The Right Opinion
DOJ: Family Can't Run Their Business as Catholics
William, Paul and James Newland and their sister, Christine Ketterhagen, who together own Hercules Industries, have no right to conduct their family business in a manner that comports with their Catholic faith.
The federal government can and will compel them to either surrender their business or to engage in activities the Catholic faith teaches are intrinsically immoral.
This is exactly what President Barack Obama's Justice Department told a U.S. district court in a formal filing last week.
Never before has an administration taken such a bold step to strip Americans of the freedom of conscience -- a right for which, over the centuries, many Christian martyrs have laid down their lives, and which our Founding Fathers took great care to protect in a First Amendment that expressly guarantees the free exercise of religion.
As the Founders understood, no government has legitimate authority to take this right away, because it does not come from government. It comes from God. The very purpose of government is to protect this right. A government that seeks to strip it away from the people is by that very process stripping away its own legitimacy.
What we are seeing from the Obama administration today -- in its attack on religious liberty -- is simply evil. When government seeks to compel individuals to act against their consciences and to engage in activities that, if willfully done, would imperil their immortal souls, there is no other word for it.
The Newland family owns and operates Hercules Industries, a Colorado-based corporation that manufactures heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment. Through their hard work and dedication, and through their willingness to reinvest their own money in building their family business, they have managed to create jobs for 265 people while exerting a positive influence on the communities they serve.
The Newlands believe the morality the Catholic faith teaches them must animate their lives not only within the walls of the churches they attend, but literally everywhere else, as well -- in the way they deal with their families, their neighbors and, yes, their business.
The Newlands sued to protect their free exercise of religion in this regard because Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius issued a regulation, under the Obamacare law, that requires virtually all health care plans to cover -- without cost-sharing -- sterilizations, artificial contraception and abortifacients.
Under Obamacare, businesses that employ more than 50 people must provide their employees with insurance or pay a penalty, and the required insurance must include the mandated cost-sharing-free coverage for sterilizations, artificial contraception and abortifacients.
At Hercules Industries, the Newlands provide a generous self-insured health-care plan to their employees. It does not cover sterilization, artificial contraception or abortifacients.
"The Catholic Church teaches that abortifacient drugs, contraception and sterilization are intrinsic evils," says the Newlands' lawsuit.
"Consequently, the Newlands believe that it would be immoral and sinful for them to intentionally participate in, pay for, facilitate or otherwise support abortifacient drugs, contraception, sterilization, and related education and counseling as would be required by the Mandate, through their inclusion in health insurance coverage they offer at Hercules," says the suit.
The Catholic Bishops of the United States endorse this view. At a meeting in Atlanta last month, they unanimously adopted a resolution calling the HHS regulation an "unjust and illegal mandate" and a "violation of personal civil rights." They declared that the regulation created a class of Americans "with no conscience protection at all: individuals who, in their daily lives, strive constantly to act in accordance with their faith and moral values.
"They, too," said the bishops, "face a government mandate to aid in providing 'services' contrary to those values -- whether in their sponsoring of, and payment for, insurance as employers; their payment of insurance premiums as employees; or as insurers themselves -- without even the semblance of an exemption."
In a letter read during Sunday Mass in most dioceses around the country earlier this year, many of the nation's bishops flatly said: "We cannot -- we will not -- comply with this unjust law."
In response to the Newlands' complaint that ordering them to violate the teachings of the Catholic Church in the way they run their business is a violation of their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion, the Obama administration told the federal court that a private business has no protection under the First Amendment's free exercise clause -- especially if the business is incorporated.
"The First Amendment Complaint does not allege that the company is affiliated with a formally religious entity such as a church," said the Justice Department. "Nor does it allege that the company employs persons of a particular faith. In short, Hercules Industries is plainly a for-profit, secular employer."
"By definition," said the Justice Department, "a secular employer does not engage in any 'exercise of religion.'"
"It is well established that a corporation and its owners are wholly separate entities, and the Court should not permit the Newlands to eliminate that legal separation to impose their personal religious beliefs on the corporate entity or its employees," said the Justice Department.
This is just as if the Justice Department were to tell a family owned newspaper that it must publish editorials calling for a confiscatory estate tax, basing its coercion of the newspaper on the supposition (which lawyers for the Alliance Defending Freedom argue DOJ is by analogy making) that as a for-profit secular and incorporated employer, the paper has no First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

19 Comments
Tad Petrie in Westerville, OH
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 8:16 AM
Will someone, ANYONE, please explain to me WHY the President ahsn't been IMPEACHED?!!!
sfj in Alabama
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 10:01 AM
Because we have a bunch of "pussified" in Congress. They are afraid of their own shadow much less the MSM. This sewer rat we have for "president" needs to be in jail for treason.
sfj in Alabama
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 10:01 AM
That's "pussified members" of congress.....
Mary L in IL
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 1:28 PM
Because he is protected by a gov't as crooked and immoral and gutless as he is!
Capt. Call in New Mexico
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 2:41 PM
The current make-up of the United States Senate, would not convict Obama of any crimes; this is why conservatives need a super-majority in both houses of Congress. The super majority would then be able to both impeach the Traitor-in-Chief (in the House) and then convict him in the Senate. This is my understanding.
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades in Western KY
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 8:52 AM
What I want to say would be not printed. However, I will say that it is racist and definitely anti-Christian
mark in massachusetts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 9:35 AM
Obama is the Anti-Christ! Why haven't people figured this out? He does everything and anything,whether it's legal or not,to destroy the moral and righteous fiber of this country.He has to be stopped!
Theophile in So Californicate
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Hi Mark, There are many AntiChrists, but the US of A is looking allot more like the beast as time goes by. We really should consider what the image of "our name" is, and how many children are passed through the fire(aborted) for the promise of personal freedom, at the feet of this graven goddess Liberty, by "choice". Liberty is the name of our image(the largest graven image around), and it's what you do that marks "your hand", and what you believe that marks you're forehead. Ezekiel 9.
mark in massachusetts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 11:56 AM
Did you ever notice how many Liberals who are for abortion are against capital punishment? Truly astounding.Of course,the unborn can't vote for the 'D' on the ballot,whereas the released inmate can!
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Obama is a muslim at heart, if not an outright practitioner of that evil sect. The foul witch he appointed as secretary of HHS is as vile as any Jezabel you can conjure up. We must, for the survival of the Republic, eliminate this gaggle of traitors from our public life.
Patrick in Houston
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Compared to Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of Health and Human Sacrifices, Jezebel would be the embodiment of goodness and light.
Magdalene in Colorado, USA
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 12:38 PM
The persecution against the Catholic Church is heating up. What we see now is just the forerunner of what we can expect if the present government remains in tyrannical power. And it will not be limited to Catholics! Maybe Catholics should wear a Cross armband like the Jews had to wear with a Star of David during the holocaust?
snif in ky
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 1:52 PM
I am a non-practicing catholic. I find this requirement to be very wrong. I guess according to the government if their company was NOT incorporated it would not have to comply with this law. Maybe they need to dissolve their corporation, form a partnership and then EACH of them be liable for any problems that happens at their business. I'm sure the main reason they are incorporated is to protect their personal assets....I guess at some point THAT will be against the law also!
I don't believe they should HAVE to cover these items if their religion is against it. PERIOD.
Jim in Alabama
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 6:06 PM
They shouldn't HAVE to cover anything. Remember once upon a time when people commonly said, "Hey, it's a free country!"
Phil in Kentucky
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 4:40 PM
Demlicans and Repubocrats....... Almost all liars and in on "it" together.
Russ in Appleton Ciy, MO
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM
The author of this article has made a glaring and monumental mistake.
These people didn't build this business themselves! I know they didn't because our Dear Leader has addressed this fact recently.
They sound like they might be greedy capitalists, too! (sarcasm off)
Joe in MD
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 10:47 PM
I still want to know when this stuff became a basic right. Did I miss something?
Steve in Iowa
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 10:45 AM
I have a truly crazy idea.
Have the company drop all health coverage, pay the penalty & instead EVERY year provide their employees with a week of free trainning for their new AR-15 & Glock 19's plus 5,000 rounds of ammunition. The employee can keep the weapons or sell them to pay for health care. The employer would get a big discount for the volume purchase. Do you think the Oboma administration would like that? :-)
William in Henrico, VA
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Nice idea Steve. In the meantime, I told my employer to remove me and my family from the health program due to the contraception mandate. I wish everyone would do this.