Brief

Monday, February 22, 2010

The Foundation

"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." --Thomas Jefferson

Government

Race isn't part of the Constitution's census prescription

"Suppose you suggest to a congressman that given our budget crisis, we could save some money by dispensing with the 2010 census. I guarantee you that he'll say something along the lines that the Constitution mandates a decennial counting of the American people and he would be absolutely right. Article I, Section 2 of our Constitution reads: 'The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.' What purpose did the Constitution's framers have in mind ordering an enumeration or count of the American people every 10 years? The purpose of the headcount is to apportion the number of seats in the House of Representatives and derived from that, along with two senators from each state, the number of electors to the Electoral College. The Census Bureau tells us that this year, it will use a shorter questionnaire, consisting of only 10 questions. From what I see, only one of them serves the constitutional purpose of enumeration -- namely, 'How many people were living or staying at this house, apartment or mobile home on April 1, 2010?' The Census Bureau's shorter questionnaire claim is deceptive at best. The American Community Survey, long form, that used to be sent to 1 in 6 households during the decennial count, is now being sent to many people every year. Here's a brief sample of its questions, and I want someone to tell me which question serves the constitutional function of apportioning the number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives: Does this house, apartment, or mobile home have hot and cold running water, a flush toilet, a bathtub or shower, a sink with a faucet, a refrigerator, a stove? Last month, what was the cost of electricity for this house, apartment, or mobile home? How many times has this person been married? After each question, the Bureau of the Census provides a statement of how the answer meets a federal need. I would prefer that they provide a statement of how answers to the questions meet the constitutional need as expressed in Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. ... Americans need to stand up to Washington's intrusion into our private lives. ... Unless a census taker can show me a constitutional requirement, the only information I plan to give are the number and names of the people in my household." --economist Walter E. Williams

Liberty

"If eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, incessant distractions are the way that politicians take away our freedoms, in order to enhance their own power and longevity in office. ... Few distractions have had such a long and impressive political track record as getting people to resent and, if necessary, hate other people. The most politically effective totalitarian systems have gotten people to give up their own freedom in order to vent their resentment or hatred at other people.... We have not yet reached these levels of hostility, but those who are taking away our freedoms, bit by bit, on the installment plan, have been incessantly supplying us with people to resent. One of the most audacious attempts to take away our freedom to live our lives as we see fit has been the so-called 'health care reform' bills that were being rushed through Congress before either the public or the members of Congress themselves had a chance to discover all that was in it. For this, we were taught to resent doctors, insurance companies and even people with 'Cadillac health insurance plans,' who were to be singled out for special taxes. Meanwhile, our freedom to make our own medical decisions -- on which life and death can depend -- was to be quietly taken from us and transferred to our betters in Washington. ... The more they can get us all to resent those they designate, the more they can distract us from their increasing control of our own lives -- but only if we sell our freedom cheap." --economist Thomas Sowell

The Gipper

"Our current circumstances in the 20th century are not greatly different from those surrounding our Founders, who remarked on the long train of abuses and usurpations whose ultimate design seemed clearly to abrogate all the citizens' rights and render them subjects of an absolute despotism. The Founders' impending tyranny arose under an unjust king; ours derives from a centralizing and increasingly powerful national government that intrudes into ever-growing aspects of our lives, and prevents us from freely exercising our acts of self-government. We New Federalists therefore seek a return to our foundation on the principles of self-government. We seek a new birth of federalism because we seek a new birth of freedom, both for ourselves and for our posterity." --Ronald Reagan

Political Futures

"Are this year's 'tea parties' really tea parties? What could today's protesters have in common with the 'Indians' who dumped 90,000 pounds of tea in Boston harbor in 1773? Quite a bit, actually. What do today's tea partiers want? According to the Christian Science Monitor, the movement 'is about safeguarding individual liberty, cutting taxes, and ending bailouts for business while the American taxpayer gets burdened with more public debt. It is fueled by concern that the United States under Mr. Obama is becoming a European-style social democracy where individual initiative is sapped by the needs of the collective.' Broadly speaking, the tea parties reflect a growing anger in America that the government seems to be a closed circle, run by an elite in both parties. These elites, combined with a class of bureaucrats, lawyers, journalists and businessmen, use government power to serve their own ends, and not the public good. ... When the government is unresponsive to the views of the people, and, beyond that, when our administrative and judicial branches restrict the scope of the people's legislative rights, protest rises. President Obama, an heir to the Progressive tradition, wants to strengthen this unaccountable, administrative state. The response has been altogether fitting." --columnist Richard Samuelson

Re: The Left

"Political fraud and scientific swindle can be measured by collapsing 'science.' The University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit in Britain was regarded as the leader in climate research and the fount of raw data on which the science was based until leaked e-mails between researchers revealed evidence of doctoring of data and manipulation of evidence. The director of the research unit, professor Phil Jones, was regarded as an archbishop in the Church of Global Warming. He was pressured to resign in the wake of the scandal. Now he has conceded to an interviewer from the BBC that based on the evidence in his findings, the globe might have been warmer in medieval times. If so, the notion that fluctuations in earthly temperatures are man-made is rendered just that, a man-made notion. The learned professor told his interviewer that for the past 15 years there has been no 'statistically significant' warming. ... Terry Mills, a professor of applied statistics at Britain's Loughborough University, looks at the U.N. panel's data and applies a little skepticism. 'The earth,' he told London's Daily Mail, 'has gone through warming spells like these at least twice before in the last thousand years.' The global-warming hysteria, on which the Obama administration wants to base enormous new tax burdens, is just about as reliable as the weather hysteria presented nightly on your favorite television channel." --Washington Times editor emeritus Wesley Pruden

Opinion in Brief

"This column was scoffing at global warming back when global warming was still cool. But even we have been surprised at the extent of the past three months' 'meltdown' of global warmism, to use the metaphor that everyone seems to have settled on. As we've written on various occasions, we didn't know enough about the substance of the underlying science to make a judgment about it. But we know enough about science itself to recognize that the popular rendition of global warmism -- dogmatic, doctrinaire and scornful of skepticism -- is not the least bit scientific. The revelations in the Climategate emails show that these attitudes were common among actual scientists, not just the popularizers of their work. Still, we would not have gone so far as to say that global warming was just a hoax. Surely there was some actual science to back it, even if there was a lot less certainty than was claimed. Now, though, we're wondering if this was too charitable a view." --Wall Street Journal columnist James Taranto

Reader Comments

"Alexander's essay, Warfighting 101, especially his comments about our young uniformed Patriots, truly touched my heart. The summary of the issue with 'jihadists' was excellent and the pre and post Medina references very astute. I am a double leg amputee from Vietnam (5th Special Forces Group, 1967) who was, by the grace of God, healed from PTSD. Today I devote my energy, time and efforts in service to our troops, visiting hospitals and bases and sharing my own story of healing. Please have your military readers visit www.combatfaith.com." --Allen

"In Mr. Alexander's excellent essay, he notes that 'orthodox Muslims' adhere to the pre-Medina Q'uran, while it is the post-Mecca Muslims who advocate jihad. This clearly is a reference to the fact that the suras of the Q'uran dictated during the Mecca phase are in contradiction to the Medina phase suras and the Hadith. However, both the Mecca phase and the Medina phase together comprise the Q'uran and all Muslims are bound by all the Q'uran and the Hadith. I would suggest that it is the jihadists who are the 'orthodox' Muslims, since it is they who are strictly following the later teachings of Mohammed, (see the Doctrine of Abrogation) and that is why those who might wish to oppose them are subject to the charge of trying to refute the Prophet's teachings, the penalty for which is death." --Mary

"It should be clarified that Dr. John Christy, enlisted by the IPCC as a climate expert, has been countering the UN-IPCC claims on global warming and the causes of climate change for years and years, with scientific evidence. He is a good scientist and not a recent convert. Much of the evidence that bloggers and other political workers against the socialist agenda of the global-warmists have been using his reputation and work." --Eric

"The last sentence in your And Last item Friday made me feel uncomfortable in how it was presented. 'Jesus said, "Let your light shine before others." This calendar, however, is apparently referring to 3 Gore-inthians: "Don't let your light shine -- turn it off to save energy."' I would hope you in making such a statement are not suggesting that the Catholic Church would think of asking us to turn off the light of Christ that shines within us? The Church has been and continues to do this for the last 2,000 years. I would hope that you would not use this holy time of year as we remember what Our Savior did for us all for a bit of bad humor. To point out the 'green' aspects of it fine, political ok, but to say it suggests to turn off the light of Christ is very offensive to me and in poor taste." --Michael

Editor's Reply: We think you're reading a bit too much into our word play on light and light bulb.

The Last Word

"[S]ome 80 conservative leaders, including the heads of some of the nation's most influential groups of the right, gather[ed] to sign a document that has been more than a year in the making called the Mount Vernon Statement. For those of us seeking to pass on our conservative values and ideals to our children, this new document reinvigorates the old -- but not outdated -- concepts behind the founding of our country. According to Alfred Regnery, publisher of the American Spectator and a member of the Conservative Action Project, the workgroup behind the Mount Vernon Statement, its purpose is to articulate the common core values of all facets of the conservative movement. ... Importantly, the Mount Vernon Statement is not geared to any election or candidate or specific piece of legislation. 'We recommit ourselves to the ideas of the American Founding,' the Statement begins. 'Through the Constitution, the Founders created an enduring framework of limited government based on the rule of law. They sought to secure national independence, provide for economic opportunity, establish true religious liberty and maintain a flourishing society of republican self-government. These principles define us as a country and inspire us as a people.' ... Visitors to www.themountvernonstatement.com and the Web sites of the various organizations supporting the project are invited to sign the Statement online and to use it as a blueprint going forward for activism and policymaking. It's meant to go viral as a creed, of sorts, for modern day conservative believers. Amen to that." --columnist Marybeth Hicks



Comments

Timothy E Rea

In your "Gipper" paragraph of 22 Feb., The Gipper lived in the 20th Century, not the 21th.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 11:22:44 AM

Editor's Reply:

He did live into the 21st century, but the quote should have read 20th. It's been corrected.

Burl from OZ

Michael, who took offense at your play on words around light and light bulb, needs to 'light'en up.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 11:35:02 AM


Stephen Leonard

Would you post a specific citation for Thomas Jefferson's observation that "Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force."? I want to disseminate that as widely as possible, and having a reference for it would enhance its impact.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 11:36:02 AM


John S. Pierce

I believe the questions on the census that cannot be shown to me to be required by the Constitution are an invasion of my privacy. I will willingly give the names and ages of the persons living in my home. The other information is nobody's business and those questions wil not be answered. I know many of them were not envisioned by the framers. Most of those items had not even been invented wehn the Constitution was written, and they are ceretainly not contained in ammendments.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 11:41:02 AM


Gene Ramey

In view of the current political situation I to plan to answer only that required by the Constitution. Speaking of the Constitution, Where does it say in the constution that federal politicians will recieve any salary, health or retirement benefits or be paid expenses for serving our country. I say cut them off. We would soon find out who the true patriots are.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 11:52:40 AM


John Eckenrod

The Jefferson quote reminded me of my favorite Founding Father and a quote about him by one of our Presidents. At a White house gala, JFK toasted the gathered philosophers, statesmen, artists and assorted literati with these words: "This is probably the greatest collection of intellects and visionaries ever present in this room. With the exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined here alone."

Posted February 22, 2010 at 11:58:05 AM


Gregory N. Cecil

http://www.rv-103.com/?p=283

Sirs,

Would you be kind enough to read my blog post about Obama killing our Human Space Flight Program? If you find it worthy enough, feel free to pass it on to your readers.

Sincerely,

Gregory N. Cecil

"Expenditures of taxpayer provided funds on space related activities find constitutional justification in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, that gives Congress broad power to “promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts.” In addition, the Article I power and obligation to “provide for the Common Defense” relates directly to the geopolitical importance of space exploration at this frontier of human endeavor." Dr. Harrison Schmitt, Apollo 17 Astronaut

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:06:58 PM


Dee Hershey

I guess my objection to the CPAC poll and the Republicans' is that is seems to be an attempt to engulf the tea party movement. I object to that because there are many in the Republican party leadership that I consider to be a problem. Both of my senators are an example, John McCain's first response to any problem is to first find out what the media wants and then he reacts accordingly. He will respond to his constituients IF they inundate him with phone calls and emails and then he will take their concerns into consideration. Jon Kyl, the other AZ Senator has good ideas and good intentions, but seems to lack the back bone to stand up to the leaders that are ramming all this stuff down our throats. We would be much better off with a more aggressive conservative in office. I surely agree that stopping the Democratic agenda is important. My complaint is that you were supposed to select your top 10 priorties and out of 22, illegal immigrant was not even an option. I feel that it should be in the top ten and it didn't even make their top 22!! Not acceptable to me and it doesn't sound like the tea party that I have been involved with.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:25:03 PM


Duke of Earl

Bill,

I understand you comments on the Census. I also understand Dr. Williams comments on the Census. I agree with both of you. Dr. Williams is pointing that the questions being asked have NO bearing on counting the population of the United States of America. The questions being asked on the census relate to special items of interest to specialized groups of people in and around Washington, D.C. These groups are the special interest groups that demand governmental spending for programs that benefit them and no one else.

I plan to follow Dr. Williams lead and answer only those questions that relate to the enumeration of the Census.

Thank you for your service to this country. It is Americans like you, Dr. WIllimas and those of us who believe in the Constitution that make America great.

Duke

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:30:44 PM


Dr. Leon Francis

The name of the game for global warming, or climate change to be more politically correct, has always been greed and power. Yet, as early as 2002, the book published (Taken by Storm) by the two Canadians, Essex and McKitrick, and identifying faulty science and deliberate lies has been ignored by the radicals. Even last week, the spokeswoman for the EPA demanded that "the science is settled". This giant heat transfer problem is not over.

...........a Thermodynamicist

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:32:42 PM


G. Lester Thompson

Thanks for all you do and stand for. Here is a link that I think you will relate to and enjoy. Check it out when you have a moment.

Thanks again for your work!

G. Lester Thompson

Click here: YouTube - The Census Is Getting Personal

If this link does not work, try this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsDhkPym01k

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:35:11 PM


Art Peterson

Name, rank and serial number. When completing any 2010 census form I will only answer names and number of people in the household. All other "inquiries" will completed with the following: "refer to US CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I SECTION 2"

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:40:07 PM


Michael Singer

The arguments against global warming and against a "government response" to the situation is growing faster than I can keep up. The Patriot Post has offered so much material to refute both these hyperbolic claims. Is there a way I could access a summary of all the material you have posted? It would save me a great deal of time when arguing with "the sky is falling, call the government" crowd.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:41:35 PM


Amanda J Thayer

I am very concerned about how intrusive and over-bearing our government has become. I have re-registered as an independent. In the November elections I plan to vote for anyone whose name has an "I" after it. My philosophy has become "clear the pool". I would support an amendment to the Constitution for term limits so that our Representatives and Senators will more likely be regular folk instead of career politicians.

Thanks for your publication and for listening.

Amanda

Posted February 22, 2010 at 1:03:46 PM


Jim Leonard

The lack of Constitutional mandate for superfluous questions on the census aside; I delight in enlightening the “government” on the topic of race by checking “Other” and filling in the obvious and only appropriate answer, “HUMAN.” I encourage others to do likewise, perhaps someone in the “government” will wakeup. We need not be divided; we are one nation, one race under God.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 1:12:06 PM


Elisabeth

Art Peterson, excellent idea! I'll be using that one also!

Posted February 22, 2010 at 1:44:29 PM


Jon Schulte

This whole census thing has me a bit confused. Why is the question not "how many legal, U.S citizens live here"? If we are talking about apportionment of Reps and Senators, who else votes other than U.S. citizens (this is not intended to be a trick question)? Do we want representation based on total population or voting population? Or are the Dems counting on these undocumented voters being granted amnesty once they can get the representation aligned correctly? Now there is transparency for you....

Posted February 22, 2010 at 1:55:05 PM


Joe

First, I am not a lawyer. While I appreciate everyone's insistence that they will only provide the information required by the constitution, and while the constitution is the supreme law of the land, US Code determines how that law is executed.

Here is the 16 amendment concerning collection of taxes..

“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”

That is all is says, nothing about interest deductions, childcare deductions, educational credits, etc but I will bet everyone takes all those they can and provides the information the IRS requires to document those deductions and credits. Those deductions and credits are in the IRS tax code, not the constitution.

Similarly the constitution and census activity is similar. See GAO response to Bob Barr at http://www.gao.gov/decisions/other/289852.htm This letter was in response to ACS surveys but the letter references the US census as well.

Joe

Posted February 22, 2010 at 2:22:52 PM


Joyce Vaughan Byars

Am I mistaken? I 'thought' I just heard a bit ago that Rep. Neil Abercrombie, 1st District, Hawaii, submitted a letter of resignation to peelousy but of course she is rarely there...the appointed clerk read the letter. What do YOU know. I cannot find anything to substaniate this. Thank you, JVByars

Posted February 22, 2010 at 2:44:00 PM


Micki

I very much appreciate Walter E.Williams comment regarding the Census. There has been so much said about what information we "have" to give on the census that I have been confused and wondering what I am legally bound to give. I have chafed against any information beyond names and number of people living in my household. Mr. Williams statement that he plans to only give names and number of residents in his household gave me courage to do the same and confirms for me that the Constitution does not require or allow for further information. Thank you, Patriot Post, for your voluminous information regarding our country, Constitution and liberties to keep everyone well informed.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 3:38:21 PM


Shirley May May

I had decided the moment Mr. Obama moved into the White House.....I would not take part in the census. You do know he, Mr. Obama, will be using this info for his next campaign.....How much more stupidity are we true Americans going to provide for this folly. "Not I' .

Posted February 22, 2010 at 4:07:03 PM


Tess

I just wanted to say that I, too, felt the same as "Michael". I feel that, that Catholic parish needs to rethink their stance on "global warming". I also feel that they should not be chastised for asking people to be responsible when it comes to conserving electricity and recycling b/c it is good for the environment even if it is based on the fallacy of "global warming". I was put off by the comment about turning off the light of Christ, too. I know that many people hate Catholics and the Catholic Church and take any opportunity to attack us. It hurt to have my beloved Patriot Post make a comment like that. I don't think Michael or any of us read too much into it. There is a feeling out there in the Liberty Movement that Catholics are a necessary evil. It is what it is, and I understand why it was brought up in the Patriot Post b/c this feeling also exists at tea party meetings. At any rate, I am still a loyal reader and Catholic American who will work to fight for the restoration of the Constitution.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 4:52:56 PM


John McMahon

Those who want a great climate book, try "Ice Age" by John and Mary Gribbon. Among other things "In the long history of Earth, polar ice caps are rare, and, having two at the same time, may be unique."

Posted February 22, 2010 at 5:17:10 PM


W.T.Door

Globull warming. If we had the honest, intelligent, wise political leaders dedicated to the public good we supposedly elect, the increasing flood of information on ClimateGate should produce confessions of error, and an immediate end to not only proposed legislation, but restrictions already imposed; e.g. EPA on carbon dioxide. Of course, Al Gore's mea culpa should be the very first. He could save face, and possibly win another award by producing a documentary exposing how all this nonsense was foisted off on a gullible public with the active participation of a power hungry Administration. Obviously the title should be An Inconvenient Truth.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 5:35:58 PM


Howard Last

Global cooling (oops climate change) has two new supporters, the Piltown Man and the Cardiff Giant. Say doesn't AlBore look like them?

Posted February 22, 2010 at 5:40:34 PM


Mike

Timothy E,

In what century would you place 2000-2004? I believe he lived in both.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 5:43:54 PM


Howard Last

Federal government control of health care is the largest take a away program of Citizens rights since social security (also known"" as stealing from your children and grandchildren), the federal reserve board and the income tax. The ones responsible for these monsrtosities are Wilson, FDR, BHO, Otto Bismark and Adolph. Yes Bismark and Adolph. Bismark came up with the original idea for social security. That is why the age was set at 65, because most people did not live to 65. And Adolph refined it. BHO, FDR and Wilson fit right in with these two great humanitarians.

Posted February 22, 2010 at 5:52:50 PM


Rifleman

Then said He unto them, "But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -- Luke 22: 36 (KJV)

Posted February 22, 2010 at 7:05:38 PM


Barb Amos

Thomas Sowell is so accurate in the article he wrote. The Progressives/Socialists/Democrats are attempting to use tactics of class warfare in their efforts to ram through their Leftist Agenda. We, as freedom loving Americans must resist the blatant arrogance of those on the Far Left as they go about the country fomenting turmoil. One of the terms we must remember is, not to allow them to, "divide and conquer".

Posted February 22, 2010 at 7:55:49 PM


Douglas Roy

Can someone tell me why the current number of how many constituents are represented by one representative is around 650,000, when the Constitution says 30,000 to 59,999?

Do you get the feeling we are not represented adequately? Each citizen has 1/13th the power a citizen of the United States did for the first several decades of our existence. That means each representative has 13 times the power of the original representatives. This is an approximation of course, but I think you see where I'm going. If not, I'll explain.

The purpose for the census was to determine if a state should gain or lose representatives according to the population change every ten years. All that is happening now is that lines might get redrawn. Let's say that a state has 6 representatives, like Kentucky. If the average number of constituents for each rep. is 650,000, how high does it have to go before another is added? Pretty high is the answer. In fact, the number of representatives per state has shrunk several times as they fudge the figures and change formulas, all contrary to the Constitution. All done outside of Constitutional mandates. Constitutional amendment is needed to change the original mandate, but that has never happened. Check it out yourself.

Posted February 23, 2010 at 1:18:31 AM


Lawrence

How can any legislator, Democrat or Republican, even think about voting yea or nay before a thorough examination of any bill. The "health care bill" is, in my 70 year young opinion, not intended for health care per se, but a means to control 16% of our national wealth. It is so open ended that it's tantamount to signing a check and letting the vendor fill in the amount. The ONLY means that cost can be regulated is to regulate patient care. The younger generation cares little about health care because they are, in their minds, indestructible. I was, as were virtually all of you in your youth. My wife and I saved all of our lives for retirement. Now Obama is having trillions of worthless dollars printed to pay our nation mortgage and that of future generations on top of demanding legislation that will further erode our economy. Many people seem to forget that the government has no money other than what they take from the working class. The "redistribution" of wealth is purely a socialist agenda. The economy in Europe is failing, as is the Euro, because of socialism. Help those that cannot help themselves? Absolutely! Support those on the dole at the same level as a worker? Nay, I say! Allow Illegal's any rights, privileges or access to public funding? Nay, I say. Perhaps a National I.D. card, much like a passport, should be issued to legal Americans that would have to be presented whenever someone applies for a rental apartment, a home mortgage, public assistance or medical attention. Some people seem to forget that they are nothing more than criminals simply by breaking our immigration laws, have some of the most violent gangs, do not, for the most part, pay taxes and for a litany of other valid reasons should be send packing back to their countries of origin. "Oh", some say as they wring their hands in a pious manner, "but they just want a better life". So did all other immigrants, but they did it legally! Is each individual allowed to pick and choose which laws are O.K. to break? As a retired NY State Correction Officer I saw this all too often. Enough. I say!

Posted February 23, 2010 at 9:25:45 AM


Jennifer

In response to Michael's comment about the Patriot Posts' bad humor during Lent, I would like to say as a devout convert to the Catholic faith, I was offended by the Church engaging in political nonsense, not the Post's play on words. The Church shines light on all corners of the world, so it is quite distressing that the Church would even mention going 'green' as a remotely legitimate practice during Lent. The end all of the 'green' movement would bring more poverty and lower standards of living to everyone (except AlGore). Progressives have long been infiltrating the Church, and the Post has quite nicely ratted them out.

Posted February 23, 2010 at 10:15:58 AM


Bob

Mr. Ramey Article 1 Section 6 of The Constitution allows compensation from our Treasury to our illustrious Congressional folks. Mr. William's idea regarding answering the Census is great along with Mr. Peterson and Mr. Leonard's recommendations. The problem is Joe's interesting point. I will investigate before I provide more than name rank, serial number. You folks certainly provide interesting thoughts in a civil manner. Thanks. Enjoy, Bob

Posted February 23, 2010 at 12:56:51 PM


Have you considered

I must take issue with this post:February 22, 2010 at 12:06:58 PM by G.N. Cecil:

"Expenditures of taxpayer provided funds on space related activities find constitutional justification in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, that gives Congress broad power to “promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts.”

The actual Enumerated Power reads: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;"

This is specifically for the operation of a national patent office, as our founders understood that #1) humans are motivated by self interest, and #2)that if each state had their own patent office, there would be no "security" in the invention.

The only constitutional guise that NASA can use is defense, but that flys in the face of the stated goal of a military free zone.

Posted February 23, 2010 at 1:25:20 PM


P A Noel

The 'Climate Change' issue: Since the git-go my bell-wether is when the Gloom and Doom crowd start buying beach/ocean property on Vancouver (Canada) Island or Newfoundland I'll give their claim a serious analysis!

Posted February 23, 2010 at 4:48:16 PM


Bruce

Excellent column by Mr. Williams on the census (2/22). Unfortunately, the bureau will probably send someone around to get the answers you rightly refuse to give.

Instead, I'd suggest, that anyone born here in the U.S. answer the 'race' question with 'Native American'. It's certainly not a lie, although it's anything but the answer they're looking for. Come up with a ridiculous number for the number of times married (27 for example), how much paid for electricity ($10,000) and # of bath & bedrooms (1 bedroom, 15 bathroom).

If at some point in the future you get questionnaires asking the time you leave for work, be sure to respond as detailed as possible (7:03:14.2), but note a different time zone, preferably Greenwich Mean Time, or somewhere overseas, and use a completely different zone for when you arrive at work. If you can, use military time.

Posted February 24, 2010 at 11:43:58 AM


SmajDawg

I thought slavery was against the law in the United States of America? Seems to me that the "nattering nabobs" in our federal government are trying to bring it back...for all of us!!! Revolutions have begun for fewer abuses than are currently being propogated against "We the people" by those whose pay checks we sign... I have a small business. If my employees attempt to run me I will run them out the door!!! Should we do no less to our "employees" in the Congress in November?

Posted February 24, 2010 at 4:24:41 PM


John Fisher

In answer to Stephen Leonard's request for the provenance of Jefferson's quote, I believe you will find it in the draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798/99 written by Jefferson

Posted March 1, 2010 at 9:15:59 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund