Options
Defense Spending Is a Shovel-Ready Investment
· Thursday, January 12, 2012
President Obama just ordered massive cutbacks in defense spending, eventually to total some $500 billion. There is plenty of fat in a Pentagon budget that grew after 9/11, but such slashing goes way too far.
Fairly or not, the cuts will only cement a now familiar stereotype of Obama's desire to retrench on the world scene. They follow symbolic apologies for purported past American sins, bowing to foreign royals, and outreach to the likes of Iran and Syria. Abroad, such perceptions can matter as much as reality, as our rivals begin hoping that Obama is as dubious about America's historically exceptional world role as are they.
In contrast, a robust military keeps the peace by deterring aggressors through the appearance of overwhelming force. We often forget that the appearance of strength in peace is almost as important as the reality of strength in war. When wars end, we scale back (think 1919 or 1946) -- only to kick ourselves once tensions arise again out of nowhere, and we must scramble to catch up and rearm for an unimagined World War II or Cold War.
America's armed forces spend about 80 percent of their budgets not on bullets and bombs but on training and compensating soldiers. Often, they do a far better job shaping the minds and character of our youth than do our colleges. Somehow the military can take an 18-year old and teach him to park a $100 million fighter across a carrier deck, but our colleges cannot ensure that his civilian counterpart will show up regularly for classes. Young men and women leave the service debt-free and with skills. Too many of our college students pile up debt and become increasingly angry that by their mid-20s they still have received neither competitive skills nor real education.
The reason why our deficit is more than $1 trillion is not just that we have multimillion-dollar jet fighters or tens of thousands of Marines. Defense outlay currently represents only about 20 percent of federal budget expenditures and is below 5 percent of our gross national product. Those percentages are roughly average costs for recent years -- despite an ongoing deployment in Afghanistan. In contrast, over the last three years we have borrowed a record near-$5 trillion for vast unfunded entitlements -- from a spiraling Social Security and Medicare to expanding the food stamp program to include one-seventh of America. Yet many Americans would probably prefer a new frigate manned by highly trained youth to discourage our enemies, rather than another Solyndra-like investment or a near-$1 trillion stimulus aimed at creating "shovel-ready" jobs.
Unfortunately, defense cuts do not occur in isolation. They feed a syndrome best typified by an insolvent and largely defenseless socialist Europe. The more that prosperous societies cut their defenses to expand social programs, the more the resulting dependency leads to even less defense and ever more benefits. Once the state promises to take care of the citizen, the citizen believes that more subsidies are still never enough. And once voters believe that defense spending is an impediment to greater entitlements, the fewer impediments they will pay for. The net result is something like the squabbling, soon-to-collapse European Union: trillions in unfunded entitlement liabilities, and unable to defend itself.
Many of the new cuts are aimed at the traditional ground forces, given that we are in a high-tech age of missiles, sophisticated drones and counterinsurgency missions. But the nature of war is neither static nor predictable. After World War II, Harry Truman wanted to do away with the Marines -- and then was glad he had not when they largely saved the reputation of the U.S. military during the unforeseen disaster in Korea in December 1950. After the Gulf War of 1990-91, we cut back on our ground forces, only to build them back up so that the Marines could deal with enemies in awful places like Anbar Province in Iraq.
The decline of civilizations of the past -- fourth-century-B.C. Athens, fifth-century-A.D. Rome, 15th-century Byzantium, or 1930s Western Europe -- was not caused by their spending too much money on defense or not spending enough on public entitlements. Rather, their expanding governments redistributed more borrowed money, while a dependent citizenry wanted even fewer soldiers to guarantee ever more handouts.
History's bleak lesson is that those societies with self-reliant citizens who protect themselves and their interests prosper; those who grow dependent cut back their defenses -- and waste away.
(C) 2012 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Constitutional Scholar Dr. Alan Keyes reads The Patriot Post: "The Patriot recalls the noble tradition of our Founders. 'Publius' would have admired and endorsed The Patriot Post, as do I." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























mmccrindle
And so it goes - those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.
It truly amazes me that people will still vote for any Domocrat when history always debunks their agendas.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 9:19:27 AM
rod
mmccrindle is right: I am equally amazed at Democrat arrogance thinking that they can defy the lessons of history. Great column.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 9:55:46 AM
Marcus
so what is your solution crindle? you criticize prolifically and offer nothing else. i'm neither demo nor repub and as an independent i think that like most situations in life, the solutions (there's never just one) lie somewhere in the middle.
what would you do with a larger conventional military? did you serve in any of the branches? did the author of this article? why not put everybody in the military and we can all stay in for 20 years and retire. what then? who will be in the private sector to pay those salaries and retirements? how will you determine the right size of the military if you are not going to have 100% participation? how is a huge peacetime military different in principle from make work welfare?(shovel ready as the author describes it) why do you doubt that if this country was ever attacked by armies (not skyjackers)that the citizenry wouldn't rise to the occasion? Assuming that the armies could even get close given our current detection capabilities?
you or the other crindle labeled a response of mine the other day as marxist propaganda when i essentially stated the realities of our current situation and that we must hold our government and ourselves accountable first before we go venturing out into the world.
please tell us what being an armchair patriot feels like....
Posted January 12, 2012 at 10:49:40 AM
wjmccrindle
@Marcus
And you can tell us what an ignorant usefull idiot feels like!
For your information, I served 26 years in the United States Air Force, in more countries than most Americans have States, and can say your opinion that my service was "make work welfare" is despicable on so many levels. While you are free to scribe your head in the sand drivel, our military is supporting freedom for you and many opresse people throughout the world. Your childish fantasy of whirrled peas, maybe you have seen those idiodic bumper stickers, that you espouse as reality are a delusional result of believing the propoganda of a leftist media. We have a voluntary military force, so your inane drivel of putting everyone in wouldn't work, there will always be cowards such as yourself who reap all the benefits of freedom the brave patriots in the military provide, while you sit on your backside and disparage what they do. We are at war with Islam, and your isolationist cowardly media driven beleifs would only get you killed. Please stay in your armchair and feel free to type some more. There are real men and women Patriots our there protecting your right to speak or write freeley, even if your missives prove ignorant and foolish.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 11:22:11 AM
mmccrindle
@ Marcus-
One thing the Constitution instructs the Federal Gvt. to do is to defend our country.
We have the best military in the world and we need to keep it that way. Obama cut off the production of the F-22's shortly after taking office. Big mistake, but then again he has done nothing but harm our country since he's been in office.
Where in the Constitution does it give the Feds responsibility for education, health care, charity, welfare or any other frivilous social issue?
Please don't say the commerse clause. The wack-job lefties and their rendition of a 'living constitutiion' make me ill. They can twist that clause into having the authority to go into your kitchen to inspect the dust puppies under your fridge.
My solution?
A return to strict rule of law restrained by the Constitution.
That would of course entail getting rid of or severeley reducing entitlements. Citizens (notice I didn't include immigrants as did Pres. Carter) that are in such entitlements now would still get them but later new enrollees would see a whole new ballgame.
What the progressives (from Wilson/FDR on) have promised is simply unsustainable. The country is broke.
Couple that with the fact that we really do not have a revenue problem - we have a spending problem.
In short, The Government IS the problem and my answer is to make it smaller and make it do it's job as outlined by the Constitution like, HEY!, provide for the commen defense!!!!
Posted January 12, 2012 at 11:22:25 AM
mmccrindle
BTW- When was the last time Obama tried to compromise on anything.
The Democrap party is not the party of JFK. It is now the puppet of the Shadow party.
Todays so called Independants should familiar themselves with the differences between socialism, capitalism and republics and democracies.
Read up on greats like Friedman, Hayek some of the more notable conservative writers of today.
Or just be another Independent useful idiot (as my brother so aplty puts it) and continue to believe yourself so smart and noble as to split your ticket and keep believing in the lefts oh-so-noble causes.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 11:45:34 AM
BoFromTexas
A very strong military is quite necessary for the same reason that you should not go to a gunfight in which you will be starring armed with a knife. We have kept the various world miscreants at bay (the sane ones anyway) because they know our capabilities. Osama bin Laden certainly knew that he would sooner or later die a violent death. The American citizenry does not own, nor knows how to operate fighters, missiles, or tanks. We must have specialists to do that. It is called our military.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 1:19:32 PM
PDK
Excellent post Victor.
The military implies dealing with reality. Liberals and their democrat party do not deal with reality, they prefer illusion.
BHO has gutted the military his entire Presidency. He has already cut the f22, laser and f35 out of his Presidencys spending.
However he spent nearly a trillion on his democrat policy of socialism, which BTW served his cronys well. Apparently, for libera/democrats, tis not nice to ask what you can do for your country, but only nice to ask what your country can do for you.
As the democrats and Obama smash their ideological wrecking ball into America, America begins to crumble, they are killing America.
Nobama 2012, vote republican. Thankyou.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 5:27:33 PM