Please, a Little Honesty About Illegal Immigration

· Thursday, February 16, 2012

President Barack Obama recently assured El Salvador that the United States would not deport more 200,000 Salvadorans residing illegally in the United States. As the election nears, and the president looks to court Hispanic voters, he also created a new position of "public advocate" for illegal immigrants. His duties would appear to be to advocate that millions circumvent, rather than follow, current federal law.

The administration has also said it will focus enforcement only on those who have committed crimes -- with the implicit understanding that it is no longer a crime to illegally enter and reside in the United States. In contrast, Obama has caricatured those supporting completion of a fence on the border as wanting to place alligators in the Rio Grande.

It is time that Americans revisit the issue and ponder very carefully the morality of entering the United States illegally.

True, American employers have welcomed in illegal aliens as a source of cheap labor. Employers were happy to pass the ensuing social costs on to taxpayers. To summarily deport those who have resided here for 20 years, obeyed the law, worked hard, stayed off public assistance and are now willing to pay a fine, demonstrate English proficiency and pass a citizenship test would be impracticable, callous and counterproductive.

Most, however, probably do not fit those reasonable criteria.

More importantly, we forget that the influx of millions of illegal aliens unfairly undercuts the wages of the working American poor, especially in times of high unemployment.

Crossing the border was also hardly a one-time "infraction." It was the beginning of serial unethical behavior, as illegal aliens on everyday forms and affidavits were not truthful about their immigration status.

The legal process of immigrating to America was reduced to a free-for-all rush to the border. Million of applicants abroad wait patiently, if not naively, in line to have their education, skills and capital resources evaluated. But they are punished with delay or rejection because they alone follow immigration law.

Billions of dollars in state and federal social services do not just help provide parity to illegal aliens, but also free them to send back about $50 billion in remittances to Latin America each year. That staggering sum also suggests that Mexico and other Latin American governments, as an element of national policy, quite cynically export human capital to gain U.S. dollars, rather than make the necessary economical, social and political reforms to keep their own at home.

Nor is it very liberal to turn illegal immigration into an issue of identity and tribal politics. Too many advocates for open borders and amnesty argue about the politics of ethnic solidarity rather than considerations of immigration law. In other words, we do not hear much national outrage over the plight of the occasional Pole, Nigerian or Korean who overstays his tourist visa, but rather equate the circumvention of immigration law almost exclusively with social justice for Latinos.

How reactionary and illiberal that debate has become, when Mexican Americans who object to the undermining of immigration law are slandered as sellouts, while non-Hispanics who do the same are smeared as racists and nativists.

In fact, illegal immigration unfairly warped perceptions of undeniable Hispanic success. If one does not include millions of recently arrived poor Latin American foreign nationals in federal and state surveys, then Hispanic American citizens prove statistically to be assimilating, intermarrying, integrating, and finding economic success at rates comparable to many other immigrant groups of the past.

To mean anything, laws have to be followed. When newcomers choose to ignore them, then the entire structure of jurisprudence crashes as well. If aliens are free to ignore federal immigration law, then cannot citizens likewise pick and choose which statutes they find inconvenient?

Finally, illegal immigration has wrongly been couched in terms of a xenophobic and insensitive exploiter preying on a more noble and defenseless guest. In truth, the United States is the most generous host in the world, and never more so than during the present age.

There are now about 40 million foreign-born people residing in the United States, both legal and illegal immigrants. That is both the greatest absolute number and percentage of the population in our nation's history. No other country in the world is more liberal in its legal immigration policies or has been more caring toward new arrivals. To suggest otherwise is dishonest and shows an ignorance of how most countries, who now export their citizens to the U.S., treat any who would do the same to them.

We can argue about the history or the future of illegal immigration. But please spare us the psychodramatic appeals to a higher morality.

In most regards, illegal immigration has proven as immoral as it is unlawful.

(C) 2012 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Bruce R Pierce

What is even more dishonest is the way the Federal Government says that State requirements that immigration documents must be carried at all times are wrong when printed on the "Green Card" is a phrase stating that it must be carried at all times. Let’s quit helping the Politically Correct farce of the hyphenated American, either you are an American or not, either you are legally residing in this Country or you are not. Political Correctness does not change the situation if anything it confuses the situation and in the end causes more problems than it solves.

Posted February 16, 2012 at 8:13:24 AM


mmccrindle

Maybe the immoral progressives have finally noticed the millions of potential democrat voters murdered by Planned Parenthood that they see another bloc of useless idiots to exploit.

