Bush Bounces Back

· Tuesday, November 9, 2010

"Miss me yet?" ask the ubiquitous billboards and T-shirts featuring George W. Bush's cheerful countenance. It seems maybe the answer is yes.

The World Series crowd cheered as the retired but reinvigorated Bush threw the first pitch of the fourth game. This week come the tour and the TV appearances connected with Bush's newly published account of his big decisions in life, from giving up booze to invading Iraq. Next week at Southern Methodist University, it's ground breaking time for the Bush Center. Not a bad comeback for a president whom his successor keeps deriding as the source of America's present problems.

It was bound to happen. The Bush presidency -- for all its failures and missteps, which were many -- was never half as bad as the boos and Bronx cheers from the left field stands made it out to be. Moreover, Barack Obama's pledges and promises were so over the top that he was bound to disappoint -- a condition he failed to improve with his sneers and denigrations.

To the refurbishment of Bush's standing with the public, Obama indeed may have contributed the most just by his boorish whining. Not my fault! I didn't do it! I'm just trying to fix the car! See that guy sipping the Slurpee -- he's the one!

Bush -- amid obvious temptations to show up at the White House, confront his detractor and deck him -- never opened his mouth in public protest against the ill nature flowing from Obama's mouth. He kept his trap shut, behaved like a gentlemen, and reminded his countrymen what a class act looks like in politics.

Over a month ago, a CNN poll found that Americans regarded Obama as a better president than Bush by only 2 percentage points. Who knows, but Bush could have already vaulted into the lead.

You never know about presidential refurbishments. Everyone thought Richard Nixon would slither away to ignominy. In fact, bloodied but unbowed, as the poet would have it, he came back strong: a sensible, even wise, counselor on international affairs, dispensing his analyses in best-selling books. There was more to him than tape gaps, it turned out.

Ironically, Harry Truman -- Nixon's adversary in the '40s -- came back during Watergate: dead as he was by then. The biographer David McCullough made Harry's tart tongue a symbol of his essential honesty. Once, Americans had joked that LSMFT (Lucky Strike Means Fine Tobacco) meant "Lord, Save Me from Truman." Amid the Watergate turbulence, various Americans prayed to be saved by someone like Truman.

George W. Bush may not have been George Washington, and he may have outraged critics who hoped to turn him around on the Iraq war and waterboarding, and he may have been unduly careless when it came to spending taxpayers' money and increasing federal power through ill-conceived legislation, such as the No Child Left Behind Act. But he didn't contemplate, far less ram through, an unpopular "reform" of health; nor did he depreciate the work of predecessor presidents in advancing American interests abroad; nor regularly put the knock on businessmen; nor lecture Supreme Court justices on television; nor bandy witticisms with television performers; nor pass himself off as an authority on whatever came into view -- e.g., police procedures in Cambridge, Mass.; nor lower, in countless ways, the dignity of the White House; nor give the impression the main signal caller on Capitol Hill was Ms. Nancy Pelosi.

To one degree or another, we're all afflicted with grass-is-greener syndrome. That's to say, we're impossible to satisfy. We want to move on. "Change" is our middle name as a people -- a trait that keep scholars and fellow journalists busy trying to refurbish reputations stained by events.

Obama himself will benefit eventually from reappraisal, which isn't the present point. That point being, George W. Bush -- patriot, family man, church-going Christian, reformed drunk -- did his duty as he saw it for eight critical years in the life of his country. We can surely give him credit for that much.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Brian Crook

It is interesting to note the sympathetic electronic "ink" given Bush's book tour by the MSM.

It may not be a fair comparison, but I recall no such resurgence for Clinton after the 2002 election.

Bush had many flaws as president. Obama has broken new ground in that respect.

Posted November 9, 2010 at 10:12:06 AM


Annie

I always believed that Bush would rebound and still believe that after all is said and done he will be considered a good president. There is no doubt he is a patriot and his actions were led by a true concern of protecting American citizens. Right or wrong he did what he believed was in the best interest of the country. And how can you fault someone for that?

I have ordered his book and look forward to reading it. I believe it will be enlightening to see what was going on behind the scenes during those tough times.

It doesn't surprise me at all that he has remained silent and refrained from criticizing his successor. Throughout his time in office, former presidents criticized him, members of Congress criticized him, the press, etc. and he remained a class act by refraining to engage in mud slinging. If nothing else, this stands him apart from former and current occupants in the White House.

Posted November 9, 2010 at 11:35:34 AM


richard ryan

Bush certainly wasn`t perfect by far, but I believe he did what he did not out of self indulgence, but out of true love of his country. I`m not sure of the wisdom of the Iraq war, but I would guess that history will deal with that. He did spend too much, and should have welded the veto much, much more. He handled the 9/11 attack on America with grace and an uplifting courage and confidence. If Gore had been president at the time, we would still be on our knees begging the Muslims to forgive us for what-ever we had done to make them mad at us. He would also have sent them a check for one trillion dollars as an offering for forgiveness. With Mr. Bush`s leadership we handled the situation with dignity and grace.

Richard Ryan

Lamar, Missouri

Posted November 9, 2010 at 11:36:07 AM


WLB

It seems to me that it takes about 25 to 50 years to evaluate a presidency objectively. We aren't there yet with Pres. Bush. Nevertheless, because I supported many of his decisions, I am glad that the worm appears to be turning in his favor. Though I never met him, everything I read and heard about him made me think that he is a good, decent and honest man. In addition, to borrow from "A Knight's Tale," his men (and women) love him. While I may known nothing else about him, that is enough for me.

Posted November 12, 2010 at 7:24:08 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund