Options
The Principle of Yin Yang
· Monday, November 28, 2011
"The concept of yin yang which is often referred to in the West as 'yin and yang,' is used to describe how polar opposites or seemingly contrary forces are interconnected and interdependent in the natural world, and how they give rise to each other in turn. The two are not opposing forces (dualities), but complementary opposites that interact within a greater whole, as part of a dynamic system. Everything has both yin and yang aspects as light cannot exist without darkness and vice-versa, but either of these aspects may manifest more strongly in particular objects, and may ebb or flow over time." – Wikipedia
Let us now look at the liberal and conservative ideologies from the yin yang perspective:
Consider the idea of "ebb and flow over time." Ask a conservative if there is ever a time for liberal policies and she will say, "no, never." Ask a liberal the same about their opposite and you will get the same answer. But, this cannot be true. There are times and circumstances for the application of each. Over time, the ebb and flow of the yin and the yang creates a teeter totter affect. Only occasionally do things achieve a state of neutral balance.
The idea of checks and balances built into our form of government mirror the idea of yin yang. Our founders had the good sense to defend the people from absolute power and corruption. Trust me, if the Republicans had total control for too long, they would eventually abuse the power. The Democrats would do likewise. Power corrupts, etc. Some favor elimination of political parties, but I feel the system is not broken.
Let us now witness a dialog between Mr. Yin and Mr. Yang in the year 2011:
YIN>> America is a great and wealthy nation. Americans are fortunate for their circumstance and should be willing to share their great wealth with the less fortunate.
YANG>> Presently, America is nearly bankrupt and we are $14.8 trillion dollars in debt. When liberals speak of more spending to help the less fortunate I must ask how are we going to pay for it?
YIN>> It would only be fair if some of the wealth of the richest people in America could be redistributed.
YANG>> Redistribution by any means other than voluntary would clearly be theft.
YIN>> I am only asking that rich people give their fair share.
YANG>> When government is given the task it must create more and larger bureaucracies to perform the redistribution. That causes a higher cost in tax dollars. Fair and equitable is not the issue. Americans are generous and want to help the needy, but free men desire to give voluntarily to help those they choose, because that is the way of free men.
YIN>> Well, it sounds like you are speaking of middle income, or middle-America types. I am speaking of rich Americans, mostly Republicans. They need to give more, because they can afford it.
YANG>> Well, there you go again. Please understand that I am speaking about all Americans and I certainly hope I am speaking for the majority. The federal government was not constituted by "we the people" for the purpose of being a bureaucratic agent of charity or welfare.
YIN>> Regardless of what you say, the result would be the same. If the process is left to private citizens nothing will be done, the needy will remain needy and the hungry will not be fed.
YANG>> I respectfully disagree. In a low tax, high economic growth environment all Americans have more disposable income and there is nothing that brings them more satisfaction, more inner peace, than helping their fellow man. I worked for a non-profit, charitable services organization for many years. I observed individuals and corporations giving generously to help those less fortunate. A part of my patriotic pride of being an American is based on the good heart of the American people.
YIN>> If what you say is true, why did the government have to step in? Why were welfare programs ever necessary?
YANG>> The Federal Government did not need to step in. Let me be clear: I am not speaking of Medicare or Social Security. But, there are a multitude of government run programs that have no purpose other than the perpetuation of their own existence. These cost billions of tax dollars annually. Many of these programs were created by politicians of both parties for the purpose of expressing their progressive attitudes in the hopes of garnering reelection votes. Before all this became commonplace, very few Americans starved to death or lacked for shelter, or basic needs. That level of public assistance was performed by churches, families, and private charitable organizations. But, these arguments are moot. What really matters at this present time is that the American people whose taxes fund the United States government can no longer afford to allow the runaway federal spending and exploding debt. A continuation of past policies will soon complete the destruction of our economy and the devaluation of our currency. Then there will be chaos in the streets and starvation will be the national health concern.
YIN>> Okay, Mr. Smart Guy, there are no easy solutions. How then shall we fix the problem? Shall we raise taxes on everyone, or print more money on the government printing presses? This is America and I agree we are generous people, so there must be a solution that does not ignore our needy citizens, but one that does help resolve the economic and fiscal problems of our country.
YANG>> I agree there are no easy solutions. But, there are solutions. They will not be painless and some will take time. Taking care of the needy is valid concern. My thinking is that we must solve bigger problems first to establish the means to help our neighbors. Gross waste in our bloated bureaucracy, corruption in high places, and billions of tax dollars wasted on useless foreign aid should be the first priorities. A reform of the tax code could also increase net tax income to the government while not increasing tax rates and such a reform could certainly play a major role in revitalizing our economy. Economic growth has a way of curing many ills.
YIN>> I concede that your ideas have merit. But, I remain concerned on behalf of some of our citizens.
YANG>> I share your concern for all of our citizens. But, I fully believe that economic growth, less wasted federal spending, and a revised tax code could be the foundation for a positive upward spiral that would elevate the spirits and the well-being of all our citizens. However, I remain concerned whether we the people will unite in the cause to take back our nation from self-serving politicians and special interest groups. And lest we forget, a corrupt people will always be led by corrupt politicians whom they have elected for all the wrong reasons. That identifies America's greatest need. It is for a great awakening, a spiritual revival like we have never experienced before.
YIN>> A moral America would be a better America. We can agree on that. I am also a Believer. It is not difficult to see that America, all of America, would benefit beyond hope if we would repent and turn back to God. Let us unite under His direction to once again become great.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Syndicated Radio Host Dr. Laura Schlessinger: "The Patriot is the most informative and witty publication on the Internet. I read every issue!" It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- William Murchison: Do You Care? I Don't
- Dennis Prager: Rational People Fear Big Government, Not Big Business
- David Limbaugh: Obama's Morbid Vanity
- Mona Charen: Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?
- Cal Thomas: The Citizen and the Government
- Thomas Sowell: Big Lies in Politics
- Arnold Ahlert: Illegal Aliens Get Billions in Tax Refunds
- Jeff Jacoby: Two Is Enough
- Rich Galen: The Real Issue Is Pakistan
- Michael Barone: Obama Pursues Higher Tax Rates, Growth Be Damned
- Burt Prelutsky: Random Thoughts About Romney and Race
- Edwin J. Feulner: A Budget Plan That Adds Up
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























CarlV
Most people that I talk to will tell me that Washington needs to better understand the needs of the people. They will tell me that the politicians need to care for those needs, and work to resolve those needs. They will, in most cases, carry on with their ideas as to how this should be done. However, ask them to get involved; ask them to be an active part in a group to bring these needs to the politicians; ask them to be a part of a solution group; and you’ll quickly hear a barrage of ‘reasons’ why they haven’t the time.
While I agree with the concept discussed by Mr. Yin and Mr. Yang, and even more strongly agree with the need for real (underscore real) morality in Washington, how can real morality be obtained if We The People will not send the message that we are tired of ‘business as usual’ in our nation’s capitol.
You see, Mr. Yin and Mr. Yang talk as if THEY are the only ones involved in fixing the problems. What they are missing is the guidance of We The People. The ones that sent them there in the first place. The only way we will ever realize our need of real morality in Washington is for the voters of this country (We The People, that is) to get off their soft, fat, recliner chairs each election day, and send our message to Washington, making it clear exactly what we expect. That message is sent at the ballot box, for those that have forgotten.
Mr. Yin and Mr. Yang have been missing that piece of the puzzle for some time now, because Mr. & Mrs. Voter have had what they think are ‘more important’ things to do. Believe me, in this country, there in nothing more important to do then to make them understand our expectations.
How else do you tell the Liberals, just for instance, that we flatly do not approve of their endless borrowing, and spending, that is ruining our countries financial system? How else do you let the Conservatives know that there must be a certain amount of compromise in order to improve our lot in life. That we expect them, both of them, to work together to get the job done?
Sadly, if they have no ‘guidance’ from us most will slip back to the ‘less desirable’ traits that seem to be built in to most politicians. (Can I be any nicer then that?)
In short, while we may choose to blame the politicians for our problems, if We The People are not part of the equation the balance of the equation is lost. If the balance is lost for too long, the country is lost. Want proof? Look at Europe. Look at the middle-east.
If you would rather not join that club, then We The People MUST get the message across soon. Find a way. A way that is part of the system hopefully. The best way of all will arrive on Nov. 6, 2012.
Posted November 28, 2011 at 8:55:04 PM
Norm
Theonomy is our answer!
Until "We the People" repent of our personal AND national sins, "We the People" will be in perpetual national judgement... with "Big Government" (imposing & enforcing a multitude of man's laws) a constant yoke upon us. See also 1 Samuel, chapter 8.
Theonomy is our answer!
When "We the People" invoke 2 Chronicles 7:14: "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."
We must all eventually proclaim & commit to the words spoken by an ancient people:
"And the people said unto Joshua, The LORD our God will we serve, and his voice will we obey." Joshua 24:24
And it starts with you & I...
Along with your Bible, a good place to start one's studies is...
http://www.missiontoisrael.org/blvc-tract.php
Posted November 29, 2011 at 8:42:44 AM
David G. Brewer
There is no doubt that an active and involved electorate is essential for the enduring success of our nation. But, what is even more important than action is wise action.
In our recent history, clearly, many people have acted and are acting – the development of the Tea- Party Movement, with new people elected to congress and bold action to reshape America. More involvement and action by an informed citizenry is certainly a good thing.
Yet, wise action requires a depth of thought that may go beyond the normal human range. I am not an historian. But, maybe I have an example. My understanding is that during the Great Depression action was taken, fairly quickly, to help solve the problem. Americans were losing jobs and people overseas where taking some of those jobs and selling their products here. So action was taken. Tariffs were quickly established to stop this. In response, other nations did the same thing. They established tariffs to save the jobs of THEIR citizens. The result, of course, was a big drop in international trade, which greatly harmed everyone, making the Great Depression worse!
It is often lamented that we don’t have statesmen, in political office, in this country. It is said that we have only partisan politicians. But, in order to have statesmen in political office, we will need citizens who recognize and support statesmanlike policies and ideas.
The discussion between Mr. Yin and Mr. Yang is the beginning of that kind of wisdom. This is not an easy process, because it goes deep – even deeper than the “Moral” and all the way to the “Spiritual”. I am in process of reading an excellent book called, Lincoln’s Melancholy. This reveals something of the painful struggle, on these kinds of deeper ideals, faced by a man who many call our greatest president.
During his time, men took courageous action. In the southern states, they formed armies and succeeded. In the northern states, they acted with equal courage and boldness, forming bigger armies and eventually crushing the armies of the southern states. So, there was plenty of sincere action, but perhaps there could have been more wisdom.
Years before, Lincoln had taken months to prepare a speech at Coopers Union, New York – in which he dug deeply and broke down the reasoning of his opponents. This looked to me to be a very partisan speech. And yet, he got to the truth in it, where others failed to do so.
There is room for strong views and partisan action – that’s how a two party system works. But within that context, there needs to be a deeper wisdom and charity for all. Perhaps that is the pathway to true greatness for our nation.
Posted November 29, 2011 at 9:47:09 AM
George Rogers Clark
Thanks, CarlV, for your insights. Actually, I did not intend for Yin and Yang to be perceived as two arguing politicians, but rather just two citizens... count them among "we the people". However, I clearly needed to make the distinction and did not.
Happily, my error inspired CarlV to add value. His points truly express the frustration of most Americans, whereas I merely touched on that element.
Posted November 29, 2011 at 10:00:01 AM
George Rogers Clark
Amen, Norm. Amen, David Brewer. "Lord send a revival, and let it begin in me."
We cannot reconstitute our nation any time soon. We cannot presently legislate religion or morality (even if it were wise, and I am not sure it is). It seems to me that the Lord gave us free will and expects us to use it wisely. He also appointed Israel and Christians to be evangelicals. We need to get busy.
Our nation can be great again. In my opinion, we the people must embrace and preserve our founding principles and among those are the religious principles of the first settlers to this great nation for it is truly a promised land.
Posted November 29, 2011 at 11:25:53 AM
Ted R. Weiland
Well said and thanks for the plug, Norm!
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to Yahweh's moral law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments). Take our Constitution Survey (http://www.missiontoisrael.org/constitutionsurvey/constitutionsurvey.php) and receive a free copy of the "Primer" (an 85 page book, normally $7 plus shipping) of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
Posted November 29, 2011 at 1:39:57 PM