Digest

Friday, May 6, 2011

The Foundation

"I regret, as much as any member, the unavoidable weight and duration of the burdens to be imposed; having never been a proselyte to the doctrine, that public debts are public benefits. I consider them, on the contrary, as evils which ought to be removed as fast as honor and justice will permit." --James Madison

Government & Politics

Fixing the Deficit Will Take More Than Tinker Toys

Playing at deficit cutting

A great threat to our nation assumed ocean temperature this week with Osama bin Laden's death and disposal, but a larger threat looms -- the national debt. Underneath the (deserved) hoopla surrounding OBL's demise, Congress and the White House were still, as Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) put it, "tinkering around the edges" of federal spending as the nation nears its debt ceiling. We know it may come as a shock to some, but it's going to take a lot more than just tinkering to fix it.

The Treasury Department released a new estimate this week on just how long the government could postpone raising the debt ceiling. Apparently, Treasury thinks it can cook the books until Aug. 2, or almost a full month longer than previously thought. The ceiling is currently at $14.294 trillion, and that will be reached on May 16. Treasury estimates that, at current spending rates, the U.S. government will need a $1.5 trillion increase just to make it through one year. But if the ceiling can be raised every time it's reached without changes to spending patterns, then there is essentially no limit.

That's where Congress is hung up. Republicans are pushing -- if not nearly hard enough -- for spending reform before they agree to vote for a debt-ceiling increase. A deal is in the works to cut spending and put in place supposedly strict deficit targets in order to win GOP votes. The Wall Street Journal reports, however, "The deal would defer contentious decisions about Medicare, Medicaid and taxes until after the 2012 elections." How convenient. The Journal explains, "If such an agreement were reached, it would allow both sides to assure financial markets and the public of their commitment to reducing the deficit and then use next year's campaign to lay out their competing visions for the future of major government programs." In other words, kick the can down the road. Again.

The Senate's so-called "Gang of Six" is also working on a compromise. Republicans Saxby Chambliss (GA), Tom Coburn (OK) and Mike Crapo (ID), and Democrats Mark Warner (VA), Dick Durbin (IL) and Kent Conrad (ND) are having trouble compromising on numerous issues, however, from entitlements to revenue. Meanwhile, Conrad has (finally) introduced, at least to Democrats, a Senate budget resolution. It was due April 15, the same day House Republicans adopted Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan's proposal for fairly drastic cuts and reforms. Notably, despite controlling both houses of Congress, Democrats failed to pass a budget at all last year.

Unfortunately, with Democrats still in control of the Senate and the White House, Ryan's 10-year budget proposal is likely dead on arrival, as are any other serious proposed cuts. In particular, Ryan's plan to reform Medicare and Medicaid has Democrats screaming about cruel Republicans victimizing seniors and the poor. Democrats have the easy job of scaring people about losing benefits. Republicans must explain why such measures are necessary.

Without reforming the now-four major entitlements -- Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and ObamaCare -- there is little hope for truly reining in federal spending. And before some of you write to tell us that Social Security is not an entitlement because you paid in and are entitled to your money, let's remember that current workers are paying for current retirees. There is no trust fund, and payroll taxes are just that -- taxes. The big three now consume 40 percent of the federal budget and, frankly, we will have to make hard choices that not everyone will like. Either that, or the nation will go bankrupt.

New & Notable Legislation

The House this week passed a bill along largely party lines aimed at repealing elements of ObamaCare. H.R. 1213, which was sent to the Senate by a 238-183 vote, is another attempt to correct the impending fiscal disaster that will come with the full implementation of the health care takeover. In particular, this bill would repeal the automatic ObamaCare funding for insurance exchanges imposed at the federal level to sell government-approved insurance policies. The original bill doesn't include a spending limit for funding the euphemistically titled American Health Benefit Exchange, so the Health and Human Services Secretary would be allowed to fund the exchange at whatever amount she sees fit. This gives HHS, currently run by Kathleen Sebelius, a blank check to "determine the amount of spending and spend the funds without further Congressional action," as noted in the House Energy and Commerce Committee legislation report.

Unfortunately H.R. 1213 doesn't have much of a chance of clearing the Democrat-controlled Senate, and it certainly doesn't stand a chance of being signed by the president. The Republicans elected to push the legislation through as a stand-alone bill, as opposed to attaching it to an unrelated bill for political advantage. The latter was a tactic Democrats perfected with defense and war appropriations during the Bush administration. So H.R. 1213 is, as the Heritage Foundation noted, "an important expression of intent," even though it's unlikely to de-fund or repeal this or any other provision of ObamaCare. We look forward, however, to the gathering momentum of these legislative actions.

The House passed the Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act on Thursday by a vote of 266-149. The bill would force the Obama administration to pick up the pace of issuing offshore oil-drilling permits. The White House opposes the bill, but hasn't yet threatened a veto.

The House passed H.R. 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, on Wednesday by a vote of 251-175. The bill would make permanent many of the funding restrictions of the Hyde Amendment, which has been passed every year since 1976. Under current law, taxpayer funding for abortion -- except in cases of rape or incest, or if the mother's life is at risk -- is banned. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) introduced a companion bill in the Senate.

2012 Campaign Kicks Off With GOP Debate

The first debate of the 2012 Republican primary was held in South Carolina Thursday night. Participants included former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and former Godfather's Pizza CEO Herman Cain. Four of those five took the stage merely needing to build name recognition. Paul, of course, needs no introduction.

However, as Kyle O. Peterson of National Review observed, "Perhaps the most conspicuous thing about the first GOP presidential debate for 2012 are the elephants not in the room: Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, and Sarah Palin, among other potential candidates who will not be stepping behind the podium tonight. Those four are currently considered "front-runners," if only because of name recognition. Huckabee and Palin haven't even announced their candidacies.

There are candidates here that could be serious contenders, but it's going to take some time to sort out just who those candidates are. If Republicans play it right, though, the next election should be theirs to lose.

Canada's Historic Realignment

Canada held national parliamentary elections earlier this week that were understandably underreported considering other events, but the results are noteworthy. Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper can now claim a majority in Parliament after a stunning victory that secured at least 164 of 308 seats for his party after winning 40 percent of the popular vote. It's the first time the Conservatives have had a majority since taking power in 2006, and the first time any party has had a majority since the Liberals did in 2000. The Conservatives will have at least the next four years to consolidate their policy initiatives.

The NDP, a democratic socialist party that traditionally ranked third, tripled its parliamentary presence to at least 102 seats, with a party record of 30 percent of the vote. The real surprise to many, however, was the collapse of the Liberal party, which ran Canada for much of the 20th century. Their heavy tax-and-spend policies earned them a record-low 33 seats, down from their previous 77. Adding insult to injury, the debacle was set in motion when Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff pushed a no-confidence motion against Harper's government in March, prompting the May 2 vote.

These surprising results have made Canada the only conservative government in North America. Canada's new parliamentary majority is likely to put in place a 15 percent corporate tax rate that will offer a competing vision to the policies that Barack Obama has in mind for this country's private sector. Unless drastic fiscal changes are made here, we may soon see our jobs flying north in droves.

National Security

Immigration Front: Border Agent Faces Time for Doing Job

Another Border Patrol agent, Jesus Diaz, has been prosecuted by Johnny Sutton, federal attorney for the Western District of Texas. In 2006, Sutton put two other agents, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean away for "violating the rights" of a fleeing Mexican drug smuggler. Sutton's tactics raised great protests, even from such senators as Dianne Feinstein and Arlen Specter.

A Border Patrol veteran, Diaz is married to another agent, Diana Diaz, and has four children, including a six-month-old he has never met. He is being held in solitary confinement for his own protection from the illegals who fill the prison he's in. He is allowed only two 20-minute visits per week.

Diaz was prosecuted for excessive force under color of authority against an illegal alien, a charge more serious than murder for an average citizen. His crime consisted of forcing an uncooperative suspect to the ground by raising the offender's handcuffs. Even though pictures taken of the man soon after the arrest showed no signs of abuse, Mexico complained, and Sutton filed charges.

As in the 2006 trials, the "victim" received full immunity plus a visa to come and go in the U.S. (which he promptly used to smuggle drugs again). Sutton carefully controlled everything the jury heard and suppressed exculpatory evidence. When the first trial ended in a mistrial, he re-filed. This time he got his conviction, despite prosecution witnesses having changed their stories and some indicating that they had lied to the grand jury. Diaz could get 10-35 years simply for doing his job when he's sentenced in September. Diana Diaz perhaps states the obvious when she says that these prosecutions are causing other agents "to think twice" when bracing the Mexican invaders.

Postscript: A recent Government Accountability Office report indicates that only 129 miles of the 1,954 mile U.S.-Mexico border is "controlled" by the federal government. The Mexican cartels control the rest.

Department of Military Correctness: Navy Overboard on DOMA

U.S. military personnel have begun training for the age of Leftists Give Blessed Tolerance (LGBT) now that the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy of barring open homosexuality is history. As part of recent training, service men and women learned how to respond to two male Marines kissing. Then, two weeks ago, the Office of Navy Chaplains ordered that even same-sex "marriage" is to be condoned. Citing "additional legal review," the Navy says it "has concluded that ... if the base is located in a state where same-sex marriage is legal, then the base facilities may be used to celebrate the marriage." Chaplains are granted permission to "marry" homosexuals. "This is a change to previous training that stated same-sex marriages are not authorized on federal property."

