The Patriot Post® · Clinton's Leftmedia Enablers

By James Shott ·

Seven months after her last press conference, Hillary Clinton finally appeared before journalists last Friday. But they weren’t just any journalists. Clinton took softball questions from the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) and the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ) — two ethnic groups that are generally friendly to her. And part of a Leftmedia that is very friendly to her. But a campaign stump speech at a minority journalist organizations’ convention, with attendance limited only to members of those organizations asking only pre-vetted questions, does not a press conference make.

What kind of softball questions? For example, Clinton was asked to recall the “most meaningful conversation” she has had “with an African-American friend.” Now if it had included a reference to classified information sent over an unsecured private server, we might have something, but alas…

Moreover, The Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto illustrates the dynamic at play, noting, “A juxtaposition of headlines from the Hill reveals a lot about politics and journalism in 2016: ‘Clinton to Press: "Hold Me Accountable”’ and ‘Journalists Applaud Clinton at Event.’“

It isn’t difficult to understand why Clinton, or any candidate, would want to speak at such an event, but it is fair to ask why objective journalists of any description would allow that, let alone invite it.

The Media Research Center outlined the fondness of CNN’s "New Day” for Donald Trump issues over the issues surrounding Iran and the payment of $400 million in ransom money for four hostages held by the Islamic nation.

MRC’s NewsBusters detailed the allotment of time on the two topics: “CNN set aside nearly half of its air time on Wednesday’s "New Day” to various recent controversies involving the Trump campaign — 1 hour, 24 minutes, and 18 seconds over three hours. By contrast, the program clearly didn’t think much of the Wall Street Journal’s Tuesday revelation that the Obama administration secretly airlifted $400 million in cash to Iran. John Berman gave a 27-second news brief to the report, but didn’t mention that the payment was sent on ‘an unmarked cargo plane.’ ‘New Day,’ therefore, devoted over 187 times more coverage to Trump than to the millions to Iran.“

No matter what you believe about the Iran hostage release and potential ransom payment, no matter what actually transpired, the utter clumsiness of making a payment for any purpose that way on that date warrants more than a half-minute in a three-hour program that spent 84 minutes on the Trump issues.

All major media organizations spent hours of broadcast time and dozens of printed pages on the Republican and Democrat nominating conventions. At each of these events, more than one speaker addressed the delegates about the loss of a child.

At the Republican convention, the Gold Star Mother of Sean Smith, one of the four American heroes killed in the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, spoke movingly about losing her son, and laid responsibility for it at the feet of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Pat Smith also noted that when her son’s body was brought home, Clinton "looked me squarely in the eye and told me a video was responsible.”

The following week at the Democrat convention, Gold Star Parents Khizr and Ghazala Kahn appeared and Mr. Kahn talked about the death of his son, Marine Capt. Humayun Khan, who died in Iraq heroically protecting his men. Kahn described himself and his wife as “patriotic American Muslims, with undivided loyalty to our country.” He then criticized Donald Trump for his comments about Muslims, and said, “You have sacrificed nothing and no one.” Predictably, Kahn’s comments about Trump triggered a major response.

“While all the grieving parents deserve sympathy, the Big Three (ABC, CBS, NBC) network evening and morning shows seemed to only care about the parents that showed up at the Democratic Convention,” NewsBusters reported. “Khizr Khan and his wife Ghazala’s DNC appearance earned 55 minutes, 13 seconds of Big Three network coverage, nearly 50 times more than Pat Smith, whose RNC speech honoring her son earned just 70 seconds of airtime.”

The First Amendment protects free speech, and that includes newspapers, television and radio news operations; they are free to say what they like, bound generally by the same restrictions as individuals. The difference is that the public depends on media sources for information upon which people base important decisions, such as deciding whom to elect to important positions.

Therefore, news organizations have a solemn duty to provide balance to the news they cover and how they cover it. Yet these recent examples show decision-making by journalistic organizations that confirms every doubt conservatives have about objectivity. It displays a clear, undeniable lack of balance in reporting on important events that Americans will use in deciding their choice for the presidency and other offices.

Surely the U.S. media can do better than this.