Digest

Friday, September 17, 2010

The Foundation

"Excessive taxation ... will carry reason and reflection to every man's door, and particularly in the hour of election." --Thomas Jefferson

Government & Politics

Tax Increase, Tax Cut ... What's the Difference?

A tip for Congress: "Higher taxes" isn't the answer

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has introduced the Tax Hike Prevention Act of 2010, which would, true to its name, prevent taxes from increasing for everyone on Jan. 1. The semantics of the bill's name are more important than just an election year ploy, though they are that too. These words go to the fundamental issue at stake -- whose money is it?

In 2001 and 2003, despite controlling Congress and the White House, the only way Republicans could pass the Bush tax cuts and avoid a Democrat filibuster in the Senate was to agree to sunset them beginning this year. That unfortunate reality has created one of the biggest issues of this year's campaign, as taxes will automatically increase unless Congress acts.

Democrats seem to believe tax rates prior to 2001 were the natural order of things. To them, the Bush tax cuts were a 10-year loan from the government and now it's time for the American people to pay up. In other words, it's the government's money. By Democrat illogic, "extending the cuts" will "cost" government $3.7 trillion. Especially egregious to them is extending the current rates for the "rich" -- those earning more than $250,000 per year ($200,000 for singles and $125,000 for couples filing separately). Extending the cut for that bracket accounts for $700 billion of the $3.7 trillion total. And, they ask, don't you ungrateful voters care about deficits?

Furthermore, notes Investor's Business Daily, "Democrats are in effect arguing that the country can 'afford' $3 trillion to keep the middle-class tax cuts in place over the decade, but not $3.7 trillion to keep them all."

Aside from being wrong in principle, their numbers are wrong, too. They assume that increasing taxes would have no negative effect on economic activity. That's demonstrably not so. Democrats also ignore the fact that the Bush tax cuts actually increased tax revenue.

So far, Senate Republicans are united behind McConnell's effort, and a growing number of Senate Democrats are admitting that tax increases during a recession are not a great idea. Sens. Evan Bayh (IN), Kent Conrad (ND), Ben Nelson (NE), Jim Webb (VA) and Joe Lieberman (CT) all have offered support for stopping the tax hikes. Thirty-one House Democrats sent a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), pressing them to extend the current rates temporarily for everyone.

The weak link in the GOP's armor appears to be House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH). The would-be speaker gave cover to Democrats, saying, "If the only option I have is to vote for those at 250 [$250,000] and below, of course I'm going to do that." Barack Obama, who wants to raise taxes on the "rich," will get mileage out of that one, regardless of the fact that Boehner is leading the charge in the House for a two-year extension of current rates.

At minimum, Congress should make the current rates permanent. A one- or two-year delay would only postpone the decision. (Ideally, of course, we favor a flat or fair tax to replace the current system entirely.) Second, federal spending must be cut. And not just cut in the way Democrats talk about "cutting" spending -- i.e., smaller annual increases in each budget line item. This two-pronged, fiscally responsible approach is necessary to get the economy -- and the nation -- back on track. Republicans have a real opportunity here. Let's hope they don't waste it.

Quote of the Week

"If anybody believes they can increase taxes today, I think they're out of their mind." --Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, Democrat extraordinaire

News From the Swamp: Speaking of Taxes...

Two separate attempts to repeal one terrible provision in the gargantuan ObamaCare law failed in the Senate this week, lighting up a serious issue for small business owners to consider when they vote in November. Anyone who is an independent contractor or owns a small business has likely seen a 1099 form. Pre-ObamaCare, the IRS required 1099s only for services purchased from vendors. In order to make ObamaCare "deficit-neutral," the legislation requires that small businesses report any business-to-business transaction over $600 with a 1099. The amount of paperwork and accounting needed to maintain compliance with this bureaucratic nightmare will add immensely to operating costs for small businesses. In some cases, it will bury them.

Sen. Mike Johanns (R-NE) sponsored an amendment to repeal the provision, but even with the help of a handful of Democrats, the amendment failed 46-52. Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) crafted a weaker version that would have placed a $5,000 reporting threshold for 1099s and eliminated the requirement altogether for businesses with fewer than 25 employees. That failed to reach cloture, 56-42. This plan was little more than smoke, though, because it still would require businesses to monitor all their transactions for possible filing in case they reach the $5,000 threshold. It would also cause businesses to avoid hiring that 26th employee -- it simply wouldn't pay to grow.

The repeal of the 1099 provision failed this time, but ObamaCare is clearly under attack. The very Congress that passed it is now deliberating changes and repeals to the president's signature agenda item, just in time for the midterms. On the legal front, U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson in Florida said that on Dec. 16 he would hear arguments on a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of ObamaCare. Twenty state attorneys general claim the health care bill violates states' rights and will force massive new spending. Unfortunately, they have to wait to state their case until Oct. 14, when Vinson will rule on the federal government's dismissal motion. Legal analysts say that it's likely the dismissal will be rejected since Vinson has already set a court date. There is little agreement among these same analysts on the outcome of the case.

With all of the consternation over something Obama lectured we "should be saying 'thank you'" for, it's no wonder Democrats "are spending three times more advertising against the health reform law than they are in support of it."

Constitution Day 2010

Today, Sept. 17, 2010, marks the 223rd anniversary of the signing of our Constitution at the Philadelphia (Constitution) Convention in 1787. Of course, these days, Memorial Day may be a more apt description.

We invite you to share your thoughts here.

Tea Party Notches Another Victory

Just two weeks after incumbent Republican Lisa Murkowski lost her primary in Alaska to a Tea Party-backed challenger, Christine O'Donnell accomplished a similar feat in Delaware. Longtime Republican Rep. Mike Castle appeared to be cruising to victory in the race, and looked like a pretty safe bet to take what once was Joe Biden's seat. But after Joe Miller, a relatively unknown West Point grad, decorated Gulf War vet and federal magistrate, took out Murkowski, the Tea Party rallied behind O'Donnell in an effort to upset Castle, who may as well be a Democrat. Mike Castle was one of eight House Republicans who helped pass cap and trade last year and his lifetime American Conservative Union rating is a pathetic 52.

In the general election race, Castle was well ahead of Democrat Chris Coons, while O'Donnell trails him, meaning the Tea Party upset may cost Republicans that seat -- and possibly control of the Senate. Even among bone fide conservatives, she has her detractors due to various financial missteps and her gender-discrimination lawsuit against her former employer, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, which is a conservative non-profit in Delaware. In fact, she doesn't appear to be the strongest candidate, but that certainly says a lot about voter outrage at incumbents. Even if O'Donnell loses, the message for the GOP is clear: Stick to constitutional principles, or else.

First Impeachment Since Clinton Under Way

The impeachment trial of U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous of Louisiana began in the Senate this week. It marks the 15th impeachment proceeding in the nation's history, and the first since Bill Clinton in 1999. Porteous, a Clinton appointee (hold the laughter), faces four articles of impeachment including taking gifts and cash payments from a law firm, making a false statement on a bankruptcy filing to hide gambling debts, and lying under oath to the Senate and the FBI. Porteous plans to move forward with his defense rather than resign, but the case against him is pretty solid. Of course, so was the one against Clinton.

Investigation of Justice Department to Begin

Glenn Fine, the Justice Department Inspector General, made known in a letter to Reps. Lamar Smith (R-TX) and Frank Wolf (R-VA) this week that investigations examining the Obama Justice Department's selective enforcement of voting rights law are under way. Smith and Wolf have campaigned for over a year to find out why the Justice Department dumped a clear-cut case against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation during the 2008 election. Eric Holder's team stonewalled the congressmen at every turn, but now progress is being made. The Office of Professional Responsibility is about to finish a report into this specific issue, and the IG is going to open a wider investigation into the Voting Rights Section of Justice's Civil Rights Division. At long last, maybe Holder and his thugs will be held accountable.

What the Despot Meant to Say

Part-time Cuban leader and full-time despot Fidel Castro gave a long overdue tip of the hat to Econ 101 when asked recently whether Cuba's economic model was "worth exporting" to other countries. His reply: "The Cuban model doesn't even work for us anymore." What a shocker -- not that communist/socialist/progressive models don't work, but rather that a dyed-in-the-wool communist would actually acknowledge the truth of that statement.

Not to worry, however: No sooner had Castro uttered these words than the damage control party hopped into its East German Trabant and mobilized (read: got out and pushed). Typical statements begin, "What Comandante Castro meant to say was..." In this case, apparently the meant-to-say piece included a name change, as well: "U.S." for "Cuban." "The reality is that my response means exactly the opposite," explained the ancient communista. Well of course it does! By the way, can we have our copy of Orwell's "1984" back?

Further elaborating, World Hero of Solidarity (the title conferred upon him by the UN in 2009) stated, "My idea, as the whole world knows, is that the capitalist system now doesn't work either for the United States or the world." Yes, we know. The American media have done a fine job of telling us just that.

Meanwhile, el Presidente is laying off 500,000 state employees. By next March, these workers will be on the street -- um, "released to the private sector" -- and looking for nonexistent jobs in Cuba. With 85 percent of its workforce -- or roughly five million people -- working for the Cuban state, such a layoff is no small matter either. That number will eventually increase to one million due to "efforts to increase efficiency in the state sector," making fewer new state positions available to the unemployed masses. Needless to say, massive layoffs are always symptomatic of sound economic planning in Castro's world.

In one sense, however, Castro has hit on an important point: Our own "Comandante," Barack Obama, continues to blur the lines between the economic models of the two nations. If the Chosen One is able to maintain his assault on the U.S. economy unabated, Castro's statement will ultimately apply to both nations without caveat.

Introducing the Tea Party Pace Car

Visit TeaPartyPaceCar.com today!

The Tea Party Pace Car leads the field in the race to restore Essential Liberty as enshrined in our nation's founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.

The Tea Party Pace Car is privately owned, but the owner has dedicated it to our Patriot mission for the purpose of promoting three of the Internet's most outstanding resources for advocates of Liberty: The Patriot Post, The Patriot Shop and the Tea Party Primer.

Find out more at TeaPartyPaceCar.com.

National Security

START Treaty Passes Senate Committee

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 14-4 Thursday to send the new U.S.-Russia nuclear arms treaty to the full Senate for ratification. Just three Republicans -- Johnny Isakson (GA), Richard Lugar (IN) and Bob Corker (TN) -- voted for the agreement. In the whole Senate, 67 votes are needed, meaning more Republicans will have to go along with it. The treaty limits both nations to 1,550 deployed warheads, which is a 30 percent cut from the 2002 limit.

The treaty, known as new START, is a bad idea, as we warned in July. In addition to reducing the U.S. nuclear arsenal for no reason except to appease Russia, the treaty is also a backdoor means of re-instituting the limits of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that the U.S. withdrew from under President George W. Bush. Russia cannot afford to maintain a larger arsenal anyway and has always hated U.S. missile defense efforts, including the modest system that Obama scrapped last year -- the one that would have been deployed in Poland to defend against Iranian missiles.

In other defense news, the Obama administration announced the largest arms deal in U.S. history. Saudi Arabia will purchase $60 billion worth of advanced aircraft, and the administration is seeking to add naval and missile defense upgrades worth billions more. The deal includes 84 F-15 fighters and upgrades for 70 more, as well as 70 Apaches, 72 Black Hawks and 36 Little Birds. The administration views this sale, as well as that of the F-35 to Israel, as part of an effort to build regional defenses against an increasingly belligerent Iran.

U.S. Air Force Birthday

Relentlessly committed to the defense of liberty, the United States Air Force celebrates its 63rd birthday tomorrow, Sept. 18. The Air Force began life as the Army Air Corps but became a separate Armed Services Branch when the Department of the Air Force was created by the National Security Act of 1947. As the U.S. Air Force continues its critical mission "to fly, fight and win ... in air, space and cyberspace," we ask that you pray for these brave Patriots prosecuting "The Long War" against Jihadistan, and for their families awaiting their safe return.

Court Rules Against Hazleton, PA, Immigration Law

Hazleton, Pennsylvania, a community of 30,000 souls in the northeastern part of the Keystone State, shares the mounting frustration of most American citizens over the issue of illegal immigration. In 2006, the city council made it illegal to hire or rent to illegals. It worked at first; many illegals began leaving. Hazelton's action emboldened more than 90 other communities across the fruited plain to consider or approve similar measures. But the leftist lawyer locusts descended upon Hazelton, 24 in all, representing the ACLU, the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, the Community Justice Project and the BBB. They filed suit to kill the law.

The town stayed enforcement until the case was heard. In July 2007, U.S. District Court Judge James Munley, a Clinton appointee, struck it down. In his 206-page opinion he declared, "[our] political system ... prohibits the city from enacting ordinances that disrupt a carefully drawn federal statutory scheme." The ordinance also, according to Munley, violates the constitutional rights guaranteed everyone in the country, legally or not.

Hazelton appealed and lost again on Sept. 9 when 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Theodore McKee, a Clinton appointee, ruled against the town. In his lofty wisdom, the law usurped the federal government's exclusive power to regulate immigration.

But the loss only steeled the city's resolution. "Hazleton was the first, and became the symbol of hope for many around the country," said Mayor Lou Barletta. "[The national frustration] will not go away until the federal government finally secures our borders and cracks down on illegal immigration." Barletta pledged to take the case to the Supreme Court.

Profiles of Valor: U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Salvatore Giunta

Giunta

United States Army Staff Sgt. Salvatore Giunta will become the first living service member to be awarded the Medal of Honor for actions in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The White House described Giunta's actions:

Then-Specialist Salvatore A. Giunta distinguished himself by acts of gallantry at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty while serving as a rifle team leader with Company B, 2d Battalion (Airborne), 503d Infantry Regiment during combat operations against an armed enemy in the Korengal Valley, Afghanistan on October 25, 2007.

When an insurgent force ambush split Specialist Giunta's squad into two groups, he exposed himself to enemy fire to pull a comrade back to cover. Later, while engaging the enemy and attempting to link up with the rest of his squad, Specialist Giunta noticed two insurgents carrying away a fellow soldier. He immediately engaged the enemy, killing one and wounding the other, and provided medical aid to his wounded comrade while the rest of his squad caught up and provided security. His courage and leadership while under extreme enemy fire were integral to his platoon's ability to defeat an enemy ambush and recover a fellow American paratrooper from enemy hands.

Giunta himself was shot in the chest, though his ballistic vest prevented injury, and another bullet disabled the weapon on his back. Unfortunately, Sgt. John Brennan, the first soldier Giunta saved, did not survive surgery. They were best friends. No date has been set for the award ceremony, but we offer our sincerest thanks for Giunta's service.

Business & Economy

Hope 'n' Change: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Given that jobs are hard to come by these days, Vice President Joe Biden was questioned regarding the "Recovery Summer" the White House has been celebrating for the last few months. It turns out that Biden wasn't talking about jobs; he was talking about construction projects. As White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee explained, "The vice president was talking about the summer of recovery in reference to the Recovery Act, that you would see the creation of a series of infrastructure and other projects ramping up over the summer. And you did see that." Yep, that's their story and they're stickin' to it.

The Senate has come to the "rescue," however, with their $42 billion bill that they claim will help small businesses create 500,000 jobs. "The Small Business Jobs Act authorizes the creation of a $30 billion fund run by the Treasury Department that would deliver ultra-cheap capital to banks with less than $10 billion in assets," according to CNN. "The bill would also provide a slew of tax breaks to encourage investment that will cost $12 billion over a decade, according to a preliminary estimate from the Joint Committee on Taxation."

Meanwhile, another crop of employees is poised to join the unemployed thanks to Democrat policies -- Democrat staffers. If Republicans win the House and Senate this November because of Democrat malfeasance, some 1,500 staffers may wind up with nothing more than Hope 'n' Change to put on the dinner table.

But not to worry. As Joe Biden says, "No doubt we're moving in the right direction."

Regulatory Commissars: Drilling Ban Hurts

Well, well, well, it looks as if Barack Obama's ban on deepwater drilling is actually inflicting pain in shallow waters, too. Thanks to new regulations from the land of czars, shallow-water drilling -- which constitutes the bulk of offshore drilling in the Gulf -- has come to a near-screeching halt. "The pace at which regulators grant drilling permits in water less than 500 feet deep has slowed sharply this summer," according to the Associated Press. "Just four out of 10 shallow-water drilling applications have been approved from June through August; 15 applications were sought and approved in the same period last year."

Oil executives say the new rules are not only costing companies millions but are also leading to layoffs. Despite this, the administration released a report this week claiming that there is "no evidence of declining employment after the moratorium was announced." According to the Obama mind-trickers, these are not the unemploids you're looking for.

Jobs notwithstanding, the feds aren't budging, and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement head Michael Bromwich stated, "We will not approve applications until and unless they fully comply with the new requirements." On the other hand, Bromwich said that "it is highly unlikely the moratorium will be extended" after it expires in November.

Finally, Obama's ban doesn't apply to the Mexican state oil company PEMEX, to which the U.S. Export-Import Bank is guaranteeing $1 billion in loans to support drilling operations. Bank spokeswoman Maura Policelli claims past loans to PEMEX have "helped create or sustain" American jobs. That's little consolation to Gulf workers facing job losses as Obama hand-ties private U.S. oil companies while funding Mexico's government-run counterpart.

The First Nanny Weighs in on Restaurants

Iron Chef has nothing on ironhanded Michelle Obama, the administration's restaurant-czar-in-residence. Admonishing -- er, addressing -- the National Restaurant Association, the First Lady issued a plea that restaurants help fight childhood obesity (her current crusade) by limiting butter and cream and replacing side dishes on kids' menus with options like apples or carrots. "Even if we give parents all the information they need and improve school meals and build brand new supermarkets on every corner," she said, "none of that matters if when families step into a restaurant, they can't make a healthy choice." Right, families "can't make" healthy choices without Big Brother's help.

As Investor's Business Daily notes, "What's galling about all this is that Mrs. Obama's anti-obesity campaign -- like the policies pushed by her husband -- presumes government has all the answers. In reality, it doesn't." Furthermore, as blogger Doug Powers observes, "The laughable contradiction about those who claim to be losing sleep over childhood obesity ... is that this is usually the same bunch [whose] election-year sales pitch to the minions is essentially 'elect us and you'll never have to get off the couch again!'"

We wonder if Mrs. Obama plans to hawk-eye restaurants with the same "zero tolerance" zeal that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius threatened last week against insurance companies. Given shakedown tactics like these, the restaurant industry should be very afraid.

Culture & Policy

Second Amendment: Gun Sales Up, Crime Down

In what may seem a paradox to leftists, violent crime continued to fall in 2009 as gun sales reached an all-time high. The FBI released its annual violent crime statistics Tuesday, revealing that such crimes had decreased by 5.3 percent in 2009, while murders and manslaughters -- the types of crime most likely to be committed using a firearm -- fell 7.3 percent. According to the FBI's National Instant Background Check System, 14 million guns were purchased in 2009.

"What the data tell us is exactly the opposite of what the gun-ban lobby has predicted for several years," said Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizen's Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. "Their dire predictions that America's streets would run red have been shown up as a fraudulent sales pitch for public disarmament." Facts may be stubborn things, but the Left is perhaps even more stubborn.

Around the Nation: The 'Green Police' Are Coming to Town

We may have laughed at the Audi Super Bowl "Green Police" commercial back in February, but a $100 fine for not recycling isn't very funny. Several cities are adopting the practice of embedding computer chips into recycling bins in order to track compliance, with most claiming these checks are to target recycling education efforts to specific areas and neighborhoods more effectively. However, the city of Cleveland, Ohio, is taking it a step further.

The city pays $30 per ton to haul away trash but gets only $26 per ton to recycle it. So in order to help their bottom line, Cleveland's City Council recently enacted a $100 fine to frequent recycling scofflaws who don't put their bins out to the curb. It's easy to verify, because city workers can use special radio-frequency equipment to check whether bins have been placed.

The city anticipates $170,000 in annual fine revenue, but they would prefer compliance in order to raise collections at the recycling point. (Of course, the Cleveland City Council may not have figured out that the more recyclables they bring in, the less they'll likely get per ton. Yet the fines will be there in perpetuity.) So now Big Brother doesn't have to watch -- all he needs is the right equipment and a computer chip to become part of the growing cadre of green police.

Income Redistribution: A 'Post-Stimulus' Program

We hear a little now and then about some of the strange places our "stimulus" money went, but this one may take the cake. Call it the "post-stimulus" program. Researchers at UCLA secured an $800,000 grant for teaching African men about post-coital genital washing as a possible method to reduce the spread of AIDS on the continent. We suppose if this replaces the post-act cigarette, it may not be the worst thing in the world, but on our dime? And $800,000?

In typical government fashion, the research from this study, if successful (and we're sure it will be regardless of result), will likely be used as the basis for a future study. So far, the overall study has racked up a $12 million bill, although the $800,000 grant is the only portion paid yet by stimulus funds. (Insert your own witticism here ... err, on second thought, don't. This is a good place for abstinence.) Still, we wonder: Where will the ubiquitous sign glamorizing this stimulus-funded project go -- in the bedroom or the bathroom?

At Least We Know What He Looks Like

An excellent teachable moment in cable news occurred recently on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." We're used to conservative voices being shouted down on talk shows, but we thought the purpose of a talk show is to promote discussion, not diatribe.

Florida Pastor Terry Jones, who planned and later abandoned a Sept. 11 ceremony to burn the Koran, was invited on the show, but was used simply as a prop to receive a "message" from co-host Mika Brzezinski and erstwhile Newsweek editor and MSNBC correspondent Jon Meacham. In his statement, Meacham lectured the pastor, "the central message of the New Testament is forgiveness, and to put oneself in the place of another." After Meacham finished preaching, Brzezinski concluded, "All right, well said, Jon Meacham, and Pastor Terry Jones, we appeal to you to listen to that. And we don't really need to hear anything else, so thanks." They promptly cut Jones' feed without letting him say a word.

We're happy that the final result prevented Jones' making a spectacle of himself and his church (and therefore Christianity itself), but the rudeness exhibited by supposedly professional members of the "mainstream media" shows once again that they're not as much interested in the truth as promoting their leftist point of view.

Unlocking a Timeless Mystery

In collaboration with the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City, two agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) spent three months deciphering the facial features of a 2,500-year-old Egyptian mummy known as Ka-i-nefer. They used facial recognition computer software and other techniques normally used for identifying crime victims to determine the probable height, facial features and age of death for the mummy.

While the "gee whiz" aspect of making this technique better known is good for the ATF and emulates the success of crime dramas like the various CSI series, one has to wonder whether their time would have been better spent, say, solving crimes? Perhaps the ATF needs a little bit more to do. Then again, given the frequently picayune and capricious enforcement agenda of federal agents, perhaps it's better that we allow them to pursue these side projects.

And Last...

The White House denies it, but Politico reports on a sad state of affairs for the First Lady. "In an authorized biography written by French journalists Michael Darmon and Yves Derai, [French First Lady Carla] Bruni recalls that during her March visit to the White House with French President Nicholas Sarkozy, she asked the first lady about her post. 'Don't ask,' Obama said, according to Bruni. 'It's hell. I can't stand it.'"

The poor dear. Maybe she just needs another vacation.



Comments

Thomas

And assuming a republican bill gets passed by some incredible miracle, who would possibly believe that O'vomit will sign it?

Posted September 17, 2010 at 11:17:02 AM


Bruce

"Their dire predictions that America's streets would run red have been shown up as a fraudulent sales pitch for public disarmament." No, no. You got that wrong. We misunderstood. They were really predicting that our streets would run red with blood AFTER they disarmed the law-abiding citizens. And that is one prediction that will most assuredly come true.

When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have them. The leftist takeover is counting on it.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 11:34:15 AM


Barry

The big deal this fall seems to be the discussion over extending the Bush tax reductions -- will they or won't they?

Both sides are claiming catastrophe if they don't get their way: The Democrats say that keeping the tax rates low will bury us in debt while the Republicans claim that raising the tax rate on upper income people will kill the economy.

Both sides are wrong.

Look at the 1950s and weep, boys and girls. The top marginal tax rate for most of the decade was 91%. As I remember it, the 1950s were a pretty good decade, with some bumps along the way, but all in all, pretty good.

It turns out that the problem isn't with the tax rate itself but with changes in the tax rate. If businesses and people know with certainty what the tax rate will be, they can make their long range plans accordingly. If, however, tax rates, loopholes, preferences, etc., change minute-to-minute, as has been the case recently, then large parts of the economy freeze up -- if I don't know what kind of governmental environment I'm going to be facing, I may decide to take things a bit slower than I otherwise would.

So, Patriot Post, drop the rhetoric of both the Evil Democrats and the Stupid Republicans and cast your voice for consistency and stability.

Cheers,

Barry Harmon

Posted September 17, 2010 at 12:04:54 PM

Editor's Reply:

In a round about way, you made our point. As we said, "At minimum, Congress should make the current rates permanent." However, low rates and reasonable spending is the way forward, not high rates just for the sake of "consistency."

Carol

While Michelle chastizes the rest of us for our eating habits, that hypocrite should take a look at her rear end. I pity any bicycle seat......and then that same hypocrite should be chastizing her husband for smoking.

I noted while they were on their many vacations seeing Hussein and & kids eating ice cream & I bet they weren't made from tofu either.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 12:06:42 PM


Steve Bunten

Regarding Judge G. Thomas Porteous, if he is impeached he will now be qualified to run for congress just like Representative Alcee Hastings in Florida.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 12:13:24 PM


Howard Last

Any truth to the rumor that the ATF will charge the 2500 year old Egyptian mummy with planning to build a full automatic firearm (machine gun).

Posted September 17, 2010 at 1:09:15 PM


Rebecca

If the first lady is so unhappy with her post then perhaps she should be relieved of it.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 1:56:12 PM


MIKE

If it is hell, perhaps she and her hubby should just quit. Of course that would mean we would have to put up with Joe for 2 years, but I really think that would be preferable then another 2 with bo.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 2:30:12 PM


C. Dawson

In your September 17th Digest, I had expected to see some mention of the 148th anniversary of the Battle of Antietam. This day was - and still is - the bloodiest day in American history. Along with December 7, 1941 and September 11, 2001, Americans need to remember these days and the lessons that accompany them. Each year allots a single day to officially memorialize these events, but it is equally important that we keep them all in our memories the other 364 days of the year.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 2:51:07 PM


Robert T.

One of the impeachment charges against Judge Porteous is that he lied under oath. How about Obama? It seems that he did the same thing when he swore to uphold the Constitution.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 2:56:19 PM


Jim Reese

You mentioned that you favor a flat tax or a Fair Tax..... I agree that either would be better than the system we now have.

However, the flat tax would leave the IRS in place... MAJOR mistake! Let's get the transparency of the Fair Tax...then, taxpayers could observe what the federal government is costing them. Chances are good that we would decide that we can get by with less federal government.....

Posted September 17, 2010 at 2:58:16 PM


Guy L W Hardy

"violates the constitutional rights guaranteed everyone in the country, legally or not."

This judge is a retard, and I hope someone who is close to him tells him I said so.

All men everywhere have God-given and unalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness; only lawful citizens have .onstitutional rights. How is this so hard to understand?

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:06:51 PM


Hamilton

Tea Party backed candidate Christine O'Donnell's win over Republican Mike Castle has stirred up numerous controversies. One big one is the question of whether Conservatives should vote for the most conservative Republican who they suppose can win, or whether they should vote for the most conservative candidate, period.

I think the first method is faulty, and here's why. Conservatism leads to More. It leads to a more robust economy, more prosperity, and more liberty. But in order to get More, you have to argue for Less - less government. In this case, Less is More. But it's hard to make the case for less government when the control-monger Liberals want more government to be in charge of, and when the guilt-ridden bleeding heart Liberals want more government to tax everything in sight in order to give a living to the "needy", and when the greedy leech-like special interest Liberals want more government to create more entitlement programs...

So just about for forever, as long as the Republican party has stood for conservative principles, Republicans have had a handicap - trying to make the point that Less is indeed More. This has been patently obvious say, over the course of the last half century, while government has grown by leaps and bounds and overflowed with bounty from government coffers and into the hands of our fellow freeloaders. This massive redistribution of wealth has resulted in our massive national debt. Now the entire country, including the Liberals, faced with this obscene debt, should have learned that More is actually, and eventually, Less.

Over the historical long-term, this 150-or-so year path towards a larger, more Liberal government, has been assisted by Conservatives voting for the most conservative Republicans that they suppose might win instead of the most conservative candidate, period. This is because many such votes have been a compromise of principle, for many of those candidates were, in some way, willing to placate the Liberals and thus shed a portion of their handicap, in exchange for votes.

I certainly hope Christine O'Donnell wins against Democrat Chris Coons, but regardless, her primary win is a win for principle. And now Delaware voters will have a clear choice between a Conservative and a Liberal, rather than between a Liberal and a Liberal-in-training.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:15:19 PM


Bob W

Double-speak leftists at their best with election year politics.

Had this been any other year, than before an election where the Socialists were taking such a terrible beating in the polls, they would have jumped on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid increase tax band-wagon in a heartbeat.

I hope November proves even better than the predictions, and that instead of "Republicans" taking seats, Conservatives do so in their places.

Time to take America back from the steal and redistribute commies!

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:25:20 PM


Caseace

Having the ATF spend 3 months with a long dead mummy is way preferable to them killing citizens, including children or ripping children from loving families. Maybe they should do facial recognition on their victims.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:34:22 PM


Gyuy L W Hardy

God bless you, Sgt Giunta, and may His Holy Spirit bring you comfort for the loss of your friend.

If we back home need any reason or incentive to stand and fight the oppressive and anti-American regime in place today, it may be provided by the hardships, pains, and sacrifices made by you and your fellows-in-arms; you deserve to return to a country worthy of your efforts and dedication.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:37:30 PM


mick

Mr. Mark,

the us air force traces its honorable lineage as follows:

humbly began on august 1, 1907, as the aeronautial division us army signal corps. stil in the signal corps, on july 18, 1914, it became the aviation section. for a scant four days, may 20, 1918–may 24, 1918, it was the us army division of military aeronautics. on may 24, 1818, it become the us army air service, it gained corps status and became the us army air corps on july, 1 1926. on june 20, 1941 it became the us army air forces. finally becming as we know it today, the us air force on september 18, 1947

take it even from an old ground pounder

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:38:12 PM


OneVAPatriot

I think what Michelle said was "Don't ask, don't tell." She was just misquoted by M. Derai, a frenchman.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:59:19 PM


BoFromTexas

Two issues need comment. The first is that regardless of cutting taxes and stimulating the economy by doing so, we must (MUST!) cut government spending in other areas that the military. Were I president I would order each cabinet head to fire 25% of employees within 90 days, and then another 25% within the next six months. Any cabinet head who failed to do so would lose his job. We simply cannot support so many people on the government payroll, and on the dole, which sometimes is the same thing, e.g. looking at old mummies by ATF officers, who clearly have no useful purpose other than to assault and kill innocent American women and children. Next issue-- shallow water drilling is safe and effective, just like all those drugs, except much better. As a former drilling company business manager, I want to let Obama and company know that the oil industry employs truck drivers by the thousands, roughnecks by the thousands, accountants by the thousands, store clerks by the thousands, and before you know it, the number is in the millions. To deny that shallow water drilling delays (read moratoriums) are not hurtful is like saying that polio is not harmful. And by the way, Obama did not lie about his agenda before he was elected, he simply misrepresented what he was going to do to this country. That is technically not a lie, but is legally defined as fraud. He probably did lie about his place of birth.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 4:07:46 PM


Rifleman

With his own hands, Che Guevara -- the darling of the Progressives, Communists, Marxists, Obama supporters and defenders -- is known to have murdered 180 people. To hear his idolizers tell it, that's not all that many -- especially if they had to be removed for Fidel to gain control and to "change" Cuba into his island utopia. During the "relocation" of the Kulaks to Siberia -- 60,000,000 of whom were worked, starved, tortured, and murdered by the KGB -- Josef Stalin ("Man of Steel") justified their deaths as necessary for the "change" into a new Soviet Union to occur. He explained it this way: "The death of one person is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic." When asked to explain the confiscation of millions of Kulak farms, he answered, "You have to break some eggs to make an omelette." Pol Pot, formerly an English teacher and poet, tortured and murdered some two million Vietnamese in order to "change" Viet Nam to a Communist satellite. In his drive to "change" China, Mao Zedong might have been the bloodiest of them all. Obama intends to redistribute the money to insure 35 million previously uninsured Americans by reducing and eventually eliminating the 35 million of us whom he considers to be unproductive Old Phartes by restricting our access to medical care. His approach is that we should "Take two aspirin." It doesn't matter where, when, or which tyrant is "changing" a nation to central control. The language and the justifications remain the same. It's simply a matter of degree.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 4:59:46 PM


Rifleman

Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution should be the heart and soul of the debate regarding spending. In that Article and Section, The Founders listed the TWELVE ENUMERATED DUTIES of the Congress. All other Duties were to be left to the States -- a rubric reinforced in crystalline language by the Tenth Amendment. Health "care," education, the "environment," mortgages, retirement, banking, agricultural subsidies, bail-outs, student loans and the thousands of other "duties" which Congress has assumed since FDR are all unconstitutional, not that it matters any longer. Do we want limited government? In Article 1, Section 8, The Founders laid it out for us in the simplest terms possible. It's a grocery list, stated just as simply. What it's lacking is obedience by the Congress. Of course, they haven't obeyed the Constitution because for the past 70-plus years, We, the People, haven't demanded it of them.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 5:05:39 PM


Zeke

Rifleman- the only way in hell that the People can get Congress to obey the Constitution is to physically go there and watch them then drag them out of their chairs and out the door when they don't. The VA congressman (Perriello) told everyone on U-tube that to get them to stop stealing we'd have to tie their hands. What part of that don't you think he meant literally?

Posted September 17, 2010 at 5:31:21 PM


SandieJ

If he Iron Maiden was serious about children's health then she should get the corn syrup out of all the products we buy... Everything has it in it and this is a biggie for over weight everyone... It is unhealthy, even worse than sugar... So again just lip and spin from the socialist in charge.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 5:37:56 PM


Shane M

In response to your Business and Economy section talking about the Small Business Jobs Act, you missed a key point regarding the capital being lent to small banks. "Treasury would require each bank applying for funds to submit a small-business lending plan “describing how the applicant’s business strategy and operating goals will allow it to address the needs of small businesses in the areas it serves, as well as a plan to provide linguistically and culturally appropriate outreach, where appropriate.” http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/243552

Posted September 17, 2010 at 5:42:52 PM


Hamilton

Reply to: Barry,

I don't know where you got that the highest marginal tax rate during the 1950s was 91%. That seems awfully high. But on to your main point, that the taxation rate doesn't matter to the private sector - that it's the uncertainty of where taxes might be going on down the road that matters. While I agree with your uncertainty point (the evidence gratiously provided by Obama and the Democrats all around the private sector right now, thank you very much), I think that overall taxation rates DO definitely matter. Economic booms always occur after tax reductions. That's a fact. And if we don't control taxation rates to something exactly respective of the amount needed to pay only for the enumerated powers of the government as outlined in the Constitution, we could end up with 100% tax rates for everyone. As I've said before in this forum, the cost of government is the sum of the overhead costs of all our family enterprises combined. And right now, our government is spending so much that family enterprise Americana is like a business running at 50+% overhead. Not a pretty picture.

And True Patriot, I wish you'd get with the program and understand that political condemnation isn't just a partisan event. We're trying to find our way and Republican or Democrat, or alien spaceranger, pushing America to spend itself into oblivion is the wrong direction.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 6:19:46 PM


veritaseequitas

Wait a minute here...Charlie Rangel with his HUGE ethics issues just won his primary. Teddy Kennedy killed a woman and held his seat for 40 years. Robert Byrd was a Grand Flegel in the KKK and held his seat for 40 years. POTUS JFK and POTUS Bill Clinton were/are both adulterers. POTUS Bark Obama is a druggie and a traitor, and Christine O'Donnell has to worry because she has some outstanding student loans and a gender discrimination suit against a former employer?

John Boehner says something stupid about taxing those earning over 250K just to hear himself talk? Karl Rove trashes Christine O'Donnell because he has a bad case of irrelevance? Republicans are talking about repealing the "worst" portions of BOCare (like there is anything good about it)? What is this? The twilight zone?

Obviously the Republicans think they are immune from getting the boot. But they too will fall like rotten fruit from the tree when conservatives start shaking it.

BOCare needs to be repealed in its entirety. Crap & Tax needs to die a quick and painful death. Taxes AND spending both need to be cut. And while we are at it, every politician and talking head needs to stop referring to "government money." America needs to wake up to the fact that the government does not create revenue by selling goods and services and then with a generous heart distributes it to those it deems worthy. The money that the government continuously wastes belongs to the Tax Payers. It is, first and last, the Tax Payers money. If Bu!!sh!t were a commodity, then maybe the government would have some money. But until that day, the government needs to get their d@mned hand out of our pockets.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 6:53:41 PM


W.T. Door

"The Small Business Jobs Act authorizes the creation of a $30 billion fund run by the Treasury Department that would deliver ultra-cheap capital to banks with less than $10 billion in assets," Despite the requirement Shane M notes, won’t the actual result be the same kind of Government encouragement of risky loans that helped get us into the current economic mess ?

Posted September 17, 2010 at 7:34:25 PM


Darla

Can't stand the heat get 'OUT' of the kitchen!!!

Posted September 17, 2010 at 8:18:55 PM


enemaofthestatistquo

Term and Tenure Limits---Proposed Constitutional Amendment as follows:

We The People of the United States of America, declare the Declaration of Independence and the Signatory Clause as the fore word and the end word of this our Constitution, and ever proclaim our Sovereignty as a People and a Nation. And Renounce the use of Force: Armies, Navies to make aggressive War, declared or nor, for the purpose of conquest or dominion.

No Person, upon sole reason of quantity of debt shall be deprived of life or liberty; and the Congress shall make No Debt for the Nation or the several States, lest the monies appropriated be for exigencies of War or of the common defense.

The Person, a Citizen, whether being; Elected, Appointed, or Commissioned; such that each of these officers, not elsewhere provided for in this Constitution, shall have been a Citizen of the United States seven years; and Cadre military, hired civil servants, and contractors of all inferior offices shall be a Citizen. And these Persons upon candidacy for office, to prove literacy and to Know Thine Oath, shall read aloud and whole, in English, henceforth the official language of the Land, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States; before a randomly Called and Sworn Jury of one hundred Citizen peers of the vicinage of the Person; and after reading, the Jurors being empowered to annul such candidacy by a vote of seventy-six. Citizenship is not required of non-cadre enlisted military lest secrecy be a necessity in the performance of their regular duty.

No one Person shall be an employee of the United States as any Officer or subordinate- receiving an emolument or profit, for a span longer than thirty-eight years. A Citizen only, shall vote in the vicinage of the state wherein they reside, proving residence of seven months per annum; for elective offices or issues in federal, state, or local elections or referendums within the United States or any jurisdiction thereof. And the Will of the People as determined by vote tally shall not be challenged, stayed, or negated, by any Person, Citizen, Judicial Court, or Officer of the United States or of any State, lest the resultant margin be less than one percentile. And no Justice, Judge, or other Officer shall cite any other source save this Constitution to decide the constitutionality and meaning of the Laws of the Land, or treaties made in pursuance thereof; or to decide any cause of action.

The President; -he, in the event of a vacancy of Office not elsewhere provided for in this Constitution, shall appoint Constitutional Officers, military Flag officers, and other inferior managerial and staff officers made by Congress, to take office with the advise and consent of the Senate; such that all terms of appointment and commission, and of election, begin upon the day of Senate consent, certification of election, and upon Affirmed or Oath of Office. Each Person appointed to be twice eligible for appointment of the same Office, except military officers thrice eligible for appointment. So, henceforth, the President, –he, shall appoint Supreme Court Justices; and Judges to the Bench of inferior courts made by Congress, to a term of eleven and nine years, respectively, though not subject to His forbearance. So, the President, -he shall appoint Secretaries, Generals, counselors, chairmen, directors, ad-ministers, and other officers of the Departments to one term concurrent with his own term; but subject to his forbearance as chief-executive. So, the President, -he shall appoint Ambassadors and Consuls to a term of five years, subject to his forbearance as head-of-state; with Senate consent to affirm to Office or recall from Abroad or Office, all these officers of state. So, the President, -he shall appoint to a term of five years, Flag-officers of the military, though these be subject to his forbearance as commander-in-chief, and he may repost or retire military officers by his own initiative.

Each of the several states shall be entitled to three and no more than fifty-three Representatives. Each Representative shall be elected by the citizens of the state such that each citizen shall vote election of two Representatives, one of which shall be elected by the citizens of the whole state and shall be the Spox of the State congressional delegates; the remaining Representatives allotted to the several States per the Census, shall be elected by citizens within a district made by the state legislature. The Representative shall have a term of two years, and be nine times eligible for election, no more than eighteen years. In the event of a vacancy of office, the Governing executive of the State, shall appoint a Representative for the remainder of the vacant term, and a Representative elected from one state or district within that state shall Not be elected a Representative by any other of the several states. A majority of all Representatives must be present to constitute a Quorum to do business provided each State shall have one Representative present.

Each Senator shall be elected by the citizens of the whole state; such that each citizen shall vote election of three Senators. Each Senator elected upon bi-annual years. The Senator shall have a term of six years and be thrice eligible for election no more than eighteen years. In the event of a vacancy of Office, the Governing executive of the State, with consent of the state Legislature, shall appoint a Senator for the remainder of the vacant term, and a Senator elected from one state shall Not be elected a Senator by any other of the several states. Each Senators staff shall be provisioned by the State. A majority of all Senators must be present to constitute a Quorum to do business provided each State shall have one Senator present.

The Congress shall meet at least once per year, commencing the third day of January, excluding Saturdays and Sundays, no less than eighty days, nor more than ninety-nine days; the President may waive this provision to call a Special Session, or the Congress may assemble should imminent danger to the Union or to any of the several States will not admit of delay. Upon certifications of election of the new Congress, each Elected shall be sworn or affirmed to office and assume their place. The members of the House of Representatives shall number no more than three times the number of members elected to the Senate.

Upon each decade, in the seventh year, betwixt assembly the second Monday of May and adjournment by disbandment September 17, a Federal Convention shall be convened, presided by the Speaker of the House, who shall have no vote lest they be equally divided. This Body may adjourn for any exigency, or to meet as the House and the Senate in regular session. This Body shall be composed of the Spox of each State and those Senators elected upon the sixth year, and each member shall have one vote. Upon convening, each member shall be sworn or affirmed to office. This Body, upon necessity, shall be empowered to propose and submit to the legislatures of the several States, upon the approval of seventy-six of the members, Constitutional Amendments for ratification- pursuant to petitions for the redress of grievances, received by the President or the Speaker, and being originated by one-tenth of the populations of each of two-fifths of the several States, or pursuant to applications of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States. Further, this Body shall be empowered to review the Constitutionality of all laws, resolves, treaties, and other Acts which shall have been approved by Congress, or ratified by the Senate; and signed by the President; also all executive orders, rules, and regulations, having the force of law pursuant to those Acts; also all judicial reviews, adjudications, and opinions of the Supreme Court or of the inferior courts of the United States. And to introduce, and by simple majority vote, approve bills of statute legislation for corrections, or pursuant to petitions as afore being originated, for the requisite approval or disapproval of the House of Representatives and of the Senate in next regular session. The Convention shall make NO Amendments of effect upon this Constitution as provided hereunto and any other provisions wherein this Body shall deem proper to add hereunto: Amendments One through Ten, the Bill of Rights; Article I, Section 7; Article I, Section 8; Article I, Section 9; Article I, Section 10.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 9:08:31 PM


Hamilton

To Rifleman:

Yours were two wonderful additions to this column.

Thank you.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 9:19:23 PM


GordAuch

Dear enemaofthestatusquo,

What a curious collection of details to be gathered in one place. They are not yet ready for prime time.

It ain't the Constitution that's broke, it's the imperial application of man-rule by POTUS and SCOTUS and the cavalier attitude of COUS that hurt.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 9:30:36 PM


Roy MacLean

Mrs. Obama reportedly denied she ever made the statement, but let's accept for a minute that she did. What she is discovering is that the First Lady position is not a "no-show" job. She actually has to WORK for it.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 11:06:14 PM


RSF

How can you report that violent crime rates are falling, when here in Denver, Co; the local TV news stations have recently reported that violent crime rates across the country are rising the past three years ?

p.s. I know who is lying

Posted September 18, 2010 at 3:19:36 AM


AJ Randolph

Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Posted September 18, 2010 at 7:47:16 AM


Carlos

""What's galling about all this is that Mrs. Obama's anti-obesity campaign -- like the policies pushed by her husband -- presumes government has all the answers. In reality, it doesn't." "

Even more galling, this hypocrite needs to take care of the junk in her own trunk before pointing out that shortcoming in others.

As far as the "hell" of being first lady, it is assumed she sleeps with barry.

Hell, indeed.

Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:56:20 AM


Rosabel

The Obama's are not known for any previous charitible works, real or implied. They don't know the way to helping others, and enforcing an anti-obesity program ain't it.

Maybe she should give some thought to an 'anti-smoking' campaign and stop 'Himself' from smoking up OUR house, the White House. After all, it's smoking that kill, not only the smoker, but the standbyers..not to mention the awful smell in the drapes, furniture, etc....who wants to kiss a smoker?

..and keeping his feet off the furniture...

Posted September 18, 2010 at 1:15:30 PM


karl anglin

A fool and his money are soon elected.

----Will Rogers (1879-1935)

Posted September 18, 2010 at 4:49:11 PM


Brian Crook

With regard to the soon-to-be-ubiquitous RFID chips. By now, I'm sure some 13-year-old has built a device to detect the presence of a RFID chip. It only takes a basic knowledge of physics. The next step is to build a device to swamp the chip with an overload of RF power and render it useless. As with the Cleveland re-cycle bins. Still only high-school physics.

Don't think so? In the early 70s nerds learned how to access the AT&T billing signals and nerds were getting their dope money by selling "blue boxes" which were used for making free long-distance calls. Some noted sellers were Jobs and Woz and one William S. Gates III. I knew a guy who could whistle the tones.

Posted September 18, 2010 at 7:07:48 PM


enemaofthestatistquo

:') GordAuch, Yes it is a 'curious collection of details', but I assure you I have a reasoned opine for each. Some based upon- J. Madison's convention notes, &or the Anti&Federalist debates 1787-88, some are responses to more recent issues, &or reminders to our Governance that We The People are in charge. for instance, a 3rd Senator?! every voter of each state should have = leverage each election cycle in either House. Debtors prison has never been officially denounced. Has the Fed Govt. ever addressed any petition of grievances directly from the people? Does the governance class need to read the documents of governance guidance often & w/ the people being able to check a demigogue b4 office not just after the error is in office. Protects constitutional rights of citizens voters, limits influence of any one person by limits in offices. States The Declaration is a moral principle document is ignored too often, & the Signatory clause has never had official recog being within Art7, the Constitution ratification details. Denies games of 'political musical chairs', & judges no more lifetime appt. is reeligible to appt but by different HR, & S, & POTUS!

Posted September 19, 2010 at 12:30:58 AM


Morning Glory

Gosh.........I'm trying really hard, but I just can't seem to reach the current First-lady-want-a-be. Are you kidding me? She thinks her life in the White House is "hell"? If she thinks THIS life is bad, wait until judgement day.

Posted September 19, 2010 at 8:13:04 PM


Saint Peter

The ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms) should not be out investigating mummies and assaulting mommies. They should be a privately-owned, jobs-creating, convenience store!

Saint Peter

Posted September 20, 2010 at 8:16:01 AM


Doug

I really enjoy your newsletters, and getting the news I wouldn't otherwise get. The only problem I have is your tendency to emphasize political parties, as if they mean something. I think we found out during 2001 to 2007 that political parties don't mean anything. After years of preaching fiscal reponsibility, the Republicans went on a spending spree that would put drunken sailors to shame. I am more interested in who is a fiscal and social conservative then whether they claim to be Republican or Democrat. Olympia Snowe is a prime example.

Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:11:46 PM


M. K. Alexander

My comment is aboout the mosque at ground Zero. No one has fully addressed the source of the funding for that building, and I believe Americans need to know. In addition, I'd like some enterprising conservative to hire Arabic speakers to attend their services, reporting on what is being taught during their "worship." I'd like the same for European mosques, especially those surrounding Israel.

Posted September 22, 2010 at 10:49:41 AM


Godstxgirl

She needs a vacation indeed..............a permanent one not paid for with our tax $$!

Posted September 25, 2010 at 2:10:55 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund