In regards to the "health summit", I find it very telling that President Obama responded to John McCain's concerns by saying, and I paraphrase: "The campaigning is done. The election is over." That implies that he knew he was lying when he was campaigning, saying what he knew the American people wanted to hear just to get elected.

The whole thing with Acorn where he said he didn't keep up with what goes on with Acorn is another example of blatant lies. He claimed to have been involved in one incident with them, then while speaking to Acorn, he acted like they have been working together ever since he was a community organizer back in Chicago.

The president is a compulsive liar. It scares me that he sometimes doesn't seem to realize he is lying. What scares me more is when he says something that shows he is very much aware that he lies and uses it as a tool to get what he wants.

We keep catching him in lies, yet there are many who are still treating him like he's a god. If the liberal press, which is supposed to be the watch dog that keeps the American people aware of what our government is doing ever turns on the president like they did on Bush, I believe President Obama will "go off the deep end". I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to pull something like the Iranian President did when he lost the election.

In today's Digest, you quoted the nation's leader as having stated, "Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, I am an ardent believer in the free market."

This is accurate and, I believe, sincere. Remember, it has been said by many that the Devil is a believer in God. His agenda is completely contrary to the Lord's, but he certainly believes in Him...

As a loyal and WW2 defender of the Constitution during the period ( 1939 -46 ),when All Americans were totally devoted to furtherance of the Nation's Cause,please permit me to make one comment re your statement today.

I agree with your critical comment about the O'Reilly mis-statement you pointed out however,vehemently object to your description of his being a Pinhead!!

He is a decicated Patriot through and through,albeit,in this case he erred,and I am certain,will soon acknowledge same.

But to disregard all of the constant Good he and his TV program reflects night in and night out,calls for far less than being a Pinhead.

Respectfully, as I admire you and your daily/weekly articles, all of which I read and pass on regularly.

Richard( Dick ) Lindstrom

Venice,Florida

The latest dog and pony show in D.C. inappropriately named the "Health Care Summit" has exposed the true depth of systemic and intellectual rot in our government. One only needs to recall what Ronald Reagan said over 50 years ago to fully understand what's behind the push for this obamanation.

“One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It's very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. From here, it's a short step to all the rest of socialism," Ronald Reagan

Read and heed, America

Just curious, did B.O. call the recycled dentures a "prop" the way he did the 2,400 page healthcare bill? I didn't think so.

Here is a cut and paste of a comment from a local NBC affiliates public comment website......

I continue to be bothered by the underlying assumption...(stress on assumption) by the left and the right, by the Democrats and the Republicans ...that there must be a change in a "system" when there is no system... Any person in this country can go to an emergency room and must be given needed medical care...

I keep raising the question that no one, not readers and people leaving comments here, not local and state politicans and not federal legislators and elected politicans...no one will answer clearly and concisely... SHOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVE ANY DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY OVER THE MEDICAL DECISIONS OF ANY INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES CITIZENS???

Why won't anyone answer the question??? Why won't people who claim they want "health care reform" answer the question with a Yes...if they truly believe that the government should control medical decisions of individual citizens? What are people afraid of... If an elected offical honestly believes the Federal Government should be involved have the honesty to state so clearly. And if not then admit honestly that this whole fiasco is about nothing more than command and control of the individual lives of more than 300 million citizens...

If there should be reform of the insurance industry...then start the insurance industry reform debate and lets decide what changes should be made to the insurance industry.

If there should be reform to medical malpractice Tort Law...lets start that debate...

If anyone in the Federal Government thinks that some specific aspect of medical care is too expenses then put limits on the cost of that aspect of medical care...

But this immense barrel of monkey nonsense that has been going on for decades..is nothing more than monkey nonsense no matter how any politicans or media talking head wants to spin it....

NO GOVERNMENT IS GOOD GOVERNMENT AND LESS GOVERNMENT IS BETTER

2/25/2010 6:11 PM CST on ksdk.com

Government officials always talk about people who have dental problems and say health care reform will solve that. NOT TRUE. Very little dental care is covered under medicare or any other healt Ins. You need a special policy for dental care.

I, too, watched the so-called Health Care Summit yesterday. All I saw was more of the same from the Democrats. If you want to see how something is received by the opposition, just look at their faces when the prposals are made. What I saw was boredom, and incomprehension, a sort of "What am I doing here, and why must I listen to this, because my mind is made up on it?" Our illstrious President thrives on commissions and panels to do everything thing for him. He thinks this makes for consensus. He needs to realize that in the beginning, God so loved the world, He didn't send a committee. In other words, if you really want consensus, build it! If you really want to listen to the other side, be attentive! If you really care what the American people want, hear what we are telling you, not in thousands of pages of useless print, but right now. We want you to fix the system we have, not complicate it so you have to be a corporate lawyer to understand it. People are hurting, boys and girls, and they want action, and they want it NOW! Summits, panels, commissions are all a bunch of delaying tactics. The system is broken, so FIX IT AND DO IT IN A SIMPLE WAY THAT BENEFITS ALL AND DOESN'T COST AN ARM AND A LEG! If you can't do better, then come election time in the fall, we will get some people in there who can fix it. This bill is DEAD, so admit it, and get something that will work, even if you have to start slow and build up. The word "Farce" was used for this so-called Summit, but you were too kind. I would have used Fiasco, because that's all it was. When all was said and done, more was said then done. Business as usual, ho-hum, it's Five O'clock, time for a couple of martinis and dinner.

I don't understand why we are so concerned about Iran developing nuclear weapons. Israel has nuclear weapons and Israel has done more to harm Middle East relations than anyone else in the area. We give Israel BILLIONS of dollars every year and yet they ignore U.N. resolutions time and time again. Israel even enjoys killing animals in zoos and civilians without any concern for human rights. Perhaps you should go back in history and review the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed over 200 of our sailors.

Sanctions only hurt the common person, not the elite. And yet Hillary Clinton continues to promote sanctions against Iran. FDR did this to Japan in 1940-1941 and look what it got us - WORLD WAR II. Sanctions haven't worked in Cuba for 50 years and only got us a dictator in our own back yard.

Wake up America.

Just when you think they can't out dumb Themselves, Suprise

Commention on this content in today's Patriot Post: When Rhodes explained to O'Reilly that, even during a state of emergency, it's unconstitutional to confiscate lawfully owned guns, the Fox News Pinhead responded, "That's a pretty extreme position."

Thank you for both your insight and your consistency. O'Reilly likes to pretend that he's conservative while thinking that nobody knows that he views himself as a demigod dispensing favors and policy. But in this respect, he's no differrent than Senators Lindsey Graham and McCain who, knowing nothing about the subject, gratuitously concede even the most outlandish and unverifiable claims of the AGW zealots and eagerly leap to the economically catastrophic next step in a solution to a problem that nobocy can demonstrate! Even when it means accepting the huge lost opportunity costs of diverting trillions from addressing verifiable problems with real solutions. Ignorance is bliss--but in politicians this can be both very dangerous and very costly!

Richard

I agree O'Reilly does some good things. However, O'Reilly will not admit he erred on the gun issue just like he refuses to admit he is wrong about the global warming issue and has his head in the sand about The Obamanation being a socialist.

For all their posturing, neither Democrats nor Republicans can say that any of the concepts in the health care package are even worth the effort to promote or obstruct them. They have wasted a year fighting over this nonsense called "reform" when in fact they could have actually been doing something constructive to help the economy. Freedom is the absence of legislation. We haven't been free for a long time. We need term limits in both chambers of Congress, and until that happens, we will continue to get what we always got - more of the same.

"However...ACORN...ha[s]...simply re-branded" Let's hope those reporting the activities of these "new entities" henceforth will insist on using their real names:

The New York (ACORN)Communities for Change,

New England (ACORN)United for Justice in Boston, etc.

On the comments of NY Rep. Louise Slaughter about the false teeth, am I missing something here? Is there provisions in their bill for Dental coverage? I will soon be 70 and spent 20 years of my life in the Navy and one thing I don't have is Dental coverage. If so, what will it cost? The reason I don't have it now is because I can't afford it. Everyone thinks that people who serve a large portion of their life in the Military have it made when it comes to Health Care etc. Well there are some of us out here that are very close to living on the street. I served my Country with pride and was promised FREE medical, dental, etc if I served 20 or more years, but I have never seen any of it. The Government ruled that everything promised me to keep me in were lies. So as I see it, the same thing will happen with their current promises. Getting away from Healthcare for a minute, lets look at Cap & Trade. If that is passed, anyone that owns their home is going to pay BIG time, especially if they try to sell it. Just compare it to emission testing for vehicles. Your home will have to be tested for it's energy efficiency, have a label put on it, which will cost you, but the real kicker will come when you try to sell it. If it don't meet a certain standard, you will be required to make the changes to reach those standards, before you can sell it. These standards will be subject to change whenever the Government feels like it. Wait until that housing crunch arrives. Welcome to AMERICA!!!!

I agree with Sen. McCain's DSSA. Anyone who takes a dietary supplement is a guinea pig that the drug aka "Dietary Supplement" is being tested on. Supplement sellers become wealthy and are not accountable but the gullible guinea pigs who buy their products waste their money on supplements which fail to do what their sellers say they do and frequently harm the guinea pigs.

As a Strick Constructionist I acknowledge that an arguement can be made that the FDA is unconstituional but from a practical point of view the FDA is a very necessary evil. The bad drugs it has prevented from coming to market far out number the good drugs it has prevented from coming to market and the bad drugs it has let through the cracks. It will be wonderul if someone can come up with a more constitutional method for regulating drugs but for now all drugs should be regulated and no exceptions should be made for those drugs with a political constituency.

The thing I found most disgusting about the "health care summit" was the complete absence of any reference to the Constitution of the United States. I would have thought that Rep. Cantor would have included taht document in his stack as proof there is no authority for the rest. (SIGH) Maybe next time.

Thanks for all y'all's hard work!

As an American, I woke up this morning to the news that the Dems. are going to push Healthcare thru with "Reconciliation". Also, that if things don't change, Dr.'s will stop taking Medicare as of Monday. This will affect me next year as I will have to go on Medicare. This Arrogant President needs to listen to the American people. I would appreciate an email if I am wrong on the facts. Linda

"Some congressional leaders were so bent on making their case at Thursday's "Healthcare Summit" that they resorted to what Barack Obama called "props" that "prevent us from having a conversation." While Republican Congressman Eric Cantor used the 2,400-page bill itself as a "prop," one of his Democrat colleagues wielded a deceased woman's dentures."

Why has not one Member of Congress read the proposed Health Care bill? After all, it’s only 2,400 pages long. That’s equivalent to sequentially reading books One through Five (2,689 pages) of the Harry Potter series, by J.K. Rowling. Unfortunately, J.K. Rowling has only 10-20 central characters in her stories, while the Health Care issue centers on more than 300 million characters—the American People.

As with the tax code, which no single person understands, the Health Care issue is much more political and thus vote-collecting, than it is for the benefit of the Public. Even so, why is it that the Congress of the United States will passionately debate and defend an instrument of such sweeping power, when no one has even read the document? And, just for the satisfaction of my curiosity, how is it that an eye-catching display of the physical immensity of the bill—let alone the wording--is a “prop?”

“It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act V, Scene V

"Dont't Ask, Don't Tell". The only opinions and right to make comments should be left to those who are currently serving, have served and discharged with honor and those normal citizens of current legal voting age who will sign a binding pledge to serve with the US military. It is those currently serving and will pledge to serve who will suffer from having to question if the man serving next to him is normal or not. Such distractions endanger their lives.

I once witnessed a man being given a GI shower for refusing to take a shower on his own. The smell of this individual was disgusting and those serving around him were demanding something be done. While suffering the indignity and the harsh brushes used in a GI shower, this queer, as we later learned, became sexually aroused. It was the last military show he took, thanks to the then existing rules on denying queers the ability to serve. How many men serving in a war zone want to worry about being the object of some queer's sexual fantasy?

Note: The phony term HOMOphobia must be banished from our vocabulary. It is not a fear that one is a queer himself, but DISGUST with and NAUSEA at the very idea of what a queer does that makes us nauseated. This term was created by queers and supported by the liberal media in an effort to shift the disgust with their behavior on to those who are willing to condemn that vile behavior, behavior that should always remain as criminal as it is immoral.

Dan Syme wrote, "It will be wonderul if someone can come up with a more constitutional method for regulating drugs..."

We've had just that for electrical devices for many years, and it has done an excellent job of protecting the safety of the people. Underwriter's Laboratories tests products for manufacturers, and will only put its good name and reputation on the line for products it deems properly designed to prevent fire and shock hazards.

If we could get out from under Nanny Government's skirts and simply insist on products with a private underwriter's guarantee of safety and effectiveness, we would probably find that we not only get good results, but high quality new health care products will arrive on the market more quickly and at lower cost than at present.

George Bush started tapping my phone, now Obama wants to force me the get insurance

We should Change Falatio and Sodomy also, these terms should have a more disgusting sound

it's true -- her sister died. This poor woman had no dentures. She wore her dead sister's teeth, which of course were uncomfortable and did not fit.

There were and are NO provision for dental care or insurance in this one trillion dollar death bill for America.

I don't Think the founding fathers could believe such a tragedy could ever happen in America. A Black Foriegn born radical muslim terrorist elected as President. I just want to move to another country but all the other countries force taxes and free healthcare to individuals. I have heard that in Australia if a elderly member of your family is sick instead of allowing you to put him or her in a nursing facility that is paid for by taxes, The Government almost forces people by paying their salary to stay home and take care of them, taking jobs away from other people.

As a practicing dentist for 32 years, I am telling you there is no way that this woman could wear her deceased sisters dentures nor anyone elses. Aside from the "gross" factor, the dentures would not function properly to enable the woman to fit them into her mouth,let alone chew anything. That's the reason that dentures aren't sold in small - medium and large sizes at Wall Mart.

Linda: Stand up to the government and do not sign up for the socialist medicare program. There are pleny of Insuranse companies that will allow you to pay for healthcare.It would be a truly patriotic act not to allow taxpayers to pay for your needs

In your "to keep and bear arms" section, why didn't the neighbor kill the rapist, rather than just wound him? Doesn't he realize the recidivism rate for criminals is over 90%? Personally, my aim would have made the rapist a eunuch rather than a cripple.

Dr. William D. Young

"As a practicing dentist for 32 years, I am telling you there is no way that this woman could wear her deceased sisters dentures nor anyone elses. Aside from the "gross" factor, the dentures would not function properly to enable the woman to fit them into her mouth,let alone chew anything. That's the reason that dentures aren't sold in small - medium and large sizes at Wall Mart."

Thank you Doctor Young.

Pity that the news media never interviews guys like you for their opinion of this debacle.

Federal Takeover of Education. How long before government mandated uniforms bearing the image of "osama obama" with the term "The Anointed One" or "Our Glorious Leader" embossed upon them? And of course the letters U.S.S.A. must be displayed. Follow that with the morning "Praise 'osama obama'" being sung by the children, mandatory of course. And the new, pledge; I pledge allegiance to "osama obama" and under him, the democrat party ....

To Richard Lindstrom's comment:

God bless you for defending this country in WW2. I have literally put years of research into our history and in particular, WW2 has held my interest and study for reasons I can't explain.

To your comment on Bill O, he himself uses that word reguarly and I myself am a pinhead at times. I understand your view but I think you may have taken it a bit too seriously.

God Bless You...my friend and hero.

What is the name of the lady with her sister's dentures? Is she available for an interview?

How can we solve this tragic situation without this information? You know, come to think of it...this might just be another liberal fairy tale!

All this out of control unconstitutional government spending and legislation is awakening a sleeping giant, the American Population. A population slow to anger and slow to action, BUT, once mobilized will be impossible to stop. If our government officials are concerned now about the voice of the TEA Party movement protests it has not heard anything yet. Ram health care legislation through and they will look back at the peaceful protests with nostalgia. We are getting mad as hell and not going to take this much longer.

I own a business and must operate within my income limits. BUT, if I were to try the governments model of income needs to my wishes, I could just raise my prices to my clients to raise my income, RIGHT. Do you think I would retain all of my clients?

Unlike tax payers that must submit to government dictates on tax payments, enforced at the point of a governmental gun, my customers can choose to take their business elsewhere and my income would drop or my business would fail.

In order to succeed I must provide a great service at competitive rates or have no business.

Our government can create anything regardless of efficiency and not be concerned with income creation, just raise taxes and take from our blood, sweat and tears for any unconstitutional program envisioned and operate it good or bad at our expense for as long as desired.

The American population is armed to the teeth and our government knows it. I think we need to send a message, not buy more guns, but do so if you wish, lets all go out an buy a hay pitchfork, there is a symbolism there that even those anti gun anti self defense pukes can get behind to send the message we are fast approaching the end of our rope.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) introduced the Dietary Supplement Safety Act (DSSA), S. 3002, which would empower the Food and Drug Administration to regulate dietary supplements such as vitamins. I still am hanging by my thumbs, not, waiting for someone to tell me which section of the Constitution authorizes a FDA as well as DEA. As for Dan Syme's comment, "FDA is a very necessary evil" and that he is a strict Constitutionalist the two ideas are oxymorons. I believe it was Daniel Webster who said, "the purpose of the Constitution is to save us from good ideas." I think it is way passed time for James Madison, Patrick Henry and Benajmin Franklin to call the office.

My uncle has a whole drawer full of teeth down at the funeral home... come on by and try some on, I'm sure sumthin will fit!!

The event again showed current administrative leaders can talk the talk. Yet, they have failed to Walk the Walk. I believe the debate, not negotiations, was an effort to float a trial balloon. First, to see if the current administration could get the upper hand in the public presentations; and, second to quickly measure public opinion hoping for a shift in public opinion warranting a 51 or majority vote with justification through rationalization. It didn't work. The American public watched, the public opinion was not changed and the three Musketeers need to ride into the sunset saying.......WE NEED TO START OVER!

I AM PROUD OF OUR REPUBLICAN STATESMEN!!

Breaking ranks is apparently risky in the status one can lose within his respective party. What would have been nice was to have heard one of them say..."I am not speaking as a Repub. or a Dem.; I am the representative of the great people from the State of __________________.

Senator Bernie Sanders (Soc.-VT) should know better than to cheapen the Holocaust the way he did regarding his pathetic comparison to climate change. He too is Jewish and should be ashamed of himself.

With all the really important things that need to be dealt with, along comes a Senator (who will remain nameless out of respect for his war record, but who will be out of a job come November) proposing Federal regulation of dietary supplements. The reputable companies all clearly label their products as not being proven medically effective. And there are studies readily available that show the jury is still out on most of the ingredients positive benefits having not been substantiated. On the other hand, there ia a very large number of people who by their experience believe that supplements are of value. I've taken a variety of them for lo these many years, and still can't swear that it's not all a lot of snake oil. But they haven't hurt, and they may help. So, Feds, butt out. Still, the information is there. Let me make my own choice. If Nanny government had been the people's choice long ago, we'd still be isolated on the East Cost under an English sovereign.

For "Faith and Family", you are correct in that the 1st Amendment does state that the Govt shall not make any law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Got it, however by that same Amendment they cannot make a law establishing a religion. You can't have the cake and eat it to. If you want to get funding from the Government, you cannot favor one religion over another. Period, end of story. Either treat ALL people equally or you can't have any tax money for your operations. This group (The Archdiocese of Washington, DC)discriminates against a certain group(s) of people for RELIGIOUS reasons. Explain how this is in accordance with the Amendment that you quote. If it is good for one group of people, it is good for all. And before you say it, I am referring to Law Abiding Citizens, convicted criminals are not in the equation.

The Arizona Court is wrong. If this is a case of 1st degree murder, then the defendants religion has nothing to do with the case. And the only standard that should be applied is the rule of law. If "they" are worried about public perceptions, show that all are treated equally in our courts....Of course that cannot be done, because if you have the money, you can get away with murder. No matter what your race, color or religion.

With regard to the "Great Moments in Socialized Medicine" article in the 2/26 Digest, the big question really isn't "Where will other wealthy Canadians go for health care?" but it should be "Where will Pelosi, Reid and Obama and other wealthy Americans go if this monstrosity passes?"

Tyrant obama and his henchmen arehell bent on DETROYING the United States !!! What a bunch of s'facimes (Italian) !!!!

obama is ABUSING his office ???!!!

J.Z.

Our first president, George Washington, had false teeth. I don't believe he asked Congress to pay for them.

Very good, Dr. Young, I,too, have been involved with Dentistry, and that was ONLY designed for the "gross factor" as you say.

You told it just like it is, and "tear off the coverings of these "liars". If a woman did such things,(as taking dentures off of a corpse" - What else would she do?????????????? BEWARE!!!!!!!

Comment on the "Political Production" staged for TV on health care.

I am glad that the Republicans "didn't come off as wimps" but what was so discouraging to me, that neither, Republicans or Democrats stated, "This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL". NO HEALTH CARE FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL. "OUT OF BOUNDS".

I, also, was astonished about the word, "incremental". I posted a post about the difference between the Democrats - Communism vs Republicans - "incremental" Communism, both "BAD CHOICES". NO,NO,NO (they left off the word, Communism, wonder why??????)

REVERSE AND REPEAL - Go back to the Boundaries of the Beloved Constitution and be "chained to the limits of that Document, given to US by men who loved their people.

We, the people, will be happy, glad & FREE when we can once again "TRUST" representative legislators. (Gaining "TRUST", after many violations, takes awhile), but we, the people, look for a "new earth wherein dwells righteousness."

This can be FIXED. "Put your hands to work and your hearts to God." Remember, Benjamin Franklin's words of wisdom, "Have forgot our Friend.... and they prayed." God was entreated, and our Beloved America was the ANSWER. "America, the Beautiful"

"Men ought always to pray and not to faint."

For God & Country

Ruth Ann Wilson

Wally Kiesler: Under socialized medicine, the ruling elite have their own clinics, hospitals, and pharmacies, staffed with the most modern equipment, best trained doctors, it is free, and the working class (the rest of the population) does not have access to them.

Re the healthcare summit: Why has the conservative media and politician's played into Obama's hands by further dignifying the discussion other than calling it what it is...another socialist entItlement program? Just say No! ...to summits that provide a platform for thieves to legitimize unconstitutional activity.

As far as the Nanny State punishing via taxes:

Here's an interesting thought: whenever the government taxes something, THEY ARE APPROVING OF THE ACTIVITY. They place a tax on cigarettes. Does that mean they want you to quit smoking? I'd say, "no." Why? Simple. The government takes those tax dollars and spends them. No. Really? Yup. Now, when the government gets used to a revenue source, and spending that revenue source, do you honestly believe they want that source to go away? C'mon! Absolutely not! Look at Social Security. The money is no longer sitting in a Trust fund to pay those who have contributed to it. The government has ALREADY spent that money for other "important" things. Now that Trust fund is empty. Those paying into Social Security now are supporting those who are currently on it. Thus the crisis of not enough workers supporting the system. Do we "fix" it by raising the retirement age? By raising the taxes of those paying into it? How about cutting other not-so-"important" spending and putting the money BACK in the Trust fund? Yeah, that'll happen . . .

So, the government will spend any revenue source it can get it's corrupt, greedy hands on. That means, if they truly wanted people to quit smoking, they would make cigarettes illegal. But no, they tax it instead. "Keep smoking, just give us a cut of the 'profit'."

Another example: the government wants to tax bonuses of Wall Street CEOs. Does this mean the government "feels your pain" and wants to punish the CEOs? Nope. They want the CEOs to keep getting the bonuses. Whenever the government taxes something, they are approving of the activity. They want the activity to continue so they can grab a piece of the action. Kind of like mafia extortion . . .

Re: O'Reilly and his comments on the 2nd A. I've been a waning O'Reilly fan for some time now and I think I am nearly over the hurdle now.

I nearly lost it when O'Reilly explained (in part) his basis for taking issue with what was done in LA after Katrina (house-to-house confiscation of legal firearms). It was apparently okay, he seemed to suggest, because it was an "emergency" situation. This is appalling - it is precisely because of an "emergency" situation that I want, and will have, legally owned and possessed firearms in my home. It's called self preservation, and it is legal under the Constitution. I cannot lay my finger on that portion of the 2nd A (or anywhere else) that reads "except in an emergency". If we ever get to a point where that is acceptable, we're doomed as a nation.

O'Reilly's position shows, in my mind, that even an arguably ardent defender of American freedoms can be duped by the lefty-MSM and the daily pounding of their ideology.

Finally, when I think about it, I often break out in cold sweat when I wonder how I would have reacted when faced with purported "law enforcement" officers banging on my door in the middle of the night demanding to confiscate my legally owned and properly possessed firearms. I don;t want to face that situation...

Col. Robert Howard, VIRTUE AND VALOR

I reckon, after reading this account, how we refrain from "tears" is beyond me. The price paid for FREEDOM is certainly told in these accounts by our Valiant Veterans.

Because of "these shining examples of valor", we must not shrink from our responsibility as citizens to secure our Beloved America for God and Posterity.

May the Lord give peace and comfort to the family that has lost such a valiant man.

For God & Country

Ruth Ann Wilson

About O'Reilly's picking and choosing which rights in the Bill of Rights to support:

Fox Nation had this story posted on it's site. But when criticism of O'Reilly became prominent, they quickly removed the story.

I just found that interesting.