Options
The Battle of the Textbooks
· Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Few things in life are as clear as the futility of a real debate on the clarity of America's religious origins.
"Debate," I said? Lay a finger, unsuspectingly, on The New York Times Magazine's inspection of the attempt by so-called Christian fundamentalists to overhaul history textbooks, and you require treatment for first-degree burns.
I refer less to the article itself than to readers' sulfurous responses to the claims of Texas State Board of Education members concerning the need they see for forthright teaching of the founding fathers' Christianity. Yow-ee! "These people are dangerous." "These people are scary." "Can't we simply return Texas to the Mexicans and terminate this national embarrassment?" "Next we will be arresting 'non-Christians' and putting them in internment camps." "There seems to be an unlimited supply of lunatics in America." This, and more, from readers of our major newspaper of record.
See what I mean? Better yet, see what many Christians, not all of the "right-wing" variety, mean when they suggest the presence in the United States of growing hostility to their faith, or supernatural faith of any kind?
The magazine article in question comes down, tonally, on the side of those who reject the understanding of about half the state education board's members "that the United States was founded by devout Christians and according to biblical precepts" -- and that textbooks should reflect that understanding.
The reason this is a big deal is that Texas buys 48 million textbooks annually, which gives textbooks publishers the incentive to "tailor their products to fit the standards dictated by the Lone Star State." Jeepers, some innocent Brooklyn kid, on the instance of boot-wearing yahoos from Bushland, could actually hear in class (shudder) that our country's founders saw Christianity as more than a personal opinion. Clearly, if you read The New York Times, you're supposed to stew about such a prospect.
Jeez, guys, I consume The New York Times myself, seven days a week, and the major worry I see emerging from behind the sulfur smoke is the sanctification of religious intolerance. In the name of "tolerance." Such is the irony here. We can't talk about claims to religious Truth without reviling those who claim such a thing as religious truth exists and requires intellectual notice, if not affirmation.
Was the United States organized as a "Christian nation"? That's a claim I'm not sure you can get away with. You can say, with total accuracy, that Christianity informed and inspired the whole of the civilization to which the founders belonged. Which seems to me the claim that really is at stake here. No Texas school board member contends the founders intended to "establish" Christianity as the state religion: Merely that they accepted Christianity's assumptions, in greater (Washington) or lesser (Jefferson) degree -- viewed them as reflective of truth about human origins and destiny. From this a second contention follows: Students need reminding, in greater or lesser degree, that the founders prayed. (And, yes, they did pray!)
Why? What goes on? Chiefly, the working out of trends that set in during the early 1960s: growing secularism, growing depreciation of religion's -- any religion's -- importance in shaping motives and actions and consequences. The U.S. Supreme Court's often hostile rulings on school prayer and religious symbols in public places reflect a growing view, chiefly on the political and social left, that people who want God can look for Him in church and leave everyone else alone.
OK, interesting. Can we talk about that approach to civic life? Evidently not. As with abortion, the Supreme Court governmentalizes the discussion. A theological matter becomes, in our democracy, a power question. The State Board of Education in Texas takes up the question at precisely the level -- the political one -- to which the Supreme Court invited us all half a century ago.
My fellow New York Times readers don't appreciate my fellow Texans getting in their faces. Too bad. The secularists started this whole needless foofaraw. Let them, if they care to, pray for an end to it.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Cal Thomas: "The Patriot interprets current issues in the conservative context of history." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Ruth Ann Wilson
Here come the smart alecks, trying to run the LOCAL school boards. The smart alecks have just about "ruined" Public Education. "Crush from the Top" (that's my title) It is called "Rush from the top". I say "give'em Dr. Rush".
Dr. Rush, an intellectual of the "1776" variety, with quite a "job description", leading physician, Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Treasurer of the United States Mint for sixteen years, driving force in the "American Philosophical Society", 4th of July orator when the Constitutional Convention was assembled. He wrote, now, remember, this an "Educator's Educator":
"Those philosophers (that's someone who went to work everyday and wrote in their "spare time" "1776" Variety) who REJECT Christianity, and those Christians, whether parents or schoolmasters, who neglect the religious instruction of their children and pupils, REJECT and NEGLECT the most effectual means of promoting knowledge in our country...
If the measures that have been recommended (in this essay) for inspiring our pupils with a sense of religious and moral obligation are adopted, the government of them will be easy and agreeable. Strictness of discipline will always render severity unnecessary. There will be the most instruction in that school where there is the MOST ORDER."
DR. Benjamin Rush
Thoughts upon Female Education
1787
If Dr. Rush would have opened a "modern day, very expensive textbook" he would have been horrified. The trash that is contained in modern day textbooks is not "worth the paper they are written on."
Dr. Rush also wrote an essay on "A Defense of the Use of the Bible as a School Book".
Our Founders knew what we would need to sustain this Glorious Constitutional Republic. The enemy demanded in 1963, Prayer and Bible reading out of the Public School at the request of the atheist O'Hare and it's been "down hill" ever since.
FIX IT. REVERSE THE DECISION.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted February 17, 2010 at 9:13:45 AM
Marcus
DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS!!!
Posted February 17, 2010 at 11:29:00 AM
Brian
Two things I keep coming back to: Freedom OF religion is NOT the same thing as freedon FROM religion, which is what the left is pushing for. Secondly, atheism is, by definition, a religion. How is it ok to follow an atheistic policy, but not a Christian one? Remember, religion does not mean only Christianity, or Judaism, or Islam. Religion is ANY system of beliefs. That includes, wait for it, atheism. But the schoolbook debate is more about indoctrination than education. "How can we properly indoctrinate the children of America if the great state of Texas is going to INSIST on teaching children the truth? We can't have it, gentlemen." One of the first things the Nazis did when they came to power was rewrite the textbooks. For that matter, so did Stalin.
Posted February 17, 2010 at 2:33:41 PM