Brief
Monday, November 30, 2009
The Foundation
"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton
Looking for Value
So what is The Patriot Post's Brief anyway? It's possibly the most useful thing you could read on Monday.
Our team of contributors puts together Monday's Brief by sifting through dozens of opinion articles by leading conservative thinkers each week looking for the best analysis of the issues facing America. You'll find the latest on the Left's proposed takeover of the health care system, updates on so-called global warming, timeless advice from "The Gipper," comments from our readers and much more!
We depend on your support to keep this priceless resource coming to your inbox every Monday. Help us by making a secure online donation to The Patriot's 2009 Annual Fund. If you prefer to support us by mail, please use our printable donor form.
Thank you and God bless!
Nate Jackson
Managing Editor
Reader Comments
"Thank you so much for the opportunity to support your tireless efforts and outstanding work. The Patriot Post is a refreshing departure from the mainstream media's constant attempt to brainwash me into believing their thinly veiled attempt to socialize the country. Their constant gushing and slobbering all over themselves about President Obama is enough to make me ill. All I can say is I'm disgusted by the Left's antics but at the same time heartened by your efforts to thwart them. Thanks again." --Capt. USAF (Ret.), Balad, Iraq
"Aside from bending my knee daily before God in thankfulness, I must thank you for encouraging us. Fifty-two years ago I was led to these shores after escaping from East Germany, via Berlin. Having served my adopted country in the U.S.A.F. and accepting gratefully citizenship in the U.S., I feel so blessed to be here to express my gratitude for your labor. In my limited capacity, I am mirroring your admonitions to people around me as much as I am able. I am here to tell you to 'Keep her headed straight into the wind.' And STAND! With appreciation," --Uli
The Gipper
"It's always a struggle for those of us in political life to take the long view and to brave decisions without regard to personal political cost. There are times when we fail in the struggle and times when we succeed. And I suspect the next few years will test us more than usual, but I know we're up to it. ... We'll have our battles ahead of us, but they're good battles, and they're worth fighting for. ... I hope the loyal opposition realizes exactly how committed I am and you are to changing the status quo and improving our national life. We won't be resting on our laurels, even if we were so inclined, which we're not. History wouldn't allow it. We've been handed great opportunities and great challenges, and we intend to meet them together." --Ronald Reagan
U.S.S.A.: The Democrats' DreamOpinion in Brief
"This is how I see health care reform working: If you are a doctor who has spent a lot of money and time becoming a responsible and caring physician, the government will tell you how much to charge your patients and, in fact, whether you will be allowed to treat them at all. Bureaucrats, having given themselves the power of God, will decide whether a patient is worth the cost of treatment, thereby deciding who lives and who dies. Despite the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, somewhere down the line taxpayers will be forced to underwrite abortions in violation of the consciences and faith of the majority. This is the triumph of the humanistic, atheistic worldview. We are all to be regarded as products of evolution in which the fit and the powerful will decide our survival and worth. ... The new breast and ovarian cancer screening guidelines may soon become mandatory as health care rationing kicks in. The unwanted, the inconvenient and the 'burdensome' could soon be dispatched with a pill, or through neglect. Great horrors don't begin in gas chambers, killing fields, or forced famines. They begin when there is a philosophical shift in a nation's leadership about the value of human life. ... In our day, the consequences of government seizure of one-sixth of our economy and government's ability to decide how we run our lives (it won't stop with health care) are foreseen. They are just being ignored in our continued pursuit of personal peace, affluence and political power. ... Welcome to the U.S.S.A., the United Socialist States of America." --columnist Cal Thomas
Government
"When you knowingly pay someone to lie to you, we call the deceiver an illusionist or a magician. When you unwittingly pay someone to do the same thing, I call him a politician. President Obama insists that health care 'reform' not 'add a dime' to the budget deficit, which daily grows to ever more frightening levels. So the House-passed bill and the one the Senate now deliberates both claim to cost less than $900 billion. Somehow '$900 billion over 10 years' has been decreed to be a magical figure that will not increase the deficit. It's amazing how precise government gets when estimating the cost of 10 years of subsidized medical care. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's bill was scored not at $850 billion, but $849 billion. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said her bill would cost $871 billion. How do they do that? The key to magic is misdirection, fooling the audience into looking in the wrong direction. I happily suspend disbelief when a magician says he'll saw a woman in half. That's entertainment. But when Harry Reid says he'll give 30 million additional people health coverage while cutting the deficit, improving health care and reducing its cost, it's not entertaining. It's incredible." --columnist John Stossel
Political Futures
"It's got to be about the oldest dodge in the book: When a politician casts a momentous vote on a major issue, and doesn't want to take responsibility for it, the pol minimizes its importance. The folks back home are told it was just a little ol' procedural vote, and they needn't worry their pretty little heads about it. Blanche Lincoln, the senior senator from Arkansas, has got this routine down pat. When the showdown on the health-care bill came [last] Saturday night, she cast the deciding 60th vote to cut off debate on whether to let this huge hodgepodge of a bill advance to the floor of the Senate. It could prove the most significant vote of her otherwise unremarkable political career. Once debate on whether to proceed with this ever-morphing blob of a bill is cut off, as it now has been, the Democratic majority in the Senate won't necessarily need a super-majority of 60 votes to pass it. A bare majority of 51 would suffice, although another procedural hurdle could quite likely require the Democrats to muster another 60 votes in the Senate to make the most radical change in the nation's health-care system in decades. And it will be Blanche Lincoln's vote that made it all possible. Much as she might try to deny it. The senator says she's against a public option — that is, a government-run insurance scheme with all its dangers to private insurers, and to workers who could be dumped into it by employers unwilling to go on paying their employees' insurance. Yet it may be Blanche Lincoln's vote that opens the way for just such a drastic change. ... Whatever the ramifications of the new health-care system that finally emerges from all this confusion, Blanche Lincoln and her fellow Democratic 'moderates' are going to be responsible for its passage. And no amount of talk about how they cast only a 'procedural' vote is going to hide the fact that their votes let this thing get to the floor of the Senate." --Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editor Paul Greenberg
For the Record
"[T]here is an array of taxes on the horizon -- increased federal income tax rates; promised hikes in health-care surcharge taxes; and even rumors of value-added federal sales taxes. These increases are said to be aimed at the proverbial wealthy. But that could change -- given that the top 5 percent of households already provide 60 percent of the nation's income-tax revenue. And many are already paying 50 percent to 60 percent of their incomes in combined local, state, federal and payroll taxes. Just consider. The price of gas will soon likely increase. The cost of servicing our profligate borrowing will, too. One more terrorist attack like at Fort Hood, or nightly sermons from a grandstanding Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, or a new Taliban offensive, and the momentum could shift to radical Islam in their decades-long war against the United States. Next year's tax hikes will be real and large -- and no longer just this year's idle talk. As these storm clouds gather, Congress bickers on Saturday nights about borrowing even more money for health-care reform, yet another federal entitlement. If you thought things have been rough so far, hang on, 'cause you ain't seen nothing yet." --historian Victor Davis Hanson
Faith & Family
"Peter Vidala was being harassed at work-subjected, over and over again, to views he found offensive. When he finally spoke up, he was fired. It's an illustration of the double standard that often prevails when it comes to same-sex 'marriage.' Vidala was a deputy manager at a Brookstone store in Boston's Logan Airport. Last August, a manager visiting from another store told Vidala she was planning to 'marry' her female partner. Vidala said he 'quickly changed the subject.' As a Christian, he considered homosexual behavior immoral, and same-sex 'marriage' an 'oxymoron.' The woman's comments made him uncomfortable. But the visiting manager didn't get the message-or maybe she did. She talked about her wedding plans over and over. Vidala later told Fox new she was goading him into commenting on her relationship. Vidala said, 'By the fourth time she mentioned it, I felt God wanted me to express how I felt about the matter. So I did.' He told her, 'Regarding your homosexuality, I think that's bad stuff.' He also reported that he had intended to tell her he would prefer she not bring up the subject at work, but she just started laughing. And then she told him, 'Get over it ... keep your opinions to yourself.' She then complained to human resources, and Vidala was fired. Why? Because by 'imposing' his beliefs on her, it constituted 'harassment.' So pummeling a junior-level Christian employee with endless comments he finds offensive is OK. But making a single critical comment to a lesbian senior-level employee is a firing offense. Even more disturbing is the reason Brookstone gave to back up its decision. In Massachusetts, same-sex 'marriage' is legal. So a lesbian employee can prattle on about her wedding plans without harassing anyone. The implications of this are frightening. If same-sex 'marriage' is foisted upon other states, then expressing disagreement with it-or even criticizing the homosexual lifestyle-could become a firing offense for everyone. If employers had taken this attitude 90 years ago, people could have lost their jobs for disagreeing with laws forbidding women from voting! This is how far the gay agenda has come in this country. Any disagreement is portrayed as hatred and harassment. And the victim-as in this case-is often a Christian. Peter Vidala's firing will have one beneficial effect, at least. It will help the rest of us understand why same-sex 'marriage' laws are like no other. Oppose them beforehand or speak out afterward, and you will be punished." --author Chuck Colson
Re: The Left
"Of somewhat more import was the news last week that a bunch of climate scientists -- in fact THE bunch of climate scientists -- who have been at the center of the global warming movement were found to have cooked the books to make the 'Earth-is-warming' numbers work. According to ... Dr. William Hamilton's weekly 'Central View' column, emails which were hacked and released, 'reveal that climatologists at Penn State, Amherst, the University of Arizona and England's East Anglia University have been engaged in a conspiracy to: hide data that the planet is cooling, apply pressure to scientific journals to exclude studies casting doubt on their theories of global warming, hide data being requested under the Freedom of Information Act that would discredit global warming, and, delete any data in their files that would support the existence of global cooling.' Yikes. The very people who 10 days ago were laughing and pointing at global warming skeptics for hanging on to their position notwithstanding the evidence in support of the man-induced effect on the Earth's climate, are now very quiet. A lot of people have a lot invested in the business of global warming, and the concept of their scientific beards having cheated on the numbers, coerced their opponents, covered-up the data and shredded potential evidence is impossible for them to accept. Notwithstanding the evidence." --political analyst Rich Galen

The Last Word
"As Air Force One heads to Copenhagen for the climate summit Dec. 9, it will presumably not make a U-turn while flying over the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at University of East Anglia near Norwich, England. But perhaps it should. The 61 megabytes of CRU e-mails and documents made public by a hacker cast serious doubt on the ballyhooed consensus on manmade global warming that the Copenhagen summit was called to address. The CRU has been a major source of data on global temperatures, relied on by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But the e-mails suggest that CRU scientists have been suppressing and misstating data and working to prevent the publication of conflicting views in peer-reviewed science periodicals. ... For those of us who have long suspected that constructing scientific models of climate and weather is an enormously complex undertaking quite possibly beyond the capacity of current computer technology, the CRU e-mails are not so surprising. Do we really suppose that anyone can construct a database of weather observations for the entire planet and its atmosphere adequate to make confident predictions of weather and climate 60 years from now? Predictions in which we have enough confidence to impose enormous costs on the American and world economies? ... The more interesting question going forward is whether European and American governmental, academic and corporate elites, having embraced global warming alarmism with religious fervor, will be shaken by the scandalous CRU e-mails. They should be." --political analyst Michael Barone
Subscribe
Howard Baker, Ronald Reagan's White House Chief of Staff, comments on The Patriot Post: "Thank you for your confidence in, and efforts to sustain the Reagan legacy." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
Patriot Headlines
- Fate of Health Care Bill Rests on Looming Budget Office Estimate
- Idaho First to Sign Law against Health Care Reform
- CBO: Covering the Backsides of Obamacare-Pushers?
- Obama Evokes His Dying Mother in Health Care Reform Push
- Walgreens: No New Medicaid Patients as of April 16
- Drone Strike Said to Kill a Leader of Al Qaeda
- 'Jihad Jane' Suspect to Be Arraigned
- Clinton in Moscow for Mideast, Nuclear Arms Talks
- Obama Says East Jerusalem Housing Plan 'Not Helpful'
- Obama Says No Crisis in US-Israeli Relations
- Hawaii Considering Law to Ignore Obama 'Birthers'
- Senate Votes to Change Cocaine Sentencing Rules
Opinion
- Ann Coulter: My Health Care Plan
- George Will: Betting (Again) on an Education Fix
- Cal Thomas: Israel's New Enemy: America?
- Victor Davis Hanson: Another Partisan Push for Another 'Comprehensive Reform'?
- Larry Elder: Obama to America: Bend Over and Cough
- Matt Towery: Inappropriate Portrayal of First Lady Benefits No One
- Lawrence Kudlow: Is Dodd Ending Too Big to Fail?
- Michael Barone: What's Good for House Leaders Is Bad for Members
- Debra Saunders: Conyers Is the Wrong Guy To Chair Judiciary Committee
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: Moving Past Hillary
- Jeff Jacoby: Fixing 'the Mistake on the Lake'
- Jonah Goldberg: Reading Tea Party Leaves
- Michael Gerson: Democrats' True Colors
- Austin Bay: Obama's Iran Conundrum
- Jacob Sullum: Death in Juarez
The Patriot is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!





Richard S. DiStaola
Trust in God. Let the truth be told. Who in their right minf would believe anything Al Gore espoused.So let's begin a crimial case of FRAUD by the UN & the other Anti-Amercan groupies. Now there's a conspiracy theory with a real "Smoking Gun".
Posted November 30, 2009 at 11:50:21 AM
John W. Floyd
I think if people would get out of their air conditioned homes, vehicles(including farm and constr. equip.) etc, businesses and workshops,
they would realize it's warm outside. We've re-climatized ourselves. That's the reason the rest of the world doesn't seem as concerned as the U.S. of A.. They're not living in an A/C world like us Americans and they not making the big bucks like Al and gang. I'm a little concerned with melting icebergs, but whether my cows are living is no comparison to what major industries do. Next we humans will be taxed for living.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 11:52:48 AM
R.M. Zobenica
A couple of years ago, I was informed that I was one of about twenty people on the planet that didn't accept AGW. Sadly, our number is reduced with the death of that intellectual giant, Dr. Michael Crichton. The remaining nineteen of us will be following the issue closely to see how the "Hadley" people answer the following allegations suggested by the 'hacked' material:
1.) Manipulated raw data.
2.) Wrote computer program language that skewed data.
3.) Turned the 'peer review' process into an incestuous
'circle jerk'.
4.) Berated non-friendly journal editors; sought their
removal.
5.) Refused to share data and methodology.
6.) Refused to obey FOI requests.
7.) Destroyed evidence.
8.) Refused to engage in open debate.
9.) Publicly denounced and smeared those who questioned
the 'science'.
10.) Engaged in public hyperbole, made fraudulent and false
claims to gain 'attention' and create public support.
11.) Declared the debate 'closed' before it even 'began'.
It is necessary to make an important distinction in the climate-alarmists' position. They are arguing for Gaia health, earth health. They are not advocating for 'man; that we must reduce industrial effluents to benefit 'man'. They are not concerned that 'man' may be killing other 'men'. They allege that 'man' is making Gaia sick.
Gaia, not 'man', is at risk...that is the argument. And the abuse of Gaia comes from a particular subset...'rich Caucasian man'. Asian and Indian sub-continent 'man' are not considered part of the problem. It's as if a physician is advising an emphysema patient thusly, "I'd prefer that you didn't smoke, but if you must, buy Chinese cigarettes."
For those that argue that anthropogenic climate change is settled, that it is universally accepted by all rational observers, that award-winning scientists have 'spoken', allow me this mild rebuke. Al Gore recently spoke on the merits of geothermal energy. Paraphrasing, he said that at a depth of 1-2 kilometers into the earth, there are hot rocks, a million degrees.
Can't argue with that. One dare not solicit an explanation as to how steel well-casing (Melting point: ~2500 degrees F.) maintains its structural integrity as it traverses the 'hot zone'. After all, Mr. Gore's got a Nobel.....
Now, here's some emperical evidence:
Matter is neither created nor destroyed, only changed in form.
The geologic age of planet earth is 4.54 billion years old.
4.54x10^9
Homo sapiens is 60-100,000 years on the planet.
1.00x10^5
Industrial revolution man is 250 years old.
2.50x10^2
It is asserted that in a fraction (0.000000055 or 0.0000055%) of earth time that 'industrial revolution man', by keeping warm, planting crops, driving to work, benefitting from AC power...by just going about his normal business...has endangered the survivability of the planet.
To believe this, one has to dismiss all other internal and external influences exerted upon the planet. From the far reaches of space... cosmic rays. From our solar system...variances in solar output (Milankovic and others), solar magnetic influences/solar wind, earth-sun orbital variations, obliquity, earth axial tilt (now 23.5 degrees; range 22-24.5). Earth planetary forces...plate tectonics, earthquakes, volcanism, ocean current gradients, earth magnetic field variations. Toss in the secondary effects of... hurricanes, tornadoes, straight winds, tsunamis, flooding, lightning-caused fires, methane from termites and rice paddies, ruminant flatulence, bacterial and fungal 'outgassing' during the decomposition of organic material. All of a sudden, man's influence is placed in perspective. It is really very small.
Not heretofore mentioned is the effect of water vapor and clouds....missing from the computer models...yet 95% of greenhouse gas is water vapor.
To hypothesize that a trace gas, CO2, measured in ppm (385ppm)....utilized by plants as raw material for photosynthesis, exhaled by mammals, absorbable in H2O, incorporated into shellfish, functioning as one of nature's buffering systems...might be responsible for an earth calamity stretches credulity.
Why CO2, not CH4 which has 20-times the green-house effect, mole-mole?
Why are the battery of computer models, currently projecting impending doom, unable to replicate the conditions of the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age using proxy data?
Why does snow always melt first on the sunny side of the street? Why is it cooler under a tree? Why is Dallas warmer than Duluth? Why is it cooler when a cloud blocks out the sun?
There are about 30 micro-environments identified. You'll see a number of them on excursions to the Grand Canyon. What is the major variable? CO2 concentrations or exposure to sunlight?
700 million years ago, earth was a giant ball of ice.
Ten thousand years ago, where I'm now sitting, the land was under a mile of solid ice. What happened to that ice? What caused the warming? Why did the climate change? Greenland was once green. The oceans were once 500 feet shallower. The Sahara was a pasture.
We're currently late in an interglacial period. If I were a betting man, I'd lay $$$ on impending global cooling, just because that's the previous pattern for interglacials. Of course, it must be mentioned that it was the 'consensus' of scientists in 1975 that global cooling was upon us.
It should be pointed out that Milankovic's hypotheses correlate well with known periods of climate variation, and are supported by ice core samples. It could fairly be shouted from every Minnesota playground, "It's the sun, stupid!"
As for greenhouse gases, great. Without them, we'd be about 18 degrees cooler across the board.
Civilizations, and species, come and go. We should be good stewards. That's what the 'Good Book' advises.
I see God, every day, in His creations...grandkids, airplanes, flowers, puppies, computers. My belief won't allow me to accept that He would be so cruel as to cause our species, made in His image, to be felled by our physiological 'exhaust'....that CO2 would be the instrument of our own destruction.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 12:14:35 PM
JTC
"Next we humans will be taxed for living."
Um, we already are, John, my friend.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 12:23:56 PM
John
In reading this, it is interesting to note that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) released, yesterday Nov 29, a statement concerning our weather. In brief, the statement indicated that the United States had it's third coolest and wettest October on record.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 12:50:18 PM
William Hoard
To Whom I may Concern
The articale about the USSA is good. When I first started college back in the fall of 1959 a lot of the Proffessors were commies. They brainwahed the students into their thinking. Most people were not taught to think for themselves.(my parents told me think yourself don't beleived everything you are told.
Then in 1966 when I got out of the army again I went back college and there were even more professors who were commies. I was a memeber of the vets club. The heppies spite on us, call us names and threw rocks at us. Guess what those are the people now running our government.
God bless
Bill
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:11:03 PM
Joe Earley
At last we can understand why the global warming predictions have not been following on track. Now we read on line that the so-called scientists have fabricated data and really don't understand the connections between temperature and man's actions, so how can a computer model be created? The current disclosures and admissions will save the world a tremendous cost - if the power-hungry politicians and those who have invested heavily in anticipated cap and trade (Al Gore, for example, and Obama's global warming czar, Carol Browner with her $172,200 per year salary). Gore says he just "puts his money where his mouth is," but it is really the other way around. He puts his mouth where his money is. I wonder how much money he is putting out to try to squelch the reports that there is no man-made global warming. He can't have an ethical issue with doing that, since Obama just spent $300,000,000 of our tax money to buy Senator Landreau's vote on ObamaCare.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:11:35 PM
Orval
Has anyone considered all the roadways and streets and skyscrapers, all the paved parking lots, that on a typical summer day, you can actually fry an egg? Doesn't that in fact add to and help generate heat? If indeed we are in the cooling stage of climate change, then maybe we need all this to keep it from plummeting!
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:19:25 PM
John J. Mentink
Bad science is bad science. But it also makes you wonder about how much of teh science used for health care justification is a complete fabrication. This makes this sound like we have another socialist crop of Henrich Himmlers (remember him- and "Aryan genetic superiority") - who want to force their view on about the world on the rest of us - even if it requires "selective use" of truth and scientific principals
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:20:17 PM
Richard Maycock
I went to The University of East Anglia (we call it UEA) and I'm more that a little worried that the impression that some of the work done there does not meet normal academic standards of transparency and honesty may rub off on me!
My nephew is completing a Ph.D. at the same institution. If a serious fraud is proved there we'll all be tarred with the same brush.
I have had doubts about global warming since the whole thing kicked of 20 - 30 years ago, when I was a young man I remember "artists impressions" in British newspapers showing Nelson's column protruding through a layer of ice! such were the predictions of the 1970's
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:28:50 PM
Chris North
I thank God for Patriot Post. You are a part of the light at the end of the long, dark tunnel the scientific screwballs, self-professed "illuminati" and so called "climate experts" have led us into and where they seem hell-bent to keep us.
Yet, Mother Nature keeps right on keeping on. This old earth isn't doing anything it hasn't been doing for eons and eons - that is, following God's will.
No, I am not an overly religious man but do my best to practice tolerance and goodwill toward my fellow man - that is, where I am permitted to do so as dictated by my fellow man. But when someone tries to shove theory masquerading as truth or fact down my throat I get a little upset and somewhat impatient.
The Almighty Power - maker of the universe - gave me an intellect. Functioning within me, that intellect says the doom-sayers promulgating global warming can't tell theory from fact. They've got a problem - I don't.
I thank all of you folks at Patriot Post for keeping the light shining beacon-bright at the end of the tunnel. This old soldier (Korean and Vietnam Wars Vet.) is glad to know that when I'm gone there will still be people with common sense like you to help keep the kooks, the misguided and the greed seekers at bay. Keep up the good work.
May God bless you all. And may God bless and speed our gallant fighting forces as they daily put their lives on the line to keep safe this wonderful, free country in which we live.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:49:49 PM
Alan Travis
A fabulous book by S. Fred Singer and his co-author is titled "Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1500 Years." In it, Fred convincingly that humans are not, and cannot be, responsible for global warming. It is this linkage that is so easily and often overlooked by blind AlGorians. We should not shut down our lives in supplication to liars and knaves like Al Gore, the world's biggest hypocrite.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 1:57:22 PM
Alan S. Ferguson
RE:Chuck Colson's 11/30/09 article on Peter Vidala, the bookstore employee fired for voicing a discenting opinion on a senior employee's constant blathering over her upcoming gay nuptials.
If I were him I would sue for sexual harrassment. Just because gay marriage is legal in MA doesn't mean, he has to hear about it all the time. That is TMI. I would not want to hear about a man or woman's sexual romps with their spouses either. All of it is unwanted, and I believe subject to sexual harrassmet laws.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 2:04:46 PM
p kelly
RE Chuck Colson's article. Guess where I won't shop this Christmas - or ever?
Posted November 30, 2009 at 2:41:53 PM
John Bonnar
RE:The Left by Rich Galen. If any data has been been destroyed and Federal Grant money was used to support their research, wouldn't that be Federal Crime? Will the current administration persue those
that are involved and get to the facts? Or will this be another denial, that global cooling is real!
Posted November 30, 2009 at 2:45:24 PM
Jack Elms
The fact that the global warming hype was created by Gore and his cohorts is not a suprise. That University's joined in to the hoopla is unfortunate but not a surprise. I am dismayed that organizations such as NASA and National Geographic joined in the frey. Many of the governments that originally "joined in" have pulled back either openly or quietly. It is time NASA came forth with a statement of truth. It is time National Geographic close its doors in shame. I don't believe Gilbert Grosvenor would approve of the political sham National Geographic has willingly become apart of. Is everything for sale to these people? Is patriotism sold by the gallon? Are ethics sold in bunches? They have to be of great value because I see quite a few people that seem to have any.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 2:49:13 PM
ILEANA
Mr. Hoard, good observation about the college "commies." I have news for you that 99% of college professors today, elementary, middle, and high school teachers are bona fide members of NEA (a communist union) or are sympathizers of communism. They indoctrinate our children every day and most parents are clueless. Students put up with it because they want a good grade or are too naive and believe the ideological utopian drivel. I can recall back in 1978 the political correctness that destroyed anyone in the academia if they so much tried to object to the communist curriculum being planned and spewed to our youth. I remember thinking, if this is freedom, I would like to go back to communism. If teachers did not go along with the communist program, they never received tenure, awards, fat paychecks, travel funds to conferences, lucrative collaborative work, bonuses, teacher of the year, teaching fellowships, textbook ghost writing, etc. This current situation has been many years in the making, not so much insidious but out in the open, with the full blessing of the general public who was too busy to take time to notice and object. Case in point, University of Delaware tried to program dormitory students in a year long brainwashing effort, making students feel that they were racists and bigots. Only when parents, alumni, and the general public cried out, did they end it. University of Minnesota is trying to implement a curriculum for future teachers, denying them diplomas and grades if they fail to modify their views according to communist ideology. This sounds to me like "Scientific Socialism" in the USSR.
Can we reverse the damage now? I seriously doubt it.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 3:07:06 PM
Derek K
Regarding Michael Barone's comment about the Global Warming Scientists covering up data.
I would think that if you were really worried about manmade climate change and a proposal to spend billions to fight it was on the table and you found out that the actual data came back showing that there is none to very little impact, this news would be shouted from the rooftops. But it's not. It shows that climate change guru's are now in the business of perpetuating the lie in order to keep their position and power as seen by people from around the world. Tis so sad.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 3:37:06 PM
dave norris
More Global Warming Hogwash. And they tell us that the CRU computer can predict the global weather for sixty years and NOAA can't accurately predict tomorrow's weather for just a segment of America. I find that absolutely amazing. I wonder if these Geeks have tried this machine on the Stock Market. I see this as just another token justification to raise our taxes even more. I wonder if the government has considered eleminating some of their wasteful programs in lieu of raising our taxes yet again. I don't know about you guys but at the current rate I'll probably defalt on my mortgage and give my home back to the mortgage company or Obama or whomever. At the current rate of deprication I'd be better off living in a cave, and hopefully somewhere other than the U.S.S.A.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 3:44:40 PM
Dolores Adams
Peter Vidala should not have been fired. He was being harrassed and goaded by this homosexual.
Same sex marriage (if you want to call it that) is an abomination. They are getting way too many rights in some areas.
No wonder this country is going to hell.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 4:06:33 PM
Daniel Garcia
Regarding the Last Word by Michael Barone. We must remember, or take into account, that the President is not merely 'taken in' by the global warming alarmist. He is using it as a venue to push through a bill that will line the pockets of his close friends around the world. The talk and fevor of global warming has gone far beyond a few 'tree huggers', and has taken on a life of it's own. the new political wagon is "global warming".
So they can hack a terabyte of information from the CRU, it wont matter to the Trillion dollars Barry Sotero and his cronies stand to make by having the MSM ignore it.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 4:16:53 PM
Paul Terry Stone
It's a sad day for this country when the Manhattan Declaration has to be issued encouraging civil disobedience because this government has become anti- Christian and acting on issues of conscience may not be permitted.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 4:36:27 PM
Thom McDermott
There are three(3) noteworthy bills in the house and senate. Two(2) in in the house HR 861 and HR 227 and one(1) in the senate that state life begans at conception. This legislation would negate Roe VS. Wade. Phill Roe, my representative has signed on to both and deserves credit. Neither Alexander nor Corker has signed on to the senate bill. Please say something on your Web site about these bills and hopefull we can pressure our senators to support this legilation,
TNX
Thom
Posted November 30, 2009 at 4:52:58 PM
Joel Gill
U.S.S.A.: The Democrats' Dream
As a conservative Democrat, this is not my "dream", it is more of a nightmare.
www.gillforcongress.org
Posted November 30, 2009 at 5:16:42 PM
clifton armstrong
Re: White House party crashers
1. If the government can't take care of President Obama, how do they expect to take care of us?
2. Where are the bi-partisan house panels investigating how so many party crashers make it accross our borders? If they want to throw citizens out of the White House, why are they so reluctant to keep non-citizens from entering illegally?
3. Speaking of citizens... why is the Fort Hood guy (a citizen) getting a tribunal, while the 9/11 mastermind gets a citizen's trial? I bet they give the White House crashers a military tribunal.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 5:43:18 PM
Rifleman
Too many Americans have become accustomed to being robbed, beaten and raped by their government. They lie there, hoping by not resisting that somehow, in some way, the attacker will be satisfied and will eventually stop. Robbers and rapists do what they do because they like it and they get away with it. Our government has become a robber, mugger and rapist and there's only one way to deal with such a bully: Punch him right in the mouth -- as hard and as often as it takes to knock him out and, while he's lying on the ground, kick him, hard. Then, when he wakes up and tries to rise, knock him down and out again. Do it as often as it takes to convince him that he's got to change his perceptions, his assumptions, his way of dealing with you. Bullies grow stronger in proportion as they meet no or weak resistance. They won't go away until they're forced to. This government has become a bully of international proportions, far more dangerous and powerful than any historical bully or tyrant.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 6:24:21 PM
Howard Last
Does anyone know if AlBore's ancestors were responsible for the Pilton Man and the Cardif Giant?
Remember the Saturday afternoon movies with cavemen fighhting dinasours, they were actually documentaries.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 8:11:39 PM
John
Where is the rest of the media? Why is it not news? This is particularly disconcerting!
Posted November 30, 2009 at 8:27:43 PM
Carolina Boy
Given the enormous damage the policies of the current administration are certain to cause this new nation they are building-the United Socialist States of America-it seems obvious to me that what they are doing is tantamount to treason. The fact that so many Americans are willing to stand back and let them get away with it is terribly disconcerting to conservatives. Folks, the final chapter of the book "The Decline and Fall of the United States of America" is being written before our very eyes by the traitors in Washington, DC.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 9:13:05 PM
Ileana
Mr. Thomas, you are so right. Human life has no worth in communism. Even productive souls have a price that is somewhat below human dignity. Life in the womb is considered inconvenient cells to be disposed of, imperfect children are often left to die without care, or if they survive in spite of the abuse, to rot in orphanages without the touch and love of another caring human being, the elderly, if not cared for by their families, dispatched with morphine when they adversely affect the hospital's or the doctor's bottom line. Sounds crazy? Not really, it has happened again and again in socialized medicine under the euphemism euthanasia. Hyppocratic oath means nothing to them. Is that what we want in this country?
Posted November 30, 2009 at 10:05:17 PM
John Willse
Has anyone including the Attorney General of the U.S. given any thought to the safety of the jurors chosen for the KSM "show trial"? Once their idntity becomes known, their lives and the lives of their families will be in grave danger, probably for as long as they live. Some reporter looking for a Pulitzer prize will undoubtedly publish their names. Most likely in the New York Times.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 10:07:13 PM
Doug
871,000,000,000 for the house health care / 350,000,000 people in the US = $2488.57 over 10 years / 10 = $248.85 per year premium?!
I have the VA fixing most of my ill's but I'm 32 and in great shape other then Army wear and tear. My comprehensive medical care coverage quote was $178 per month with a $5,000 deductible (I was pricing last week).
So the people who can not even run their own staffs with a budget think they can pluck that 871BIL number out of the air? More like if EVERYONE was healthy with supplemental insurance like me the bill will cost 350mil x $178/mo x 12mo/year or 747,600,000,000 per YEAR x 10 years, or 7.48TRILLION over the projected 10 years. Opps I guess they were off by a few zeros, that is if everyone is 32 and in great health with supplemental VA health care.
Some days I wonder if I am the only one left on the planet who can add. . .
Doug
PS, I hope you enjoyed this farce of a math equation as much as I did writing it at midnight, a nice little break from working :)
Posted December 1, 2009 at 1:02:45 AM
Barb Amos
Hope Blanche Lincoln, Mary Landrieu, and the rest of the Democrats who "just voted for the Obamacare bill" to be brought to the floor have a good answer as to why they voted against their constituency for the almighty dollar. THEY SOLD THEIR SOULS TO THE DEVIL! I wonder how that explanation will play out in the hereafter.
Posted December 1, 2009 at 2:13:11 AM
Ruth Ann Wilson
Times that Try the Souls of Men
According to all sources, Hussein will be "using" West Point as the "stage" for his troop announcements.
Meanwhile, House Rep. Obey - D from Wisconsin is proposing a "surtax" on I guess US to pay for "the war".
How to unravel all of this "mischief" and "convolution" that the enemies are throwing at us is quite stymieing.
So I am going to set out to use these boundaries for myself in these "treacherous times":
1. When the troops are in the field:
1. Be respectful
2. Say or do nothing to destroy morale.
2. Always support "reinforcements" to troops already in the "field" - It is unconscionable to do otherwise.
I believe that this was the common "thinking" in this beloved land during WWII & Korea, when we as a society, " feared God and eschewed evil". These were the last wars that we fought without this "strange, overt, hostility toward the troops".
Where did all this "foreignism" come from in this Beloved land??? The seat of infamy was the university campuses!!!!!! Where we, the people, were sending our young people to be "educated"!!!!! They turned the young people into "clever devils" that turned on the Veterans returning from Vietnam. We, the people, stood in "unbelief" that this was happening, but it was happening.
Men declaring they wouldn't go to war for this Beloved Nation (draft-dodgers). Unthinkable amongst the common, God-fearing people to have such notions amongst the men. Unbelievable, but it was happening.
A large majority of these legislators that are in Washington, now, are the "campus hippies" of the '60's. Remember, their "folk songs" "If I had a hammer"!!! We, the people, FORCED. Unbelievable, but it is here.
I hope MacArthur returns to West Point tonight and surprises all our enemies. Will the enemies of our Beloved Country, enter into our beloved places and set up their "images" "the abomination that makes desolate" as the Bible says?????
Dear God, have mercy on us.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:31:41 AM
Maggie
Cal Thomas's article this Monday really hit home with me. As a history teacher, his reference to "great horrors" in history not beginning with gas chambers but with a philosophical shift about the value of human life rings so true. The press chided tea-party protestors who compared Obama to Hitler. I see the the connection as accurate, not only due to his efforts to increase government control over our lives, but in his administration and party's views about what human begins lives and livelihoods are "worth" protecting.
Posted December 1, 2009 at 10:37:38 AM
Craig
Cal Thomas misunderstands and misrepresents evolution. It's a biological process, not a political ideology, and cannot be blamed for anybody's behavior or politics. The old bromide that evolution is "the survival of the fittest" is also a misrepresentation. It better summarized as "survival of the most adaptable."
Likewise, atheism is not a political ideology. The urge to socialism comes from the misguided notion of utopianism, that government is the agent of perfecting man. That's not an atheistic position, but a collectivist one. I can point out plenty of collectivists who believe in a god.
Thomas is right that the country is slouching into Socialism. He's on the wrong hobby horse(s) as to why. You can't win a war if you are not willing to name the enemy. Thomas' poor aim is making enemies of friends and vice versa.
Posted December 1, 2009 at 12:57:19 PM
marlell nielson
I have never believed the hoopla about Global Warming. It is nothing moe than climate fluctuations, which happen with the change of seasons. Al Gore and his cohorts should be required to give the rest of us 'carbon credits' in the form of green dollars.
Posted December 1, 2009 at 1:55:10 PM
james wright
To break the global warming issue down even further, consider your local weather forecasters who can't get the weather forecast right from day to day, in spite of having the "latest doppler radar systems" available. Seasons come and go and will continue to do so, regardless of what the babbling idiots in copenhagen may decide.
Posted December 2, 2009 at 7:27:30 PM
dorothy hind
Anyone that can believe they can predict what is
the "future" with climate is a fool....Science
is not perfect...it is SCIENCE...has anyone
added up the MONEY Al Gore has amassed with his
project....can it be money or climate?
dottie Hind
Posted December 4, 2009 at 2:56:43 AM
dorothy hind
Anyone that can believe they can predict what is
the "future" with climate is a fool....Science
is not perfect...it is SCIENCE...has anyone
added up the MONEY Al Gore has amassed with his
project....can it be money or climate?
dottie Hind
Posted December 4, 2009 at 2:57:25 AM
Avocation Aviator
Brookstone...not going to shop at that store in airports. In fact, I think during my next layover I will tell that manager I do not believe in their one sided sexual harrassment policy. I can spend my money elsewhere...
Speaking of my money and taxes going up next year. What the hell...I cashing in my IRA and spending it on real goods now before I cannot afford to buy them. Real goods like guns, ammo, ten more acres of farmland on which to grow what I need when it all comes down.
Times are a changin!
Posted December 4, 2009 at 11:38:35 AM