The 'Fairness' Fraud

· Wednesday, February 22, 2012

During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration's tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of "fairness."

He pointed out that a child born to a poor woman in the Bronx enters the world with far worse prospects than a child born to an affluent couple in Connecticut.

No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more "fair" for others?

Even if additional tax revenue all went to poor single mothers -- which it will not -- the multiple problems of children raised by poor single mothers would not be cured by throwing money at them. Indeed, the skyrocketing of unwed motherhood began when government welfare programs began throwing money at teenage girls who got pregnant.

Children born and raised without fathers are a major problem to society and to themselves. There is nothing "fair" about increasing the number of such children.

A more fundamental problem with the "fairness" issue raised by Beckel and many others is the slippery vagueness of the word "fair."

To ask whether life is fair -- either here and now, or at any time or place around the world, over the past several thousand years -- is to ask a question whose answer is obvious. Life has seldom been within shouting distance of fair, in the sense of even approximately equal prospects of success.

Countries whose politicians have been able to squander ever larger amounts of a nation's resources have not only failed to make the world more fair, the concentration of more resources and power in these politicians' hands has led to results that were often counterproductive at best, and bloodily catastrophic at worst.

More fundamentally, the question whether life is fair is very different from the question whether a given society's rules are fair. Society's rules can be fair in the sense of using the same standards of rewards and punishments for everyone. But that barely scratches the surface of making prospects or outcomes the same.

People raised in different homes, neighborhoods and cultures are going to behave differently -- and those differences have consequences. The multiculturalist dogma may say that all cultures are equal, or equally deserving of respect, but treating cultures as sacrosanct freezes people into the circumstances into which they happened to be born, much like a caste system.

While talk about "fairness" may provide a fig leaf to cover politicians' naked attempts to grab more and more of the nation's resources to spend, there is no assurance that raising tax rates on "the rich" will result in any more tax revenue for the government. High tax rates have too often simply caused wealthy people to put their money into tax-free securities or to send it overseas.

Four years ago, TV interviewer Charles Gibson pointed out to candidate Barack Obama that raising capital gains tax rates had on a number of occasions led to less capital gains tax revenue being collected -- and, conversely, lowering the capital gains tax rates had on other occasions increased the amount of capital gains revenue collected by the government.

Obama readily admitted that. But he said that "fairness" justified a higher tax rate on "the rich." Yet how does a higher tax rate on paper, without a real increase in the amount of taxes actually collected, promote fairness?

However, raising tax rates on "the rich" pays off politically, even if the government loses revenues when the rich put their money into tax shelters.

High tax rates in the upper income brackets allow politicians to win votes with class warfare rhetoric, painting their opponents as defenders of the rich. Meanwhile, the same politicians can win donations from the rich by creating tax loopholes that can keep the rich from actually paying those higher tax rates -- or perhaps any taxes at all.

What is worse than class warfare is phony class warfare. Slippery talk about "fairness" is at the heart of this fraud by politicians seeking to squander more of the nation's resources.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

wjmccrindle

If you tax something, you get less of it. If you subsidize it, you get more. Stop making having children profitable as an income source, and the problem would go away. Sound harsh? Tough, that would be the Fair thing to do.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 8:26:01 AM


Robert

"The multiculturalist dogma may say that all cultures are equal, or equally deserving of respect, but treating cultures as sacrosanct freezes people into the circumstances into which they happened to be born, much like a caste system".

Bingo!!! You'ld be surprised how many anthropologists haven't figured this out yet. I guess they are too busy being social activists to soend any time trying to understand the consquences social and economic systems have on human behavior.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 10:22:53 AM


Ernest Wilson

Taxing the Rich isn't about raising revenue, wasted or not. The objective is to punish sucess and reward failure. Why you ask? Good question, it would seem the ultimate outcome goes to destroying the culture. Sounds like transformation to me.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:52:42 PM


Howard Last

What is fair about stealing money from so called rich people to give to poor people? Yes stealing, what else would you call it when something is taken under duress? Don't pay all the tax the IRS says you owe on your 1040 and see what happens. Just be glad it is the IRS and not the ATF. The IRS will just jail you, the ATF will kill you in a raid.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:56:55 PM


Richard Ryan

No one ever guaranteed that life would be fair. Jesus, whom Obama seems to fancy himself an authority on, said that we would always have the poor with us, and that we would only have him for a short time. Hopefully we will only have Obama with us for a short time, although it will seem like an eternity.

Richard Ryan

Lamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:56:53 PM


alex torello

Never understood the misuse of that left-wing, overused word, "disadvantaged."

Advantages abound in different ways to different people. Focusing only on the present situation of those who have attained a degree of financial security, dismisses the many facets of the wondrous thing called life.

"Gee, I wish I was tall enough to stuff a ball in a basket or strong enough to hit a 400 ft. homer!"

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:14:54 PM


AlbertPaparesta

The biggest problem with "fairness" is who gets to determine what is fair? The President, maybe a joint Congressional committee, not likely, both are elected and would not want to alienate any voting bloc. What about a new cabinet department, the Department Of Fairness, probably not, that would get political at the hearings for Secretary. That leaves a new agency, "The Fairness Protection Agency". It would be the fair thing to do. After all, none of the administrators would be elected or subjected to the politics of the moment.

And do we stop at taxes? How about "fair" wages, "fair" prices, "fair" grades for students? The options are limitless.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 7:34:17 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund