Thursday Column
There's Nothing 'Gay' About Gender-Disorientation Pathology
It's that time of year again, when many unsuspecting American families travel to one of the nation's favorite family-theme parks only to find themselves at the epicenter of cultural degradation. This week, hordes of extroverted homosexuals congregated in Orlando at Disney's Pleasure Island for the annual exercise in societal entropy they call "Gay Days at Disney." Fortunately, the gaudy and lurid displays of sexual deviance at Disney are not typical of the public etiquette maintained by most homosexuals.
Our forefathers understood "gay" to mean "licentious, lacking moral restraints, leading a debauched or dissolute life." The "Gay '90s," for example, was a decade the sagacious Mark Twain dubbed "The Gilded Age" -- an era of unmitigated opulence and unrestrained immorality exercised by a subculture of the elite. Now, in the current vernacular of the fashionably PC, "gay" alludes to "homosexual" and therefore evokes the words of that inimitable American philosopher Yogi Berra: "This is like deja vu all over again."
They may call it "gay," but it's not. Indeed, today's "gay" culture is equally dissolute, and its agenda is anathema to the bedrock institution of our past, present and future -- the American family.
Of course, homosexuality is not the most insidious of social trends that undermine the continuity of the traditional family -- the essential governing unit and innate building block of natural society. That unfortunate distinction is reserved for those who divorce -- particularly men who abandon their responsibility as husbands and fathers.
Concerns about divorce and its consequential degradation of social and moral order are not new. As Founding Father John Adams wrote, "The foundation of national morality must be laid in private families. ... How is it possible that Children can have any just Sense of the sacred Obligations of Morality or Religion if, from their earliest Infancy, they learn their Mothers live in habitual Infidelity to their fathers, and their fathers in as constant Infidelity to their Mothers?"
What is new is the vast number of fatherless children in America, kids who have been largely abandoned by their biological fathers, and the incalculable burden that places on them and society. One deleterious outcome associated with some of these broken and dysfunctional families, in addition to the life sentence they serve trying to sort out the rejection issues, is the absence of a healthy sexual identity -- particularly in boys who have not been fathered properly. This identity void can result in lifetime pursuit of homosexual approval.
Though divorce, unlike homosexuality, lacks a well funded and well organized advocacy movement attempting to normalize it (divorce lawyers notwithstanding), it isn't difficult to connect the dots between dysfunctional families and homosexuality.
To understand fully the homosexual subculture and its aggressive social agenda, then, one must gain some rational insight into the pathology of homosexual behavior. Unfortunately, there are few comprehensive treatises on the subject that inspire rational discourse -- as opposed to emotive rants.
A few years ago, the most learned debates over the ordination of a homosexual cleric as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire revealed that not only the Episcopal clergy and laity needed assistance understanding this issue, but the Christian Church as a whole needed clarity. Indeed our whole society needs a better, and in some cases more compassionate, understanding of homosexual pathology.
Consequently, The Patriot has just published The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response online, a comprehensive yet concise review of gender-disorientation pathology. It's an essay that anyone, inside or outside the Church, making a psychological, theological or social argument concerning homosexuality, should read.
The real value of this landmark report's substance is not measured in the accolades from conservatives around the world who have reviewed it, but in the unguarded praise it has received from homosexuals (including some activists), who responded that, for the first time, they have been able to comprehend, with the help of this analysis, both the Christian theological and conservative social perspective and objections, without feeling personally attacked.
Every American family is under assault from many quarters, one of the most menacing being the challenge to traditional sexual morality. The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response, provides context for understanding sexual deviancy and addresses the familial origins and pathology of such deviance, the political, cultural and social "normalization" agenda of homosexual practitioners, the conflict this agenda has created within the Christian Church, and an appropriate Christian response.
High on the homosexual political agenda list is same-sex marriage. President Bush announced this week his support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. While we would support such an amendment, we believe that if the President is going to use what is left of his political capital to mobilize a national movement to amend our Constitution, there are much more important amendments to consider, starting with one mandating a balanced federal budget (just as most states require a balanced state budget).
That debate aside, if you're interested in healthy marriages and families, the consequences of broken families and the potential implications of a largely unabated homosexual agenda on the next generation of our children, take a few minutes to read The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response -- regardless of your theological orientation.
10 Comments
spiff
Friday, October 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM
Does this mean that when a homosexual/pedophile is turned away or is resisted that the innocent party can be arrested under the "Hate Crime" law?Spiff
Elaine
Friday, October 23, 2009 at 3:01 PM
spiff: Good question. It depends on who is interpreting the words in the "hate crime" law I would assume.But I would venture a bet that if a normal person, i.e., someone not confused about their humanity, were to file a lawsuit against a sodomite under the "hate crime" bill, they wouldn't even be granted a hearing.In fact, I'll venture a bet that an addition to the "hate crimes" bill will be added to the effect that if anyone who is NOT confused about their gender/sexuality/humanity and files a lawsuit under this bill, not only will they not be granted a hearing but will be fined for having the audacity to believe the bill covers anyone other than sodomites.
Bud
Friday, October 23, 2009 at 6:14 PM
Links don't work to the paper.
Keith
Friday, October 23, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Your links to the paper "The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response" don't work. I looked at the properties and found the reference to 03-32.asp, but you have no way to search within the Patriot Post. I would greatly appreciate a method to search your web site (I'm sure I am not the only one who wishes this). Otherwise, fantastic site!!!
John
Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 9:25 AM
The Article can be found at http://www.bibleteacher.org/pdfsermons/HomosexualityPOST.pdf
Herb1949
Monday, October 26, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Mr. Alexander,I enjoy your articles and almost always agree with you. However, your statement; Our forefathers understood "gay" to mean "licentious, lacking moral restraints, leading a debauched or dissolute life.", is not correct.Its oldest English meaning, attested as early as 1310, is "disposed to joy and mirth", and was the most common use until the later part of the 20th Century.This was the basic understanding of the word 'gay', when I was in school in the 50's and 60's. The use of the word, at that time, to describe homosexuals, was considered an insult, to them. It meant that they were not serious about life and were therefore, not worth being around.
Will
Saturday, January 16, 2010 at 1:08 AM
"... the gaudy and lurid displays of sexual deviance..." That's an awfully peculiar double standard. I don't think that I've ever heard heterosexuals being scolded for being clad in bathing suits. You're describing the event as some sort of new-age Sodom and Gomorrah, when in reality, such partying is more common among straights. You continue employing this scapegoat tactic against gay people throughout the article, blaming us for "undermining" American society, when clearly the changes in our culture could not have possibly been brought about by an oppressed minority group which makes up less than 3% of the population. The number of out-of-wedlock births in America (or "broken families", as you call them) has been increasing steadily for quite some time, long before gay people had any civil rights at all.
Davya Eschenazi
Wednesday, March 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM
An unfounded and salient display of the kind of heretic-seeking fundamentalism that has infested Conservatism in this country and allowed liberals to label us as bigots. Jefferson always called for the protection of the minority from the majority. Fundamentalists in the Conservative party failed to use this legal precedent during the Black and Women's civil rights movement, thus cursing the conservative movement, including the fairer minded, to be put under the constant sign of prejudice. You want to talk about the American family? What about the two mothers who adopt a child with little hope in the world and are not allowed to recognize the strength and values they instill in that child? What about the governmentalists who take that child away from them "in the name of values". Values, can mean anything you want them to mean. But in America, they involve and have always involved the free and independent progression of healthy thinking. Given religious institutions and psychological associations, both liberal and conservative, have, through independent and mutual discussion and research, provided that lgbt people are healthy and can be just as socially competitive in their social structures as others, it is only bias against difference that dominates your thought. And difference, my friend, is what makes our country greater than any other state on this earth.
BOB G in GEORGIA
Thursday, June 21, 2012 at 11:20 AM
A very well written statement. I wish all were as adept at applying their thoughts to paper.
John D in Texas
Tuesday, June 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM
I am becoming more fascinated with discussions around this topic. The more I hear cultural "conservatives" expressing their views and discussing why they find homosexual activity abhorrent, the more intolerant the "liberals" seems to be in their posts. If a person is going fight to insure that people are not persecuted because of their beliefs, then he/she has to insure that ALL people are not persecuted because of their beliefs, including the beliefs that you do not support. "Intolerance" in this case seems to be an accusation made by those who are the most intolerant. Not accepting your way of life does not constitute "hate."