Brief

Monday, October 5, 2009

THE FOUNDATION

"In reality there is perhaps no one of our natural Passions so hard to subdue as Pride. Disguise it, struggle with it, beat it down, stifle it, mortify it as much as one pleases, it is still alive, and will now and then peek out and show itself...." --Benjamin Franklin

The Chosen One failed to deliver the Olympics to Chicago

POLITICAL FUTURES

"On Friday the International Olympic Committee (IOC) voted to award the 2016 Summer Games to Rio de Janeiro. As you now know, not only was Chicago not chosen to host the 2016 games, but it was the first city knocked out in voting for the four cities still in the running. In addition to the U.S. and Rio the other two were Tokyo (which came in 3rd) and Madrid (2nd). ... [T]he Olympic story completely buried the news that unemployment ticked up to 9.8 percent and is likely on its way to the magic 10 percent mark. ... [T]his was not an embarrassment for Chicago -- only one city was going to get the 2016 Olympics. It was not an embarrassment for the United States -- Brazil is still a pretty good ally. ... It is a personal embarrassment for Barack Obama because he truly believed, or was told, or both, that if he showed up personally to make the final pitch, the IOC would not be able to deny Chicago the Games. Because he is B-A-R-A-C-K O-B-A-M-A the President of All the World! ... The Myth of Obama met the Reality of Obama. Obama lost." --political analyst Rich Galen

LIBERTY

"In his address to Congress, President Obama made clear that he and his allies know how to spend your health-care money better than you do. It's a matter, you see, of 'shared responsibility': You share your dollars with the feds, and the feds are responsible for making your decisions. ... On 'shared responsibility,' the president brooks no dissent. 'Unless everybody does their part, many of the insurance reforms we seek -- especially requiring insurance companies to cover preexisting conditions -- just can't be achieved,' he said. 'That's why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance.' This requirement is known as the 'individual mandate.' The president's proposal is historic -- though not in a good way. Never before has Congress forced Americans to buy a private good or service. In fact, for those with a traditional understanding of the Constitution as a charter of liberty (as opposed to the 'living' version), the list of Congress's powers in Article I, Section 8, grants it no authority to require any such thing. ... Requiring everyone to buy government-specified health insurance, whether they need it or not, is an unacceptable violation of personal liberty. It is a way of taxing healthy people without calling it a tax. Since that is an irresistible temptation to politicians, the list of required benefits would be certain to keep expanding. The choice between freedom and responsibility, as the president and his congressional allies portray it, is a false choice. We can and should have both." --The Heritage Foundation's Robert Moffitt

THE GIPPER

"The Founding Fathers established a system which meant a radical break from that which preceded it. A written constitution would provide a permanent form of government, limited in scope, but effective in providing both liberty and order. Government was not to be a matter of self-appointed rulers, governing by whim or harsh ideology. It was not to be government by the strongest or for the few. Our principles were revolutionary. We began as a small, weak republic. But we survived. Our example inspired others, imperfectly at times, but it inspired them nevertheless. This constitutional republic, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal, prospered and grew strong. To this day, America is still the abiding alternative to tyranny. That is our purpose in the world -- nothing more and nothing less." --Ronald Reagan

INSIGHT

"Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome who have so enthusiastically acclaimed and adored him and rejoiced in their loss of freedom and danced in his path and gave him triumphal processions. ... Blame the people who hail him when he speaks in the Forum of the 'new, wonderful good society' which shall now be Rome's, interpreted to mean 'more money, more ease, more security, more living fatly at the expense of the industrious.'" --Roman statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.)

GOVERNMENT

"As Harvard economist Greg Mankiw writes, 'In light of the shifting baseline, it is impossible to hold the administration accountable for whether its policies are achieving their intended effects. The administration, however, has not been particularly forthright in admitting to this lack of accountability. Indeed, the act of releasing quarterly reports on how many jobs have been 'created or saved' gives the illusion of accountability without the reality'. This lack of accountability -- this claim of success no matter what happens -- should surprise no one. Many of us warned about it months ago. Remember, Obama didn't promise to create 3.5 million jobs. He promised to create or save that many. There is no way to test that. If you still have your job, does that mean Obama saved it? If an entrepreneur created a new job, in spite of Obama's destructive anti-business regulatory apparatus, does Obama still deserve the credit?" --columnist John Stossel

FOR THE RECORD

"[T]hough barely reported, Obama made this statement in his U.N. speech: 'We have fully embraced the Millennium Development Goals.' I'm not sure where he got the authority to make that unilateral declaration, but he nonetheless made it. I guess now that he's president, he can sometimes just issue fiats instead of having to deal with the cumbersome legislative process.... So why do you suppose the evil Bush administration opposed the innocuous-sounding 'Millennium Development Goals'? Well, how about its multi-pronged assault on America's national sovereignty? It commits participating nations to be bound by the International Criminal Court treaty; support regional disarmament measures for small arms and light weapons; and press for the full implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which Wikipedia describes as 'an international legally binding treaty' that includes among its goals a 'fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources,' the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, described as 'an international bill of rights for women,' and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which purports to be a 'legally binding international instrument' that gives children the right to express their own opinions 'freely in all matters affecting the child' and requires those opinions be given 'due weight.' The Millennium Declaration also affirms the U.N. as 'the indispensable common house of the entire human family, through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development.' Indeed, under President Obama, 'We Are the World.'" --columnist David Limbaugh

CULTURE

"Just to recap, [Roman] Polanski drugged a child put in his care for the purposes of a photo shoot. He tried to bully her into sex. She said no. He raped her anyway. He pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse but fled the country before sentencing, allegedly for fear the judge wouldn't keep his end of the plea bargain. He spent the subsequent three decades living the life of a revered celebrity in Europe. He never returned to America because there was a warrant for his arrest. In a bit of ironic justice, he was apprehended en route to Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award. That ceremony will apparently go on without him. ... It all boils down to the fact that Polanski is famous and talented and an Olympian artist, living above the world of mortals. Indeed, if he didn't rape that girl -- and he did -- Polanski would still be considered a pig in most normal communities. This is the man who, after all, started dating Nastassja Kinski when she was only 15 and he was in his 40s. His taste for teenage girls is an established fact. His defenders don't care. They are above and beyond bourgeois notions of morality, even legality. And that's the main reason I am grateful for this controversy. It is a dye marker, 'lighting up' a whole archipelago of morally wretched people. With their time, their money and their craft, these very people routinely lecture America about what is right and wrong. It's good to know that at the most fundamental level, they have no idea what they're talking about." --columnist Jonah Goldberg

FAITH AND FAMILY

"In the midst of grappling with a scattering of thorny issues, President Barack Obama took time to lend a fatherly hand this week. Your little Jake, it seems, doesn't spend enough time under the gaze of the state. As it turns out, Jake is at a tragic disadvantage when competing against Yuri from Kazakhstan. If you believe this tale, the administration has an answer for you: Kill summer vacation, and add a few hours to the school day. 'Young people in other countries are going to school 25, 30 percent longer than our students here,' Secretary of Education Arne Duncan claimed. 'I want to just level the playing field.' He, generously, wants to level the playing field for your children. Hey, admittedly, I'm not a product of the dazzling Hungarian school system, yet I can't help but wonder: With the pitiful performance of so many of our school systems -- Duncan left Chicago's schools with a more than 40 percent dropout rate -- doesn't it seem counterintuitive to extend this interaction? Where, after all, is the evidence that longer days translate into smarter kids? We will hear all about Sweden, Belgium and Denmark's longer days and high test scores, but as The Associated Press points out, kids in the U.S. spend more 'hours in school (1,146 instructional hours per year) than do kids in the Asian countries that persistently outscore the U.S. on math and science tests -- Singapore (903), Taiwan (1,050), Japan (1,005) and Hong Kong (1,013).' In the U.S., we also piddle away more funding per student on education than nearly any other nation in the world. Employing Duncan's decidedly non-Singaporean calculus, this would necessitate a cut in education spending to achieve higher results and 'even the playing field.'" --columnist David Harsanyi

RE: THE LEFT

"Imagine how much worse our public schools would look -- assuming that were possible -- if we allowed other countries to exclude one-half of their worst performers! That's exactly what liberals are doing when they tout America's rotten infant mortality rate compared to other countries. They look for any category that makes our medical care look worse than the rest of the world -- and then neglect to tell us that the rest of the world counts our premature and low birth-weight babies as 'miscarriages.' As long as American liberals are going to keep announcing that they're embarrassed for their country, how about being embarrassed by our public schools or by our ridiculous trial lawyer culture that other countries find laughable?" --columnist Ann Coulter

ESSENTIAL LIBERTY PROJECT

The Patriot's Essential Liberty pocket reference guides are a great primer on liberty as "endowed by our Creator" and codified by our Founders in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, including a comprehensive introduction on the history of American Liberty by Mark Alexander.

Please consider providing these Essential Liberty Constitution booklets to your student's entire class, grade or school. The booklets are available in bulk from PatriotShop.US.

Or, if you would rather sponsor -- online or by mail -- the distribution of Essential Liberty booklets to student groups, organizations, clubs, military units, etc., you can do so at our Essential Liberty Project sponsorship page.

READER COMMENTS

"In Alexander's essay, 'Not yours to give', he wrote, 'Today, there are but a handful of Senate and House incumbents who dare support and defend the Constitution as Crockett did. But there are candidates emerging around the nation who, with our support, will deliver orations as brazen and eloquent, and stand firm behind those words.' Please, Sir, tell us who they are and we'll vote for them!" --Westby, Wisconsin
Editor's Reply: See the Republican Study Committee's members list and the American Conservative Union's Congressional Ratings.

"The provenance of the Ellis account of Crockett's statements is questionable. Did Crockett say what Ellis attributed to him in 'Not yours to give'?" --Los Angeles, California
Editor's Reply: Ellis undoubtedly researched his account of Crockett's years in Congress, and his character in general, but as Alexander noted, "While the exact text of [Crockett's] speech was not transcribed (not the practice in those years), the spirit of his words in regard to those proceedings was captured in an 1867 Harper's Magazine article entitled 'Not yours to give' by Edward Ellis. There is, in fact, a congressional record of Crocket opposing a welfare bill similar to that referenced by Ellis. It is not known how much of Ellis's account is fact mixed with the annals of Crockett legend, but it is known that the account is consistent with Crockett's character, and his support for our Constitution."

"Alexander wrote a fine article about David Crockett and his friend Sam Houston. Houston did serve as Governor of Texas, but prior to that he held two terms as PRESIDENT of the Republic of Texas. Texas is the only state authorized to fly it's flag at the same height (to the left of course) as the National Flag, because it is the only state to have been recognized as an independent nation by the United States government (for a period of 10 years). Keep up the good work!"

"David Crockett said, he could 'eat a Mexican just put plenty of butter on his head.' Well, let me tell you, as much as I like Crockett, I disagree with him on eating a Mexican. I am a Mexican and I am full of real hot pepper. I eat hot pepper with my refried beans, my tortillas and my tacos. I eat very hot salsa in my pancakes and on eggs, and I eat four or five time a day. If he tried to eat me up, he would light up on fire." --Houston, Texas
Editor's Note: We did not make this up.

THE LAST WORD

"It's hard out there for a first lady of the United States. Take it from travel-weary Michelle Obama. On Tuesday night, she boarded a luxury 757 for Copenhagen. Think of the stairs she had to climb. Oh, the agony of the feet! Upon arrival, Mrs. O, her 'chit-chat buddy,' Chicago-based talk-show queen Oprah Winfrey, and Chicago powerbroker/interest-conflicted real estate mogul/senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett immediately embarked on a grueling, grip-and-grin campaign to secure the Olympics for their hometown. Our smile muscles ache in sympathy. You will be comforted to know that the gracious FLOTUS feels your pain for her pain. 'As much of a sacrifice as people say this is for me or Oprah or the president to come for these few days,' the first lady told a group of fellow Chicago 2016 boosters, 'so many of you in this room have been working for years to bring this bid home.' Translation: Thank me, thank you, for all we do. Never has self-congratulatory gratitude been raised to such an art form, but there was no time for loyal subjects to dwell." --columnist Michelle Malkin



Comments

John

It's great to see John Stossel show up in your pages. I've enjoyed his incisive news reporting and analysis for many years. ABC's loss is, as I understand it, FoxNews' gain - bravo for them. Stossel never had the mic long enough over there. Please keep up the good work and God Bless you all.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:11:44 AM


Ted

Clearly, it's not Mr. Obama's fault we lost the Olympic bid. It was You Tube. All of the attention about the recent killings by young hoodlums with pipes and 2x4's. We'll be ready next time. Chicago's restrictions on gun ownership have clearly worked - we just now need to follow through and ban 2x4's and pipes, and all will be well.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:12:19 AM


Barb

If (and I pray it does not pass) Obamacare passes with the inclusion that all Americans must purchase healthcare, I question the legality of it. According to the Constitution it is illegal to force citizens to purchase anything. Is it possible that the entire healthcare legislation could be left in limbo due to legal challenges arising from the forced purchase of healthcare portion of the law? Surely, there will be legal actions brought by citizens questioning the constitutionality of just that portion alone.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:12:49 AM


Stanley

"The Last Word" in your post of Monday last describes in some detail the trials, tribulations and travails of the First Lady (capital letters necessitated by custom, not belief), but fails to mention how many of her 26 assistants, servants and paid hangers-on accompanied Mrs. Obama on her grueling voyage to distant shores. One can only hope they were there in sufficient numbers that there were no long term detrimental effects. After all, we wouldn't want Mrs. Obama to miss her next shopping trip to London, would we? Although, it must be pointed out, that would not be nearly the sacrifice that was the trip to Copenhagen.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:16:41 AM


Robert Baker

I agree with pretty much most of what you say. I consider myself to be a patriot and support the Patriot Post with my contributions. However, I feel that the publication should be showing a little more respect for the Office of the President. It's not that Mr. Obama himself has necessarily earned our respect, but I don't think it is appropriate to be referring to the President of the U.S. mockingly as "The Chosen One". We certainly need to keep getting the message out, because it is the right message. However, we are potentially turning off people who might otherwise listen, by these types of comments.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:17:13 AM


Charles

You should send The Patriot's Essential Liberty pocket reference guides to the US President, Senators, Representatives and Judges; apparently they haven't read them these documents.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:17:57 AM


Shirley Ann

Two of the reasons for children other than Those in the USA to do better in school are their parents! So many parents here in the United States feel their job is done when they send the child to school. When a child misbehaves and is corrected they are right there to criticize the teacher. The child brings homework home or needs help a parent is no where to be found. I can agree the system may need changing and in some parts of the country, out of necessity the schools have turned to the 45/15 day plan. There are 4 "tracks" and every child in the household is on the same track. They get 4 vacations a year but for only three weeks at a time. Keeps many out of trouble. My children were on this system and loved it. It saves building too many schools also.

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:20:00 AM


Alan

As a proud Texan, I am compelled to dispel the common myth put forth by my fellow Texan in a Letter to the Editor published in Patriot Post Vol. 09, No. 40, October 5, 2009.

In his letter he claims that the Texas flag is the only state flag permitted to be flown at equal height to the National flag because of Texas' history as an independent Republic prior to statehood.

It's an honest mistake I'm sure, but Texans are proud because we don't take credit where credit is undue. United States Code, Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 7 contains no prohibition from any state flag flying at equal height to the National flag. And Texas Government Code, Title 11, Chapter 3100 conforms to the national display standards outlined in the United States Code.

It pains me to correct my fellow Texan(s), but in today's world our integrity is paramount.

Thank you for all your good work, fellow Patriots!

Posted October 6, 2009 at 8:21:17 AM


Howard

Friday was a great day for the citizens of Chicago and the U.S. They will not be forced through taxes and fees to pay for Olympic Games which most people do not give a pound of sand about. And one question, why aren't the shooting events shown with the other olympic events?

Posted October 6, 2009 at 6:02:50 PM


Kristin

Obama did not create the deficit, the Chaney[sic]-Bush aces did. Obama did not turn a blind eye to the banks and other credit lending institutions for eight years, Bush-Chaney[sic] did. Obama did not create taxation evading blackholes/loopholes for corporations, Bush-Chaney[sic] did. All of these fore mentioned[sic] delights were handed down to our President of these United States.

You, disagree that Americans who cannot afford Health Care should be given another option? Fine, but stop lying about the details! The Obama administration does not want to touch the healthcare that any American currently has. This administration mearly[sic] wants to make some of our tax dollars to go to Assisting those who cannot afford United/Humana/Blue-Cross Blue Shield.

For all the good this President has done for the American people such as taking on Banks,Corporations, and constently[sic] trying to improve the cluster[profanity redacted] of the US economy it is disgusting how fickle and backward citizens like all of you can be.

As a wife of a United States Air Force Officer I believe I have earned the right to proudly proclaim my disgust in your lack of insight into our country and her citizens rights.

Posted October 8, 2009 at 1:11:43 PM

Editor's Reply:

Posting on our site is a privilege, not a right. Profanity is not tolerated, and proper spelling and grammar are encouraged.


Bill

Kristin

I am deeply offended by your remarks due to your insistence in illuminating yourself as the spouse of an Air Force Officer. As the proud son of a retired and highly decorated career Air Force Officer, (a veteran of three wars), and having served in the Navy myself, I cannot for the life of me, remember my mother, rest her soul, unleashing the kind of hate, language, and vitriol I detect in your post. She always exhibited grace, peace, discipline, and leadership in everything she wrote and in everything she did. She lived her life in this manner out of respect for my father, the uniform he wore, and more importantly, the country he served and she loved, right or wrong. This goes for the super majority of the wives of the AF Officers AND enlisted men my father served with, that I knew as a child and grew up with.

What a blessing for myself and my family to have the comparison with someone like yourself.

I sincerely hope you will talk to and get some counseling from a Chaplain first to solve some of your personal issues. Next, you should read the Constitution and learn what it means. Last but not least of all, get yourself a basic education in spelling, writing, and communication. And while you are at it, before you speak, arm yourself with facts. It could help your argument immensely. Wishing you all the best.

Posted October 9, 2009 at 9:02:42 AM


Guy L W Hardy

RE: "the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which purports to be a 'legally binding international instrument' that gives children the right to express their own opinions 'freely in all matters affecting the child' and requires those opinions be given 'due weight."

This terrifies me. This is the very thing that pedophiles in this country want - the requirement that a child's claim of consent (to sex with an adult) be given legal weight. This may not be the intent, but it will happen this way if this goes through, you just watch.

Posted October 10, 2009 at 11:50:45 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund