The Patriot Post® · Anti-Slavery Party Formed

A call to ban images of groups that were involved in slavery would include the Democrat Party’s Donkey and Islam’s Crescent, as both of these institutions were involved in the enslavement of Africans.

The Democrat Party defended the right to own slaves, as the Party’s founder, Andrew Jackson owned slaves.

Beginning in colonial times, approximately 350,000 African slaves were brought to America. This number grew to nearly 4 million slaves prior to the Civil War.

Slaves were purchased at Muslim slave markets.

Islam defended the right to own slaves, as its founder, Mohammed, owned slaves.

Beginning in 622 AD, the next 1,400 years saw an estimated 180 million Africans enslaved in Islamic occupations.

Only by international pressure did Yemen and Saudi Arabia nominally end slavery in 1962, and as recently as 1980 for Mauritania, though some claim it continues unreported.

Prior to the Civil War, the United States had two major political parties — Democrats & Whigs:

Democrats, who favored freedom of choice to own slaves; and

Whigs were attempting to be a big tent party in order to stem the loss of members to the Know-Nothing Party.

(Whigs were originally the party in Britain who opposed the king’s absolute power.)

On February 28, 1854, in Ripon, Wisconsin, anti-slavery activists met for the first time.

They then held their first State Convention in Jackson, Michigan on JULY 6, 1854.

This new political party took a stand against slavery.

The name of this Party was “Republican.”

The new Republican Party was also against efforts in Utah to redefine marriage.

The chief plank of the original Republican Party platform was “to prohibit … those twin relics of barbarism: POLYGAMY AND SLAVERY.”

America was divided geographically between:

– Radical Republican North, which said slavery is wrong, end it now. This included abolitionist societies, the Underground Railroad, anti-slavery preachers and, unfortunately, the fringe John Brown who took guns and killed slave owners.

– Moderate Republican North, which said slavery is wrong, but the country should transition out of it slowly over time.

– Practical Neutral, which cared less about the value of human life, being more interested in jobs, wages, economy and tax-tariff issues.

– Moderate Democratic South, which said slavery may be wrong, but the country has to live with it. Though personally against slavery, they believed the right to own slaves should be protected, just made rare and few, and treat slaves humanely.

– Extreme Democratic South, which said slavery is good and should be expanded into Western states. They tried to justify it by twisting Scriptures, citing that Abraham owned slaves but ignoring Jesus’ teaching to “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

Extreme Democrat politicians Speaker Howell Cobb and Senate President William King pushed through the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.

The Fugitive Slave Act put the slavery issue squarely in the face of the anti-slavery North, whereas before it had become an out-of-sight and out-of-mind issue occurring on Southern plantations.

The Fugitive Slave Law imposed severe penalties on those who aided escaped slaves with food or shelter in their passage to freedom in Michigan or Canada.

It also made it a crime to interfere with the slave catchers’ recovery of runaway slaves.

A person could be held criminally liable, fined $1,000 and imprisoned for six months if they failed to report a neighbor suspected of helping slaves.

The Fugitive Slave Law mandate intensified sectional animosity, provoking the Civil War by requiring citizens who are against slavery to violate their consciences and take part in it.

It was one thing for Northerners to be apathetic toward pro-choice Democrats enslaving people in the South, but it was quite another thing for them to be forced by a federal mandate to dip their hands in the blood of the crime and participate in enforcing slavery.

New lands were added to the United States:

– 1803, Louisiana Territory, 827,987 square miles;
– 1819, Florida, 72,101 sq. mi.;
– 1845, Texas, 389,166 sq. mi.;
– 1846, Oregon Territory, 286,541 sq. mi.;
– 1848, Mexican Cession, 529,189 sq. mi.; and
– 1853, Gadsden Purchase, 29,670 sq. mi.

Though importation of slaves into America was outlawed in 1807, the question arose, should slavery be extended to these new lands coming into the Union?

Futile attempts were made to reconcile the tensions with “The Missouri Compromise of 1820” and “The Compromise of 1850.”

Congress made the situation worse in 1854 by passing Democratic Sen. Stephen Douglas’ Kansas-Nebraska Bill, which let inhabitants in those territories have the freedom of choice to decide if they wanted to own slaves.

It prescribed “dividing the land into two territories, Kansas and Nebraska, and leaving the question of slavery to be decided by the settlers.”

Instead of gradually diminishing, as many founders had hoped, slavery was now expanding.

On March 6. 1857, the Supreme Court, with 7 of the 9 justices being Democrats, rendered the Dred Scott decision.

Hoping to settle the slavery issue once and for all, their efforts to avoid a civil war actually precipitated it.

Dred Scott was a slave who had been taken by his master to Illinois and Wisconsin, but, as he was not allowed to learn to read, he was unaware that those territories forbade slavery.

When he returned to Missouri, Scott sued for freedom with the help of abolitionist friends, such as Henry Blow, a Republican congressman whose wife started the first kindergarten in the United States.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney, appointed by Democrat President Jackson, rendered the decision that Dred Scott was not a citizen, but property that belonged to his owner, writing that slaves were:

“… so far inferior … that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for their own benefit.”

Leaders rose up in churches, media and politics.

Republican President Lincoln said, March 17, 1865:

“Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.”

Some states defied the federal government’s Fugitive Slave Law mandate by passing “personal liberty laws,” effectively nullifying it.

Communities insisted on jury trials before alleged fugitive slaves could be taken away by federal authorities. Some juries refused to convict those indicted.

Other communities forbade local law enforcement officials from using their jails to hold the accused.

President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation under questionable Constitutional authority.

The issues was settled by passage of the 13th Amendment, officially ending slavery.

Every Republican in the House (86) and Senate (30) voted for it, joined by a few Democrats in the Senate (4) and House (15).

The Tuskegee Institute recorded that between 1882 and 1968 there were 3,446 Blacks lynched.

In addition, there were 1,297 whites lynched, many of whom were white “radical” Republicans who had gone down to the South to register freed Blacks to vote.

In support of the Republican anti-polygamy plank:

“to prohibit … those twin relics of barbarism: POLYGAMY and SLAVERY,”

the Republican Party defended the natural definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

Republican President Abraham Lincoln signed the Anti-Bigamy/Polygamy Act of 1862.

Those attempting to redefine marriage were denounced by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant, December 4, 1871:

“In Utah there still remains a remnant of barbarism, repugnant to civilization, to decency, and to the laws of the United States …

Neither polygamy nor any other violation of existing statutes will be permitted … They will not be permitted to violate the laws under the cloak of religion.”

On December 7, 1875, President Grant stated:

“In nearly every annual message … I have called attention to the… scandalous condition of affairs existing in the Territory of Utah, and have asked for definite legislation to correct it …

That polygamy should exist in a free, enlightened, and Christian country, without the power to punish so flagrant a crime against decency and morality, seems preposterous …

As an institution polygamy should be banished from the land …

I deem of vital importance to … drive out licensed immorality, such as polygamy and the importation of women for illegitimate purposes.”

Republican President Rutherford B. Hayes stated, December 1, 1879:

“Polygamy is condemned as a crime by the laws of all civilized communities throughout the world.”

President Hayes stated December 6, 1880:

“The SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE and the FAMILY relation are the cornerstone of our American society and civilization.”

Republican President James Garfield stated March 4, 1881:

“The mormon church not only offends the moral sense of manhood by sanctioning polygamy, but prevents the administration of justice through ordinary instrumentalities of law.

In my judgment it is the duty of Congress, while respecting to the uttermost the conscientious convictions and religious scruples of every citizen, to prohibit within its jurisdiction all criminal practices, especially of that class which destroy the family relations and endanger social order.”

Republican President Chester Arthur stated, December 6, 1881:

“For many years the Executive … has urged the necessity of stringent legislation for the suppression of polygamy … this odious crime, so revolting to the moral and religious sense of Christendom.”

Supreme Court Chief Justice Morrison Waite, appointed by Republican Ulysses S. Grant, rendered the Murphy v. Ramsey, 1885, decision:

“Every person who has a husband or wife living … and marries another … is guilty of polygamy, and shall be punished…

No legislation can be supposed more wholesome and necessary in the founding of a free, self-governing commonwealth … than that which seeks to establish it on the basis of the idea of THE FAMILY,

as consisting in and springing from the union for life of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN in the holy estate of matrimony; the sure foundation of all that is stable and noble in our civilization;

the best guaranty of that reverent morality which is the source of all beneficent progress in social and political improvement.”

Preserving natural marriage between one man and one woman precludes Islam, which embraces polygamy, harems, sex-slavery, “mut-ah”-temporary wives for pleasure, and child brides.

The comprehensive annotated John Quincy Adams-A Bibliography, compiled by Lynn H. Parsons (Westport, CT, 1993, p. 41, entry #194, Essay on Turks, 1827):

“Mohammed poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy.”

Saint Thomas Aquinas wrote in Summa contra Gentiles, 1258:

“Mohammed … seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us … and he gave free reign to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men.”

Winston Churchill wrote in The (Nile) River War, 1899:

“In Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”

Republican President Theodore Roosevelt stated to Congress, January 30, 1905:

“The institution of MARRIAGE is, of course, at the very foundation of our social organization, and all influences that affect that institution are of vital concern to the people of the whole country.”

With the call to ban symbols of past slavery, from the Confederate Flag to the Democrat Donkey to the Islamic Crescent, it may well be worth remembering the original plank of the Republican Party was:

“to prohibit … those twin relics of barbarism: POLYGAMY and SLAVERY.”