As we have warned before, the military will be severely harmed by serving as a laboratory for leftist social experiments. The negative impact on the chaplain corps cannot be overstated. But at least nobody's feelings will be hurt.

Questions in Libya

Last week, it was reported that a NATO air strike in Tripoli had killed a son and three grandchildren of Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi. That report, however, is now in question as the only confirmation is from the Gadhafi government itself. The family rarely stays in the same place for long, particularly given current circumstances. Also, Saif-al-Arab, one of Gadhafi's sons, is 29, unmarried and childless and is not a senior military commander or other notable target.

As Hot Air's Allahpundit writes, "That means it's unlikely that the coalition was targeting him; why hand [Gadhafi] free propaganda by killing a son who's not causing the west much trouble? The airstrike must have been aimed at [Gadhafi] himself -- except that ... the [Gadhafis] are probably keeping their distance from each other knowing that there are eyes in the sky. And even if he did decide to meet with Saif, NATO would have to have spies very, very close to him to be able to pinpoint his location and launch a quick attack. Is that likely? The rebel's spokesman in Benghazi told the media that the whole thing smells fishy."

In related news, Gadhafi is losing even his friends' support. Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has called for Gadhafi to step down "for the sake of the country's future." Given that and the termination of Osama bin Laden, Gadhafi may be wondering just how many days he has left.

Russian Arms Sales Take a Hit

Arab despots and tyrants aren't the only ones feeling the sting of turmoil from what has been called, rightly or wrongly, the "Arab Spring" sweeping the Middle East these past months. Russia, long a major arms supplier to almost all of the Arab states, has seen the unrest cut into its lucrative arms business, and further sales and profits are under threat of cancellation.

Perhaps the biggest hit has come from Libya, where Russia has already lost $4 billion or more. Russia has numerous weapons contracts with Moammar Gadhafi's government already, and in January 2010 Libya signed a number of sales agreements with Russia that included combat aircraft, modern Russian battle tanks, and the building of a Kalashnikov rifle factory in Libya. Following the UN Security Council resolution of March 17, 2011, authorizing military action against Libya, however, Moscow suspended the arms sales. Given the unrest in other Arab countries, there is a high probability that additional arms sales will also be curtailed, at least for the time being. With the likely nature of any new Arab regimes, Russia probably only has to bide its time before the "new" Arab leadership comes calling, looking for good deals on weapons to use against the infidel West.

Business & Economy

Income Redistribution: Tax on Vehicle Miles Traveled?

In 2009, then-White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs assured America that a per-mile gas tax "is not and will not be the policy of the Obama administration." As with everything Obama, this may be exactly the administration's policy. The Hill reports, "The Obama administration has floated a transportation authorization bill that would require the study and implementation of a plan to tax automobile drivers based on how many miles they drive. The plan is a part of the administration's Transportation Opportunities Act (TOA)." We already have such a tax. It's called the gas tax.

The White House is now distancing itself from the draft, however, saying, "This was an early working draft proposal that was never formally circulated within the administration, does not take into account the advice of the president's senior advisers, economic team or Cabinet officials, and does not represent the views of the president."

As one analysis of Obama's proposed TOA explains, it "would establish a Surface Transportation Revenue Alternatives Office" which "would analyze the feasibility of implementing a national mileage-based user fee system that would convey prices to users to reflect system use and other travel externalities." Translation: drive a mile, pay a tax, apparently based on electronic tracking equipment installed in cars. The administration's proposal would also let state and local governments add tolls to existing "free" ways -- further evidencing Obama's economic motto: Why stop with one fee when you can have two?

Driving is already expensive enough with the national average gas price nearing $4 per gallon and drivers in many states already paying more than this. The Left wants us to believe that "Big Oil" is making out like bandits thanks to high prices and government subsidies. Truth is that many so-called "subsidies" are actually deductions or cost recovery mechanisms that are often not unique to oil companies. But don't expect to hear this from the Left -- it wrecks their sound bite.

Furthermore, as Investor's Business Daily writes, "Recall just a couple weeks back, when people were up in arms after Exxon-Mobil announced record first-quarter profit. Exxon-Mobil's earnings came out to 7 cents a gallon, up from 2 cents in the fourth quarter. What about gasoline taxes? During the same quarter, they totaled 48 cents a gallon -- seven times larger than Exxon's profit, which more than one Democrat termed 'obscene.' Now Democrats want taxes to go even higher." That should help the economy.

Chrysler Returns to Profitability

For the first time since 2006, the maker of Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep -- the little brother of GM (Government Motors) in the federal government's bailout of the American auto industry (read: United Auto Workers union) -- reportedly is making a profit and poised to escape the shackles of government ownership.

Buoyed by the events hampering some of its Japanese competitors, the smallest of the Big Three Detroit automakers reported $116 million profit in the first quarter of this year based on a robust 35 percent increase to $13.1 billion in revenue. Given that and renewed Wall Street confidence in the company, the plan is to pay off the $7.5 billion in government loans by the end of June. The first-quarter profit came after $348 million in government interest payments, so erasing that debt will make Chrysler's bottom line even that much better.

If you think we've seen this movie before, we have. Chrysler needed federal loan guarantees during the bleak recession era of 1979-80 to survive, but innovative new product lines and Lee Iacocca's leadership brought the company back to life. Undoubtedly, the new ownership team, led by Italian automaker Fiat, is hoping for a similar success story.

Not So Super-Sized Recovery

This week, the long-awaited capture of Osama bin Laden brought celebrations around the world and a boost in approval ratings for our "Fearless Leader." But as Fox News' Brit Hume pointed out, the hunt for bin Laden was not among the many reasons for Obama's huge decline in popularity.

Right now the lousy economy is Public Enemy No. 1, and the administration and its friends in Congress aren't doing anything to make it better. Evidence of this is the fact that when McDonald's advertised 50,000 openings for low-skills, low-wage jobs, one million people showed up to apply. (The fast food giant ended up hiring 62,000.) That may be because, as Reuters reports, "The number of Americans filing for jobless aid rose to an eight-month high last week, and productivity growth slowed in the first quarter, clouding the outlook for an economy that is struggling to gain speed."

Ironically, one of the reasons the fast food giant is able to hire so many people is that it received a waiver for ObamaCare. Small businesses, which create most new jobs -- including high-paying positions -- do not have the benefit of such generosity. This doesn't bode well for the unemployed or underemployed.

While the national unemployment rate rose to 9 percent in April (real unemployment is closer to twice that), Democrats in Congress are planning new ways to further cripple the free market system. From the comfort of Capitol Hill, they want to raise taxes and increase regulations. We admire people with the gumption (and maybe in this case a little luck) to eschew the easy, eternal unemployment check. Working at McDonald's for an honest living is as admirable as running a company, but Democrats won't be happy until flipping burgers is the new national norm.

Culture & Policy

Storm Update -- The South 'Deserved It'

It's global warming: "The earth is warming. Carbon emissions are increasing," said Sarene Marshall, Managing Director for The Nature Conservancy's Global Climate Change Team. "And they both are connected to the increased intensity and severity of storms that we both are witnessing today, and are going to see more of in the coming decades." Ms. Marshall apparently never read Newsweek's ultra-authoritative super-issue blaming global cooling for the 1974 tornado outbreak.

Actually, according to Bjorn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, "We've seen a declining level of the severe tornadoes over the last half century in the U.S. So we need to be very careful not just to jump to the conclusion and say, 'Oh, then it's because of global warming.'"

In fact, Greg Carbin, the warning coordination meteorologist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Storm Prediction Center, affirms, "There really is no scientific consensus or connection between global warming and tornadic activity. Jumping from a large-scale event like global warming to relatively small-scale events like tornadoes is a huge leap across a variety of scales."

Regardless, as climatologist Kevin Trenberth notes, the South "deserved it": "The congressional delegations of these states -- Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, Georgia, Virginia, and Kentucky -- overwhelmingly voted to reject the science that polluting the climate is dangerous. They are deliberately ignoring the warnings from scientists." Who says belief in global warming isn't a religion? A vengeful one, at that.

Faith and Family: King James Turns 400

On May 2, the English-speaking Christian world celebrated the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible, often referred to as the Authorized Version. The KJV was not the first English translation, but it has been the most enduring. It was commissioned in 1604, when King James I convened the Hampton Court conference. In 1607, scholars set forth with the original manuscripts, of which more and better ones had been discovered, and had the first draft available in 1609. Two years later, the final version was ready and an estimated 1,000 copies were printed. It quickly became the most widely used English Bible and is still in common use today.

The KJV's importance is difficult to overstate. The KJV was the Bible of America's Founding Fathers. Furthermore, as Jason Georges, executive director of the Bible Nation Society, put it, "Because of this printing and distribution over the past 400 years, this book has almost single-handedly shaped the English-speaking world. For example, over 250 English idioms derive from the King James Bible -- for instance, 'An Eye for an Eye,' or 'You Reap What You Sow' -- and so as the King James Bible caused the English language to solidify, it also made English-language speakers ... speak the same because we all were reading the same book."

From the 'Non Compos Mentis' File: Superman, World Citizen

Soon the Man of Steel will no longer be an American citizen. Through generations of readership and a number of movie and television portrayals, the familiar story of the ultimate alien from the planet Krypton always placed his roots in small-town America, where he learned traditional American values from the family that adopted him. Not even the darkest take on his story denied his embrace of American ideals -- until now.

In an upcoming Action Comics edition, the superhero icon arrives in Iran amid a million protestors and endures a daylong barrage of physical and emotional threats, only to be accused by the Iranian government of committing an act of war on America's behalf. In response, Superman states, "'Truth, justice, and the American way' -- it's not enough anymore. The world's too small, too connected."

While DC Comics denies Superman is going rogue and will continue to uphold American traditions as a citizen of the world, the timing of the move and the situation that writer David S. Goyer places him in both seem to paint the superhero as a victim of political correctness. Obviously, PC is the latest form of kryptonite smuggled in by evildoers, and eventually it could bring about the end of America's most well known superhero -- or at least his publisher.

Mother's Day

On Sunday, as we celebrate Mother's Day, we're reminded that among the 10 Commandments there is but one that comes with a promise: "Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the LORD your God is giving you" (Exodus 20:12). President Woodrow Wilson signed legislation in 1914 proclaiming Mother's Day a national holiday. But then again, we don't need a holiday to express our appreciation to moms everywhere. May God bless each and every mother among our Patriot readers.

And Last...

After U.S. forces took out Osama bin Laden, the official response was not to talk about the unit or units involved. Despite numerous reports that it was a team of Navy SEALs, everyone from CIA and Pentagon officials to counter-terrorism chief John Brennan to Barack Obama himself wouldn't confirm anything. Apparently, Joe Biden didn't get the memo.

At a dinner at Washington's Ritz Carlton Hotel this week, Biden praised one of the night's distinguished honorees, Admiral James Stavridis, and "the incredible, the phenomenal, the just almost unbelievable capacity of his Navy SEALs and what they did last Sunday." Later he added, "As vice president of the United States, as an American, I was in absolute awe of the capacity and dedication of the entire team, both the intelligence community, the CIA, the SEALs. It just was extraordinary." Good 'ole Joe. We can always count on him to open his trap, though after this slip of the tongue, his lips may be SEALed.

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
The Patriot Post Editorial Team



Comments

Semper Fi

Recovery? The only thing Obama recovered this month was 9% unemployment. Didn't BHO make creating jobs a "top priority" of his administration? Oh wait, my bad...it was "creating or saving jobs." I guess The One saved so many jobs that unemployment has not surged to 10%. Socialism RULES!

Posted May 6, 2011 at 10:59:07 AM


Shooter

"his lips are SEALed"! I think The Patriot has just coined a new word for the operators lexicon. Obama, oops, OSAMA got SEALed. SEAL this and SEAL that. Ah, the possibilities. SEALed with a kiss!

Posted May 6, 2011 at 11:06:34 AM


Howard Last

You posted a news item about the Republican senators wanting to merge the DOE and EPA. What is wrong with them? Both agencies should be abolished. There is no section of the Constitution that authorizes them. Their motive is to save $3 billion a year by the merge. How much would be saved by eliminating them? And don't forget it would also start to get big brother out of our lives. When the hell are the RINO's going to wake up? What the Republicans are part of the problem!

Posted May 6, 2011 at 11:13:20 AM


Cary

While the gist of the article regarding the case of Agent Diaz may be true, Sutton resigned his position as federal prosecutor over two years ago in April of 2009. Regardless of our shared opinion of Sutton's persecusion of our Border Patrol, it seems a bit "after the fact" to bring his involvement up at this point. A more pertinent question would be what is the status of Agent Diaz' appeal and who is prosecuting/persecuting him now?

Posted May 6, 2011 at 11:56:43 AM


Edward

"both the intelligence community, the CIA, the SEALs." ?? No wonder we have so many problems with our government and their spending. Even the Vice-president can't count!

Posted May 6, 2011 at 12:14:48 PM


Anton D Rehling

If the “Govmint” tries a per mile tax on the American people I believe it will be received with as much enthusiasm as the stamp Act of King George the III. We the People are not a government controled gold mine to withdrawl resources as they see fit.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 12:25:07 PM


Pete Seidel

I agree with those that say they paid into Social Security, and Medicare, including myself, my whole career. I understand that there was originally a trust fund established to fund future liabilities....but that fund has been raided and obliterated by succeeding congresses/administrations for other purposes.

Therefore, this is not an entitlement, and my investment has been stolen by our government. It must be re-established. I also believe that the payout ought to resemble the pay in. e.g. those not paying in have no benefit, and everything thereafter pro-rata.PCS

Posted May 6, 2011 at 12:53:28 PM


Pat

The identity of Admiral Stavridis as the senior SEAL is hardly a secret. Actually his current assignment, which I see perusing this month's issue of the Naval Institute Prooceedidngs, is Supreme Allied Commander Europe/Commander European Command. But as the third-most senior officer in the U.S. Navy, that "Budweiser" device on his chest also makes him the highest-ranking SEAL. So Biden, for all his failings, wasn't spilling any top secrets by praising Adm Stavridis and our SEAL teams.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 12:55:38 PM


Allen

"The House passed H.R. 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, on Wednesday by a vote of 271-175." Hmm, 446 total votes? Neat trick...where did those extra votes come from?

Posted May 6, 2011 at 12:59:37 PM

Editor's Reply:

It was a typo. It should have been 251-175.


Jim Stieringer

The 'voucher" solution to Medicare reform would work, but will never pass muster with the senior population. However, if the Congress were to offer a "carrot" of shared savings it would be wildly popular. Under such a system recipients would continue to receive traditional Medicare, but would share (say 25%) of the amount by which their individual annual utilization was less than the current average of $9,000 per beneficiary. This would help eliminate the many unnecessary medical visits for minor ailments that lend themselves to self help or home remedy treatment. More serious ailments would continue to be treated through the medical community.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 1:13:26 PM


Joe in Mt Juliet

If most Americans knew how really bad our debt/spending problem is and what the Wahsingtonites who really know are not telling us, most Americans would be like Chicken Little. Meanwhile, it's still tinker toy time with our deficits.

Some learned economists are saying if we don't cut the deficit by 500 billion immediately and then continue cutting from there to show the world markets we are serious about getting our own house in order, we will hit the debt wall that cannot absorb any more world debt, and economic collapse will result.

"Can't happen!" you say. "They will never let this happen!" you say. Tell that to the person with cancer who needs radical surgery or a radical life style change to have a good prognosis for the future, but continues to tinker with their cancer or by living in denial.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 1:15:29 PM


jiggs

I got a supposdly true email this week that stated that the Administration, including the President and VP wanted to retrain the cattle guards in use in the west and southwest to work as border patrol officers. The question was asked, "Don't these people in the adminstration have any sense at all? Surely they aren't so credulous as to not know what a cattle guard actually is? After watching and listening to Joe Biden, I wonder that myself.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 1:49:09 PM


Alton

Well Joe in Mt Juliett, that is exactly the plan, collapse the government. If there was someone in Congress with the marbles to do it, they could unravel Nobama. I am beginning to get the idea, they are either complicit or afraid of the fall out.

No guts no glory and if these politicians see their war chests dwindling, maybe they need to take the pulse of their constituents occasionally.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 2:00:33 PM


A Schaefer

What's with this Johnny Suttton...

He should move to Mexico!!

W. commented "he was a good guy" did not say good for what!

How many other enforcement officers are in prison thanks to this Sutton...I say throw him in prison for 20 years...would he last???

Posted May 6, 2011 at 2:09:45 PM


Drifter

RE:Chrysler Returns to Profitability

What significance does Chrysler's return to profitability have when their competition was the victim of a government hit, which turned up almost nothing but, before Toyota was given the green flag, cost them over $2 billion.

Let's phrase a little differently: Should the owner (the government)of competing car companies have the right to use the power of the federal government to take economic action to damage a competitor?

Let's add another similar question: Should the owner of a car company (The UAW) have the right to carry out collective bargaining with a competing car company (Ford)?

Clearly the conflict of interest is enormous and the answer is 'NO'.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 2:15:48 PM


Retired Senior

As far back as I can remember, Companies and Farmers, and people in general, have been looking for ways to save money, so as to put more into the coffers! When I was a youngster, if I needed a few extra dollars for Saturday night,,,I would get my 'cotton choppin' hoe, and go down the road to a neighbor's patch and spend the day killing careless weeds. Then the farmers started using weed killers. And soon stripping machines for harvesting. Bigger tractors replaced horses, and soon bigger implements. The little guy soon had to sell out because he could not compete with the big guy.

That trend is still going on today. Co.'s are still trying to 'cut back' so as to put a little more on the bottom line! The cut back usually means fewer employees, and another sophisticated machine to take their places. As long as this continues, and I can't see any evidence that it wont,,, we will continue to have large, and probably larger un-employment numbers!

We the People,,, have literally put ourselves out of business!!!

Posted May 6, 2011 at 2:37:50 PM


RK Sprau

Semper F: Didn't the GOP run on creating jobs? Plenty of blame to go around.

I concur with Alex, the big entitlement programs has to be fixed but alas the GOP took a pounding in town halls. Political reality or will. My money is on Political reality for Who wants to be voted out. They are already running from the Ryan budget.

My own Tea Party Rep refused to answer any q's on those programs, In fact he had questions and names submitted. Those with anything to do with him voting for it, etectra, were deep sixed. Several of us lied. He squirmed. Voting for a voucher program on something which may not in respects to coverage, work has people concerned.Voting for a budget that will drive us deeper in debt and tip us over the edge as I understand it, in respects to borrowing is not the way to do business.

If anyone has a real solution, call your Congressman and tell them. Make your voice known. Do it before it's to late.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 2:42:21 PM


Sandra

I heard a caller on a radio show say the SEAL team members are cold-blooded killers because Osama bin Laden wasn't armed (if you believe that). I say OBL was given the same chance he gave American citizens (and others) on 9/11. He deserved every degree of "cold" he received. Maybe SEAL should stand for "Surprise Entrance, Abrogate Life." I think it's commendable--spectacular--that our military men and women continue to conduct themselves as professionals and with clarity of purpose and procedure despite serving under a commander-in-chief who has no respect or appreciation for the watchcare and protection the military provides to our country.

A word on Obama, bin Laden, and "truth":

With this inept administration, there will be no telling of THE truth. Ever. For them, there is no foundational truth about ANYTHING. There is "truth" of convenience, "truth" of expediency, "truth" of practicality, "truth" of what-will-get-BHO-reelected, but no indubitable, foundational truth. More than likely, the real truth will never come out. Even if it does, the situation has been so befouled that we won't be able to distinguish it as authentic truth; thus, we won't be able to declare it the truth. And what's most despicable about this is that BHO WANTS it this way. He wants to be the master manipulator of all things "truth." If people cannot make a logical correspondence between what happened and what is true--and BHO has made sure that such a logical conclusion cannot be reached with the way he's mucked things up--most people (including mindless drones and the oblivious horde) will allow BHO to substitute his version of "truth" for the actual truth, and most people will devour it like candy ... or Kool-aid. Don't be taken in by this administration's drivel. Nothing it says is truth or ever will be.

Truth be told (no pun intended ... well maybe a little), this works with any scenario associated with BHO and his cohorts, not just with the death of OBL. They'll never tell the truth. Never. They are incapable of it.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 2:54:27 PM


RC

Religious leaders should never imply that God might be involved in death and destruction caused by violent weather because we all know that it is really "Mother Earth" retaliating for our neglect and/or abuse. Thank you, Kevin, for setting the record straight.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 3:56:51 PM


Robert the Bruce

"As we have warned before, the military will be severely harmed by serving as a laboratory for leftist social experiments. The negative impact on the chaplain corps cannot be overstated. But at least nobody's feelings will be hurt."

How about the feelings of the chaplains themselves?

Forcing a man of God to "marry" two men or two women is going to have a very detrimental effect on the "feelings" of that man.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't it true that the civilian version of a military chaplain is called a priest, or minister, or rabbi? If one of these civilians wants to marry two people of the same sex, that is his prerogative. It may result in his being looked down upon by his church (or not), but a military chaplain is an officer who has sworn to uphold the Constitution and is answerable to his superiors as well as his church.

So a chaplain who stands up for the tenets of his faith can run afoul of the orders of his superior officers. Or a chaplain who follows his military orders can end up in trouble with his personal beliefs. It's true that there will be a negative impact on the chaplain corps, and there will also certainly be a lot of hurt feelings.

I wouldn't want to be in their shoes these days.

And I thought Father Francis Mulcahy, of the M.A.S.H. TV series, had a hard life!

Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:09:38 PM


W.T. Door

Chaplains. Back in the first century, Peter had the same problem of whether to obey God or the rulings of men. The only alternative for a Christian, Jewish, or Muslim chaplain is to resign.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:24:35 PM


W.T. Door

“As one analysis of Obama's proposed TOA explains, it ‘would establish a Surface Transportation Revenue Alternatives Office’”

Ah, yes. Establish an office, appoint a czar. SOP. Anything to avoid the horrible fate of “drill baby, drill”. The Hydra of ancient Greek mythology is alive and thriving in WDC.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:27:05 PM


Jon Wardlow

I am hoping that most Chaplains will be honorable enough to follow God and resign if necessary. It is sad to see as I've known many fine officers over the years - and one of my favorite admins where I work is a Chaplain's wife.

That said, I think there are some (very few) of that Corps whom do not care for anything but their career prospects. Here is where the true test comes - do you serve God or your paycheck? This kind of change seems unfair to those in religions that gay marriage is a direct affront to.

I'm hoping that men and women of God will resign in droves and show where their loyalty truly lies. Not because they aren't loved and appreciated by the serives they are part of, but because following God is the very definition of honor.

God bless our Chaplain Corps... may He see you through this time of testing we knew would eventually come.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:42:30 PM


Donald Stump

No one is going to take Congress seriously about reducing debt until they at least reduce and modify their illegal criminal pensions if not their salaries.

Everyone wants to reduce costs unless it benefits them.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:43:59 PM


Ron Richards

I went to work for an agency that was in the Dept. of Energy in 1980. This agency purchased their vehicles through the General Services Admin.(GSA). For several years over 90% of the vehicles were Chrysler products. I would say that Chrysler was given a running start on their recovery by having a large almost exclusive purchaser in the GSA. Lee Iacocca was a good CEO, but he had considerable help along the way beyond the federal loan guarantees.

Posted May 6, 2011 at 6:03:29 PM


Major Stu

Mileage tax? Three words: Right to Privacy.

Fourth amendment should protect us in our affairs, and we already pay a gas tax and state sales tax at the pump. The jump in gas price is a spike in sales tax revenue for the states.

When will the greed of the monster on the Potomac become more evident?

Posted May 6, 2011 at 10:16:30 PM


Roger Damm

I'm a senior (over 80) and also feel that I've earned my SS which is over 70% of my annual income. Because we have no debt we live comfortably. The same could be true for the whole country if governments had no debt. (I accept that there will be debt, but it should be limited to a fixed percent of the previous year's GDP). I recognize that we must reduce SS and Medical costs. I am willing to give up a reasonable percentage of SS if the congress, both houses, Supreme Court, all governmental workers, Judges, and the president will give up the same percentage amount AND apply it to the debt - not new projects. My concern is the inflation which is inevitable if we don't reverse this borrow and spend spree that is still going on.

I could go on, but that's enough for now.

Posted May 7, 2011 at 11:59:26 AM


Jay

I'm beginning to get a little peeved when people keep talking about Social Security being an entitlement. I, like all the other seniors have paid into Social Security all our working lives.

If the politicians had not put that money in the general fund and kept it separate like it originally was there might not be a problem with it now, but whenever they need extra money for something they helped themselves.

If they want to save some money get all the illegals off the entitlements they now get, round them up and send them back to where they came from. The government didn't mind doing it to the Japanese during WWII. I know they didn't send them home but they put them in internment camps, broke up families even.

Of course the Democrats would never go for that now since the illegals are most of their voters.

It's not that I'm against immigration, well yes I am, I'm against letting any more Muslims in the country. If you are going to immigrate then learn the language and follow our laws.

Posted May 7, 2011 at 12:48:29 PM


Buzzkill

@R T Bruce -- That hurt feelings remark was sarcasm...

Posted May 8, 2011 at 3:18:26 PM


Scott

Fund Social Security by taking half or more of the legislators Social Security who were in office during the time that the SS lockbox was not secured.

Posted May 9, 2011 at 6:18:05 AM


AegedWell

If we do not seriously reduce the debt, the country will default!

That being said we can reduce it, BUT it will hurt all, mostly the governmint. (typo meant to be there).

Here is how:

2010 Revenues= $X trillion

2011 budget= .95 times $X. .05 To reducing the debt, not service on the debt

For EXTREME emergencies (like WWII) takes a super majority with reductions on budget in three years to .9 times X. and can only be used for ANY three years in ANY consecutive 20 year period.

for individual budget (DOD, DOJ, Entitlements)the ratio is whatever the previuos percentage of the budget was. Oh, you want YOUR special program to have more funds, OK, what/where do YOU want to reduce the other programs by the same amount. Budget number is NOT adjusted for increases in specific programs.

This is how we handle our personal debt. There is no Bankruptcy court for the country.

But this will NEVER be passed, too harsh.

Posted May 9, 2011 at 9:41:44 AM


Matt S

So, McDonald's has hired 62,000 new workers. Where is the outcry form the left that these are just "hamburger flipping jobs"? I thought they wanted union jobs for everyone? Well, they want union jobs to fill their campaign coffers.

Posted May 9, 2011 at 3:44:34 PM


Teresa

You observed the anniversary of the King James Bible.

What you failed to include is the fact that, thanks to Martin Luther's (or his agents') translation to the vernacular and his own heretical teachings, matter from the Old Testament (i.e., The Book of Maccabees) and the "Lord's Prayer" is not what Jesus answered when asked how we must pray.

Someone--Martin Luther or one of his translators--decided that "...for Thine is the Kingdom," etc. sounded good. The fact is that this addition was purloined from a prayer of thanksgiving composed by--if memory serves--St. Ignatius of Antioch.

Last, even though this was the version of the Bible used by our Founding Fathers, tradition has it that George Washington was very interested in the True Church, made the Sign of the Cross before meals, and made a death-bed conversion to the True Church.

Posted May 9, 2011 at 11:38:56 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund