. Sowell! So many people fail to realize that it was the government, not the markets, that caused the Great Depression. It wasn't until 1941 that our economic woes, which truly started in 1930, not 1929, were "solved" by our entry into World War II. I can only imagine how long the depression would have lasted had there never been a WWII. Over 16 million men and women got a job in the armed forces of our Nation between 1941 and 1945. Tens of millions more got jobs in industries that supported the war effort. At the conclusion of the war, when most industrialized nations on this planet had been bombed into oblivion, the U.S. was left unscathed and had the industrial might to support the rebuilding of the world. Talk about an economic stimulus!!
Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:37:01 PM
Margaret
Dear Dr. Sowell,
I too wish to thank you for introducing me to classical liberalism. I use to ask myself two questions 1. Whey did the Great Depression last so long? We have had depressions before and none lasted as long. & 2. Why is the West rich and the rest of the world poor? I found a book, "The Mystery of Capitalism" by Hernando De Soto a few years ago. Another ah ha moment. You truly are a Renaissance Man. Thank You
Posted June 21, 2010 at 3:30:33 PM
Tim McNabb
I am not a fan of government intervention. I also think New Deal policies are both legally problematic as well as just dumb economically.
I am interested to what degree the Dust Bowl catastrophe influenced agricultural unemployment, and further, to what degree this furthered unemployment.
Posted June 21, 2010 at 10:49:30 PM