Options
At Last -- Maybe Some Job Creation
· Saturday, November 6, 2010
Well, look, the president said, while reflecting somberly on why he got "shellacked" at the polls.
Look: "If right now we had 5 percent unemployment instead of 9.6 percent unemployment, the people would have more confidence in those policy changes" -- the ones he and fellow Democrats enacted.
It's the political version of the ancient hobo's lament: If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs. If we had some eggs ...
You get unemployment down with policies calculated to get it down. You do the right things, not the wrong ones. No more than you create the Mona Lisa by throwing paint on the wall do you put America to work by, well, let's enumerate:
1. Elevating something called health care "reform" to the top of your legislative priority list; giving it pride of place over competing legislative opportunities.
2. Permitting Congress to fashion and pass an economically incoherent and pork-laden "stimulus" bill.
3. Ordering a temporary halt to oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico for no better reason than wanting to seem tough on oil companies.
4. Dawdling on the issue of extending tax rates due to expire at year's end.
5. Promising to exclude Americans earning $250,000 or more from any extension Congress might grant at the last minute.
6. Promoting and signing a 2,000-page bill tightening federal control of financial institutions.
7. Declining -- possibly never thinking of doing otherwise -- to express admiration for business of all sizes as well as not supporting the removal of obstacles to job-creation.
In real life, as opposed to the political version, you do the right things, not the wrong ones, to get the results you want. So every day is this principle that you wouldn't imagine the necessity of explaining it to a Harvard Law graduate and Nobel Peace Prize winner. Nevertheless ...
Calling the Obama administration hostile to jobs and the marketplace economy wouldn't be completely fair. It's not that the administration (occasional tea party rants to the contrary) wants to socialize America. The point is in some sense more disturbing. It is that the administration seems not to have the slightest idea why particular Americans would start a business: borrowing money, assuming risks of all sorts, working long and vexatious hours, following a dream peculiar to the dreamer, knowing at the end of the day that the dream might not even work out.
At the heart of American economic success is the cult of the entrepreneur -- the go-getter, the risk-taker. If you want job creation, you want entrepreneurs who will create the jobs (not to mention pay the taxes that keep the government running).
Community organizer that he was, Barack Obama has ideas and notions seemingly formed by the experience of issuing directives rather than that of persuading customers. A pity. Some background in business might have fostered appreciation of how the businessperson yearns not for government that costs him plenty and orders him around; instead, for government whose rhetoric and policies say to him, go for it!
We circle back to where we started. Calvin Coolidge probably couldn't have achieved a jobless rate of 5 percent this year, so hard was the economy's fall in 2007-'08. A rate of 9.6, nevertheless? When Obama promised nothing higher than 8, following the stimulus? How come? And what next?
The sovereign voters on Nov. 2 gave a preliminary answer to that latter question. What we need is in some measure what we seem sure to get, thanks to the Republican resurgence: namely, broad political support for the ideal of encouraging rather than stiff-arming those most eager to create jobs, who seek nothing fancier than the chance to succeed. That means lower taxes; it means lighter regulations; it means, on the part of the powerful, friendly words and actions instead of scowls and kicks in the shin.
There's finally the chance to get this unemployment thing right -- hardly overnight, but with good intentions and policies, soon enough to make sure the shin-kickers enjoy a good long rest on the political sidelines.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Dr. Bill Bennett: "The Patriot is leading the charge in the battle to restore America's values -- a vital ally on the front...." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























mrkim
While the opportunity certainly exists for the current administration to make an about face move regarding its seeming onslaught of laws and regulations that continue to stymie instead of congratulate business achievement and success, the real question, and the ensuing answer to it would seem to be if the president and his administration have to capacity to subjugate their obvious agenda and do so?
If Obamas agenda, and indeed that of the liberals in general, were not so firmly entrenched in the concepts of "We know what's best for the electorate, and if they were only intelligent enough to understand it, they would be in agreement with us.", it seems doubtful at best they will ever be willing to, as Obama told the Repub/Conservatives, "get in the back seat" regarding their own agendized ideologies.
With the economic life-blood sucking fangs of a decidedly liberal congressional caucus having been severely blunted by the will of the electorate in the mid-terms results, watch for moves in future to more subversive as the use of presidential orders/decrees and defacto policy changes by governmental agency policy changes will become the new methodology used instead to enact the changes the legislature will now refute.
Having heard it as a near mantra by many in the conservative camp "Obamas actions speak much more strongly than his words.",this conservative is at least willing to give him time to see if his actions moving forward will indeed signal that he has at last listened to the electorates outcries, though certainly not holding my breath while doing so :>/
Posted November 7, 2010 at 7:41:10 AM
J Henry Jr
Obama is far too much of a delusional ideologue to be willing to compromise enough to move this country forward. He really believes we are too stupid to know what is good for us. Lip service is all we will get until we boot his sorry behind out of there in 2012 or before.
Posted November 7, 2010 at 2:57:30 PM
Anton D Rehling
Giving the POTUS and the liberal faction on our government time to see if they got the message is like giving a pack of wolves time to see if they will stop an attack because one or two were injured in their attemt to take down big game.
Posted November 8, 2010 at 11:54:49 AM
Scott
Oh yes, it is more than fair to say Obama's administration is hostile to jobs and the marketplace economy. Just have a look at the gigantic spike in the SEC and DOJ witch hunt for FCPA targets. In 2009, after the inauguration, their enforcement staff and investigation talley rocketed up from under one hundred to over three thousand. Their tactics amount to blackmail, extortion, and the suppression of business in the name of eliminating "corrupt practices" in international business proceedings. America's competitors are unhampered by this draconian interference. Of course, our government gets to define what's corrupt as opposed to effective, and they get to keep the money they collect from fines, penalties, and disgorgements.
Posted November 8, 2010 at 1:09:27 PM
richard ryan
I`m not quite sure what Mr. Murchison is getting at with his crack about the occasional Tea-party rant about Obama trying to socialize the USA. He apparently dosen`t believe so. But everything I see certainly confirms that he wants to turn us into a European style socialist country. That is at the root of his anti business attitude.
Richard Ryan
Posted November 8, 2010 at 7:10:12 PM