Brief

Monday, March 1, 2010

The Foundation

"There is a certain enthusiasm in liberty, that makes human nature rise above itself, in acts of bravery and heroism." --Alexander Hamilton

Opinion in Brief

The Gadsden Flag

"Americans cherish their independence. One interesting aspect of the spontaneous tea party movement is the constant invocation of the Founders and the prominence of the 'Don't Tread on Me' flag. ... Americans tend to see themselves as independent doers, not dependent victims. They don't like to be told, especially by those with fancy academic pedigrees, that they are helpless and in need of government aid. That's why the politically popular American big government programs -- Social Security, Medicare, veterans' benefits, student loans -- all make a connection between effort and reward. You get a benefit because you've worked for it. In contrast, Americans have loathed and rejected big government programs with no nexus between effort and reward. Welfare was begun in the 1930s to help widows with children, whose plight, as Russell Baker's memoir 'Growing Up' showed, was often dismal. But when welfare became a mass program to subsidize mothers who didn't work and to excuse fathers from responsibility for their actions, it became wildly unpopular. Bill Clinton recognized this when he signed welfare reform in 1996. ... Barack Obama, who has chosen to live his adult life in university precincts, sees ... Americans generally as victims who need his help, people who would be better off dependent on government than on their own. Most American voters don't want to see themselves that way and resent this condescension." --political analyst Michael Barone

Political Futures

"When Republicans regain a majority in the House and Senate -- either this fall, as seems increasingly likely, or in the election following -- they must learn from their previous mistakes when they last held power. In addition to focusing on overturning whatever health insurance 'reform' proposal this Congress eventually passes (by a veto override, or a lawsuit challenging the measure's constitutionality), a Republican congressional majority must help large numbers of the public unlearn the factual errors they have been taught to accept. From 'climate change,' to the notion that government is a guarantor through 'entitlement' programs of a minimal outcome in life, to the forgotten idea given to us by the Founders that Liberty is the most precious gift there is, the country needs a history lesson based on truth, experience and provable facts. ... A Republican majority should turn the nation's attention away from Washington. A Republican majority must teach us again that 'you can do it,' like so many of our fathers did when the training wheels came off and we learned we could fly down the sidewalk without assistance. America doesn't need restructuring. It needs revival; revival of the principles that made us strong and great; revival of the moral foundation that proved to be our real strength and allowed us to conquer our demons and become independent, not dependent on government. This is the message most Americans want to hear and need to hear. Will the Republicans deliver it?" --columnist Cal Thomas

The Gipper

"Perhaps you and I have lived with this miracle too long to be properly appreciative. Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again. Knowing this, it is hard to explain those who even today would question the people's capacity for self-rule. Will they answer this: if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else?" --Ronald Reagan

Re: The Left

"The reason massive Democratic majorities in Congress aren't enough to pass socialist health care is AMERICANS DON'T WANT SOCIALIZED MEDICINE! In fact, you might say that the nation is in a boiling cauldron of rage against it. Consequently, a lot of Democrats are suddenly having second thoughts about vast new government commissions regulating every aspect of Americans' medical care. Obama isn't stupid -- he's not seriously trying to get a health care bill passed. The whole purpose of this public 'summit' with the minority party is to muddy up the Republicans before the November elections. You know, the elections Democrats are going to lose because of this whole health care thing. Right now, Americans are hopping mad, swinging a stick and hoping to hit anyone who so much as thinks about nationalizing health care. If they could, Americans would cut the power to the Capitol, throw everyone out and try to deport them. ... But the Democrats think it's a good strategy to call the Republicans 'The Party of No.' When it comes to Obamacare, Americans don't want a party of 'No,' they want a party of 'Hell, No!' or, as Rahm Emanuel might say, '*&^%$#@ No!' ... Complaining that Republicans are 'obstructionists' is not a damaging charge when most Americans are dying to obstruct the Democrats with a 2-by-4. While you're at it, Democrats, why not call the GOP the 'Party of Brave Patriots'?" --columnist Ann Coulter

