The Patriot Post® · Springsteen, Why Do You Hate Women's Safety?

This is horrible. Just terrible. I cannot believe that conservatives and religious types actually think is it not discriminating to keep men out of women’s bathrooms. This is abhorrent, preposterous, disgusting, mean, bigoted, and abnormal. Completely unnatural. We all know that it is completely normal to have male gender parts, but want to use the bathroom with women. I just think those mean conservatives care too much about women’s safety. How disgusting. Who do they think they are?

In “protecting” the transgenders feelings, a few weeks ago the city of Charlotte decided it was going to pass an ordinance that was going to “protect on the basis of sexual orientation.” Apparently, having bathrooms that are designated to genders, male or female, is not “protecting” anyone. By that liberal progressive logic, which is rarely consistent or correct, if a male claims he is a woman, then the only safe place he can be is in the women’s public bathroom.

Bruce Springsteen has done nothing significant when he cancelled his concert in North Carolina. He did this because the governor, Pat McCrory, signed legislation that will protect women and young girls. So what? Springsteen cancelled a concert. I doubt he had that many people coming in the first place. In fact, he probably just used this as an excuse to bolster his name and not claim food poisoning like most bands do when the ticket sales are low. Regardless, McCrory actually cares about the safety of girls and women in the public bathroom, while Springsteen is as delusional as those who advocate for these mentally ill people and claim that nothing bad could happen in transgender bathrooms, even though it already has.

Bryan Adams cancelled a show in Mississippi over the religious freedom bill that was signed into law. However, he has performed in many Middle East cities such as Dubai, Damascus, Beirut and others, which are Muslim. These people follow a religion that will literally kill someone for homosexuality. On a very teeny tiny small note, they don’t have transgender bathrooms either. Typical progressive hypocrisy.

The liberal progressives love to scream in the faces of those who do not agree with them, saying they are intolerant, bigots, rude, mean, hateful, blah, blah, and blah. However, when was the last time you saw the bakers, photographers, or florists screaming in the face liberal progressives because they could not operate their business the way they wanted? You won’t because they refuse to use the same tactics as the progressives.

Of course, the ACLU is jumping on top of this news story. They are saying it is the right of the transgenders to be able to go into the bathroom of their choice because of how they “feel.” There is not one thing in the Constitution that will protect these people’s feelings. Nowhere will you find anything that allows them to disrupt the privacy that is afforded to the women through decency. However, the liberal progressives and the ACLU choose to ignore the fact the First Amendment has allowed the individuals who own a business to operate it on the ground of their religious faith. The First Amendment is explicit in ensuring there should be no government interference in the religion of an individual. The business is the extension of the individual’s religious beliefs. John Adams was correct when he said "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.“ It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Yes, you have a right to self-expression, and free speech. However, you do not have the right to be listened to, or agreed with.

We are starting to see the results of a country that is slipping further and further from God. There are no morals when the government, local, state or federal, make an ordinance allowing men to go into a public bathroom or locker room under the guise of what they identify as gender wise. The depraved local government of Charlotte, North Carolina was going to let the safety of women and young girls be compromised with no due regard.

One thing the city council cannot answer is how females were going to be protected from sexual predators. There was no provision for them. Of course, how do you prove that each male playing dress up for the day was not a sexual predator? You cannot. Criminals start somewhere. Why not the public bathroom at the mall, where there are hundreds of women and young girls in and out during operating hours? Government always knows best and never ruins anything. Sure…

This whole issue is disturbing and scary. What is really scary is the person who pushed this perversion on the city council. Chad Sevearance is a convicted sex offender that is pushing this “nondiscrimination measure.” However, an eight-year-old girl who would like to use the bathroom with no males leering at her, or film her with a cell phone while using the bathroom, is out of luck. Never mind, her physical safety, or dignity. This is about the twisted feelings of a sexual deviant. That is what is important. So, the city council votes 7-4 in favor of a sexual convict. Bruce Springsteen, you could have boycotted the state of North Carolina for that reason, but you chose to boycott because you are against the safety of young girl and women.

I recently read an argument that unisex bathrooms are “the original transgender bathrooms.” No. That is idiotic. Unisex bathrooms have one toilet. “Transgender” bathrooms have multiple toilets. That isn’t even an argument. This brings up another point. Why is the standard female bathroom a target? Why not use a unisex bathroom? Or, here is a novel idea, why don’t you just go to the bathroom that correlates with the gender you were assigned when created? And don’t use the “argument” that is not what you identify with. You have no argument.

I thought that liberal progressives where on the side of women. A male cannot change his chromosomes no matter how much make up or women’s clothing he wears. When the liberals side with the transgender men, then are they not really siding with women. Just calling it like I see it, but that is too logical for some.

The problem here is not gender identity issue. It is a heart issue. A heart issue of the depraved human. When a person, who has religious convictions, like Pat McCrory, he is the bad guy. And the media perpetuates that narrative, putting women and young girls in harm’s way.  Bruce Springsteen is no hero, despite what the media, liberals and progressives say. He is someone who truly does not care about the safety of women, or young girls. He is another player in the transgender fairy tale agenda.

The bathrooms need to be left the way they are for the safety of young girls and women from sexual predators. The public/society is dangerous enough as it is.

Governor McCrory, keep up the good work.