Time to open a new slave plantation modeled after the black community, which has been such a rousing success story for them (not the blacks, the democrats).

Posted February 16, 2012 at 8:39:16 AM


wjmccrindle

The organization La Raza has assimilated so well, haven't they? What,??? they advocate the southwest US be given back to Mexico? They only want to speak Spanish? They should be arrested as domestic terrorists. Either you are legal or you should be arrested and deported, no services, no welfare, no drivers license, and certainly no voting!

Posted February 16, 2012 at 9:55:16 AM


PDK

Good post Victor.

Americas three big problems, each the 800 pound gorilla in the room are 1) spending and all things financial, 2) Islam and 3) illegal immigration.

On this, the illegal immigration problem, the first thing to do is build a wall on our southern border. However, a secure double fence will do. This comes first, not last, as it implys an honest desire to stop illegal immigration now. Then Americans can deal with the illegals already here.

It is clear however, that the democrat party and their minion liberal constituents want illegalism flourishing, its multicultural baggage and most of all new democrat constituents, keeping the democrat party from going the way of the dinosaur, into extinction.

It speaks volumes that liberals and democrats have to cheat to remain viable. It bespeaks the charactor of their collective mind that they have no problem pandaring America and Americas future for the Hispanic vote of today and tomorrow.

Obama, Holder and Napalitano serve an unAmerican agenda. If this were the 1950s HUAC would be investigating them. When it comes to illegal immigration they see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.

Remembering a Three Stoogies flick where Moe says to his new boss, "Mr., you just hired yourself three good men", I look at the three good men America hired in January 2009, and I wish to cry out "help"!

These three, Obama, Holder and Napalitano are asleep, past out and drunk at the wheel, as they steer the good ship America into her future. Good grief, God help us.

One and done. Nobama 2012, vote republican. Thank you.

Posted February 16, 2012 at 12:06:22 PM


Brian

"To summarily deport those who have resided here for 20 years, obeyed the law, worked hard, stayed off public assistance and are now willing to pay a fine, demonstrate English proficiency and pass a citizenship test would be impracticable, callous and counterproductive." Says who? If they have resided here illegally for 20 years, they have NOT obeyed the law. If they are willing to pay a fine, by all means fine them, send them home, and, if they are /such/ good, hard-working, law-abiding people, they will apply for legal immigration and come to this country the right way.

Posted February 16, 2012 at 5:35:49 PM


Cylar

My favorite are the ones who have resided in the country since the 1980s and still cannot speak English. I am still waiting for an explanation on how that is even possible. You can bet that someone would rightfully be upset with me if I'd spent that length of time living in China and could not speak any Mandarin or Cantonese.

Posted February 17, 2012 at 5:50:39 AM


COS911

" To summarily deport those who have resided here for 20 years, obeyed the law, worked hard, stayed off public assistance and are now willing to pay a fine, demonstrate English proficiency and pass a citizenship test would be impracticable, callous and counterproductive."

Guess VDH has drunk the cool-aide. It would be callous and counterproductive to NOT deport them given the opportunity. Not deporting them not only penalizes the tens or hundreds of thousands that are patiently following the rule of law, waiting their (hoped for) turn to come to the promised land. It also incetivizes more to follow (hence Reagan's amnesty is really why the problem has climbed to its present scale. And ALL of them are law breakers for simply being here--so by definition none could really pass that hurdle.

And it really is a simple problem to solve--if we can, within an hour or so, tell if someone is eligible to purchase a firearm (and one of the things checked is legal residency) then employers can also check. All we have to do is hold employers responsible (i.e. senior company executives actually going to jail) for breaking existing laws against hiring illegal aliens. Without the source of income they will start to head home. It really is that simple!

Posted February 17, 2012 at 11:56:27 AM


Gunner

@ COS911 et al:

Anyone seen/heard/found/located results on the Alabama illegal problem results since the law was passed?

And I agree wholeheartedly ALL ILLEGALS are criminals by the act of coming here without using the proper channels. That includes the visa overstayers like the Moroccan wannabee suicide bomber arrested Friday in DC.

And I'd include ALL college/university presidents, administrations, boards of trustees and faculty who allow "students" to remain in school past their visa dates.

As for illegals who commit violent crimes, I favor road building the ALCAN Interstate/Province Highway with no mosquito protection or heavy equipment. It's also good exercise for the enablers, too.

Follow the rules or pay the price.

Posted February 17, 2012 at 11:16:45 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund