Options
A Nation Starting (Maybe) to Turn
· Tuesday, September 28, 2010
A nation of 300 million souls -- richest and most powerful in the world, for all its messes and perturbations -- needs a turning radius wide as the future. But you know what -- realization precedes intellectual assent, which precedes needed action. There's much to be hopeful about as the nation goes in for its electoral physical.
Valuable realizations are growing upon us. I mention two that might lead to assent and, eventually, action.
First, you gotta have rich people, like it or not -- a point evidenced by growing support for renewing all, not just some, of the Bush tax cuts. "I don't think this is the time," says the Connecticut Democrat Joe Lieberman, "to raise anyone's taxes, including those who are wealthiest." So saying, Lieberman evidences understanding of two economic truths: 1) the rich pay most of our taxes to begin with, and 2) tax hikes lead the intended victims to work or invest so as to decrease their tax liability, even if their ensuing decisions reduce economic productivity.
Democratic arguments for cutting the rich out of the tax-cut extension, sure to pass this year, rests upon the premise that class warfare works politically. It does -- until the consequences start to show through the seams. A policy of redistributing other people's money doesn't wipe out the rich; it does build into the tax system a bias against wealth accumulation.
Wealth, however, plus the simple desire for it, puts people to work. The price of an expanding middle class is tolerance of other people's success and even greed. Speaking of greed, isn't that just part of Original Sin? -- the good old human condition, dating back to Eden? What do we want government to do, after all -- overhaul the human condition from top to bottom?
A second realization that grows upon us is that centralized "We'll Do Everything in the World for You (If You'll Keep Voting for Us)" doesn't get the job done. Wasn't that economic stimulus bill a great success? Eight hundred billion, and don't we feel better? We don't? Maybe we're wondering whether cutting taxes and regulations for the private sector isn't the quickest way to get laggard economies off their backs and on their legs again.
Another notable ingredient of centralized government is control of schools, control of curriculum and standards: a general shutdown, so far as government and teacher unions can manage it, of private decisions in educational matters.
Things were bad enough when all decisions began to bunch up at the state capital. Now they cluster at the tip-top -- the U.S. Department of Education, may it vanish in the night like a carpet stain soaked in detergent. The Obama administration is currently in the process of trying to set national standards for school performance. It already controls the way federal money is spent at the local level -- overmatched experts from colleges of education.
In a much-touted new book ("Life Without Lawyers: Liberating America from Too Much Law"), Philip K. Howard sets forth five goals of extraordinary relevance to our present discontents, each goal centered on the need to increase personal accountability and responsibility. Howard wants, among other things, to "Push responsibility down to local organizations -- give back to Americans the freedom to make a difference -- without unnecessary interference of centralized bureaucracy, especially in schools and other social services."
In other words, he hopes we might become again what we once were: a people dedicated to the proposition that those nearest a problem know the most about it. Shouldn't they?
Let's not celebrate just yet. Remember the time and space needful for nations to turn upon their axes: great battleships in a bathtub. Still, what could be nearer our present purposes than some counsel we once heard from within the Obama administration? Never, so the counsel went, let a crisis go to waste -- this crisis, flowing from forgetfulness as to what happens when government promises the moon ... and falls flat on delivering the atmospheric gases.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
American Spectator Editor in Chief R. Emmett Tyrrell: "The Patriot is an indispensable resource for sound conservative opinion." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























David S.
Unfortunately, I don't think most of the Republicans that we elect are yet ready to do what needs to be done. This can not go on. Drastic steps have to be taken now, while the time is right.
First, income taxes need to be either eliminated (with a national sales tax substituted) or set on a flat tax basis with a standard unchangeable rate and no deductions.
You can't do this, you say? The government wouldn't have enough money to operate? I'm glad you brought that up.
Next slash the federal budget by 80-90%. Eliminate, privatize, or give to the states the majority of the federal government. Examine each department and determine wheter or not the constitution even allows the federal government to handle that function (remember, the 10th amendment states that all powers not specifically allocated to the federal government are entrusted to the states, or to the people). So, we say goodbye to the EPA, the FCC, the FDA, FEMA, and a ton of other overall money-wasters and give that responsibility to the states.
For my money, you can also eliminate or otherwise dispose of the majority of cabinet-level departments (i.e. the Department of Education, the Department of Commerce. the Department of Agricuture, etc.) and make those state or local organizations.
Once you do this, impress upon the various states and local (i.e. city) governmental structures that the federal government will no longer bail them out if they get into financial trouble, and they are on their own where their budgets are concerned.
Finally, privatize Social Security. Get this slush fund (because that's what it is) out of the hands of the federal government and make it private. Better yet, gradually phase it out completely and put the responsibility to invest for the future back into the individual's hands. Also, reform welfare to make it MUCH harder to get benefits from it. The whole idea of welfare is that you should be on it for as short as possible, so raising the bar there should guarantee that
These steps would drastically help to get our debt under control, and I haven't even begun on term limits, spending caps, or any moral legislation.
Oh well, another time...
Posted September 28, 2010 at 11:33:10 AM
Hondo Menudo
Excellent ideas from "David S."
It may of benefit to know that the original income tax was set at 3%. As well as the fact that, initially, Social Security was voluntary, not mandated.
If we institute a new flat tax in lieu of the current mess, across the board with NO exemptions, I would not mind paying 3% of my income at all. That might be one peaceful way to shrink the government to it's Founder's defined size, by choking off the money teat.
We also need to weed out government agencies that have accomplished their original mission - E.g., The Rural Electrification Administration. The nation appears to wired up to the grid, and that agency STILL gets bundles of OUR money every year. They use the money to make some slight increase by loaning it out to, in the main, electric companies at low, low bargain basement interest rates. The electric companies then improve their infrastructure with the money? Not hardly. They rent it out to other actors at an increased interest rate, pocket the difference, and pay off their "loan" from the REA. Pretty slick, eh?
The Ponzi scheme know as Social Security? Keep paying off those who have spent their lifetimes paying into the pyramid and set aside a special, inviolable, untouchable fund to do so. Then, cancel the entire Socialist abortion. Americans with any brains will provide for their own retirement quite nicely. The idiots who don't will be able to fall back on our traditional forms of charity - They won't be living in the lap of luxury, but they will be fed.
If, a very BIG "if," we can take over the House, and the new members of that august Institution for the Criminally Insane can discipline themselves, we may just be able to turn off the river of money flowing to ... God alone knows, anymore.
Never weaken!
Posted September 28, 2010 at 5:00:33 PM
Upthecreek
It doesn't bother me a bit that there are rich people. I grew up in a "poor" family with lots of kids and walked to a one-room school house. I also went to college and earned a post-graduate degree. I never wanted to be rich. I just wanted to be happy. For the most part, I have succeeded. Poor people do not provide jobs, nor are all those who provide jobs "rich." They are just mostly good people trying to fulfill their own dream.
On the subject of education, when I got to college I found that I could compete with almost all of the people who had all the "advantages" I never had. Our little school had made sure that we could read, write, and that we knew our numbers. Our teachers also taught us to become lifetime learners. It looks to me like all these things are missing from present-day "education." I don't know how we can free ourselves from what we have now, but it seems to me that we must. As with all these things, money is the key. Redirect the money and you will reclaim the power.
Posted September 29, 2010 at 2:56:08 PM
Marty C. Keef
It is past time to stop electing "leaders" and start electing REPRESENTATIVES who actually believe their sole responsibility is to REPRESENT THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THEM as our Constitution requires.
I agree with and support the preceding letters requiring a better, minimal, tax system and limiting the ability of the Congress to change it without direct support of the electorate. Reducing, eliminating, and restructuring existing government agencies and departments at ALL levels is absolutely necessary. This awakening is wonderful. Pass it on.
Posted September 29, 2010 at 4:17:42 PM
karl anglin
There is no use whatever trying to help
people who do not help themselves. You
cannot push anyone up a ladder unless
he is willing to climb himself.----
Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919)
Posted September 29, 2010 at 10:27:10 PM