Government

"Filibusters are devices for registering intensity rather than mere numbers. Besides, has a filibuster ever prevented eventual enactment of anything significant that an American majority has desired, strongly and protractedly? Liberals say filibusters confuse and frustrate the public. But most ideas incubated in the political cauldron of grasping factions are deplorable. Therefore, serving the public involves -- mostly involves -- saying 'No.' The Bill of Rights effectively pronounces the lovely word 'no' regarding many possible government undertakings -- establishment of religion, unreasonable searches and seizures, etc. The fiction that government is 'paralyzed' by partisanship is regularly refuted. ... Liberals are deeply disappointed with the public, which fails to fathom the excellence of their agenda. But their real complaint is with the government's structure. And with the nature of the politics this structure presupposes in a continental nation wary of government and replete with rival factions." --columnist George Will

For the Record

"For those not versed in the arcane rules of the U.S. Senate, reconciliation is not what a divorced couple attempts when they visit Dr. Phil. It is a mechanism for avoiding filibusters on certain budgetary issues. If Democrats can find a way to apply it to health care reform, they could pass a bill with just 51 votes, negating the election of Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown and the loss of the 60-seat supermajority. Reconciliation was established in 1974 to make it easier for Congress to adjust taxes and spending in order to 'reconcile' actual revenues and expenditures with a previously approved budget resolution. Thus, at the end of the year, if Congress found that it was running a budget deficit higher than previously projected, it could quickly raise taxes or cut spending to bring the budget back into line. Debate on such measures was abbreviated to just 20 hours (an eyeblink in Senate terms), and there could be no filibuster. As Robert Byrd, (D-W.V.), one of the original authors of the reconciliation rule, explained, 'Reconciliation was intended to adjust revenue and spending levels in order to reduce deficits ... [I]t was not designed to ... restructure the entire health care system.' He warns that using reconciliation for health care would 'violate the intent and spirit of the budget process, and do serious injury to the Constitutional role of the Senate.' In fact, in 1985, the Senate adopted the 'Byrd rule,' which prohibits the use of reconciliation for any 'extraneous issue' that does not directly change revenues or expenditures. Clearly, large portions of the health care bill, ranging from mandates to insurance regulation to establishing 'exchanges,' do not meet that requirement." --Cato Institute senior fellow Michael D. Tanner

Faith & Family

"One of the major differences between the right and the left concerns the question of authority: To whom do we owe obedience and who is the ultimate moral authority? For the right, the primary moral authority is God (or, for secular conservatives, Judeo-Christian values), followed by parents. Of course, government must also play a role, but it is ultimately accountable to God and it should do nothing to undermine parental authority. For the left, the state and its government are the supreme authorities, while parental and divine authority are seen as impediments to state authority. ... In a nutshell, the left wants to have ever-expanding authority over people's lives through ever-expanding governmental powers. It does so because it regards itself as more enlightened than others. Others are either enemies (the right) or unenlightened masses. It is elected by demonizing its enemies and doling out money and jobs to the masses." --radio talk-show host Dennis Prager

Culture

"Personal responsibility is a real problem for those who want to collectivize society and take away our power to make our own decisions, transferring that power to third parties like themselves, who imagine themselves to be so much wiser and nobler than the rest of us. Aimless apologies are just one of the incidental symptoms of an increasing loss of a sense of personal responsibility -- without which a whole society is in jeopardy. The police cannot possibly maintain law and order by themselves. Millions of people can monitor their own behavior better than any third parties can. Cops can cope with that segment of society who have no sense of personal responsibility, but not if that segment becomes a large part of the whole population. Yet increasing numbers of educators and the intelligentsia seem to have devoted themselves to undermining or destroying a sense of personal responsibility and making 'society' responsible instead." --economist Thomas Sowell

Reader Comments

"If the message in Mark Alexander's essay, 'The First Statement of Conservative Principles', is that the Tea Party should link up with the Republican GOP, then count me out. I am about to switch from being a registered Republican to that of an Independent. The GOP keeps throwing rocks at the Obama liberals, as they should, but they need to clean their own house as well." --TroutLakeTom

Editor's Reply: Mr. Alexander's message was precisely that no such link between the Tea Party and the GOP should be formalized.

"In Friday's Digest, you quoted the nation's leader as having stated, 'Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, I am an ardent believer in the free market.' This is accurate and, I believe, sincere. Remember, it has been said by many that the Devil is a believer in God. His agenda is completely contrary to the Lord's, but he certainly believes in Him..." --Capt., USN

"In reference to Friday's 'And Last' item and Rep. Louis Slaughter, as a practicing dentist for 32 years, I am telling you there is no way that this woman could wear her deceased sisters dentures nor anyone else's. Aside from the 'gross' factor, the dentures would not function properly to enable the woman to fit them into her mouth, let alone chew anything. That's the reason that dentures aren't sold in small, medium and large sizes at Walmart." --Dr. Young

The Last Word

"[W]ho are regular, run-of-the-mill, tax-paying Americans to question Obama? He's brilliant, after all. ... [I]f Obama is so brilliant, why does he parrot the words and thoughts of a bunch of schmucks like Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Al Gore and Michael Moore? Why does he insist that the trouble with the Constitution and the Civil Rights movement is that they didn't focus on the redistribution of wealth? Why would he hand over the federal budget to a couple of morons like Pelosi and Reid? And why on earth would he put Henry Waxman in charge of his energy program? A brilliant person wouldn't trust Waxman to bring baked beans to a picnic. When someone decides to model a health care plan after such dismal failures as England, Canada and Cuba, while exhuming the failed economic policies of FDR, why would anyone suggest he is anything but a left-wing ignoramus? This is an American president, for heaven's sake, who has more in common with Noam Chomsky, Hugo Chavez and some Berkeley hippie than he has with Washington, Jefferson and Adams. Except that he is now 30 years older, Obama seems to think exactly the same way he was thinking back in college, when he was a pot-smoking idiot who sought out students who were self-professed revolutionaries and professors who were communists. If we have come to a point where the ability to read scripted lines off a teleprompter is considered a sign of brilliance, no matter how fatuous the actual words may be, we are in even worse shape than I imagined." --columnist Burt Prelutsky



Comments

ILEANA

This administration calls Americans "dependent victims," they are "entitled dependents," who neither work nor deserve the entitlements they demand/receive from our government. If we want to see the results of such policy, we need not look any further than Greece - they are in full revolt because their "entitled benefits" would have to be cut because there is NOT enough money to go around to the growing numbers of entitled dependents when coffers are shrinking and the economy is in dire straights. They now look to the European Union to bail them out, especially to Germany, as a more economically successful member of EU.

The European Union had reservations before admitting the PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain) to their ranks because of their poorly managed economies, high unemployment rates, and high inflation rates.

Ever growing number of immigrants to the European Union have inflated the welfare rolls and now, many countries are having serious problems maintaining the utopian socialist nanny states they have imposed.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 11:12:39 AM


Dr. Robert Nasser

While the following may be true:"In reference to Friday's 'And Last' item and Rep. Louis Slaughter, as a practicing dentist for 32 years, I am telling you there is no way that this woman could wear her deceased sisters dentures nor anyone else's. Aside from the 'gross' factor, the dentures would not function properly to enable the woman to fit them into her mouth, let alone chew anything. That's the reason that dentures aren't sold in small, medium and large sizes at Walmart." --Dr. Young

What was not said is that Dental Care is not a benefit of Medical Insurance and would not be a benefit of a policy, new or old. Rep. Slaughter made an absurd (and likely false) comment.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 11:35:26 AM


Rich L Mack

Our Systems (Called Government) Have become the Largest Welfare entity in History. Until,We the People (Tea Party Folks)Take Our Country Back, It will slide into bankruptcy and Oblivion.I like Scores of republicans have switched to the Independent party. we need to Desperately--TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK..Rich.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 11:49:24 AM


Howard

atta boy for Burt Prelutsky

Posted March 1, 2010 at 11:50:22 AM


Steve Adams

Let's join hundreds of 1000's of believing Americans and pray for our country every evening (9 p.m. E; 8 p.m. C: 7 p.m. M; and 6 p.m. P). We are the majority and GOD is able & willing to answer.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 11:55:10 AM


snappers

All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, nor from want of honor or virtue, so much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation " John Adams

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:03:33 PM


Frank Verano

Why is this description of Obama is only now apparent to many? It was blatantly obvious to me during the campaign.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:09:11 PM


Ron Doty

I think an essay is due on how Liberals have created a state religion: The Cult of Global Warmism, with its priesthood of state-funded scientists, and places of worship established in every school, missionaries throughout the MSM and the Cap n Trade collection plate being readied.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:09:52 PM


marcthepig

Congress is so damaged, we need to vote out all of the incumbents, both houses, both sides, no exceptions. We need to do this for a number of election cycles until the idea of citizen service in Congress is remembered.

Lawmaking is not supposed to be a lifetime endeavor. Citizens are supposed to seek office, serve, and then go back to private life. The idea of a lifetime as an elected official is what has given us this priveliged class we call Congress. No wonder they have the best of everything from medical care to pensions. They have gone from being those who serve to those being served - by us.

Finally, the debt being foisted upon this and future generations by the ideologues in charge gives us a clear choice - fight this now or join your children and grandchildren on their knees in service to this very same debt.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:17:48 PM


Christopher Popham Smith

DATELINE: Reconciliation Day, U.S.A.

(scenario some time in the near future)

Major U.S. cities are plagued with street protests and demonstrations over the passage of an unwanted

health care reform bill. The people have had enough

of the Washington elites telling them what to do.

So far, there are few injuries and no reported deaths in clashes with police.

Just in: police are asking for assistance from the

national guard in many cities and towns as the

violence escalates.

The White House announces that they are considering

curfews and martial law to quell the protestors.

Just wondering. Could this really happen in a

'free society' such as ours? Oh well, Nov. 2nd is

here in just 8 months. That will be the true

21st Century American Revolution. Won't it?

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:18:34 PM


Rob

re: The Last Word.....Amen! Amen! Amen! This so-called intellectual elitist can't even pronounce 'corpsman' or 'ask' correctly. And where did he get the money (as a young 'Community Organizer', and on a politician's salary) for a $500K townhouse in Chicago?

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:18:44 PM


Richard Jansen

Although George Will fancies himself William F. Buckley’s replacement in the Conservative wing of the Republican Party, he is too often less than conservative in his opinions, willing to compromise principles for results. However, in this he has hit the nail on the head.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:30:02 PM


Ralph L. Overmyer Sr.

I love people that tell it like it really is! I agree with each one of these writers and I'm sure they share the same degree of patriotism that most retired military personnel have. We love our country and probably most of us are willing to once again fight to the death to save it.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:32:02 PM


BYRON BUTTERS

Very well stated... I wish every American could read and understand the truth of it.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:34:26 PM


Mike McGinn

Burt Prelutzky asks in "The Last Word" of Monday's Brief "Why would he [Obama] hand over the federal budget to a couple of morons like Pelosi and Reid?"

I think Burt needs to review the Constitution. It is Congress that has the power to tax and spend, not the President. The President merely submits his budget to Congress. Congress submits their "re-crafting" of the budget back to the President for his approval. If the President vetos that budget, Congress can still pass it by overturning the President's veto. At the end of the day, Congress could completely ignore the President and his budget submission if they wanted to.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:35:19 PM


Robert Kenny

TroutLakeTom is missing the whole point - should Tea Party members automatically hook up with Republicans? No, but if we keep to a "Holier than thou" attitude and insist upon purity in any candidate, we will surely elect more Democrats by taking away opposition vote. A wounded Republican can be healed, better to work with them with 70% agreement than with a Democrat who may have only 30% agreement with the Tea Party principals. Otherwise, there is no hope, as no third party will exist for long.........

Posted March 1, 2010 at 12:42:08 PM


dave

re: the last word by burt prelutsky, amen brother. i have never seen or been aware of anything to indicate obamao is anything more than a college educated(alleged but not proved as he won't let his transcripts be released) idiot. he doesn't speak well, his thoughts that he expresses are half formed, incoherent and merely the parroting of left wing talking points, he uses words like a ghetto thug does(axe instead of ask) and if he didn't have a teleprompter he wouldn't be able to speak to schoolkids. this is truly a, i don't know what to call it as he's not really our president and i question his manhood, oh i know, puppet who is image only with no real substance.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 1:13:06 PM


L HYAK

How can we know just how brilliant the Un-Credentialed POTUS really is until he removes the legal restraint on his school records so we can actually see his GPA. I would not refer to him as the UN-Credentialed except for the fact that he also has that same restraint on his birth certificate.....Who is this guy?

Posted March 1, 2010 at 1:14:15 PM


Carolyn

I believe Mr. Prelutzky has hit the nail on the head with his description of Obama. I am just amazed that there are still too many American's who can't seem to realize the actual truth about this person who has usurped the office of President thru fraud, lying and actually being illegall to even run for any political office in the United States of America.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 1:42:16 PM


Freeman Shell

a brilliant person (0bama) would not trust Waxman to bring ants to a picnic or Rangel to pay his taxes.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 1:47:38 PM


Rene U.

I'm one of those people who is, most times, at a loss for words. Muttering things like, 'Oh yeah? Well...'

The Patriot Post makes me look smart and I can says things like, "Oh yeah? Well, what Burt said!!'.

You guys are a Godsend and without you I'd be grouchy all the time. You make it easier to 'worry about nothing, pray about everything'. Thank you!

Posted March 1, 2010 at 2:06:39 PM


Robert Bostick

The longer I observe Obama the more I am convinced he is a puppet manuvered by someone "behind the curtain." He can't stand up and make statements without sheets of paper to read off of or make a speech without tele-prompters, which tells me the man has no political soul of his own. Someone, perhaps from the Daley machine in Chicago, is running the show. Very dangerous for we real Americans!

Posted March 1, 2010 at 2:11:17 PM


mike sales

I agree, but the problem is if enough people say red is green, publish red as green, communicate to the masses red is green, teach red is green in our universities.....then red becomes green to all but the informed minority and that my friends is how President Barak Hussein Obama was elected.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 2:33:47 PM


george

I got a kick out of Pelosi trying to snuggle up with TEA. Nothing is below these people. Say one thing and do another and the KA drinkers are oblivious. The relentless smearing and demonizing of people who don't agree and then cry partisanship, SHE must see the handwriting on the wall.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 2:41:02 PM


Eugene Notkin

Americans, together with the pretend Americans, will continue the descent into oblivion unless they do whatever must be done in order to destroy the undermining of freedom and justice by the Progressive Parasitic Ruling Class (PRC). No it won't be easy, and even bloody, but it all comes down to the choice between freedom and justice which has long been the essence of America, and sucking up to the PRC!

Posted March 1, 2010 at 2:51:19 PM


W.T. Door

Michael Barone's comment quote when welfare became a mass program to subsidize mothers who didn't work and to excuse fathers from responsibility for their actions, it became wildly unpopular close quote doesn't reflect the whole population. Regrettably there are far too many that wholeheartedly embrace the no work, no responsibility program, and their heroine is Octomom.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 3:03:48 PM


Rick Faile

Why should "The Party of No" be a label of shame or ridicule? The GOP should not only adopt the "Party of No", any political party should wear it as a badge of honor. The word "no" appears 42 times in the Constitution. Of those 42, at least 29 (nearly 70%) are used to tell the Government, "No"; directly limiting what the Federal and/or State governments can do.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 3:26:33 PM


Cathryn Farr

Mr Prelutsky has added depth to my own assessment of the President. I am appalled at the praise he gets for his speechmaking. When media reports that he is such a great speaker, I ask simply, "Compared to who?" My experience of listening to leaders speak does not come from academia and maybe that is what gives me a vastly different perspective. For over 20 years I have listened to speeches given by people who teach truth in clarity. This is MY zero ref.

This is what I expect from the President.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 3:30:16 PM


Duke of Earl

There are eight months until the 2010 General Election. ALL incumbents are to be thrown from office - NO EXCEPTIONS. Do not listen to a thing they say; they can't be trusted. They have proven that time and again.

For those who are running against said incumbents (either party); we MUST make certain that these candidates know that ineptitude and laziness will not be tolerated. These candidates need to understand that "We the People" expect value and honesty from those elected to serve (not govern). These candidates need to understand that their current actions, NOT statements, are the reason for our votes. If these candidates cannot measure up prior to election, vote for NOBODY and let the chips fall where they may. With a large percentage of votes going to the atmosphere, it may be likely that those elected may realize what good fortune they just received.

Then in the next election vote all of the incumbents out again. Keep doing this until the people elected to serve will actually listen to the people and not the talking heads, etc.

Duke

Posted March 1, 2010 at 4:15:52 PM


Barbara Short

I am an independent. I thank my neice for bringing this site to my attention. I am frustrated with the political nonsence that is going on. I pray daily that we can survive the next three years. I have been telling everyone I see it is time to vote the "ins" "out" and bring on fresh minds. When did politician become a career. Why can it be limited to service like the President" Of course, the politicians won't limit the gravy train! When they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar why are they allowed to keep the perks they were voted into? Ordinary working people do not get to keep their benefits when they leave a job. Why should the politicians? God help us!

Posted March 1, 2010 at 4:28:37 PM


Barb

One of your most informative and accurately targeted issues ever. BRAVO!

Posted March 1, 2010 at 4:32:55 PM


Edward

"Yet increasing numbers of educators and the intelligentsia seem to have devoted themselves to undermining or destroying a sense of personal responsibility and making 'society' responsible instead." --economist Thomas Sowell

I can completely attest to what Mr. Sowell says about educators. If the average American, parent or not, had ANY idea of the subversive practices of the NEA and AFT through union efforts in curriculuum decisions, textbook selection (they don't buy what does not agree with what they want said), and political lobbying, they would run to the nearest private school. Those who see educators for what they are have voted with their feet, and this is somewhat evident in the growth of home-schooling.

The most basic questions pertaining to Civics reveal the almost total ignorance that those under the age of 40 have regarding the role Government has historically had in the life of an America citizen. This lack of knowledge is the direct result of what teacher's unions have done to America's children.

The current Education Department must be abololished and new standards set that would reverse this insidious undermining of America. Unions as a whole must be blocked from exercising ANY influence in areas that are not directly relative to their chartered functions. Any found in violation should be immediately decertified.

Lastly, new regulations should be enacted that prevent ANY possibility that they could exercise the current political power they now wield. As they are fond of saying, "He/she is OUR vote in (fill in DC, state, municipality)."

I, with a few other educators, have felt like the "voice crying in the wilderness" for too long. It is good to see it stated here, though in a much milder tone.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 4:45:20 PM


Texan

The Gadsden (don't tread on me) flag made it's modern reappearance in the short lived television series "Jericho". For those familiar with the show there is little difference between where we're headed and what this series portrayed. And just to help you busy-body progressives get your shorts into an even tighter bunch, the Gadsden was a militia flag, not a military one.

To quote "The Gipper", "If we lose freedom here there is no place left to escape to. We are the last stand on earth."

Those of us who understand history, don't take the history of the Gadsden lightly. It may get used as a homogenized "protest" flag today but it's a battle flag from our fight for independence. Those in Washington would do well to remember that and heed this viper's warning. We know we're the last stand on earth.

Oops, did that just put me on a watch list???

Posted March 1, 2010 at 5:08:46 PM


edward Ellis

I have a cartoon from 1934 I'm sure you would like to share. How can I send it to you?

Thanks,

Ed

Posted March 1, 2010 at 6:30:34 PM


Mike Posey

In response to Burt Prelutsky's commentary, I would suggest that Obama is indeed brilliant. He is deliberately making the moves that Prelutsky calls stupid because he (Obama) is slowly but surely overloading the system with entitlements and debt beyond the system's ability to handle it with the inevitable collapse and rescue by socialism. This is precisely the Cloward/Priven Strategy annouced from Columbia University years ago and can be seen successfully employed in the take over of all investment banks, at least two car companies and some insurance companies. Deliberate and Brilliant

Posted March 1, 2010 at 6:35:03 PM


Rick, left-coast right-winger

I love this weeks Last Word. I've often wondered why people seem to think Obama is so brilliant. We get this message primarily from the leftist media and a variety of Hollywood idiots. The reason is that Obama is simply smarter than they are. For the most part, these liberals are babbling morons who happen to have become famous because of other liberals. They hear Obama say words like "corpse" and "ax" with the aid of his alter-ego, the twin-opposed Teleprompters no less, and think that he is "brilliant".

Posted March 1, 2010 at 6:40:42 PM


Terry Webb

Could not have said it better. It's like a contest between dumb and dumber and the dumbest gets to be on the teleprompter.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 7:08:35 PM


TED THEODORE

I've decided that the only way that the people keep control of the government is for everyone to register to vote as an independent. That way those seeking public office will have to go with ideas instead of "vote for me becauseI have a D/R behind my name.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 7:23:45 PM


FreeNorth

The cartoon reminds me of C. S. Lewis' comment regarding the so-called progressive movement, "We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive."

Posted March 1, 2010 at 7:33:53 PM


FreeNorth

Christopher Popham Smith: the revolution has been underway for some time. The majority in Congress, the present occupants of the White House and their "progressive" backers are in open rebellion against the Constitution and people of the United States. They are attempting to loot the nation of its liberties as well as its property. We look forward to a successful counter-revolution on election day.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 7:38:17 PM


Rifleman

The legend surrounding the Gordian Knot was that it had been tied by Midas as being impossible for any mortal man to untie. It was said that the man who could unravel it would rule the world. When Alexander the Great was confronted by the Knot, he didn't waste his time or the time of his army. He drew his sword and hacked the Knot into pieces. History records his subsequent conquest of the known world. This Nation inherited Alexander's approach to problems: We Americans don't have much patience with folderol, with the stupidity, deafness and -- most of all -- arrogance among our elected officials. I don't think that Pelosi, Reid or Obama have any sense of the Giant that they've awakened. Pray that their ousting remains peaceful; that We, the People, will be patient enough to wait until November to toss them out of office by ballot. Pray hard because these are the times that try men's souls.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 8:47:08 PM


Howard Reed, Durhamville, NY

Hear! Hear! Mr. Prelutsky,

Boy Bam's Communist leaning unfortunately started at birth, the product of an atheistic mother and an avowed Muslim/Communist father.

The grandparents who raised him didn't do him justice where good and evil is concerned. His first father figure mentor while in high school in Hawaii was a member of the American Communist Party.

The Bammer has followed the old Soviet system from being born into it, so there is no turning back. We will just to contain him at the polls until we can get rid of him in 2014 at the polls starting in Nov.

Being of the progressive deity elite the Bam thinks is invulnerable to Americans ire. He will be brought abruptly into the reality of such a misconception one way or the other. We are all learning to just say no to Bam and the 'useful idiot' congressional progressives led by 'Nitsy' Nancy and 'Dingy' Harry.

The Turban Torpedo

Posted March 1, 2010 at 9:23:49 PM


Darlene Knott

Loved Mr. Prelutsky's comments! He hit the nail on the head. If Obama is so smart, why does he turn over great resources to idiots? Teleprompter reading is no measure of IQ. Why is it when George Bush pronounced 'nuclear' in his own way, he was skewered by the 'main stream media' but Obama's 'corps man' is never mentioned by them!! Obama is brilliant in his own mind, but not in reality!

Posted March 1, 2010 at 9:26:51 PM


Donald H. Cheney

Right On!!! How refreshing to have somebody finally define Osama for what he is. And to top it all, he is a trained, educated, dedicated Lawyer - just like Nixon and Clinton both of whom ........

Posted March 1, 2010 at 9:48:49 PM


Barry

I agree that the President has character deficits that go way beyond his infantile, dismissive attitude toward anyone that "Doesn't get it", a bigger problem is the complete lack (with some exceptions) of accurate reporting. When the previous President sneezed it was a sign of how stupid he was, when the current president does the same thing, it's a sign of his sensitivity. We need a thorough house cleaning going well beyond the Administration.

Posted March 1, 2010 at 9:53:21 PM


Ruth Ann Wilson

REVERSE & REPEAL

REVERSE - 1963 Supreme Court ruling at the request of the ATHEIST O'Hare to take prayer and Bible reading out of the Public Schools. "The Fear of God" is now gone. Hosea 4:6, "If you forget my Law, I'll forget your children."

REPEAL - 1964 Civil Rights legislation. We have a Bill of Rights.

REPEAL - 1965 Federal Revenue Sharing - This is the "teeth" of Federal rules, regulations and mandates. "NO MORE SHARING YOUR WEALTH"

This can be done "WITHOUT" a Constitutional Convention. It can be done "QUICK" and will start America back on a road to "Constitutional Restoration". Amending a Constitution was, deliberately, made a "LONG, THOUGHTFUL PROCESS" by the Founders for reasons. Love and Trust were characteristics of the Founders. Love - I love you enough to tell you the Truth even though, you might hate me after I make the declaration. Truth - Afraid to tell a lie, for God sees what you do in the dark, and you will be held ACCOUNTABLE.

For God & Country

Ruth Ann Wilson

Posted March 2, 2010 at 9:16:49 AM


Joe Rich

As a conservative I vote mostly the Republican agenda. Saying this, I'm sorry to say the Republican party has gotten away from being the party it needs to be. We need candidates who believe in the Constituton and state rights. We have a chance to take back the house and the senate. The Republican party needs to draft a contract with America and keep it this time!!!

Posted March 2, 2010 at 9:35:47 AM


DL Jenter

Refreshing and well put piece of common sense!

Posted March 2, 2010 at 10:37:18 AM


Charles Harris

I must reply to the issue of the Republican Party and the Tea Party. If the patriot Post suggests that the Tea Party attendees should actually form a third political party, then I remind you of the H. Ross Perot debacle!! A third political party can only result in the re-election of Democrats and I, for one, think this is an intended result of third party advocates.

Posted March 2, 2010 at 4:52:58 PM


Rifleman

If the GOP regains control of at least one of the Houses come November, the first thing that the GOP leadership must do is to mandate a class for all Senators and GOP staffers in Constitutional law, taught by Judge Andrew Napolitano or someone with like credentials. The first day's class must focus on Article 1, Section 8. Following the conclusion of that class, the second task is to muzzle John McCain. Better yet, have him retire. "A man's got to know his limitations." -- "Dirty" Dirty Harry Callahan, "Magnum Force"

Posted March 2, 2010 at 8:49:24 PM


Robert G.S. Plant

I have, again, received a missive from the Constitution Party. That letter lauded the advances made, folks running as CP candidates,etc.. Everything reads well, upbeat. Need Money! Again. Question, please: I read the PP every day. Do not recall a word about the CP. I, most sincerely, will appreciate your view on the CP. Thank You.

Posted March 2, 2010 at 9:06:08 PM


garrett

If I may address the unemployment funds extension,

seems to me that the need to extend somewhere in the future, an automatic switch, should have been part of the language when the the bill was passed.

Our esteemed idiots shouldn't be allowed to touch issues such as this. God help us . . .

Posted March 3, 2010 at 10:38:06 AM


Doug Reynolds

Re The Last Word (March 3rd), by Burt Prelutsky: I couldn't have said it better, though I have said much the same thing many times over the past year and a half!

Posted March 3, 2010 at 12:48:14 PM


Texan

The Constitution Party is the old "taxpayers party" and has an affinity for nominating Baptist ministers for president. Their platform virtually mirrors this site's stance. One notable part of their peamble; They proclaim Jesus Christ as God. Whether one agrees with that statement or not isn't the point and I don't want to get into a theological arguement, but I do find it curious that the founders were intentionally vague in decribing the creator while the C.P. is exceptionally precise.

Posted March 3, 2010 at 2:18:46 PM


charles

Why can't anyone get to the problem. I read this blabber each week and not one word is ever said about the real problem. GET RID of the FEDERAL RESERVE and the IRS. They are robbing americans of their money. Each 2 weeks $400 is taken from my check in federal witholdings...IRS. And can anyone explain why we have the IRS or the Federal reserve? Both which are unconstitutional. Get rid of these thieves. No one will represent the people in La. What about the rest of ya'll?

Posted March 3, 2010 at 4:07:09 PM


John

“I notice that you are carrying a pistol.”

“How very observant of you.”

“May I ask, why do you carry a pistol?”

“Because I can.”

“Are you afraid of something?”

“Not anymore.”

John

Posted March 4, 2010 at 2:43:59 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund