The Right Opinion
Which Party Is Extreme on Abortion?
When it comes to abortion, which political party's views are more extreme?
Unless you've spent the past week as a stowaway on NASA's new Mars rover, the approved media answer is obvious: Republicans are the abortion fanatics. Between the furor over Todd Akin's "legitimate rape" gaffe and the GOP platform language calling for a constitutional amendment to undo Roe v. Wade, the Republicans have revealed themselves to be -- so The New York Times editorialized on Wednesday -- "on the most extreme fringes of American opinion."
The platform's silence on any exemptions for rape or incest, which critics swiftly dubbed the "Akin plank," particularly stoked the flames. The GOP, declared Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, believes in "making rape victims bear their rapist's baby." The Boston Globe splashed a six-column headline across the top of Page 1: "GOP plank opposes all abortions." The views held by Republican leaders, Michael Tomaskey wrote at the Daily Beast, "are not anywhere close to being on the normal political scale."
Even some Republicans piled on. The party's former chairman, Michael Steele, told an interviewer that omitting rape and incest exceptions from an abortion ban would be "way outside [the] mainstream of American thought."
Which is true. Pollsters have been asking Americans for decades whether and under what circumstances they think abortion should be restricted. Only about 1 in 5 respondents ever say that abortion should always be illegal. When asked directly whether abortion should be permitted if a pregnancy results from rape or incest, huge majorities – usually around 75 percent – say yes.
Moreover, only a minority of Americans favors amending the Constitution to end legalized abortion or overturn Roe v. Wade. In poll after poll, about 6 in 10 Americans express support for Roe. A GOP platform that endorses a human life amendment conferring on the unborn "a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed" – essentially a call to ban abortion, period – thus embraces a position that significant majorities of the public do indeed reject.
So Republicans are the extremists on abortion? Not so fast.
If you're like most Americans, you believe that abortion is morally wrong. You oppose abortion on demand. You think abortion should be legal only in certain circumstances. Even then you favor restrictions on its use, including 24-hour waiting periods, parental consent in the case of a minor, and requiring a married woman to notify her husband before she gets an abortion. You want late-term abortions to be prohibited, and you reject using public funds to pay for any abortions. (These are all majority opinions, reflected in numerous polls. A broad compilation of decades of polling data, "Attitudes About Abortion," is updated regularly by Karlyn Bowman of the American Enterprise Institute.)
Does the Democratic Party uphold these mainstream positions? On the contrary: It rejects every one of them.
Though one-third of Democrats identify themselves as pro-life, the Democratic Party platform is strident in its defense of abortion on demand. The party "strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade," the platform avows, and abortion must be made available "regardless of ability to pay" -- that is, at public expense. The 2012 platform, in language recycled from 2008, vows to "oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine" the availability of abortion. While solid majorities of Democrats back some limitations on abortion -- 59 percent would ban partial-birth abortions, for example, and 60 percent endorse a mandatory waiting period -- the official position of their party is that even common-sense restrictions are unthinkable.
In 2000, the Democratic platform said the party's goal was "to make abortion less necessary and more rare." The 2004 platform declared, "Abortion should be safe, legal, and rare." But even calling for abortion to be "rare" is now too much for the Democrats' platform committee, which deleted the word in 2008. Perhaps it's no coincidence that Nancy Keenan, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, is a committee member. Or that the president of Planned Parenthood, the nation's leading abortion provider, will address the Democratic convention in North Carolina next week. That convention will renominate President Obama, who is so hardline in defense of "choice" that he even opposed a ban on sex-selection abortions.
You'd never know it from the media's coverage, but when it comes to abortion there are two political parties with out-of -the-mainstream views. Most Americans are ambivalent on the subject, both pro-life and pro-choice, against most abortions but against undoing Roe. Neither the Republican nor the Democratic platform reflects the average American's opinion in the abortion debate. Neither did the headlines and heavy breathing last week.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe. His website is www.JeffJacoby.com).

25 Comments
Gregory in Yakima Wa.
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Jeff Jacoby writes about Republican extremism on abortion policy and gets it right. He gets it wrong on Democratic excess however. Solid majorities back Democratic measures to protect choice.
Republican extremism has replaced the pragmatism of the past. Today the most active Republicans reject science regarding evolution and climate change.
On social issues the GOP is being left behind. Homosexual rights have been embraced by a majority of main stream voters. What was once a winning issue for conservatives is no longer. The GOP has become an extremist, fringe party that has abandoned it's intellectual base.
India in GA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM
"pragmatism"
Translation: "capitulation to Democrats on any and every issue"
J Henry in USSA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Taxpayer funded abortion on demand up to and including birth is something you think of as mainstream?
I am in favor of homos be allowed to have civil unions with robust rights under that, but not having it officially called marriage. All homo rights have NOT been embraced by a majority of mainstream voters. Overwhelmingly, mainstream voters have voted to keep marriage between a man and a woman. Get your facts straight.
On social issues, the GOP is NOT being left behind. It is being assaulted by propaganda and misinformation through the corrupt and criminal misnamed "mainstream" media. Despite a decades old indoctrination program from cradle to grave, thinking Americans still reject liberal doctrine.
Liberals are fools or liars or parasites or criminals, sometimes all three, but what they are decidedly not is patriots.
J Henry in USSA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:26 PM
Whoops, sometimes all four, I added criminals as an afterthought and didn't update the math! You'd think I was lerned in a Liberal Indoctrination Center, er, public school!
wjm in Colorado
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 2:47 PM
Thanks again sodomite for another installment of idiocy. Upon our founding, America had no elements of socialism, but the marxists have been chipping away steadily, and now we can see just another in a long line of failures from this ideology. And you queers really are a small percentage of the population, most of whom see you as the deranged pervert you truely are. I would encourage you to see the movie 2016, and see actuall facts presented as to how Obamao came to be the lying anti-American Islam loving Marxist you worship.
Gregory in Yakima Wa.
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 11:31 AM
Mac, You always sound so very frustrated, angry and irrational. Here's a challenge for you. Can you name any government at any time that did not have an element of socialism?
I'm not aware of any pure capitalist economy in history or the present. Individuals benefiting from mutual effort is what makes government useful. You seem to think government exists to foster a survival of the fittest extremism.
Perhaps you need some leisure time fishing on a lake or hiking or whatever you enjoy. This angry all the time, eternal hair on fire act isn't good for you and makes you look foolish.
Your friend Greg
India in GA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 12:39 PM
"Individuals benefiting from mutual effort is what makes government useful."
Oh, my goodness. And here I thought we were a nation of free people. Turns out we are a colony of bees.
India in GA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:23 PM
"Can you name any government at any time that did not have an element of socialism?"
That question is completely irrelevant.
Gregory, if there has NEVER been a government "at any time that did not have an element of socialism", does it prove that a government with no element of socialism would not work? No, it just means that it's never been tried before. Besides, I don't think Mac is making an argument for a "government with NO element of socialism". I think you could argue that ANY government that governs two or more people is, by definition, "social". The question is, where on the balance between socialism and freedom would we like to live?
I, personally, have no problem with some, -some-, very limited, "social" aspects of our government that I think might fall under "providing for the General Welfare". But we must be extremely cautious; every notch we allow ourselves to slide down the scale toward pure socialism in the name of some little benefit here or there, is a notch we are sliding away from individual freedom.
'There ain't no such thing as a free lunch'.
J Henry in USSA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:34 PM
Comrade Greg, you seem to think that government exists to level the playing field so that the makers are the slaves of the takers. Have "an" element of socialism is quite different than striving to be the definition of socialism.
Mac probably does need some leisure time, but I suspect he is busy working hard to to support the parasites that better than 40% of this country has become.
Overt socialism as a form of government has failed every single time it has been tried and it has caused the deaths of scores of millions of people and doomed well over a billion people to hopeless misery.
wjm in Colorado
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM
I have a challenge for you, Greg, get a clue, but I think it beyond you.....
Old Sarge in Hinesville, GA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM
Greg, So you don't think selection abortion, partial birth abortion, or late term abortion is extreme? Please tell me what you think is extreme! Why shoud my tax dollars pay for some woman's abortion? Is this just another form of income distribution? Should my tax doillars also pay for birth control for Sandra Fluke and others like her? Eagerly awaiting your wisdom on these issues!
India in GA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM
Agreed, Old Sarge.
Where do we draw the line? Aren't housing, food, clothing, transportation just as "vital" as birth control? Should we all be making Sandra Fluke's car payment, too?
Didaskalos in Minnesota
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM
The GOP and social issues? Still solidly within the mainstream . . . and in the majority. Despite the lavish expenditures in support of gay marriage and the left's bullying of those who support traditional marriage, the preservation of man-woman marriage is 32 for 32 in states whose voters have had their say at the polling booths.
Abortion? The Party of Death is again in the minority. In the latest Rasmussen poll, 47 percent consider it morally wrong; 36 percent consider it morally acceptable in most cases. A new CNN poll asked: “Do you think abortion should be legal under any circumstances, legal under only certain circumstances, or illegal in all circumstances?” Some 62 percent want abortions illegal in all cases or legal only in certain instances while 35% want abortions legal for any reason.
Breaking down the question further, CNN asked, “Do you think abortion should be legal in most circumstances or only a few circumstances?” Here, 52 percent took a pro-life view saying abortion should be illegal in all (15%) or most circumstances (37%) while 44 percent took a pro-abortion view saying abortions should be legal in all (35%) or most (9%) circumstances.
readinglady in CA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 12:56 PM
India in GA
Thank you for comparing us to a colony of bees. I am so glad I didn't have a mouthful of coffee when I read that.
India in GA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:28 PM
;)
Jim G in Oklahoma
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:02 PM
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." ~ Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, 1939
pete in CA
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM
The sweetest words my 16 yo niece ever said to me were, "Screw you, uncle! I'm not aborting my baby."
She married the father, and they have had six more kids. They've been married 23 years now, and that first baby will be graduating from Stanford University Medical school next year.
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 5:37 PM
Pete, exactly. I wonder how many brilliant scientists, doctors, engineers, and perhaps even someone who would have found a cure for cancer, or alz, and other ailments, we have eliminated with the murder of over 50,000 innocent children.
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 12:28 PM
Oops! I left out three zeros. Should have been fifty million rather than fifty thousand. My proof reader was absent. Fifty thousand is that many too many. Fifty million is unbelievable.
Bob James in Virginia
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Blunt, but effective! God bless you, pete, and your neice, and her burgeoning family. My sixteen-year-old is a father, by his sixteen-year-old girlfriend, of the most beautiful baby girl this side of Heaven. The darkest hours of my half century on this earth were those first days of uncertainty when I did know with any certitude that this gift from God would be permitted to live. I feared for my son's physical safety - and for my own soul - if they had made the selfish "choice."
Gregory in Yakima Wa.
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 5:31 PM
India in GA...your reply is the most lucid so I'll respond to all by responding to you. Communism doesn't work in Russia and probably wouldn't work anywhere else. But communism was never tried in Russia.
The totalitarian government with Stalin in control spouted Marxist doctrine while they perpetuated the Czarist means to maintain power. You may enjoy and benefit from a book titled "Shadow of the Winter Palace" By Edward Crankshaw. The book details 100 years prior to the bolshevik revolution.
It's interesting that so many commentors on the Parrot Post eagerly leap to the wrong conclusion of my remarks. We live in a country with a hybrid social/capitalist system. You may feel it's too social, with too many taking unfair advantage of social services but I see little in the way of proof.
I know there are food stamp fraud investigators so there must be some fraud, but that doesn't mean the programs do mare harm than good. There are excesses of capitalism too.
The Wall Street fiasco and so many other Bernie Madoff, Jack Abramoff type scandals expose crime in business and government but that doesn't mean we'd be better off without the banks and lobbyists.
We have to assure that the systems we depend on have a legitimate purpose and are reasonably free from corruption.
wjm in Colorado
Monday, August 27, 2012 at 5:39 PM
You are a complete deluded fool. What chairman Obamao is doing you communist tool, is transforming America into a totalitarian state, where the government controlls all means of production (He even said as much in claiming to want to go beyond government motors into other business), which is what Stalin tried and failed, the Chinese tried and failed, and look at the garden spot of North Korea, there is a success story for you, and Obamao envisions North Korea for America! It is in his book, his mentors believed it, and everyone who he associated with from his boyhood to the Presidency is in lockstep with this marxist ideology. What bearing does 100 years before Stalin have to do with his reign of terror. What does matter is several hundred years of American History that bears witness to the encroachment of your dream state into todays failure. I applaud your postings and the exposure of your marxist statist delusion. You are a traitor to your country and you don't even know it. Vladimir Lenin had you pegged quite adequately, you are a useful idiot to the treason of Obamao and the Democrats.
tod-the tool guy in brooklyn N.Y.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM
What political system, overall, has generated the most: upward mobility, innovations, inventions, wealth/prosperity, profits, patents, trade with other nations, liberty/freedom, opportunity, trust, religious freedom, honor, integrity, virtue, value for "buck", generosity, benevolence, and HOPE? Mr. Steve Forbes, son of Malcolm Forbes, "splains it best in "Free Markets-Free People 2006 book of CAPITALISM. Ah, schucks, folks---"I spilled the beans, again!"
tod-the tool guy in brooklyn N.Y.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 6:32 AM
Some people are busy as bees(conservatives), while others are just plain old "sons of bees"(Progressives).
tod-the tool guy in brooklyn N.Y.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 6:36 AM
J.J.---Forgive me, for getting carried away and off topic. Great BLOG, on Mr. Alexander's Patriot Post, in the Land of the Free/ Home of the Brave!