Will It Be THE HAMMER or the Constitution That Americans Live Under?
It's only natural that the power brokers were emboldened to make a third coup attempt.
The only source of legitimacy of government in America is from the people.
At the time of the founding of the United States, Samuel Adams stated, “Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that…he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.”
At a turning point in the survival of the nation after the Civil War’s bloodiest battle, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address, stating that “this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
Fast-forward to the present. Donald Trump was the first president since Ronald Reagan to run on a platform of protecting the constitutional rights of average Americans. In spite of his sometimes abrasive communication style, Trump has been unique and unwavering in his patriotism — effectively standing as a one-man bulwark against a corrupt establishment, executing new policies and executive orders that have demonstrably improved the lives of ordinary Americans.
Since honest elections are the only source of legitimacy of government in the U.S., it’s imperative to get to the bottom of vote-counting irregularities and ballot fraud in states with a high incidence. Failing to make a conclusive vote fraud determination would be a fundamental betrayal of who we are — a sort of national suicide — that would undermine faith in our electoral system and delegitimize our government.
The American people have already endured two major efforts at a coup d'état against President Trump. The first was the Russia collusion conspiracy based on a fabricated Russian dossier originating with Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, as well as illegal spying on the campaign and the presidency of Donald Trump — all sanctioned by CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and others. The second was the failed impeachment launched by Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives.
Since there have been neither results nor penalties from these previous coup attempts, which in the first case involved seditious multiple felony crimes, it’s only natural that the power brokers operating as wolves in the sheep’s clothing of the Democrat Party were emboldened to make a third coup attempt by taking advantage of the COVID lockdowns and public fear to increase the odds of victory on November 3. First they legitimized the wholesale expansion of mail-in balloting, and then they blanketed the swing states with armies of lawyers filing suits to challenge voter ID laws and signature verification laws, and, more than anything else, to extend the deadlines for mail-in ballots — all of which created chaos and opened the door to massive vote fraud.
The common denominator of all the swing states with contested outcomes is that they employed polling-place technology provided by a company called Dominion Voting Systems, a company that was rejected three times by data communications evaluators in the state of Texas for failing to meet basic security standards. It’s a known fact that a source code error in Dominion’s software flipped 6,000 seats from Trump to Biden in Michigan and also affected ballot casting and vote counting in Georgia on November 3rd. Other problems need to be reported and investigated.
Another as yet unproven source of vote tally manipulation is known as the “THE HAMMER and "THE SCORECARD,” a signals-based supercomputer and software system originally developed by Dennis Montgomery, a CIA contractor hired to penetrate Al Qaeda’s systems after 9/11. The computer program he developed, which came to be known as THE HAMMER, was modified seven or eight years later with an application called THE SCORECARD that operates through the Internet to penetrate voting systems so as to affect foreign elections.
Lt. General Thomas G. McAnarney reports that Montgomery and other sources told him that “HAMMER was used against Americans under the Obama Administration.” U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) has publicly stated that “Obama has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before … that will have information about everything on every individual in life.” In 2012, Montgomery was again approached by the intelligence community, this time to hack into and manipulate the Florida voter registration system. By 2015, Montgomery had seen enough and became a whistleblower about the abuse of surveillance and database manipulation technology — and specifically THE HAMMER and THE SCORECARD — by the Obama administration.
McInerney was joined by Sidney Powell, the lead defense attorney for Lt. General Michael Flynn, on NewsMax on November 2nd, warning that the next day’s national election was specifically at risk of THE HAMMER and THE SCORECARD being secretly deployed to change the vote tally at the point of data transfer between voting stations and data storage hubs.
With the knowledge that Democrat Party operatives used THE HAMMER and THE SCORECARD to guarantee Florida’s vote for Obama over Romney in 2012, we need to rethink the meaning of the “insurance policy” that Peter Strzok spoke of in his texts to his paramour Lisa Page, specifically referring to an ability to stop Trump from becoming president in the 2016. The most certain insurance policy would likely have been a proven and predictable means of technological vote tampering that would ensure a “fix” would be in for Hillary Clinton. The fact that that plan failed to deliver the expected results also explains the utter disbelief of Democrat Party operatives that Trump ended up with a decisive win.
One reason that Biden has been under tight control by his handlers was the fear that he might inadvertently stumble into Freudian slips, such as this one from some months ago: “We have put together, I think, the most exhaustive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
Thus it would appear that the “fix” was really in this time to assure a Biden victory over Trump. The fact that poll watchers were sent home and vote counting “stopped” in the key Midwestern swing states at a time when Trump’s advantage was impressively large may have been done to create a safe unmonitored opportunity to execute electronic vote switching. Montgomery, who signed a non-disclosure agreement with the U.S. government, commented that states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona exhibited vote tally change patterns that reflect manipulation by THE HAMMER and THE SCORECARD.
Barring a vote recount that gives Trump an Electoral College victory of 270 or more votes, three things are now needed to make a vote fraud case that can overturn the present outcome. First, there needs to be overwhelming evidence of widespread conventional vote fraud. Second, a clear case needs to be made with big data statistical pattern analysis that proves massive vote tally changes. Third, testimony needs to be obtained from a fairly high-level operative about the scope of vote fraud and how it was carried out. The first two have been largely accomplished.
With distrust and division being so extreme in the present environment, evidence of massive vote fraud will likely compel adjudication by the Supreme Court, with an obvious remedy in the Constitution, which puts the vote in the hands of the state legislatures, whose members are elected by the people and whose vote would govern the state’s electoral college vote.
The American people cannot allow fraudulent election results or even the appearance of such to stand. It undermines the Constitution and demoralizes the citizenry. Also, letting proven election and vote fraud stand would undermine our moral authority on the world stage and relegate the United States to the status of banana republics and communist regimes.
A corrective is imperative. Fortunately, the remedy is found in the Constitution that provides a clear course to restore the sovereignty of the people. If we fail to overcome the mob and chorus of the social and mainstream media, which are engaged in a massive psy-op to create confusion and marginalize and undermine the legal process to seek a court remedy, and we accept the results of a corrupt election, we will surely face a dystopian future. If Democrat operatives succeed in stealing this election, they will slam the door shut, tighten their control with the help of Big Tech and the media, and make fair elections a thing of the past.