Thursday Column
State of the Union: Obama v. Constitution
"The duty imposed upon him to take care, that the laws be faithfully executed, follows out the strong injunctions of his oath of office, that he will 'preserve, protect, and defend the constitution.' The great object of the executive department is to accomplish this purpose; and without it, be the form of government whatever it may, it will be utterly worthless for offence, or defence; for the redress of grievances, or the protection of rights; for the happiness, or good order, or safety of the people." --Justice Joseph Story
The ObamaPrompterIn the wake of Barack Hussein Obama's first State of the Union address, much of the critical analysis from Republicans posited that he should do "this" instead of "that."
Unfortunately, when there is no more constitutional authority for a president to do this rather than that, Republicans fail to distinguish themselves from Democrats since both parties are then advocating unlawful extra-constitutional policies.
Obama's SOTU teleprompters fed him a steady stream of poll-tested rhetoric, none of which comports with the authority granted the Executive Branch, unless, of course, one subscribes to the adulterated "living constitution" as amended by judicial diktat.
Predictably, Obama offered only Socialist solutions to all ills, and not a single suggestion that individual responsibility or the private sector economy should shoulder that burden, at least not without government "incentives," a.k.a. centralized social and economic planning.
In 7,400 words (second longest SOTU after Bill Clinton -- two narcissists who just can't hear enough of themselves), Obama referred to himself repeatedly, and alleged that he was the anointed spokesman for "we," the American people, more than 100 times.
On the other hand, he mentioned the Constitution only twice.
First, in his opening remarks Obama said, "Our Constitution declares that from time to time the president shall give to Congress information about the state of our union."
Correct.
Second, he asserted, "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution, the notion that we're all created equal..."
FAIL! That "notion" was enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, third paragraph, first sentence. One would think that this alleged expert on "Constitutional Law" would know better.
Our Constitution is devoted to clearly delineating the limited role of the central government from the unlimited rights of the states and the people.
To that end, James Madison, author of our Constitution, wrote, "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
Accordingly, Obama mentions freedom only once, and made absolutely no reference to liberty.
Nowhere in our Constitution is there any authority or provision for these key proposals from Obama's SOTU:
1. The power to further centralize regulation of our economy.
2. The power to completely regulate our national health care system. Obama even repeated his claim that the American people are just not smart enough to get on board: "I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people."
3. The power to further regulate and tax the production of CO2.
Obama reiterated his claims that the current recession was caused by "Wall Street," and then went on to insist that the only hope for ending the recession was government "investment," a euphemism for taxing money out of the private sector, taking bureaucratic handling fees out, then giving it to political constituencies.
To correctly interpret Obama's SOTU, you need only filter everything he says through his foremost pledge that he and his administration are "fundamentally transforming the United States of America."
That is a line Obama lifted from the primary architect of his Socialist platform, Robert Creamer, who had earlier proclaimed, "If Barack Obama is elected president, then we have the opportunity to fundamentally transform American politics and the economy."
It's likely that you've never heard of Bob Creamer, because Barack Obama is very adept at concealing his association with his Marxist patrons.
In his younger days, Obama was not concerned about such associations: "I chose my friends carefully," he wrote. "The more politically active black students; the foreign students; the Chicanos; the Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets."
But when he announced his aspirations to become a U.S. senator in 2004, Obama began to cover his tracks. He stopped associating publicly with Leftist colleagues and mentors such as Jeremiah Wright, Michael Pfleger, William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi, Bob Creamer and others.
Creamer is a member of Obama's Chicago mob, a fellow "community organizer" and disciple of Saul Alinsky. Like all of Obama's Chicago benefactors, Creamer believes that he is above the law, or, more appropriately, that he is the law in today's age of the rule of men. But like Tony Rezko, another of Obama's slick Chicago political backers, Creamer was caught with his hand in the till and was convicted of a felony (bank fraud) back in 2004 when Obama was a state senator. Creamer got a softball sentence, though: five months in a minimum-security facility for white-collar criminals and another 11 months of house arrest.
With all that time on his hands, Creamer authored a book, "How Progressives Can Win," which, along with Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals," serves as the template for Obama's campaign to "fundamentally transform" America.
Obama didn't use the word "transform" in his SOTU, but he did insist that government must "lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth," under the pretense of "reform," in order to "give our people the government they deserve."
"I campaigned on the promise of change, change we can believe in. I know there are many Americans who aren't sure if they still believe that I can deliver it. I never suggested that change would be easy ... and when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy."
And well, it should.
Though Obama's efforts to nationalize the nation's health care sector have been temporarily stalled, he has no intention of giving up, announcing that he is redoubling his efforts to expand central government controls over the private sector under cover of "economic crisis." As White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."
Leading up to his SOTU, Obama endeavored to portray himself as a fiscal conservative: "We can't continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if waste doesn't matter, as if the hard earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like monopoly money, that's what we've seen time and time again, Washington has become more concerned about the next election than the next generation."
This is subterfuge.
Obama endeavors to portray himself as a constitutional conservative: "We will lead in the observance of ... the rule of law. ... Don't mock the Constitution. Don't make fun of it. Don't suggest that it's not American to abide by what the Founding Fathers set up. It's worked pretty well for over 200 years."
This is deception.
Obama endeavors to portray himself as a resolute commander in chief. Regarding Operation Iraqi Freedom he decreed, "Let me say this as plainly as I can: By August 31st, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end." On Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, he declared, "After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home." On the treatment of captive terrorists, he says, "I will restore America's moral standing." On the Long War with Jihadistan, Obama claims, "The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam."
This is farce.
Obama is a dangerous neophyte in matters of national security, and he shows no signs of improving.
If Republicans really want to defeat Obama's Leftist agenda, they need to adopt the tried and true conservative message founded on Essential Liberty. Only then can they truly take control of the debate.
And while Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell's response to Obama's SOTU address was encouraging, the current crop of Republican leaders continues to play by Democrat rules, attempting to sell a dangerous and debilitating elixir: "We don't offend the Constitution as bad as they do."
Bottom line: Republicans must refocus on First Principles and govern accordingly.
Republicans can best distinguish themselves from Democrats by, first and foremost, honoring their sacred oath to "support and defend" our Constitution.
To that end, Obama declared, "If you abide by the law, you should be protected by it."
True, but on the other hand, if you are not going to abide by the law, you should be impeached.
P.S. If you are going to seat two police officers next to your wife in the gallery, the two who brought down the Ft. Hood jihadi terrorist, you might at least acknowledge them, or invite them to the White House for a beer.
117 Comments
William McCrindle
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM
With this speach, Obama has shown true distain for the message of Massachusets, and his ignorance or complete disregard of the will of the people towards his Marxist agenda. He stays true to his unpopular agenda of Health care, Cap and Tax, and spend spend spend. He holds the Constitution in contempt. Time to impeach this anti American Marxist!
Jack
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:39 AM
I agree with your article. I would add one thing. HE referred to a Five year plan. Isn't that what the former USSR did time and time again until they fell apart? Socialism for socialism sake does not work, and the Russians proved that Communism does not work either. For all who wanted "Hope and Change" hows it working for you now.
Jimmy D
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:45 AM
Thank you for suffering through that for us Mark. I for one can no longer stomach listening to Mr Obama in doses lasting more than a minute, but am gratified, to know I can trust you, for a succinct accounting and analysis.It surprised me that I found no better talent for watching the Republican response. It took less than a minute to notice that I was listening to a Governor of 11 days experience (how Obama-like), framed by 4 racially and genderly perfectly PC faces, in a setting designed to mimic that of the SOTUS, being applauded on cue, for a speech ever so slightly less wooden and pretentious than BHO's.And these are the guys who will save us?Your call for the Republicans to distinguish themselves is spot on, but CAN they? And what if they simply cannot?
DARIO ROSSI
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:45 AM
WHAT HAPPENED TO "OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE" ?
Pat
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Who is going to impeach Obama, and for what? Not the House of Representatives in this day and age. And a conviction if impeached? Not with the Senate we have. Even substantial changes possible in November will not change those simple facts. Obama is not impeachable because nearly all the Democrats and entirely too many Republicans in Congress agree with most of what he does and wants, and any disagreements do not rise to the level of finding impeachable conduct.
Karen Farley-Wilkinson
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM
I don't want to be like France, Germany, England or Canada. Nor do the majority of the American people. Being that Obama has not gotten the message and wants to be like these other countries, he may need to re-assess where he currently lives and perhaps apply for citizenship in a country that believes his kind of change.
Gordon Fields
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Your views on "the ship of state" coincide with mine.As for the "republican party" I would offer the words of General Patton - Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!Simply stating the obvious is insufficient.
From Texas
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:52 AM
The Republicans never call the Democrats on their pack of lies. I get so tired of "political correctness" I want the truth! Obama can say whatever he wants to say, it is simply lip service to the people of this country whom he thinks are not intelligent enough to undertand what's going on in Washington. He keeps compaining that he "inherited" this recession. Well, wasn't he in the Senate at the time? Were the Democrats not in control of the House and the Senate since 2004? He inherited nothing, he was part of the problem!Barney Frank, Harry Reid and Chris Dodd and Barack Obama all got money from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Further, Congress had to bail out AIG because their pensions are held by AIG. They would have lost their retirement as many American's did when Wall Street failed. Congress lives above the laws it passes. Impeach that lying pond scum. Remove him and his hoard of czars and assistants. It is time his lying, Muslim ass got booted out of our White House.
MHW
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:53 AM
How appropriate that a President who does not salute the flag does not know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Good catch!
Rick Baum
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Thank you Patriot Post, you hit the nail on the head concerning the upholding of the Consitution! As stated; "Nowhere in our Constitution is there any authority or provision for these key proposals from Obama's SOTU..." Perhaps someone should author a book entitled "America's Constitutional Republic 101 For Dummies."
Riflemaan
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM
The operant word is "delusional." Let's pin it down and apply the proper clinical terms: To be delusional is to harbor a Messianic personality characterized by Delusions of Grandeur and Persecution. Megalomania, obsessive behavior, feelings of omnipotence, intolerance to opposition are part and parcel of the illness. That's our CiC, folks, the president who's going to bring us "hope" and "change"; who's going to "restore America's image abroad"; who's going to hold the unemployment numbers below 8%. Face the fact that he intends to punish America for its success, its wealth, its prosperity. He intends to "distribute the wealth" in the name of reparations. What ought to be terrifying to any thinking person is how quickly he's brought us to the edge of the cliff. Those who voted for him were gullible. Those who continue to support him are just plain stupid -- and you can't fix stupid.
William
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 12:00 PM
It is time for change. We need to change our two party system and vote out the entire Democrat party. They have fully shown their true nature which is pure evil. The party to replace the Democrats should be The Patriot Tea Party since they would be more likely to be able to work with Republicans to get the job done.
Linda
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Being on Social Security/Disability and waiving Medicare since I started out on $700; can you live on $700? I am almost debt free and next year I will have to go on Medicare, if it still exists. I am so angry that our President doesn't practice what he preaches. Instead he Spends money we don't have. I wonder when the Americans will wake up. I hope it's not before he spends more money on more rail systems. If you have a solution, please let me know. Linda H.
JeffT
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 12:13 PM
Thanks to Glenn Beck, I know all about Robert Creamer. Thanks for enlightening your audience to the swill that is driving policy in this country.
Lee Mattingly
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 12:20 PM
I am extremely disappointed that Mr Obama apparently thinks the American people a not smart enough to understand his policies and agenda. Well, I have big news for him. I don't believe he is smart enough to understand that the understanding by the American people of what he is trying to do are now and will continue to be his biggest problem. Can't he come to understand that he works for us and not that we work for him. Hurry up 2012!!