September 19, 2023

Team Biden Continues to Fight Free Speech

Still stinging from a lower court’s Independence Day rebuke of its censorship efforts, the administration got temporary relief from the Supreme Court.

It’s no secret that Big Tech has become the Democrats’ favorite speech suppressor — the decider of what can and can’t be said in the electronic town square. As our Nate Jackson noted recently: “One component of [the Left’s] racketeering operation is a communication channel for lackeys in the Biden administration and/or Congress to collude with representatives from social media to determine what ideas and statements are permissible speech.”

Happily, though, that cozy relationship was dealt a blow on Independence Day in a ruling in favor of Republican plaintiffs in Missouri and Louisiana by U.S. District Court Judge Terry Doughty.

“If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true,” wrote Doughty in a 155-page trip to the woodshed for the Biden administration, “the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history. In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal Government, and particularly the Defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment’s right to free speech.”

That’s about as stern a rebuke as you’ll see from a district judge. Doughty, a Trump appointee, went on to issue a temporary injunction blocking Team Brandon from coordinating with Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter to suppress free speech.

This caused a panic on the Left, which couldn’t allow such a righteous ruling to stand. After all, it was speech-suppressing collusion between the FBI and Big Tech that likely allowed Joe Biden to prevail over Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.

Accordingly, the Biden administration sought relief through appeal, but they were denied by a three-judge panel that summarized its ruling thusly: “Ultimately, we find the district court did not err in determining that several officials — namely the White House, the surgeon general, the C.D.C. and the F.B.I. — likely coerced or significantly encouraged social media platforms to moderate content, rendering those decisions state actions. In doing so, the officials likely violated the First Amendment.”

Appealing still further, this time to the Supreme Court, the Biden administration finally got the relief it sought — at least temporarily — and from an unlikely source. As Politico reports:

Justice Samuel Alito temporarily paused a lower-court order limiting Biden administration officials from contacting social media firms. Alito’s action followed an emergency filing from the Justice Department Thursday that asked the court to block an earlier injunction previously set to kick in Monday that would make it difficult for officials at the White House, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the FBI to respond to online posts that pose a danger to public health or safety.

As Politico continues: “Alito granted an administrative stay pausing the underlying injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Terry Doughty from taking effect until Sept. 22. Alito also gave the Republican attorneys general from Louisiana and Missouri — who brought the case against the administration — until Sept. 20 to respond.”

In its emergency filing to the Supreme Court, the speech-suppressing Biden Justice Department claimed that the Fifth Circuit Court’s injunction against its collusion with Big Tech would “impose grave and irreparable harms on the government and the public.”

Boo hoo. What about the grave and irreparable harm caused by the trampling of the American people’s First Amendment rights?

“A central dimension of presidential power is the use of the office’s bully pulpit to seek to persuade Americans — and American companies — to act in ways that the president believes would advance the public interest,” wrote Elizabeth Prelogar, Joe Biden’s solicitor general.

We’re big fans of the bully pulpit as a public-address tool of the presidency, but that’s completely different than using it to stifle the speech of others, which is precisely what the Biden administration has been doing. By all means, use the bully pulpit to promote your views, but not to silence opposing views.

Prelogar argued that the social media platforms themselves, and not the White House, ultimately made the decisions about what to censor, but this claim, while perhaps true on its face, doesn’t pass the giggle test.

That’s a nice social media platform ya got there, Twitter. It’d be a shame if something happened to it.

There was a time in this country when folks were free. When we had a right to communicate ideas and information that weren’t necessarily pre-approved by our government. There was a time.

In the weeks and months ahead, the Supreme Court will be tasked with deciding the lengths to which the government can go in its desire to suppress speech it doesn’t like. In the meantime, Justice Alito’s brief stay is just that — a brief stay. Ultimately, we hope and expect the Supreme Court to render a landmark decision against the government and in support of the First Amendment.

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


The Patriot Post and Patriot Foundation Trust, in keeping with our Military Mission of Service to our uniformed service members and veterans, are proud to support and promote the National Medal of Honor Heritage Center, the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, both the Honoring the Sacrifice and Warrior Freedom Service Dogs aiding wounded veterans, the National Veterans Entrepreneurship Program, the Folds of Honor outreach, and Officer Christian Fellowship, the Air University Foundation, and Naval War College Foundation, and the Naval Aviation Museum Foundation. "Greater love has no one than this, to lay down one's life for his friends." (John 15:13)

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

Please join us in prayer for our nation — that righteous leaders would rise and prevail and we would be united as Americans. Pray also for the protection of our Military Patriots, Veterans, First Responders, and their families. Please lift up your Patriot team and our mission to support and defend our Republic's Founding Principle of Liberty, that the fires of freedom would be ignited in the hearts and minds of our countrymen.

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2024 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.