Brief

Monday, November 9, 2009

The Foundation

"History affords us many instances of the ruin of states, by the prosecution of measures ill suited to the temper and genius of their people. The ordaining of laws in favor of one part of the nation, to the prejudice and oppression of another, is certainly the most erroneous and mistaken policy. An equal dispensation of protection, rights, privileges, and advantages, is what every part is entitled to, and ought to enjoy." --Benjamin Franklin

Saturday Night Special -- "transparency" in action

Political Futures

"The push to get a health care reform bill through the U.S. House over the weekend was a classic political maneuver called 'changing the narrative.' It worked. Last week was a really, REALLY, bad news week for the Obama Administration. There was so much bad news that one story cascaded over another and, ultimately, they cancelled each other out. ... The decision to press for a Saturday vote on health care was formulated as soon as the Obama Administration realized how bad the job numbers were going to be. When the election results came in Tuesday night, that made the need to change the narrative even more important. After the Fort Hood horror, it became imperative. Among those voting for the health care bill was the new Congressman from NY-23, Bill Owens, who had said during the campaign that he was opposed to the public option. ... No matter how much the popular press pretends that the vote shows real momentum for a major overhaul of the nation's health care system, it was approved with a two-vote margin which does not sound like a choo-choo train racing across the Capitol Rotunda toward the Senate Chamber. The narrative may have changed for now, but the problems facing the Obama Administration continue to grow." --political analyst Rich Galen

We Depend on You

"We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times." --George Washington

Readers, our 2009 Annual Fund support campaign is under way. Our team of writers, editors and support staff depend on your financial support so that we may continue to offer The Patriot Post, free of charge, to countless thousands of our military, collegiate and mission field readers.

As with other mission-based, donor-supported organizations, we raise most of our budget in the last two months of each year. At latest accounting, we still must raise $302,786 before year's end.

If you have not already done so, please take a moment to support The Patriot today with a secure online donation -- however large or small. If you prefer to support The Patriot by mail, please use our printable donor form.

Every dollar you contribute provides a free subscription for someone serving our nation, or a young person who will fill a family, community and national leadership role in the next generation.

I thank you for the honor and privilege of serving you as editor and publisher of The Patriot Post. On behalf of your Patriot staff and National Advisory Committee, thank you and may God bless you and your family.

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!

Mark Alexander
Publisher, PatriotPost.US

Liberty

"Can Washington Make You Buy Health Insurance? Yes, yes, says White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. Congress has the power to make everyone buy health insurance. 'I don't believe there's a lot of case law that would demonstrate the veracity' of comments to the contrary. Thank you, Mr. Justice Gibbs. We'll see about all that when -- if -- the matter of Congress' power over private commercial judgments of this nature gets to the U.S. Supreme Court. Meanwhile the knock-down, drag-out over health insurance 'reform' shouldn't be allowed to fuzz up another immensely vital question; to wit, how in James Madison's name have we reached the point that Congress can so much as contemplate telling you, and you, and you, and all of us that we'll buy health insurance, like it or not, Buster? Why do we have to? Because the government says so, isn't that reason enough? For Mr. Justice Gibbs, and the people who employ him, it is. Just about anything Congress decides to do in the name of uplift seems to be constitutional: In other words, in accord with written stipulations as to what the national government may and may not do. Several problems arise concerning this fine theory: -- It's nonsense. It contravenes the whole constitutional concept of divided powers: particular functions reserved to particular branches of government. And other powers divided between states and the national government. -- It threatens liberty. A government that knows no limits to its power can be counted on to step more and more heavily on citizens' rights and privileges. All for the 'general good' naturally! -- It divides the citizens. On the one hand, those who want particular favors from government; on the other hand, those who deny that government has the right to dispense such favors. The Obama administration, which desperately wants health care to pass, brushes off such concerns as cranky and relevant mainly to wild-eyed Limbaugh and Palin fans, when in fact concerns about the rightful exercise of government power should inform every legislative debate. Those it doesn't inform are likely to end badly. Majority support of this or that initiative doesn't legitimize the initiative." --William Murchison, senior fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation

For the Record

"Does the U.S. Constitution stand for anything in an era of government excess? Can that founding document, which is supposed to restrain the power and reach of a centralized federal government, slow down the juggernaut of czars, health insurance overhaul and anything else this administration and Congress wish to do that is not in the Constitution? The Framers created a limited government, thus ensuring individuals would have the opportunity to become all that their talents and persistence would allow. The Left has put aside the original Constitution in favor of a 'living document' that they believe allows them to do whatever they want and demand more tax dollars with which to do it. Can they be stopped? Some constitutional scholars think the Tenth Amendment offers the best opportunity. The Tenth Amendment states: 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.' ... Constitutional Attorney John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, tells me, 'Although the states surrendered many of their powers to the new federal government, they retained a residuary and inviolable sovereignty that is reflected throughout the Constitution's text. The Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the State and federal governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people. The Court's jurisprudence makes clear that the federal government may not compel the states to enact or administer a federal regulatory program.' Lawyers are busy writing language only they can understand which seeks to circumvent the intentions of the Founders. But it will be difficult to circumvent the last four words of the Tenth Amendment, which state unambiguously where ultimate power lies: '...or to the people.' Americans who believe their government should not be a giant ATM, dispensing money and benefits to people who have not earned them, and who want their country returned to its founding principles, must now exercise that power before it is taken from them. The Tenth Amendment is one place to begin." --columnist Cal Thomas

The Gipper

"Great nations which fail to meet their responsibilities are consigned to the dust bin of history. We grew from that small, weak republic which had as its assets spirit, optimism, faith in God and an unshakeable belief that free men and women could govern themselves wisely. We became the leader of the free world, an example for all those who cherish freedom. If we are to continue to be that example -- if we are to preserve our own freedom -- we must understand those who would dominate us and deal with them with determination." --Ronald Reagan

Marine Corps Birthday

On Nov. 10, 1775, the Second Continental Congress resolved to create two battalions of Continental Marines for the War of Independence from Britain. In 1798, President John Adams signed the Act establishing the United States Marine Corps. The 13th Commandant of the Marine Corps, General John A. Lejeune, issued Marine Corps Order No. 47, Series 1921, directing that on Nov. 10 every year, in honor of the Corps' birthday, the Order's summary of the history, mission and tradition of the Corps be read to every command.

We at The Patriot offer our thanks for a job well done. For those interested in great items bearing the Marine Corps' insignia, please visit The Patriot Shop. Semper Fi!

Government

"One of the strongest talking points of those who want a government-run medical care system is that we simply cannot afford the high and rising costs of medical care under the current system. First of all, what we can afford has absolutely nothing to do with the cost of producing anything. We will either pay those costs or not get the benefits. Moreover, if we cannot afford the quantity and quality of medical care that we want now, the government has no miraculous way of enabling us to afford it in the future. If you think the government can lower medical costs by eliminating 'waste, fraud and abuse,' as some Washington politicians claim, the logical question is: Why haven't they done that already? Over the years, scandal after scandal has shown waste, fraud and abuse to be rampant in Medicare and Medicaid. Why would anyone imagine that a new government medical program will do what existing government medical programs have clearly failed to do? If we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical drugs now, how can we afford to pay for doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical drugs, in addition to a new federal bureaucracy to administer a government-run medical system?" --economist Thomas Sowell

Culture

"Those of us who are not true believers in expanded government are certain of the following: If the 1,990-page House Health Care Bill becomes law, the average American will receive worse health care, American physicians will decline in status and income, American medical innovation will dramatically slow down and pharmaceutical discoveries will decline in number and quality. And, of course, the economy of the United States will deteriorate, perhaps permanently. However, we are also certain that there is one American group that will thrive -- trial lawyers. The very existence of a 1,990-page law guarantees years of, if not more or less permanent, lawsuits. And the law actually specifies that states that do not limit attorneys' fees in cases of medical malpractice shall be financially rewarded. ... Nothing better illustrates the reorientation -- indeed, the transformation -- of values that will take place if the Democrats' health care legislation is passed. ... No rational person argues that society doesn't need law or lawyers, or that all lawyers, even trial lawyers, do no good. That is certainly not what is being argued here. But it does say something about a society when those who sue physicians and hospitals make as much or more money than those who heal disease. It says something about a society when it glorifies and rewards those who litigate while it demonizes and punishes those who produce the drugs and devices that keep its citizens alive and well. This is part of the upside-down world the left is bequeathing to us and our children in the name of health care 'reform.'" --radio talk-show host Dennis Prager

Re: The Left

"If Obama can deny that a charge is a tax even when it's collected by the IRS and identified as a 'tax' in the legislation creating it, he surely sees nothing tax-like in the money people are required to spend if they want to avoid that charge. Yet forcing people to buy insurance they do not want so their premiums can subsidize other people's health care looks a lot like a tax-funded welfare program, even if the money does not flow through the public treasury. Furthermore, when businesses buy government-required health insurance or pay a penalty for failing to do so, that money comes at the expense of employee compensation. ... 'What we are saying,' House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., explained last week, 'is everybody will contribute ... to making sure that health care options are available to all of our citizens.' So we're talking about a legally required contribution that will be used to provide a government-arranged benefit. If only there were a shorter way of expressing that concept." --columnist Jacob Sullum

Reader Comments

"The Patriot Post is an awesome conservative read that I always look forward to and I appreciate that it is dedicated to the memory of our great former president, Ronald Reagan. I am honored to support Mr. Alexander and his staff in their efforts and I consider them irreplaceable to our constitutional republic and our continuing freedom. (Your ad-free presentation is also a definite plus). I can sense a deep patriotic current running through the pages of the Post, one which would not hesitate to physically defend our republic if needed. Know that many of us among your subscribers feel a kinship with you in that respect." --Esther

"Mr. Alexander, while I'm glad you are saying what you are saying, there is no way I'll donate to you. You've come aboard too late to the liberty movement. You had your chance during the previous election cycle to prove that you are not all words. You let true conservatism down. Not as bad as Newt who supported the establishment RINO. Well so did you. McCain, Rudy, Huckbeee and even Fred Thompson were all frauds. Albeit Thompson not as bad as the rest. I'll send my donations to true patriots." --Jim

"You guys are the best. I can do without to donate $26.00 just because your mission is so important. Seriously, if I had it, I'd personally donate the entire $325,000.00, just so you could have a chance to reach that many more people. And to 'Jim': I'm curious exactly what true patriots you're going to send you're money to. Is there someone who can reach more people? Is there some other organization that's exposing the lies and corruption? Is there someone else out there who is providing patriotic quotes, columns and news, and trying to organize people? If so, who are they?" --Billy396

"The groundswell of patriotic conservatism now building in our country is like a gentle spring breeze that comes after a long hard winter. It reminds me of the early days of WW11 when we gathered around the family radio hoping for some good news, which rarely came during 1941 and 1942. When the tide finally began to turn in our favor it raised the spirits of all of us and gave us hope for the future. I have that same feeling now." --John

Opinion in Brief

"In the aftermath of last year's Obama sweep, we heard endlessly about its fundamental, revolutionary, transformational nature. How it was ushering in an FDR-like realignment for the 21st century in which new demographics -- most prominently, rising minorities and the young -- would bury the GOP far into the future. One book proclaimed 'The Death of Conservatism,' while the more modest merely predicted the terminal decline of the Republican Party into a regional party of the Deep South or a rump party of marginalized angry white men. This was all ridiculous from the beginning. 2008 was a historical anomaly. A uniquely charismatic candidate was running at a time of deep war weariness, with an intensely unpopular Republican president, against a politically incompetent opponent, amid the greatest financial collapse since the Great Depression. And still he won by only seven points. Exactly a year later comes the empirical validation of that skepticism. ... What happened? The vaunted Obama realignment vanished. ... The Obama coattails of 2008 are gone. The expansion of the electorate, the excitement of the young, came in uniquely propitious Democratic circumstances and amid unparalleled enthusiasm for electing the first African-American president. November '08 was one-shot, one-time, never to be replicated. Nor was November '09 a realignment. It was a return to the norm -- and definitive confirmation that 2008 was one of the great flukes in American political history." --columnist Charles Krauthammer

The Last Word

"These are the times that try conservatives' souls. A liberal president wants funding for defense slashed. Congress aims to increase taxes and regulate just about everything. Activist judges create new 'rights' while ignoring long-standing precedent. So why remain upbeat? Because our country still has the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. They're the touchstones of our liberty -- and the conservative trump cards in the battle of ideas. 'We don't need to remake America, or discover new and untested principles,' writes scholar Matthew Spalding in his latest book. 'The change we need is not the rejection of America's principles but a great renewal of these permanent truths about humanity, politics, and liberty -- the foundational principles and constitutional wisdom that are the true roots of our country's greatness.' In short, we need a roadmap back to where our country should be. ... Every American should know the founding principles of our country. 'The meaning and power of these ideas will be lost in the course of a lifetime if they are not taught to each generation of students,' Spalding warns. ... The principles of our Declaration and our Constitution must again become 'an expression of the American mind,' as Thomas Jefferson once said. We can -- and must -- insist that our leaders again abide by true constitutional principles. But we also must rediscover these principles as a people if we are to reclaim our future." --Edwin J. Feulner, president of The Heritage Foundation



Comments

Anton D Rehling

The constitution is the law of the land, those in power that subvert it by passing legislation contrary to the limits of the constitution can only enforce those dictates through tyrannical force of arms. We the People have no moral obligation to submit to unconstitutional law and have an obligation to challenge unconstitutional dictates. We the People have the ability and power to reverse and repeal these unconstitutional actions by those who have ingnored their oath of office and subverted the liberty and rights we all hold dear.

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!

Posted November 9, 2009 at 11:53:54 AM


Bill Little, Lt Col, USAF, ret.

I was surprised not to see something on the fall of the Berlin Wall which happened on this date. The fall of Communism was brought on by the power and might of the US military and that ugly word capitalism. Since the current leadership is apologizing to the world for everything we have done, I want to say I'm proud to have been a part of the tearing down of that wall with 32 years of service and the proud parent of an Army Captain who makes 8 generations who have answered the call. I have nothing to apologize for. Maybe Congress should think a little more about the motto of the Academy - Duty, Honor and Country.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:05:20 PM


Retsam369

I just gave my wife her "Heart Shaped" US Flag pin, purchased a short while back, for her birthday. She love it! Thought you may like to hear about it?

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:29:35 PM


Jack Moran

Thank God for the Patriot Post!

I propose a simple rallying cry for all Constitutional conservatives: "Let's ROC." The ROC acronym stands for "Rescue Our Constitution."

Let us all be reminded of our essential goal.

Jack Moran

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:31:43 PM


Mitch Turner

The GOP could have stopped the health care bill if they believed in the Constitution. That so few are making the argument about the Const. shows their true colors. They want the power to abuse the Const. when they run things, so they can't call the Dems on it when they don't. Had 100+ GOP congressmen and their staffs and the RNC consistently made the argument that if this is constitutional, then anything is, it would have failed. This is what we get for supporting GOPers who compromise on core principles--and I blame conservative leaders, including the Patriot, for leading that support of compromisers.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:32:03 PM


Henry C. Ford

Here is a thing I heard on tv Nov.6,2009 that I hought was hilarious. I certify that this s an exact quote:

"Are you getting a lot of headaches?

you might be surprised at what's bringing that on.

You're watching the Early Show on CBS."

(cut to commercial)

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:37:19 PM


Joseph Hubbard

In the Post "The Last Word" by Mr. Fuelner, he left the most treasured principle of what the country was founded on that all others he mentioned came from....a benevolent God who's grace and love allowed this once great country to be founded on His principles of law and morality. From there, we have our Constitution, our notions of justice and forgiveness (i.e. helping Japan and Germany rebuild after WWII). We need to get over ourselves, get on our knees to stand taller than what has befallen us now in the guise of leadership with two horns and a pitchfork in the likes of Obama and Pelosi. And to Mr. Turner, is it not better to whisper into the wind saying something than to say nothing at all with the wind? You brought up very good points, but what is your solution? At least Liberty is whispering in the wind and with enough whispers, the yelling will start and the wind will subside until all can hear and see. God Bless all who speak and fight to protect the USA and her Constitution!

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:51:14 PM


Geoff Baird

To Mitch:

From my understanding the Patriot doesn't necessarily support any political party but true conservative principles. Conservatism usually wins, except last election, conservative wasn't on the ballot.

As for us, we have to continue to do OUR part and keep calling our representatives and senators and pressure them to yield to the constitution. Voting is no longer enough.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:51:21 PM


DiamondProspector

Good Day,

I very much appreciate what you are doing at the Patriot Post! Thank you very much.

I was hoping that you, or someone, would publish the names of all of the congressmen who voted for the Obamacare package so we can all start working to 'De-Elect' these people. Their names should be easily visible and accessible to be sure that there is a fight to "Fire" them as they do not represent the American people.

Also, I saw a very interesting bumper sticker -

"I think, therefore I am Conservative".

One more thing. I resigned from AARP recently because they have an agenda that does not represent the majority of the retired people in this country. I would hope that most seniors would look at their ties with ACORN and SEIU and do the same. All one has to do is look at their website where they proudly display their association (http://www.aarp.org/issues/dividedwefail/).

Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:54:11 PM


Thomas mayo

God Bless You All for doing what you do.......It is a great inspiration in a world growing darker by the moment because of the corruption at the highest levels.......When the wicked rule, the people groan (Proverbs)

Posted November 9, 2009 at 1:26:12 PM


Robert G.S. Plant

Large box of Orchids for Mr. Krauthammer! Well said, Sir. The Post is daily fare for the young in our family. Your insightful, incisive conversation is required reading.

Large box of Onions for 'Jim'. Your analysis of the Patriot Post' timliness, and the qualifications of the recent White House contenders, is surprising; and quite inaccurate. Read Mr. Krauthammer's column again,for enlightenment. Robert.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 1:27:49 PM


Clindner

May God give us the strength in 2010 to remove the tyranny that exists within the halls of Congress. We, the people, are to blame for continuing to return these selfish, power hungry individuals to office time and time again (both Dem and Rep). They do not respect our Constitution, they do not respect the People. It's time we stand up and wrestle back control of our great country - encumbents MUST GO.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 1:29:10 PM


B. Lee Pemberton

Indeed, America still has the Declaration of Independence; the Constitution; the Second Amendment, and the Bill of Rights. What we do not have are members of the House and Senate who will stand up to the gutless cowards in those Houses and fight to re-instate our rights before Obama and the rest of our population! Why is this so? There are more than 200 millionaires in these two houses of Congress, and there are no term limits that will throw these bums of office after 8 years. Ted Kennedy -chief hog that he was- was on the take from the taxpayers for more than 40 years! These things are what we need to change. But what kind of hearing does a chicken get when the fox is on the bench?

Posted November 9, 2009 at 1:32:46 PM


Jim O'Brien

"Can Washington Make You Buy Health Insurance? Yes, yes, says White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. Congress has the power to make everyone buy health insurance........

A tax that applies to anyone who is uninsured is a penalty which exceeds Congress's authority under the Constitution. If this were not the case, Congress could "tax" anyone who fails to follow an order of any kind, for example, if you fail to exercise regularly, or fail to take a certain medicine, or if you are not a vegetarian. What's next, federal agents coming to my home to inspect the contents of my refrigerator?

Posted November 9, 2009 at 1:52:02 PM


Pete Kleff

As the facts concerning the massacre at Fort Hood unfold, the real tragedy from a purely military mindset is not approached by the pundits and talking heads on TV and radio. With time the motivation of MAJ Hassan will no doubt become clear. But frankly his motivation from my perspective is not nearly so important as the betrayal of his trust as a military officer.

Those who have had the unique privilege and honor of serving as officers in the U.S. Armed Forces will know whereof I speak. To be an officer imbues one with great authority, but imposes even greater responsibilities. It matters not what your specific function as an officer is, be it a combat or non-combat role, an officer is charged with caring for and protecting enlisted personnel with whom you have the privilege of serving. They are all volunteers, whom we train to place great faith in their officers. It is a trust of first magnitude.

MAJ Hassan's actions in murdering 12 military personnel and attempting to murder over 30 others was a betrayal of everything sacred to the military...respect and love for one's comrades, and most important Duty. We who have served in the military recognize too well the hideous nature of his acts, but we truly fail to understand his betrayal of that sacred trust which binds us together. It is that which offends our very being as officers. The military family has been assaulted at its very core.

Pierre A. Kleff, Jr.

Lt. Colonel, U.S. Army (Ret)

Posted November 9, 2009 at 2:06:07 PM


Cheryl Harris

"Can Washington Make You Buy Health Insurance? Yes, yes, says White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs."

So they can force me to buy health insurance, then turn around and tell me that I have to die for the greater good if I get too sick? Seems unfair, somehow, but I guess that's because I think like a conservative.

Cheryl Wood Harris

Posted November 9, 2009 at 2:19:02 PM


Orval

Some people ridicule Rush, Sean, Glen, Bill, and others, BUT have you ever listened, for more than a few seconds, to either of Keith,or Rachael, or Chris, or any number of the talking heads on the other chanels on TV and RADIO? They are still putting the blame of todays problems on former President George W. Bush! He evidently was/is the most powerful man in the World. When does accountability kick in for this administration?

Posted November 9, 2009 at 3:31:39 PM


Karl, Tucson

In all the discussion in the healthcare reform bill's provisions to criminalize the non-purchase of insurance, no one is really answering the crucial question of why is that step necessary. I believe that it comes down to the very nature of what insurance is, a method of sharing risk amongst a population of diverse risk individuals. If denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions is prohibited, who in their right minds would buy coverage until they were actually sick. Hence, the need for force, and the increased average cost.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 3:35:11 PM


Rifleman

It has become tiresome to read readers' comments which laud your publication and efforts (good though they are) instead of your publishing thoughtful insights, probing questions, historical perspectives. I'm sure that there have been a few comments that haven't been all warm and fuzzy.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 4:11:25 PM


Rusty

Occcasionally someone WILL post a comment that is not all "warm and fuzzy". If you are a regular reader, you will read all manner of opinions and comments. That is, in my never to be humble opinion, what makes The Patriot Post SPECIAL!

Posted November 9, 2009 at 4:21:37 PM


Lee Stafko

It's my opinion that the 34 who refused to sign the Health Care bill be sent a Thank You by every Patriot! The balance of the group including the 1 rino be replaced next election. as they seem to forget that they were elected to represent Us NOT THEMSELVES. Wake UP Americans.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 6:06:13 PM


Howard Last

Remember it was the republican leadership (still an oxymoron) fair haired boy, Mitt Romeny who made the subjects (oops citizens) of Taxaachussetts purchase health insurance or be fined. Tell me agin the difference between democrats and republicans?

Posted November 9, 2009 at 6:34:50 PM


Mark Woomer

The current tax situation is insane. And now, some members of Congress want to add more to the already huge burden via health care "refore", cap and whatever, etc. I figured out that for my family, we pay just about 52% of our gross income for some kind of government tax or fee at all levels. This is nuts. Some economists in our country and other countries have stated that US citizens don't save very much or enough. After taxes, shelter, food, clothing, and transportation, what exactly is left to save? We are taxed to death. We need something different, and less of it.

Posted November 9, 2009 at 7:18:33 PM


Danny Combs

Though I have not been to church in quite some time, I do believe in God and that we definItely are a Christian nation,based on Christian principles. i pray to God that it is not too late for the return of our nation to the articles of the Constitution. Though we have lost several generations of children, I think the citizens of each state should take back the curiculum being taught to our younger generations, and REQUIRE that our schools teach a thorough understand of our Constitution, and all the sacrifices suffered by soldiers and citizens of this beautiful nation (AMERICAN HISTORY- CIRCA 1965)

Posted November 9, 2009 at 8:45:57 PM


mo ky fellow

As Tiny Tim said in "A Christmas Carol", "May God Bless Us, Everyone. Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of a Living God, needs to get on their knees and beg God to Bless this Country (Me included).

But, it can not stop at this. Each and everyone of us must get out there and work to get Christians elected to Congress in 2010 and President in 2012.

...and so it goes!

Posted November 9, 2009 at 9:31:14 PM


CAROLYN

Someone should have pulled this one out decades ago when they started allotting themselves exorbitant pay raises, retirement etc...etc...Time to pull this one out before they totally annihilate the constitution!

When the people fear their government there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson

Amendment 28

Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States .

Posted November 9, 2009 at 11:41:56 PM


Ruth Ann Wilson

Charles Finney, an American Evangelist of the 19th Century, also was one of the principles in the founding of Oberlin College in Ohio, said this:

"The time has come that Christians must vote for honest men and take consistent ground in politics, or the Lord will curse them... God cannot sustain this free and blessed Country, which we love and pray for, unless the Church will take right ground. POLITICS ARE A PART OF RELIGION IN SUCH A COUNTRY AS THIS, and Christians must do their duty to the Country as a part of their duty to God."

Charles Finney, American Evangelist

"We preach and teach the religion of Americanism"

For God & Country

Ruth Ann Wilson

Posted November 10, 2009 at 7:43:21 AM


Ruth Ann Wilson

Happy Birthday United States Marine Corps

Well, here is a subject that I am "prejudice" about. Why because of two special men in my family:

Richard A. Whiteleather, United States Marine Corps, Okinawa

Russell J. Whiteleather, United States Marine Corps, Vietnam

They did their duty to God and Country, to God be the Glory.

I was doing some "research" about the Marines and ran across this "OLD stanza" to the Marine Corps Hymn:

Admiration of the nation,

we're the finest ever seen;

And we glory in the title

Of United States Marines.

First to fight for right and freedom

And to keep our honor clean;

We are proud to claim the title

Of United States Marine.

The chorus to this wonderful Song is majestic. "First to fight for right and freedom and to keep our honor clean." That's America, To the glory of God and the envy of the world.

Thanks to God for "MY" Veterans. I salute you, My dear Brothers.

For God & Country

Ruth Ann Wilson

Posted November 10, 2009 at 8:10:26 AM


Robert

For those interested, the names of the representatives who voted for the socialist health care plan should be found on Saun Hannity's web site.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 8:17:03 AM


John J. Johnson, IV

Learn to say NO.

No more "foreign aid" help the U.S.

No more U.N.

No more bowing to corrupt kings.

No more shelling out and selling out to jerks on dope who will steal but are too lazy to work.

No more ACLU.

No more ACORN

or----------

No more America

Posted November 10, 2009 at 9:34:53 AM


Everett Connor

A comment on the "Culture" section of the Nov. 9 "The Brief". When we as voters send professional lawyers to write laws we create a built-in conflict-of-interest. If we want this to stop we must stop sending lawyers to our legislatures and executive offices, both nationally and at the state level. Instead we should send businessmen and women, professional people, and such. Until we wake up to this we will continue to have laws written to favor those who demand payment BEFORE services rendered and give no guarantee of results for that money (wish I could work on that basis).

Posted November 10, 2009 at 9:50:07 AM


Paul Terry Stone

This government is the closest thing to Santa Claus that I know of and it must think that it can operate that way even though it's running up enormous deficits trying to do it. It tries to provide everything no matter that the attempt increases taxes to no end but ours.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:02:21 AM


Steven Bunten

Thomas Sowell asks questions that I have had but never hear the democrats answer--to wit, if there is billions of waste and fraud in the medical system (Medicaid, Medicare), wring it out first then come back and show us the savings. Don't say that this is what will pay for a vast expansion of government expenditures--the savings never seem to appear but the costs are always there! And if those two are full of fraud what is going to stop this new program from having more of the same, only worse due to the huge size of it.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:26:30 AM


Diane Bailey

My grandaughters attend a public classical academy. Our academy has been denied the right to use any religious texts (classical education uses original source texts) in the curriculum. We are vigorously defending this right. Schools such as this (if our nation survives the next few years without total conversion to some form of socialism) are helping to educate our young people about the beliefs and doctrines that inspired our founding fathers and Western civilization. These schools teach our young people to THINK for themselves, not parrot answers spewed out from progressive education and diluted and rewritten history.

Ultimately and above all, our hope is in God, and God alone. We all need to be on our faces before Him and take action as He directs and leads. God Bless America.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:42:34 AM


popham

There are so many dictates and mandates in the

1990 pages, not to mention fees, taxes and the

creation of more government bureaucracies. And of

course if you don't comply, then you can be fined

and/or be imprisoned. This is, of course, unconstitutional. There is talk, in the spirit of our founding fathers, on the airwaves

and on the Internet, of civil disobedience to this

bill, should it pass the Senate. Sam Adams et al

must be doing flip flops in their graves.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 12:09:33 PM


Leonard Spale

In this vast bastion of information available, it is the Patriot Post I look forward to the most. Its Patriotic tenor combined with topical insights from historical figures of our past, provides a rallying cry that uplifts my hopes and spirits for my children and the future of our country as well. Thank you Patriot Post, God speed.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 2:14:27 PM


Joe Waldroff

I keep reading about how we are protected from the Federal Government by the Constitution and the associated amendments. Yet, every day I see our freedom being siphoned away and Congress acting as though they have the power to do anything they want. If questioned, they ridicule the questioner. So, of what use is the Constitution if no one is paying attention to it? Do I hear anyone in Congress, right or left, seriously questioning the power grab? I don't think so. (If there are, they are so weak about it that no one is paying attention.) I think we may be deluding ourselves into thinking this can be turned around. Who will step up to the plate and take the lead? Who can we turn to? The courts? I think not. The handwriting is on the wall, we had our chance on the last election and we muffed it. I can't blame the voters too much. The conservative movement had no one to vote for.

Posted November 10, 2009 at 2:43:40 PM


Barb

As usual all of the authors of articles in this issue of Patriot Post are so on target. Oh, how I appreciate reading things produced by people of their stature; full of conservative values and just plain old common sense. I do have a question for anyone who cares to answer it. How does one go about suing the Federal Government that is attempting to force the American citizens to purchase something they do not want under any circumstances? I am on Medicare, not Medicare Advantage and purchase my own supplemental health care policy and prescription coverage. I would like to participate in such a suit.

Posted November 11, 2009 at 1:57:29 AM


Wesley J Leake

Congratulations to the the Patriot Post and Mark Alexander for carrying the message of true patriotism and conservatism to the American people.

I not only support verbally but financially as well and will continue to do so as long as the Post follows through on the promise to mount a constitutional challenge to some of Obama's and Congress' insane actions of the past 9 months. The lady that told me of the plans was apparently a staff member but I have neither heard nor read anything further.

I will not only contribute further when this effort is announced but I will actively campaign for the Post because I cannot find ANYONE or ANY ORGANIZATION willing to challenge this administration and congress in court where it will hit home and score points for the American people.

Thank you,

Wesley J Leake

Posted November 12, 2009 at 9:23:35 PM


Billiedbeach

Billy396 -

I, OF COURSE agree with you but I wouldn't answer that scumbag shallow 'Jim' in such nice terms.

Wish I could give more than just a $50 to this cause because I believe if this publication was the only one on the internet, it would tell it all like it is...honestly, caringly and I LOVE IT & APPRECIATE IT SO MUCH.

Posted November 13, 2009 at 8:27:32 PM


Billiedbeach

to BILL LITTLE - I thank you for your note on the Berlin wall being torn down & your working with it. You are thanked for your patriotism !!

Posted November 13, 2009 at 8:32:10 PM


Rhonda

Post above asked: What's next, federal agents coming to my home to inspect the contents of my refrigerator? I've read that's exactly what they do in Great Britain.

Posted November 16, 2009 at 12:09:51 AM


Mike

Why does everyone say "the first black president"?

He is only half black. What he has done or tried to do since he was elected makes it very unlikely that another troubled slick talking half black man will get elected. An all black man will certainly be given the chance to hold the office, if he is a true follower of the Constitution our forefathers wrote, not the all powerful govt. version being written as they go by the politicos in their mad rush to socialism. Progressives, BAAH HUMBUG!!!

Posted November 16, 2009 at 12:05:48 PM


Donna Smith

Is it just me or am I missing something here? The powers at hand tell us how badly we're doing at caring for the environment and thus must enact cap and trade laws and stop drilling because polar bears may need more land though they are no longer endangered in Alaska. We obviously don't care enough about health care of a few folks, so they must pass new forced medical care legislation for all. Now we read our pets are now also apparently suspect for causing unnecessary drain on the resources...and yet Mrs. Pelosi proudly poses before a proposed law that takes rougly 2000 pages of paper to write the law to get it passed before Congress. Has anyone figured the green footprint on Congressional activity lately???

Posted November 21, 2009 at 1:30:28 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)



The Patriot is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2010 Patriot Fund