The Patriot Post® · The Left Must Acknowledge Its Violence Problem

By Yoe Suarez

Joanne Chesimard (“Assata Shakur” to her revolutionary fans) died a few days ago in Havana, under the protection of Castroism. The former member of the Black Liberation Army had been living in Cuba since 1984 after escaping from prison, where she was serving a sentence for murdering a police officer in New Jersey. Shakur went from the FBI’s most wanted list to the pages of leftist American media, which applauded her as a revolutionary example.

The fashion and entertainment magazine Essence romanticized Shakur as if she were a runway model: “She is survived by a legacy of revolutionary thought which urges us to reflect on the lessons of power, beauty, and preservation that can be found through her physical representation.” The website Democracy Now! republished a letter from the woman “in memory of her life and her work.” The Chicago Teachers Union’s social media account honored “the life and legacy of a revolutionary fighter, a fierce writer, a revered elder of Black liberation, and a leader of freedom whose spirit continues to live on in our struggle.”

If the Left is willing to bring its murderers from the violent 1960s and 1970s, when “anti-colonial” and Marxist terror reigned, out of the basement, it’s no wonder they celebrate or justify today’s political violence. The Center for Strategic and International Studies defines left-wing terrorism as “that which is motivated by an opposition to capitalism, imperialism, or colonialism; black nationalism; support for LGBTQ+ rights; support for environmental causes or animal rights; adherence to pro-communist, pro-socialist beliefs or ‘anti-fascist’ rhetoric; opposition to government authority under the belief it is a tool of oppression responsible for social injustices; support for decentralized political and social systems, such as anarchism; or partisan extremism, where violence is justified against political opponents and parties perceived as advancing right-wing agendas.”

The last 12 months have exposed the Left as the protagonist of violence, although today its main stenographers misinform their own audience and remain in denial.

Let’s recall two assassination attempts on presidential candidate Donald Trump, Luigi Mangione’s assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City in December 2024, the bullet that pierced the neck of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the assassination of two Israeli diplomats while the murderer chanted “Free Palestine!” in Washington, D.C. Let’s also recall the violent trend against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. In one example on July 4, 2025, a dozen individuals dressed in black clothing and equipped with tactical gear attacked the Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, Texas.

The events I’ve mentioned reveal a terrible truth: that the extremist charge isn’t found in dark corners of the leftist base, but rather constitutes the very foundation of leftist beliefs.

A YouGov survey conducted immediately after the fatal shooting of Kirk asked if “it is ever justified for citizens to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals.” The results showed that the more liberal respondents were, the more likely they were to say violence can sometimes be justified.

A quarter of respondents who identified as “very liberal” said violence can sometimes be justified to achieve political goals, along with 17% of those who identified as “liberal,” 9% of moderates, 6% of those who said they’re “conservative” and 3% of those who identified as “very conservative.”

Twenty-six percent of liberals under 45 years old, compared with 12% of liberals 45 and older, said political violence can sometimes be justified; 12% of moderates under 45 years old, compared with 6% of moderates 45 and over, said it’s sometimes justified; and 7% of younger conservatives, compared with 4% of older conservatives, said it’s sometimes justified.

At the same time, the Democratic elite, including the mainstream media and several politicians, seem to justify political violence. Examples include Kamala Harris promoting donations to bail violent protesters during the 2020 “Summer of Love” and Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) repeating falsehoods about Kirk’s character.

The first step to curbing the problem isn’t creating false equivalencies by saying it’s a “problem on both sides,” because while there may be violence from the other political spectrum, it’s proportionally incomparable right now.

The first step to curbing political violence isn’t shouting to the winds about everyone “turning down the heat.” It’s the Democratic establishment that has unfairly labeled its political opposition as “fascists.” And that label is the key to the structure of permissiveness that justifies violence against conservatives. If “fascism” (defeated militarily, politically, and culturally in World War II, that is) is the representation of Satan for a secular society, then if someone is a “fascist,” ending their life would be justified.

A tentative acceptance of the problem has begun to make its way into media outlets across the left-wing political spectrum. The Atlantic magazine acknowledged that left-wing terrorism has increased since 2016, and that 2025 marks a milestone in that regard.

But to change course, Democratic leaders, strategists, and propagandists (like the addict mired in his own justifications) must accept that they are politically sick, but sick nonetheless. They must commit to shifting their rhetoric away from the constant inflammatory adjectives from platforms like California Governor Gavin Newsom’s (D).

The response from the Right has been exemplary: memorials, mass prayers, a revival of faith.

In response to those who celebrated silencing a man like Kirk who promoted dialogue, conservatives promoted more debate, although the Left continues to react with cancellations and coercion, as the Fearless Debate Tour experienced at Tennessee State University.

YouTuber Steven Crowder recently resumed his debates on college campuses under the slogan “Change My Mind.” It was precisely this format that inspired Kirk for his viral “Prove Me Wrong” videos. However, as a sign of the times, Crowder had to wear a bulletproof vest and hire private security to hold the event. He himself admitted that the cost amounted to a quarter of a million dollars.

The Left has a problem. It must acknowledge the violence that is overwhelmingly coming from its ranks today and call on its members to focus on dialogue, not bullets or blows. Otherwise, all the money, hours, and risks invested by conservatives in debating will be in vain, because there will be no one sitting on the other side of the table.