Chronicle

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

The Foundation

"We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections." --John Adams

Editorial Exegesis

Leftmedia-run debates are problematic

"The semiotic search for the racism beneath Newt's food-stamp line. The dismissal of 'the Constitution' in haughty air quotes. The wasting of primetime minutes pondering which wife would make the best first lady. The obsessive deposing of Romney on the legality of condoms. The condescending identity politics of carting out a token Latino to ask an immigration question. The dings. The bells. The buzzers. The Google Chat notification tones. ... These are just some of the lowlights of the umpteen Republican debates thus far. And ... they were all brought to us by the mainstream media. That's the same media that daily carry water for the Obama administration, approach the tea parties as anthropological curiosities, and persistently skew the public discourse leftward in ways large and small, conscious and unconscious. ... While dismantling the presuppositions of the political media is surely a skill a conservative president would do well to acquire, it does not rank with the ability to clearly and persuasively articulate a conservative policy vision for solving America's most pressing problems, or with the ability to display fiscal sobriety, strategic acumen, and strong instincts toward liberty when presented with new challenges, foreign and domestic. These abilities -- and not the ability to cleverly parry liberal inanities -- are what the primary debates are meant to test. ... [W]e favor the plan recently floated by Hugh Hewitt. Come the 2016 election season, the RNC should set the number, dates, and locations of debates. They should be fewer in number than the 20-odd we will see before this year is out, so that they are not so unduly agenda-setting. And the party should partner with local party officials, conservative think tanks, alternative media, tea-party groups, and grassroots organizations to determine formatting and questions. ... The alternative is to hope MSNBC and CNN come into the flock between now and 2016. Don't hold your breath." --National Review

Upright

"The politicians are spending us into oblivion. But I can't blame only them. The American people are complacent. We like the goodies. We think we're getting something for nothing. We are like alcoholics who know we have a problem but just can't resist one last fix. One more infrastructure bill or jobs plan will jumpstart the economy. Then we'll kick our spending addiction once and for all. But we don't stop spending. Almost all budget categories grow, even when adjusted for inflation. ... So what do we do? We must cut. But I fear Americans aren't up for that. People on the street told me that the budget is out of control. But when I then asked them, 'What would you cut?' most just stared ahead. ... We're on the way to becoming Greece -- while our 'leaders' stand and watch." --columnist John Stossel

"High tax rates in the upper income brackets allow politicians to win votes with class warfare rhetoric, painting their opponents as defenders of the rich. Meanwhile, the same politicians can win donations from the rich by creating tax loopholes that can keep the rich from actually paying those higher tax rates -- or perhaps any taxes at all. What is worse than class warfare is phony class warfare. Slippery talk about 'fairness' is at the heart of this fraud by politicians seeking to squander more of the nation's resources." --economist Thomas Sowell

"[I]n Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron has introduced a bill seeking to partially privatize the National Health Service (NHS). Why? Because the British government is 'hoping to avoid a Greek-style financial meltdown.' ... UK healthcare costs are currently $194 billion per year and consume 18 percent of the UK's budget. The projected 'cuts' in spending for 2013 that have people up in arms? As of now, a $6 billion increase in spending to $200 billion. Much of the animus likely stems from the fact that Britain has grown used to massive amounts of healthcare spending that can no longer be sustained: between 2000 and 2010, the NHS budget doubled in real terms. Furthermore, British debt as a percentage of GDP was almost 80 percent in 2010. Which brings us across the pond, so to speak, where America's debt level reached 102 percent of GDP last year, long before the full effects -- and true costs -- of our own stab at government-run healthcare have yet to be realized." --columnist Arnold Ahlert

Insight

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle." --British prime minister Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

"To be controlled in our economic pursuits means to be controlled in everything." --Nobel laureate economist Friedrich August von Hayek (1899-1992)

The Demo-gogues

Stunning hypocrisy: "Now, whenever Congress refuses to act, Joe and I, we're going to act. In the months to come, wherever we have an opportunity, we're going to take steps on our own to keep this economy moving. ... I do hope Congress joins me. Instead of spending the coming months in a lot of phony political debates focusing on the next election, I hope that we spend some time focusing on middle-class Americans and those who are struggling to get into the middle class." --Barack Obama

Reducing the American Dream: "If you're willing to put in the work, the idea is that you should be able to raise a family and own a home, not go bankrupt because you got sick, 'cause you've got some health insurance that helps you deal with those difficult times; that you can send your kids to college; that you can put some money away for retirement. That's all most people want. Folks don't have unrealistic ambitions. They do believe that if they work hard, they should be able to achieve that small measure of an American dream." --Barack Obama

Scary: "Let me let you in on a secret. I am the senior-most person serving on the Financial Services Committee. Barney Frank is about to retire and guess who's shaking in their boots? The too-big-to-fail banks and financial institutions and all of Wall Street, because Maxine Waters is going to be the next chair of the Financial Services Committee!" --Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Way over the top: "On Immigration policy and reform [Republicans] are on the wrong side of the track. ... They would have you believe that if they get into office, they are going to make sure that they are going to get rid of everyone in our society who was not born in America." --Maxine Waters

Dezinformatsia

Framing debate: "Isn't any Republican nominee going to have a problem, and that is, by all indications, the economy is getting stronger. So if you're the Republican nominee, how do you run against a recovering economy? How do you say, 'I'm not up with that'?" --NBC's Matt Lauer

Um, what? "When I first heard the discourse of the Tea Party, as much as I wasn't in agreement with it, I kind of like populist movements that are asking for jobs and worrying about the effects of big government. But the shift now has moved towards this so-called moral, ethical, racially problematic and now this contraception language. You know, jobs are simply not located in my uterus. Like, wherever they are, wherever they might be created, that's just not where they are. So, why is so much policy language around that?" --MSNBC's Melissa Harris Perry

Nothing to fear: "Despite the fact that Obama hasn't made the slightest feint toward regulating guns, firearms enthusiasts have whipped themselves into a paranoid frenzy, convinced that this is all just part of some elaborate conspiracy. ... Note the twist: It's no longer Obama's election that poses a mortal danger to the liberty of Americans who want to assemble arsenals -- it's Obama's re-election. I'm no financial analyst, but you'd have to imagine that that line of reasoning isn't going to do anything to depress gun sales." --BusinessWeek blogger Joshua Green

Well duh: "By saying ... that the president of the United States is running over the Constitution ... you seem to be saying that the president is not patriotic. You seem to be questioning [his] patriotism." --CBS's Charlie Rose to Newt Gingrich

Non sequitur: "If you're really anti-gay, you become a Catholic now." --MSNBC's Chris Matthews

Newspulper Headlines:

Sounds More Like a Republican Slogan: "Obama's Slogan: Looking to Replace Hope and Change" --Reuters

Shortest Books Ever Written: "Why China's Political Model Is Superior" --The New York Times

Answers to Questions Nobody Is Asking: "Why I Both Love and Hate the Occupy Movement" --Huffington Post

Too Much Information: "Ron Paul: Why Can't We 'Put Into Our Body Whatever We Want?'" --KIRO-TV website (Seattle)

(Thanks to The Wall Street Journal's James Taranto)

Village Idiots

Revisionist history: "[George Washington] began the political tradition that produced a Union victory in the Civil War, the Federal Reserve Board, Social Security, Medicare and, more recently, Obamacare." --historian Joseph Ellis in Time magazine

Down with capitalism: "While we believe that capitalism is fundamentally superior to any other system for organizing economic activity, it is also clear that some of the ways in which it is now practiced do not incorporate sufficient regard for its impact on people, society and the planet." --Global Warming spokesperson Algore

Disturbing dismissal: "[Occupiers] can be as filthy and they can rape people -- if you want to make stuff up -- but the fact is nobody really cares about it because that message isn't about the messengers, it's not about who's delivering the message, but the message itself which really resonates at a very core emotional level with people who are suffering in this economy." --Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas

Blame the GOP: "And the fact is, is that because Republicans decided to play politics with Keystone, their action essentially forced the administration to deny the permit process because they insisted on a timeframe within which it was impossible to appropriately approve the pipeline. ... So the fact that the process ended the way it did in terms of that permit request is wholly the responsibility of the Republicans who insisted on playing politics with the payroll tax cut extension back at the end of last year." --White House Press Secretary Jay Carney

Clueless: "And people in America are very practical people across the political spectrum. Very conservative women want their kids, their daughters taking birth control." --former DNC head Howard Dean

Short Cuts

"We conservatives, we want to make jobs as readily available as condoms in this country." --radio talk-show host Mark Levin

"President Obama reversed himself on forcing churches to give women contraceptive coverage. He also reversed his opposition to campaign PACs and started one for himself. Back when he lived in Hawaii flip-flops were shoes, now they are career extenders." --comedian Argus Hamilton

"Harry Reid took a cheap shot at Marco Rubio, saying he 'supposedly represents Hispanics.' No, he represents his constituents. You should try it some time, Harry." --Fred Thompson

"Black Eyed Peas singer Will.I.Am said president Obama is not a magic man. But Obama is magic -- he makes businesses, homes and jobs all disappear." --NewsBusted's Jodi Miller

"Italian authorities seized $6 trillion worth of fake, worthless U.S. Treasury bonds. Pretty good counterfeit job, too. They look just like the genuine, worthless Treasury bonds." --comedian Jay Leno

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team



Comments

Nancy

I have wondered, since the first debate, why the GOP candidates submit to the inane, attack questions that CNN and MSNBC give to them in debates. They should stay away from any debate that isn't sponsored by a conservative group. To expect a fair exchange with a liberal organization is crazy.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:22:02 AM


GMButler

Q.) Are you tired of the Leftmedia administering the GOP debates?

A.) Yes, and so are the other 51% of Americans that are carrying the burden of the 49% that pay no taxes and are a drain on our economy. Americans will vote their pocketbooks in 2012 (assuming we have free elections - which is not a given). That is why the NWO has to "orchestrate" the selection of a Republican candidate that they own because they know that Obama cannot win in November.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:26:27 AM


Bill DeFelice

I am tired of the leftist media holding GOP debates. Why would the GOP let Clinton network news run their debate?

Sometimes I think this is all a dog+pony show.Set up by the big money Sorros guy.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:26:43 AM


William Shimer

The man elected President in 2012 must focus on the economy and jobs. Nearly all questions should be on that subject. Other related subjects could be taxes, spending and the deficit. No other questions.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:27:56 AM


John Q Citizen

"Very conservative women want their kids, their daughters taking birth control." --former DNC head Howard Dean...Not no but HELL NO, I don't want my daughter (now 14) to start taking birth control you raving lunatic

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:28:54 AM


JWall

May I simply say, "yes -- a thousand times yes?"?

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:31:27 AM


Carl W Richardson

We need to stop the circle firing squad and take aim at the trespasser in the WH. Obama doesn't have to spend any of his billion dollar war chest if we keep doing his campaigning for him..

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:31:41 AM


Mac

The Republicans need to establish their own ground rules for any and all future dabates.

The media is determined to make every effort to lead the discussion away from substance, and towards any trivia the media believes will be useful in making the Republicans look like fools.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:31:44 AM


Harry

Why do the Republican candidates allow the lame stream media to be the one interviewing? The dipsticks from the left are going all out to make the candidates look foolish with their "gotcha" questions. Republicans become victims of their own folly.

At least get some who are neutral (if there are any.)

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:32:24 AM


Dan St. John

Who's idea was this and what Republican in his/her right mind would sign off on it? It is a given that during the general election debates that the liberal media will declare Obama the winner, no matter how he does. The Republicans should have at ;east had more objective moderators for the Primary. Now they will be 0 for 2! Not good!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:33:04 AM


M. Patracha

I must admit Newts way of shutting down the liberal media is refreshing…..let’s see if that can continue once we have a candidate?? Or if Obama will get offf with one word answers or skirting the question.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:35:44 AM


John Musson

There are two problems with the debates:

1. The left media is controlling the agenda.

2. The candidates are belittling the other candidates, instead of presenting their solutions to the day's political issues.

It is time to start talking as statesmen and serious presidential candidates.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:37:18 AM


Tim S

Yes. I have never understood why Republicans enter the enemy camp to get their message across. This is the height of stupidity.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:38:14 AM


Jolynn

In answer to the first question---ABSOLUTELY!!!

Whose idea is it ot have these cotton-minded liberals be the moderators?? My 4 year old grandson could ask more intelligent and pertinent questions!!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:38:19 AM


Tarymelon

YES! Why do the candidates agree to this? They know what's going to happen.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:40:00 AM


Joe Harthorne

The debates hosted by MSNBC and CNN have been particularly annoying. They have served to show the bias and agenda of the media questioners. We need to hear from the candidates but much of these debates hosted by Obama's footmen have become circuses. Entertaining only because we watch just how left the hosts can be.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:40:43 AM


sledgehamner

Unfortunately, the ones hosted by Fox News weren't much better.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:42:37 AM


marvy

its over...moving to new zealand to raise sheepskin condoms...

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:45:19 AM


Don G. Dinsdale

YES!!! I have stopped watching News from all Net-Work News...

I only watch Fox News, the rest of my news gathering is done mostly from Townhall.com and Patriot Post...

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:45:22 AM


Sherry

It is totally not right. The liberal media has no interest in learning about the candidates. They just want to try to trip them up and make them look bad. Someone [with half a brain] needs to have some say in the questions. FOX news needs to host another debate. At least it would be more fair and balanced.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:45:41 AM


sledgehamner

And when did media interviewer as debator become the norm? Ask a question already, and let the candidates answer w/o all this challenge & interruption already!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:46:32 AM


L.B.

With the hope that our Repulican Party is reading these messages; let me ask IS THERE A DOCTOR IN THE HOUSE?! Do they need shock treatments to the brain for them to understand the nonsense and defeat they are courting by continuing to allow anti conservative media to set the agenda and control the game?

What does it take to get this Party on track?

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:47:47 AM


Terry Lee Moser

I am tired of debates. Period. Debating is a skill that requires coaching and practice. It is only one of the skills a candidate for office needs. Yes, I think debates have some value, but they should be limited. Can you imagine Harry Truman in a debate?

As to the liberal/consrvative news issue I suggest names be put in a hat and drawn to see who airs the debate and who asks the questions.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:50:40 AM


Val

In the Eugene Robinson (Washington Post) column today, his criticism of Santorum claims the Republican candidate is well outside the mainstream because he has a problem with homosexual acts, gay marriage & abortion.... He goes on to say "his Ozzie and Harriet ideas about family life place him in a different solar system"..... Really?

Mr. Robinson evidently doesn't know much about family life that includes a husband and wife with children that love and live as a cohesive unit.. As far as I know, civilization was built on family units....

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:52:26 AM


Don Greer

Me being one of those right-wing idiots! I believe it is necessary for our candidates to visit the enemy’s home ground. How else will we every get our message out to the masses that refuse to visit the Fox News Network? However during these debates, our candidates should call the moderators on these idiot questions and ask politely for a more relevant question.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:53:17 AM


cRoby

Where is the Republican Party? They should be managing the debates for their party primary rather than letting the idelogical opposition manage it.

I doubt the Giants would have won the super bowl if the Patriots facilitated the their offense game plan.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:53:29 AM


Larry Naselli

Would Democrats let the Republican Party's Communications Division run a Democrat Debate? So why do Republicans let the "mainstream" news networks moderate a Republican debate, when those networks are nothing more than an arm of the Obama 2012 Campaign?

If the Republican candidates want to answer relevant questions about Iranian nukes, economic growth, controlling government spending, domestic energy production, judicial appointments, and the proper relationship between the individual and the state, rather than answer irrelevant questions about contraception, ex-wives and income tax returns, the GOP will have to sponsor its own debates and buy the air time.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:54:05 AM


Gary

The media are ALL patholigical communist liars.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:56:34 AM


Mark K. Potter

Obama will win re-election in November. It won't be due to those who follow politics and the course of this great country. Rather the quasi-illiterate sheep that are persuaded by the billion dollar slogan campaign of Obama will decide our future. Every developed nation since the Babylonian Empire has fallen for one reason...moral relativism. Founded a moral nation under laws of God, we find ourselves behaving as though any individual can set their own ethical standards. It is this moral relativism that has brought our country to the precipice we now face. It is the same moral relativism that will see to the eventual destruction of America. A new President, or a new congress won't stop the degradation of our society. Only returning to God may we return to the former glory (and blessing) we had at our countries inception.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:56:54 AM


Judith C. Allen

The media should be embarrassed with what they have done. Who can do a decent job and is willing to run a debate they can be proud of? Republican candidates need to agree to walk off the stage enmass the first time the media asks a useless question designed to belittle and ridicule.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:57:18 AM


Don

If the questions posed by John King and George Stephanopolis do not convince anyone of the folly of liberal controlled media hosting the Republican debates, they are so biased themselves that nothing could convince them.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:57:36 AM


Carol

The leftmedia monopolizes the airwaves, so I would suggest having leaders of other countries set the agenda for the debates on the mainstream networks and be the ones asking the questions. The leaders in Canada, the UK, Germany, etc. would probably ask questions with some substance rather than the inanities asked by the leftmedia.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:58:19 AM


Bill

Yes

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:59:23 AM


Herb Earnest

To put it in the simplest terms - YES. The liberal media should be side tracked - The RNC could and should correct this.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:00:25 PM


John Lofton

Tenth Amendment Center Founder and Executive Director, Michael Boldin, Will Speak at IOTC’s March 2nd First Friday!

Contact: John Lofton, Communications Director, IOTC, 301-873-4612, JLof@aol.com

SEVERN, Md., Feb. 22, 2012 /Christian Newswire/ -- This event is free but to attend you must RSVP by calling 866-730-9796 or signing up on the website TheAmericanView.com. It will start at 7p.m. and be held at : Heritage Community Church, 8146 Quarterfield Road, Severn, Maryland 21144.

"Institute on the Constitution" is an educational effort sponsored by the Law Office of Peroutka and Peroutka in Pasadena, Maryland. Our desire is to help individuals across America understand and appreciate their own history and heritage by reacquainting them with the worldview and vision of our Founding Fathers.

We believe that by understanding the way in which the framers of our Constitutional Republic viewed their relationship to God, to other sovereign states, to their families and to each other, we can gain valuable and practical insight into the foundational principles of America.

We encourage all individuals, families, churches, legislatures, civic and other organizations to familiarize themselves with our Constitutional heritage. Armed with the vision of the Founders, we can take an active role in the restoration of our Constitutional Republic.

"IOTC" also offers courses on the U.S.Constitution, the Maryland Constitution and a course titled "The Duty of the Jury: Defend The Constitution."

This event will be live-streamed when this event begins at 7 pm EST on March 2. Follow this link: www.theamericanview.com/events/first-fridays/first-friday-live-feed.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:01:06 PM


Mark K. Potter

Obama will win re-election in November. It won't be due to those who follow politics and the course of this great country. Rather the quasi-illiterate sheep that are persuaded by the billion dollar slogan campaign of Obama will decide our future. Every developed nation since the Babylonian Empire has fallen for one reason...moral relativism. Founded a moral nation under laws of God, we find ourselves behaving as though any individual can set their own ethical standards. It is this moral relativism that has brought our country to the precipice we now face. It is the same moral relativism that will see to the eventual destruction of America. A new President, or a new congress won't stop the degradation of our society. Only returning to God may we return to the former glory (and blessing) we had at our countries inception.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:01:41 PM


Todd Kreigh

That Leftmedia was considered to air the GOP debates is another good example of why the GOP loses elections. It's the kind of flat-footed, clueless approach we've all come to know and despise.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:03:03 PM


Walter Smith

I don't watch the debates. I realized early on that I don't really learn anything from them. I think in their current format they are a waste of time.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:03:06 PM


Raleigh Atkinson

Hell YES! This is ridiculous. They never cover the issues of Obama's record.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:03:32 PM


Vera Toyias

Yes, I\m sick and tired of them. Why do most of the debates have to be hosted by the liberals? The only one I really enjoyed was the one hosted by Brett Bier (spelling?)of the Fox Network.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:05:01 PM


Barry Payne

If the RNC had any interest in promoting a fiscal conservative they would have already done so.

One of the best questions during the debates was from a Washington Post reporter during the WP debate. The lady asked, "why no one had been put in prison for the sub-prime meltdown"? If I recall Bachmann answered first explaining that, "we(Congress) had caused it with the Community Reinvestment Act, Fannie....". Then the stunned reporter asked Newt and Mitt the same question and they confirmed it was Congress that caused the bubble and meltdown. So then everyone got quiet any they changed topics.

I think people need to be put on trial even if they are in Congress.

Just kidding, if the RNC is good with it the law should not apply.

Barry Payne, Titular Despot Emeritus

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:05:08 PM


Bonnie

I would be a wonderful thing if the Republican debates could be run by an UNbiased group . . . . wherever you could find one.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:06:25 PM


ELLEN PURCELL

OF COURSE, I'M DISGUSTED W/THE LEFTIST ORGANIZING THE DEBATES. HOWEVER, THE STUPID PARTY, DESERVES ALL THEY GET FM. THE LEFTIST MEDIA. THEY DO NOT BELONG IN ANY PROPAGANDA DEBATES BUT HAVEN'T THE STRENGTH NOR SENSE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. IT'S NO WONDER THAT THEY ARE LOOKING DOWNRIGHT MORONIC. THEY ARE A LAUGHING STOCK! I AM AN INDEPENDENT AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DUE TO THE TWO JOKE PARTIES THAT WE'VE HAD IN THIS COUNTRY FOR SOOOOO LONG. WE NOW HAVE VERY LITTLE TIME TO CHANGE THINGS, BUT DON'T TELL THE STUPID PARTY, AS THEY'LL HAVE TO FIGURE THAT ONE OUT FOR THEMSELVES, IF EVER.

CPAC USED TO BE A GREAT ORG. BUT NOW HAS BEEN INVADED BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, ET AL. TO WHERE DO WE RETURN? DEFINITELY NOT TO THE STUPID PARTY!

I'M GLAD TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOME VENTING. IT WILL NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO EXPLAIN THIS TO THE STUPID PARTY, AS THEY WOULDN'T GET IT.

VERY SAD FOR THIS COUNTRY!!!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:07:33 PM


John W. Harvey

You bet I am tired of the MSM trying to make the canidates look like idiots. Some (most of the questions they ask are realy dumb and they are asked to get the different canidates to say something that they can jump on.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:09:24 PM


Wally

I agree 100%!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:10:19 PM


NHConservative

The GOP is absolutely INSANE to allow Democrat Party hacks from the media to manipulate these debates.

The sole purpose of the moderators from PBS, CNN, ABC, etc. is to promote the Democrat's agenda and distort the messages and responses of the Republican candidates.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:10:55 PM


B.C.

I sure am. And I'm REALLY sick of Fox News ignoring Ron Paul!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:11:00 PM


Charles

I love seeing your web site. Thanks for all you do.

Did Obama send 100 US soldiers to Uganda or was that just a bad dream I had???

There is no mention, that I have seen, of this movement.

As a combat officer from Vietnam, I have empathy for those soldiers. In reality they are mercenaries for Sorros at minimum wage and not volunteering.

I know George Sorros has investments in the country and is having some very strong opposition from it's dictator.

I know you cannot answer all e mails but I would like a response if possible.,

Sincerely,

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:11:49 PM


GMButler

"You know, comrades, that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how." (Stalin - who admired Chicago politics ;-)

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:14:07 PM


Woodrow Pitt

I could not agree more. I can not agree more than that the Mainstresm Media is bias to the LEFT. Anyone that relies only on the MSM has their head where the sun does't shine!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:15:00 PM


Marcus H. Brown, III

If there are any intelligent journalists remaining within the Leftmedia, they should look at the role of "journalists" in the Socialist Dictatorships of the Soviet Union, Germany, Italy, and Venezuela. I now more clearly understand the definition of "fool."

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:19:39 PM


tony g

I believe the liberal media is to blame for all the liberalism in america. They are nasty people and do not tell the truth in many instances

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:23:58 PM


dick

I have watched the debates and have not liked the way they went. I would Li.e to see more on the economy, the middle east, the violation of the Constitution and less of the personal sniping. The Stephanopolis questioning was inane!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:25:03 PM


Hamilton

To: veritas lux mea

In case you didn't see this in Monday's Patriot Post...

I'm not taking a 2nd Amendment/gun control position on Santoruim, either way. Right now, I want, and we all need, facts.

You quoted information from Dudley Brown's group, the NAGR. I'm sorry for not exactly trusting the NAGR, but compared to the NRA, the NAGR is a fledgling organization. Does the NRA confirm this information in the NAGR site?

Moreover and even better, can you find and post either text or links, from a government public record site, that shows exactly how Santorum voted on these bills? If you could, you would really clear up the record on this issue.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:26:03 PM


R. K. Smith

I don't propose to be be informed enough to state how the debates should be held, but why not have debates wherever and not inform the candidates ahead of time the nature of the questions, input welcome.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:27:03 PM


Carol Leonard

This is something I have been yelling at the top of my lungs for years. It is beyond ridiculous and the reason the leftists keep pushing the debates through the aforementioned media outlets is because they get to control the tone, the rhetoric, the topics, etc....because if the debates were about the real issues, we wouldn't have had Clinton or O'Bummer. To me, nothing is more talk-worthy than the economy, but gay marriage, legalizing drugs, global warming & what color of underwear do you prefer make the top of the list. They have nothing to do with fixing our debt/job problems.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:29:51 PM


Terry G

Well, the GOP must have agreed to it. I think that if Santorum doesn't get the nom., he at least will remind the candidates to not play nice with the media. Go to the people, work past the media, ignore their taunts, act like Reagan. Can it happen? I don't know. But I long for it!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:33:31 PM


GMButler

@R.K.Smith,

The NWO Elite owns the media and therefore sets the rules for "debate". It is critically important that the NWO get a Republican candidate that they completely control as Obama cannot possibly win in November (think Jimmy Carter). Presidents that cannot be controlled are especially problematic - ask JFK.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:34:11 PM


James Throneburg

What critiera and from what power structure did the decision, to let the lame stream media have anything to do with setting the agenda for the Republican debates, come from???

Under the circumstances it seems obvious to me that "the establishment" (from both parties), both working to bring America "down" to the level of the rest of the world in order to achieve " A New World Order". GLOBALIST in both parties.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:40:32 PM


GMButler

@B.C.

"... I'm REALLY sick of Fox News ignoring Ron Paul!!!"

Well, if you think that Fox News is "Fair and Balanced", then you are a fool and have been fooled. Let's look at what Fox has done recently to stay "fair" and "balanced". Fired Judge Napolitano who was the only remaining voice of Constitutional reason left on Fox. Fired Glenn Beck who has successfully launched his own network GBTV. The top shows are O'Reilly and Hannity, and they are mouthpieces for the NWO ensuring that we focus on meaningless tripe.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:46:37 PM


C J Rice

I specifically avoided the debates because I knew the MSM talking heads were hosting them. I knew, and was proven accurate, that their questions would be either ridiculous or impertinent.

Given the effort the host(s) would exert to keep any substantive debate away from all things 'Obama' it was amazing to me that the GOP sanctioned the debates, unless they were thinking that all but their selectee would be sullied.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:47:28 PM


Jill

The leftist controlled media is doing all it can to make the GOP candidates look silly, foolish and trivial. On the other side, this same leftist media is throwing such adoration at obama so at to make him the messiah. If you've watched and listened carefully, the questions asked by the leftists during these debates, such at they are, are skewed. Nothing is directly "ON"...if a candidate does hit the target, the moderator will intentionally misrepresent what was said, in other words...to skew it to the left.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:47:35 PM


Kelly Jarboe

I'm not only tired of the left media administering the debates I'm tired of the entire debate process.

Candidates are more concerned with their competition than the goal of defeating Obama. I honestly think up until the one candidate is selected then and only then would a one on one debate be of any real value to the voters.

Dog and pony shows just don't get it for me, Give the Candidates air time to voice their agenda and present their case as to why they feel they are the best person for the job, and then refer the voters to their web site for detailed research.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:49:09 PM


walt jones

How can we trust the left-wing liberal media to do the right thing when "interviewing" a republican...there has been no honest reporting from, cnn, abc, cbs and certainly not nbc....the word honesty, does not exist in their hearts , mind nor vocabulary when it comes to dealing with republicans.....we had a number of these gutless liars assigned to us in vietnam and the great amount of their "reporting" was at best a LIE and slanted in favor of the north....like that treasonous whore JANE FONDA

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:51:01 PM


Sharon

Would LOVE another network, but, 1. The RNC was stupid to agree with the venue and 2. Are there really any more moderate public arenas with national broadcastings features available? The left has control and are grabbing more daily.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:51:13 PM


Connie Stanson

Yes, I am so fed up with all of them anyway. They are not fair with the candidate's. All the questions asked should be divided up equally between them. and why is it the left will not even put on their station when a Republican debate is to be aired. For instance, CNN is going to air the Republican Debate but when you go to their station, they don't show a "Republican Debate" We have to go on the web to find out when the next on will air. I don't want anything to do with any of them. I will not watch their shows. period.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:52:11 PM


Russell M Ford

It scares that those you want to lead our country would let them selves be led around by a left stream media. Wake up before it is to late

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:55:13 PM


Jeff

We hear enough of this from the "Left". Why won't the "un-biased" media report this? Do they have an agenda that we, the great unwashed, need not trouble ourselves about?

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:56:10 PM


Roxanne Koller

I couldn't agree more. The Left Wing/Statist Media's domination of these Republican Debates is a travesty. I am SICK & TIRED of the double standard for conservatives. I reject outright these so called "fair" debates. Even Fox News has to play gotcha journalism every chance they get. Only truly Conservative organizations should run Republican debates and the Left can continue their one sided Democrat debates. Enough is Enough!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:59:22 PM


Wayne Carr

It is not just the left-winged media that screws up any debate, it is the whole cncept that it is a media controlled pseudo-debate.

Any & all debates should be run by the rules of debating. A premise is given and then the contestents make opening statements & given time to rebute it. No questions from the media or attendees.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:59:25 PM


Robert Thomas

Could the RNC be any more clueless or vapid? I am astonished that the candidates continue to participate.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:01:17 PM


Alton

I am tired of the media in total. All of this superfulous B.S. doesn't matter. No one running is worse than the current President. Job one is to replace him, even if it is Mickey Mouse. Mickey, nor Newt, Santorum, Romney, Ron Paul would bring the radical baggage, the agenda and certainly none of these candidates would bring self-proclaimed Communists, terrorists, and the many people in the Presidents circle who have Communist ties. I think I read someone say, he is one from the womb to White House.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:02:41 PM


Dennis L.

As much as I despise the slanted views and opinions of the Left Media, the more it's exposed, the more people begin to see the obvious hypocrisy. I do believe Mainstream America is waking up to the corruption and lies they see and hear on Liberal "news and opinion" outlets.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:05:34 PM


ptlray

I believe that it is important to realize that this entire election is a spirtual battle, nothing more and nothing less!

The bible tells us that God is not the author of confusion,yet the Republican candidates are falling for all the Liberal's traps! I wonder where that's coming from?!?!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:06:58 PM


Thomas Hart

When the Dems have their debates they are being put on by the "friends"........yet we go to the opposition and then expect a fair debate......senseless.

GOP debates should be put on by those in agreement with Republican Principles. If the lames stream media won't cover it, that's OK send it out on the internet and CD's. Obama is the one that needs to be challenged, not us. We need a forum to explain how "Free En terprise" ALWAYS works whenever it is qallowed to and how socialism (Marxism, Fascism, communism, etc. NEVER has) Those idealogies haqve never been able to feed their own people and yet Obama says our system has failed and not worked......WTF.

We need people that will fight the fight not just talk the talk.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:12:29 PM


Fred Roff

Our country is sinking in a mire of overspending and a fuel shortage that puts us at the mercy of people who would like to kill us. Our morals are sinking more each year and in California youngsters can go on line and order condoms and lubricant at no charge and without parental consent. Let's talk about what Obama has promised and what he actually delivered.

Fred Roff

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:19:13 PM


Rob in Peoria

RE: Liberal media............So how can the MSM be blamed for their slanted & controlled GOP debates??

If the Republicans are SO STUPID as to allow the biased media to direct what, how and when the debates and the subject matter are determined, then the candidates and the Rebublican leadership will only get what they deserve....the problem is WHY should the conservative voters pay for this foolishness??

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:21:08 PM


Pamela Heckel

Tired of Bush bashing, Joseph Ellis goes out for a Hail, Mary pass.

"[George Washington] began the political tradition that produced a Union victory in the Civil War, the Federal Reserve Board, Social Security, Medicare and, more recently, Obamacare." --historian Joseph Ellis in Time magazine

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:21:51 PM


Kurt Simmons

Why have the debates chaired by these megalomaniacs at all.

Have the debates on the internet with less biased antagonists.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:22:53 PM


Jack T

Tired doesn't begin to describe my reaction to the progressive control of the debates. The adjectives disgusting, disingenuous, deceitful, disreputable, disrespectful, distorted, faulty, illogical, perverse, phantasma, fallacious and heretical all reflect my reaction to the moderators of the debates this political season.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:23:26 PM


Gerald Smith

I only hope John King has not learned his lesson (liberals never do) and says something stupid so Newt or someone can land another haymaker. I have no earthly idea why the GOP consented to a series of debates controlled by hostile progressives but when they call me to ask for money I will be sure to ask them.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:26:18 PM


Jeff Shepard

The debates were a sham. The left has declared that we have no message...but it's difficult to get across with the range of idiot questions. The planting of socialist rabble-rousers in the audiences to try to convey to viewers on TV that "mainstream" Americans disagree with the conservative message is sneaky, diabolical, and criminal. It's a Republican debate, let the Republicans run it so they can debate their strategies among themselves...and let the public decide on that!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:27:16 PM


Pamela Heckel

The man running for President in 2012 must focus on the economy and jobs. REGARDLESS OF THE ACTUAL QUESTIONS, all ANSWERS should be on those subjects. Other related subjects could be taxes, spending and the deficit. No other ANSWERS are allowed!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:27:31 PM


Jim

Howard Dean is a complete IDIOT!!!! Spoken from a true elitist. I'm sure he would want his 15 year old daughter or granddaughter on birth control. Hey Howard, how about teaching them some morals and values and not that it is ok to have sex with as many people as they can instead of abstaining and simply waiting until they are happily married. He thinks we are ALL just stupid!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:28:21 PM


Don

Remember the assistant M-60 gunners, The ammo bearers? That is what the liberal, garbage so-called news outlets are for the Obama regime. They will go to all lengths to do his will. They are trying to make these republican candidates look like they're either a radical, rightwing nutjob, and in many ways they are suceeding. Newt, Rick and Mitt are falling right into their trap. These guys have been vetted so much now by the left, that i've come to the conclusion that the only hope for our country is to elect Congressman Ron Paul. Ron Paul has not wavered, and as soon as the media and repubs start treating him as a viable candidate, only then will i pay attention to them. What's going on at present is laughable.

P.S. I watched the NAACP produced acheivements awards last night on one of the networks, ca'nt remember which one, does'nt matter. Anyway, i really enjoyed seeing a lot of those black folk receiving their due recognition, which in my mind some received awards that they would have overlooked by the Oscars or otherwise.Good for them. I hope it continues.Now the meat of my story:

The chairmans of the NAACP (Mr. Jealous, and the ceo of AARP, i think his name is Rand, not sure, anyway, they were promoting blacks to vote for Obama. They also were having a text that people could call in support of Obama. They turned this event into a political event also.

Our country is in big trouble if this socialist leaning president gets reelected.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:32:04 PM


Howard Last

Ellen, it is not the STUPID party is is the God Owful Party.

As for FOX holding debates, it is owned by CFR member Murdoch. They are the best of the worst.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:34:21 PM


Mike

News to National Review - the 2016 primaries will be set by the DNC, not the RNC.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:40:26 PM


Don

Washington's Birthday: We proudly display the country's colors on this day of celebration for the "Father of Our Country." Forget President's Day. In good conscience, my wife of 40 years and I cannot hang the colors out to honor some of the more recent occupants of that office, especially the two that never served a day in military service as I and so many others have.

Have a Blessed Day!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:41:39 PM


Rick Hullinger

I've been listening for three years to Obama concern for and plan to focus on those who are struggling to get into the middle class. What I want to know is who the hell is concerned for or focused on those of us who are struggling to get out of it, or those who have escaped but are being taxed back into it?

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:48:35 PM


Sedona

The republicans should stand up and say, Stop! We should take control of our own debates. I am tired of smarmy attitudes and smart-aleck "gotcha questions" from liberal moderators. I want to hear each candidates' plans to bring sanity and common sense to a much smaller government.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:52:46 PM


Jiggs

Re: Left media and the debates - I am tired of the Left Media...period! With the exception of Fox and PBS (which is really no better then See BS), we have little choice. I tolerate them, because I have to do so, but I take most of what they give me with a grain of salt. Their news shows are not much better then their so-called comedy offerings. (How I Met Your Mother, so nonsensical with all its canned laughter). Ridiculous. If Obama should lose the election, I will be very interested to see how the Left Media handle that.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:09:35 PM


Ed

The Republicans' use of the Left Media to host their debates proves they don't have the intelligence to govern this country.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:22:15 PM


blairblaster3

The RNC should never have agreed to the left media hosting of the debates. Whoever was in charge of that decision should be fired.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:24:13 PM


Fed Up

Mark,

Would love to see you guys on Facebook, and perhaps Twitter.

What a better way to get the "younger" generation involved, and the message out, to a new generation of Patriots.

What better way to promote the Patriotpost.us!

Go for it!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:31:13 PM


Les Lennox

If it's OK for speculators to take control of how much we pay for gasoline why isn't it OK for the Gov't to step in and set a limit of TWO DOLLARS on gas at the pump? Price controls are sometimes necessary to protect our economy and millions of Americans from the severe financial pain inflictd by a few speculators. We are entering a financjal crisis brought on by rocketing gas prices--ask any commuter--and our weak leadership is choosing to ignore it.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:33:12 PM


Michael Floyd

I am not only tired of how the media has handled the debates I am extremely frustrated with the Republican "establishment" for allowing it. Are they so liberal as to think the MSM will give our candidates a fair shake or are they so cowardly they dare not stand up to them?

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:37:05 PM


peckbud

Stop the world; I want to get off! At 77 years old, if I make it to Nov., I will vote for any real conservative still standing (if indeed we are lucky to have one in the contest)i.e. will there still be one? B.T.W., all you posters and bloggers: please use spell checkers. Thanks.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:41:45 PM


P E Paul

After watching many of the debates, I'm left in a quandary. Why are these debates sponsored by and led by the left media who also appears to define the lines of questions and to whom addressed? Is this a requirement to get the media time? Why do not the candidates come to an agreement among themselves as to sponsor, lines of questions and where held. Leave the left entirely out of it. Additionally, the venues seem to cater to the younger, the college students, who all seem liberal and thus more interesting in the lurid, shallow,etc.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:41:46 PM


Joseph E Hebert, Jr

The Left media runs these debates because that's just

about all the media there is. And they favor Romney,

Santorum and Gingrich because these three rotten

bananas are nothing but thinly-disguised socialists

themselves. Watch a debate with this viewpoint in mind

and you see it. American Free Press should administer

these debates. This would make it clear that there's only

one candidate with integrity, and we all know who he is.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:43:17 PM


RK Sprau

I like the comments, everyone is picking on us. Let's hide our head in the sand and pretend there is no other world except our own. Deal with the media, put out your message and quit making gaffs they can tear you up on.

Do any of you understand how the media works? Next week I will be on Relevant Issues taping the next series of shows for a total of 8. I am not in friendly Territory, neither is my business partner. We spin it so it works. If you shut yourself off then all you are preaching to is the base and face it, your own party is in dissary.

Last Monday and Friday I made the comment, Keep rick Santoriun out of my bedroom. The extremest want small government, I'm down with that, they want to legislate morality and tell me what to do in my bedroom? No, I'm sorry.

these are questions you will have to face now or later. Hide and duck and make you look like you're hiding something hence the uncommitted voters goes with the devil they know best.

I;ve heard finish the border fence, I'll double down and make 2 fences, I'll electrify the fence, I'll put a moat between them and put crocs in it. Lets go to the moon, lets spend, spend, spend. No one has a spending cut plan out there.

I control the media, why can't they?

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:46:28 PM


John B

The Republican (Rino) establishment is getting exactly what it deserves for allowing the mainstream media, with it's radical socialist/leftists, to "moderate" the debates. They get democrats elected, and Conservatives and true republicans looking foolish.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:47:20 PM


Richard Sears Jr.

It should be abundantly clear that the Left-media will seize upon any opportunity to divert attention from core issues, i.e. the economy, jobs, sky rocketing gas/oil prices. Until they are willing to honestly examine the performance of our current administration why should anyone think they are objective with respect to the questions posed to these cnadidates.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:58:42 PM


Howard

I think the republicans are nuts for allowing the likes of Brian Willams to have nny thing at all to do with any of their debates, they all know or should know they are cheer leaders for obama.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:00:18 PM


joe white

Not only does OWE BOMB not understand the American Dream, in his "State of the Union" nationally staged re-election speech he called it the American Promise. I havn't heard it since... but I think it is the basis of his belief of what America is all about.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:13:56 PM


Anthony Scotti

It is difficult to put into words the level of frustration I feel over the way in which these events have been adulterated (like the reporting of so many other events). the American people should rise in horror at being treated with a complete absence of reason and respect. Bravo the fourth estate bankrupt of all intelligent discourse. and nobody noticed. happy birthday Joseph Gobles

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:17:21 PM


Robbie

I am tired of watching the media trying to create agitation between the candidates.What purpose does it serve other than making the person asking the question look stupid?

Americans want answers to serious problems that our nation faces,not got you questions that serve no purpose.

I dislike it when they spin what a candidate has said in the past to be a truth.That is a total waste of time for the candidate to have to address.Time that could have been on constructive debate.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:22:13 PM


S.Lee

. "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety$$, deserve neither liberty nor safety." These networks are responsible for their own demise>!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:22:33 PM


Robert

I have a reply the following comment by Matt Laurer

"Isn't any Republican nominee going to have a problem, and that is, by all indications, the economy is getting stronger".

The economy is getting stronger on the prospect that Obama will be removed from office in eleven months and that the Republicans will control congress.

If, in a few months, it looks like Obama will be re-elected, I'm betting that the stock market will take a big dive and the economy will receed to 2009 levels.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:24:39 PM


Thomas Fox

As some candidates opted out of the Trump debate so should all have done the same for any debate organized & operated by the MSM.

Huckabee's format of asking meaningful questions to all candidates individually make a whole lot more sense.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:30:55 PM


Gayle McDaniel

The Lap Dog Media is forever setting up a straw man argument on any topic they throw out to a conservative candidate. They hardly ever ask questions of the candidates that people want the answer to. Of course, this is not the case with The Great One -- then, they throw softballs, or questions they have been told to ask.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:58:10 PM


mary dean

why do we have to let them do any more for us??? at least it could be divided by 2 & 2 or whatever # why don't we stop letting them "help us???"

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:03:28 PM


John Zavaleta

It is obscene they choose the questions and foremat. it is really unbelievable.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:06:42 PM


James R. Lansford

I agree! I have not been able to understand why the present candidates ever agreed to these farces. I have yet to hear how any of these people, other than Newt in one unnoticed comment, said that they have a written plan for their actions if elected.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:10:46 PM


Randy

I can only hope that the more they lie and get caught at it that the public continues to catch on to the fact they are just that....liars, and at the very least they learn how biased they are towards agendas that are not good for anybody. Honestly, all that are reporting on is trash!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:16:25 PM


Ltc Malcolm Chandler, USA (Ret)

Yes, Yes, and Yes - I'm tired of the left-media bias, and grateful for the few TRUE Conservatives who dare challenge them. I'm also glad I'm now retired from the Army so that I can voice my opinion.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:24:43 PM


Larry

I haven't watched any of them and refuse to as long as they're not debates but televised "gotcha" sessions run by the Demorat National Committee. Why do Republicans think they'll be liked if they let the Demorats abuse them perpetually? Sure everyone sticks up for the underdog, but when the underdog keeps putting himself in that position it gets very tiring very quickly.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:25:25 PM


wjlaine@yahoo.com

You Betcha!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:28:55 PM


Dan Lovell

I'm so tired of the LEFT MEDIA, they make me want to puke.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:34:38 PM


BILL

I have to agree with Mark Potter,this country is on a downward spiral because of moral decay....I thing Obama is our punishment from God.....It might get worse.....

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:35:34 PM


Fig

God help us, what is wrong with the RNC that they allow these travesties to continue? I can't watch them, nor will I ever contribute to the RNC again. Send your money directly to the good candidates.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:37:47 PM


Robert Smith

Unless the representatives get the courage to ignore the biases of the newspapers and TV.,the Conservatives will never receive and equal place at the American table. The Biases didn't happen suddenly, it happen while the media was patting on the conservative backside.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:37:53 PM


Glen

RE: Hugh Hewitt's plan for the 2016 debates...

That the RNC did not exercise this type of control in THIS election cycle is abhorrent.

To allow the left-media (read "most") to control OUR debates shows me that the Republican establishment is not fit to lead the conservative movement moving forward.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:44:13 PM


Judy Luberts

Yes, take your condescending questions and attitude and let someone ask intelligent questions.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:45:28 PM


LynnDan

WHY IS THE GOP EVEN INVITING THE LEFTISTS MEDIA TO THE FORUM" If the Demogods of the democratic party want to answer questions friendly to them, let them have a people they want BUT get some resemblance of balance and get a few people friendly to the Republicans.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:48:23 PM


Dee

obama would have disapproved the Keystone Pipeline, so quit plaming it on the Republicans.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:50:39 PM


William Ivill

I've often wondered why the idiots are the only ones who can control the media.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:52:36 PM


enemaofthestatistquo

The Patriot Post Chronicle is too kind, when you refer to hysterian Joseph Ellis as an historian.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:04:47 PM


James

YES! But then I am tired of the Liberal left all together and feel they should be run out of the country en masse.

The debates should be run by ordinary citizens who'll ask the questions posed by other ordinary citizens.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:05:48 PM


Jon Savage

The RNC has apparently abandoned the concept of serving the interests of the Republican Party, and those that still support it, simply because there is no alternative for those which adore the concepts that created this Republic. The MSM has long ago abandoned any concept of objectivity in "reporting." The education system has been infected with the cancer of "what's in it for me", known generally as unions. The government employee rolls likewise. The military is on a downhill slide to that same pit. The military, too, has been infected with "the fairness doctrines" of the Socialist Democrat Party. The head of that snake, and his crew, is openly thumbing his nose at the Congress, and the People. The termites have completely chewed the pillars of liberty and freedom to the point of collapse. A strength taken to extreme becomes a weakness. Our strengths of "equality", fairness, and the pursuit of such for all, has been prostituted and infected. That which guns and determined men created has been defeated by the cancer of personal greed and aggrandizement. Look for Martial Law to be declared about August of 2012," for the welfare and protection of the people." That is, if Iran has not first nuked the US potion of the American continent. With the blessing of the Chief Tyrant. What will those that now make up the MSM do, when the goal of "social democracy" has been achieved, and they are no longer needed? They, too will receive their just deserts.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:13:39 PM


enemaofthestatistquo

GMButler @Posted February 22, 2012 at 12:14:07 PM

"You know, comrades, that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how." (Stalin - who admired Chicago politics ;-)

Speaking of who will count the votes. No longer should precinct polling places be administered by "volunteers", though I do not mean to disparage those who truly volunteer from a sense of public duty, this process is to important to trust to anyone who may harbor a hidden agenda. Election weeks, no court should be held that Monday& Tuesday. On Monday, a pool of jurors should be randomly summoned, randomly divided into groups of 12 per each poll, select a foreman, and trained to admnister the polls, and report to each poll 6am Tuesday. 2 Sheriff bailiffs should be a each poll to ensure order, and each juror paid as though on juryduty. This should keep the ballots secret, & all ballots should be paper.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:21:23 PM


dolagibb

I think that the GOP needs to share how they can do a better job then obama! When the media asks a question always answer on how they can beat obama!! Love DG

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:29:32 PM


Linda Snider

Yes, I have wondered why on earth the republicans allowed the debates to be done by the left media. I am all for the republicans to call the shots for the next time. It is one of those no-brainers!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:30:35 PM


Hamilton

To: Jon Savage

That about sums it up. Maybe we won't learn from our predecessors mistakes, after all. Maybe we won't learn from history. Maybe we will have to hit rock-bottom first, and then pull ourselves back up by our bootstraps. It would be sad to have another dark age, with generations of suffering before it's through. I hope to hell you're wrong!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:33:39 PM


D Baisch

All of the media oreganizations with just a few exceptions are anti-conservatives. The leaders of them get to help control what comes out of the White House and the Senate They must past George Soros approval.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:38:54 PM


mike

The GOP makes a huge mistake by letting Obama's media friends control the message that's put out there,and then the next minute they(the Demoncrat lackeys) bash the GOP according to their well laid plans!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:41:26 PM


Robert E8 USN, Ret

Maxine Waters? "Barney Frank is retiring and the banks and other too-big-to fail,including Wall Street are shaking in their boots". What role will she have when the Democrats are (once again) rebuffed in November? There should be no further legislation allowed after the results are in, and the Dems are out. In three months, the damage will be unbelievable! Mr. Obama should lose all authority at the time he is defeated, along with the Congress. The "lame duck" legislation will be bloody if not stopped, somehow. If he wins? It will be worse!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:45:26 PM


Sherry

I have enjoyed having the many debates. It gave plenty of opportunity for everyone to see exactly how bankrupt we are in the way of common sense. The idea that anyone would vote for anyone except Ron Paul after having the field of liberal candidates expose themselves for the flipflopping, big government, unconstitutional parodies they are is part and parcel of the reason we are in the mess we are in.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:45:54 PM


RinPortland

...I'm no financial analyst, but you'd have to imagine that that line of reasoning isn't going to do anything to depress gun sales." --BusinessWeek blogger Joshua Green

Joshy, Obozo has done more for gun sales than the American Revolution! Go online and see for yourself- SOLD OUT...BACK ORDERED...NO LONGER AVAILABLE...SOLD, SOLD, SOLD! Go on, see for yourself!

Moron!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 6:03:39 PM


RinPortland

Oh, and why is no one talking about the tax increase on ammo??? I talked to a sales associate at L.L. Bean on Monday and they just raised the cost of ammo almost 20%, strictly due to tax increases!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 6:07:56 PM


Barbara

I definitely am dismayed at the questions being parlayed on the debates. The candidates are being sucked in with very few statements on their part regarding the questions they are being asked. Even then somehow they fall into pettiness themselves. Then more valuable time is wasted. I agree there are myriad more important issues that should be discussed. It's disappointing so many, particularly the ones asking the questions, are self-serving and not looking at the greater good. It's sickening; when so much is at stake.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 6:25:10 PM


Gary Chambers

All Republican candidates should sign a pledge to not debate if a liberal moderator is asking the questions. Republicans are being torn apart to obama's benefit by being stupid about how and when to debate. Maybe they will do better in 2016 if they lose to obama. It is almost as if Republicans enjoy self destruction.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:18:49 PM


Maurice

I don't understand why the Republican candidates subjected themselves to this media circus. It has destroyed the opportunity of at least 2 or 3 of the candidates to compete. It doesn't take anything beyond just plain common sense to recognize what is happening and they just go on and on subjecting themselves to falling on the sword, one by one. I'm glad to see that so far Rick Santorum is strong and standing up to them. The questions asked by the moderators does not help the voters because there are not any questions relating to how they would govern.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:22:55 PM


blaine young

Allowing the Left media to run the debates is like having the wolves heard the sheep.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:24:43 PM


James Pogue

The quote, "don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see," is most appropriate when we are listening to the main stream media. I am sick and tired of the same old trash spewing forth from the unconscious talking heads. There is no news worthy of note from the corrupt left media.

I learn more in conversations with my dog. He has never once lied to me about the character of a person that I visit with. He would make a wonderful congress person.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:34:34 PM


David

Yes, That is like asking a dog to police a butcher shop!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:54:30 PM


Ed Gilbert

Why waste the time to watch this pablum - my wife and I will not. Now a debate of Obama's Executive orders, Keystone pipeline, why a Department of Energy established to make us energy independent, why a Department of Education when it duplicates the 50 State Departments of Education, why cut the Defense budget in this time of severe global unrest and nuclear build-up by many potential threat countries - and many more such as why so many redundant Czars in the White House swamping business with unneccessary regulations. etc.

Ed

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:04:24 PM


Guy Hodgkins

I`m just sick of the left media , and there anti US manifesto...

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:17:30 PM


Corey J.

What debates? You mean the ones where Ron Paul shows up and gets 1-2 minutes to speak? What I can't understand is why it took so long for the candidates to "Just Say No" to a Liberal-moderated debate!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:19:12 PM


Marcia Reynolds

YES YES YES!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:46:23 PM


billy396

The leftist media whores are the largest reason that the majority of American citizens are almost completely clueless regarding the TRUTH about politicians, and democrats in particular. The media ignores all of the open lies, broken promises, Socialist czars and cabinet members that are connected directly with Barack Hussein Oblunder. They refuse to admit the legal FACT that our current 'President' could NEVER legally hold that position according to the laws as put forth in our Constitution, which remains the ultimate law of the land until and unless it is legally amended. Our Constitution bars anyone other than a "natural born American citizen" from becoming our President. Our Constitution further defines a "natural born citizen" as being a person who has two parents that are BOTH American citizens. It really is that simple. Barry Oblunder's father was a British citizen, therefore Barry is NOT a legal candidate for President, unles you amend the Constitution.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:54:20 PM


Bob Butters

Yes !!!!!!!! I do not waste my time.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:58:22 PM


Harry Thompson

Yes!!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 10:08:00 PM


Carol

I am disgusted with the GOP. They should be in charge of the debates. This is the Republican Party candidate we are chosing, and that candidate should be chosen by Republicans, not the left-wing media, the unions,or the administration!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 10:34:29 PM


GLenn

Seems long overdue...RNC set debate parameters and dates, find moderators who will ask questions we the conservative voters actually want answered and addressed, not some list of leftwing claptrap.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 10:39:31 PM


csc

The Tea Party sponsored debate was one of the better ones. Tonight before the program, Wolf Blitzer described the program as if it were 'sport'. We need people who take our future seriously. The discussion with Newt and Herman Cain was worthwhile to me.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:20:07 PM


Scott Westlotorn

Yes, but you can't fix stupid. You can however expose the stupidity rather than play into there hand. Newt did that cleavery in one of the earlier debates and the other candidates couldn't help but notice his approval ratings went up. What happened after that was a let down because they turned on each other. The focus is and should always be to defeat obama. Stay focused, stay alert and committed no matter who the candidate gets the nomination anyhting else is lip service.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:22:05 PM


Mike & Janet Stark

Yes, We are TIRED of all the left liberal spin of the media on just about every channel you turn your TV set on! Is there no one in WA. DC, who is a normal, hard working, tax paying average American who isn't in debt, and works hard to pay their own bills? Why does it seem that the culture there, corrupts politicians once they arrive there. And they do things like back room deals, lie, cheat, line their own pocket books, etc. Meanwhile, we, the average American are stuck with the now trillions of dollars in debt. It is pathetic, and a shame to pass this kind of legacy to our daughter and this next generation! We have never been in debt as a family. If we couldn't afford it, we didn't buy it! Why isn't the Gov't forced to live within a budget, like the rest of us? Thanks!!!

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:27:45 PM


JimmyBoy

No, I am not tired of the Leftmedia administering GOP debates because it continues to expose the Leftmedia for what it really is. Also, our candidates do not have to attend any of the debates and listen to the doo-doo put forth as questions. I am sure there are many Conservative, wealthy individuals that could finance a debate for our candidates. We do not EVER have to start with a leftmedia premise for a debate.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:51:45 PM


Richard H May

Compared to historical debates lasting more than a couple of hours between 2 candidates, as in Lincoln-Douglas, current debate forums are useless. A better model is suggested by the format represented by the appearance of 6 individual songwriter/guitar players, all sitting on stage, where the mike and the spotlight are passed among them, each able to tell their story, sing and play their song, with the full attention of the audience. Several passes of the mike allow each to address previous commentary for the consideration of the audience easily. We would, I think, learn more about each than we do now.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 7:26:20 AM


Les

Makes me wonder how many of the left wing media outlets are owned or controlled by George Soros. Anybody got that information?

Posted February 23, 2012 at 7:37:07 AM


Jefferson

This Patriot Post chronicle concerning the Leftwing media is arguably the most important topic this forum could ever address.

The failure of the mainstream media to accurately expose Obama during his "rise" to the presidency will go down as the greatest mistake this nation has ever made. Not only that, after these terrible years of the Obama presidency when everything has basically failed, the Leftwing media still present him as a noble leader who was dealt a tough hand, etc.

Here's a glaring example: Over the past several days, there's been nothing reported by the Leftwinger media about an interview that took place Sunday on CNN involving the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Matin Dempsey. General Dempsey was discussing Iran's nuclear situation and said that the U.S. is urging the nation of Israel not to attack Iran. Now get this...the General, speaking of course for the Obama administration, said the reason for trying to prevent Israel from attacking Iran's nuclear facilities is because Iran hasn't made up its mind whether or not to build a bomb! He also said that doing so would most likely cause Iran to "retaliate" in some way and cause a "destablization" in the Mid-East.

Now that's where were at with this Administration. We are viewed as weak and the media says nothing about such policy. No lessons of history have been learned by this current set of "leaders" and without the needed understanding of what this kind of diplomacy can lead to, we're traveling along on a dangerous road.

As the Wall Stree Journal pointed out in an editorial, "Weakness invites war, and General Dempsey has helped the Administration send a message of weakness to Israel and Iran.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 8:37:22 AM


NK

The best way for the GOP to get their message across on MSNBC especially but to a lesser degree ABC and CNN is to set the agenda ahead of time with moderators like George Stephanopoulos and say if the questions start straying/pushing a left wing agenda and ridiculous scenarios like contraception and states banning them that ALL characters on the stage will walk out. The left can then criticize the GOP but they will have no talking points and it would energize the right. Answering stupid left wing media topics to stay away from the what ill's the country now just plays into their hands.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 9:13:27 AM


oh not again

This feeble finger pointing by Nat'l Review won't work: after months of uncritical editorial support for Romney, all credibility is shot and now they're down to firing blanks. Out of step, out of time, out of line.

The smug pundits are Nat'l Review are part of the MSM problem, and don't let them forget it. Fees on the lecture circuit are imploding, and it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch. So kick 'em on the way down. Somewhere, Will'm Buckley will be smiling in gratitude.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 9:16:32 AM


John

I definitely think the RNC should schedule, format and structure the Republican debates. Then if the "Lame Street Media" wants to cover them, so be it. But NOT to let them be the questioners or hosts. If they want to cover them fine, if not, fine also. Why should we give the DEMS talking points from the loaded questions posed by the left-wing media.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 9:27:07 AM


NVRFGT

What I don't understand is why the RNC and the candidates have allowed the mainstream media to host and control the debates. I've lost all interest in watching anymore of them. They are no more than propagandizing the left's agenda and making the candidates look as weak and ineffective as leaders as possible with questions that have nothing to do with real issues. The candidates should have set the parameters under which debates would be considered as well as those who would be acceptable moderators.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 9:32:09 AM


Steve

The debate Wed. in Mesa, AZ moderated by CNN was not as bad as I expected. The exception that comes to mind is the online email or Twitter question that CNN brought forth: "What are the candidate's positions on contraception?"

This question brought forth overwhelming "Boos" and jeering from the onsite audience....as it should have. Such sidebars allowed Newt to score points in the past by blasting the media for tabloid-like cheap shots. Newt scored again last night for pointing out that Obama didn't get a single question in 2008 on why he supported infanticide (partial birth abortion).

Other than the tendency to explore such irrelevancies and sideshows, the debate last night was handled relatively well, giving all candidates opportunities to present their vision.

The worst part of the debate were the issues in which Romney and Santorum sank into their standard bickering and sniping at each other. To a certain extent, the lamestream media encourages this with some moderators better than others.

It was certainly much worse when there were seven to ten candidates on stage and two or three were allowed to monopolize all the time playing "keepaway pitch" by trading charges and counter-charges to the exclusion of others on stage.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 10:22:38 AM


Kenneth Brannon

I can not understand why the Republicans would even consider letting a left wing media reporter moderate their debate.It is to me an exercise in futility.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 11:20:25 AM


Hamilton

To: Mike & Janet Stark

Your post caught my attention because you sound like regular folks, living your lives without expecting anything from anyone else, while at the same time, looking for answers.

Why isn't the government as solvent as you?

It's truly frustrating that we're looking for answers that no one seems to have. Notice that the vast majority of the posts herein are registering complains. We're long on objections but short on solutions and action steps. One must wonder whether our government, of the People, by the People, and for the People, is really out of the People's control.

I'm sorry to tell you that: 1) I don't have all the answers, and 2) The problems are numerous, and so are the answers. This is a subject for protracted discussion by some large group of wise people. It took such a group to create the foundation for our Constitutional Republic. It took generations of arrogant, misguided, self-absorbed politicians who think they know better that those who came before them, to pervert that very same Constitutional Republic. And this is where we are today.

Regarding your main objection, that being about the lack of government solvency, all I can do is cite perversion. For example, income taxes didn't exist at our founding. They are a perversion. I'm not a Constitutional expert, but I would guess that the way money is spent in D.C. is also a perversion. I visualize your basic legislator, trying to make his mark, dreaming up some program to give something to someone or to some group. The bill is crafted, voted on, and then passed, without consideration that the expenditure is discriminatory, and also without consideration for where the money will come from. The way D.C. seems to work, money bills seem to get passed into law first, and then the legislators go looking for the money to pay for them, typically via new or expanded taxes. And this grows the government. Sometimes, especially lately, the money is never found but the financial obligation still occurs. This process creates debt, doesn't it? Of course. Bills are also crafted and passed without being checked for constitutionality! I don't know whether or not that is a constitutional perversion, but to me, it makes about as much sense as building a bridge without the requisit structural analysis to certify that it will support its own weight and the loads it's intended to carry.

In short, I believe that over time and generations, like a worker who lowers his standards by taking short-cuts, we have short-cutted and/or bypassed and/or rerouted provisions in the Constitution, thereby neutering those provisions and liberalizing our laws, lowered our standards, and making a grimy spitoon out of a golden chalice.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 11:24:00 AM


Eber Gowan

YES. The questions have the sole purpose of getting the canidates to look bad bickering with each other. I would like to hear questions relevant to the problems of today and how to correct them. the first question to a canidate by John King was "What do you think about what so and so said about you?"

Posted February 23, 2012 at 11:31:25 AM


Shaeri

The left-wing media has to do the debates because the republican party won't. They wanted to put Romney up,tell us he was the candidate and have it a done deal. They don't want us to pick a candidate, they want to pick the candidate. Way back in November, O'Reilly was saying we'd seen enough to pick our candidate and didn't need any more debates.

I wish they were unbiased but the right simply won't host them.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 12:21:43 PM


GWAM

Until the "Good Old Boys" in the RNC are replaced or die off, having the RNC take charge of the presidential candidate debates will improve nothing. Come on --these are the folks that gave us the loser candidates Dole and McCain and seem to be intent on keeping the Tea Party supporters alienated.

These TNC people are not fighters and further, they are incompetent at conducting a quality PSYOPS operation necessary to put public focus on the important issues facing our country and what the Republican candidate(s) will do about them. Americans whether in sports, war, or politics, traditionally want and will support an aggressive fighter -- a winner.

The current candidates are over advised (and poorly served) by their campaign staffs (as was McCain) and as a result come across as petty bickerers, intent on committing fratricide, and as a result, less than effective in championing our country; its enduring values, and constitutional protections of individuals.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 12:48:37 PM


GW

Having the proto-communist media preside at the republican debates is like having Adolf Hitler give a Bar Mitzva address.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 1:16:24 PM


Terry

Where is the Republican Party with regard to allowing the liberal media to set the tone, question the republican candidates, and bring the whole tone of discussion down to the liberal's fourth grade level? ie; "what about abortion", "what about religion?" "What about Whitney Houston?" "Bush lied, kids died," etc. etc. Why is the Republican Party so absent from these idiotic discussions, yet, if a candidate tries to answer, the Omabazombies twist and turn the answer into something else. Will no-one call them on it? Why not have the debates narrarated by a conservative? Maybe on Fox News. I suppose they'd think that's unfair.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 1:38:54 PM


John Philbrook

Absolutely tired of the left-media controlling the direction and content of these debates. Whose idea was this, anyway?

Posted February 23, 2012 at 2:29:32 PM


Vincent E. Cappelletti

Every debate I have viewed has been moderated by a Left-Leaning Member of the Main-Stream Media. Two blatant examples are John King, and Wolf Blitzer. It just soured my opinion of them both, and of the Media, even more so. Bottom line, I simply have no faith in the Mainstream media, and believe they are all in league with the current administration and would not say a word that might be critical of the current Administration, or their leader. I say "their-leader", as I do not consider him "mine!" and that is truly a shame. I'm a Korean War Vet, and am in fear of our countries future, should this man be re-elected, and he carries out his plan to fundamentally change America as I have known it. Thanks for the opportunity to voice my opinion.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 2:39:13 PM


Laurie B

It is intolerable that Republicans are handing over to the "enemy" of our values a cart blance to determining and distorting the issues Democrats want to run against. Even so, candidate debaters, one or another at one time or another have brilliantly presented loud and clear glimpses of the conservative republican stand.

Absolutely the Republican Party should be the only ones determining format, etc of our own campaign debates. What in the world do the media, and any other Democrat, have to do with our selection of who we choose to run for our party???

Posted February 23, 2012 at 2:59:08 PM


Tom Whitten

Amen to your suggestions re future debates. Allowing the lame stream media to control GOP debates was incompetent.

Surely our RNC can do better.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 3:54:06 PM


Bob in Florida

I have wondered, since the first couple of debates in this election cycle were so blatantly scripted to belittle the issues of this election, why the Republican Party was allowing 'their debates' to be run by individuals with such obvious left-leaning bias.

Early on I asked what is so hard that it has stopped Republican organizations from organizing and moderating debates among the contenders for the Republican nomination.

I am still looking for the answer.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 5:10:55 PM


Gary

I personnaly sick to death of the Communist News Network using the debates degrade Republican candidates and using the debates as a forum for their liberal agenda. I cannot belive that the Republican candidates agreed to this circus.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 7:26:42 PM


Madelyn Zelman

Can you imagine the democrats allowing Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham, Monica Crowley, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives to moderate their debates? It is the height of naivete and stupidity for the republicans to allow the left to frame the republican debates!!! I cannot fathom any reasons for allowing this to take place unless republicans have a death wish and a secret crush on Barack Hussein Obama.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 9:06:26 PM


enemaofthestatistquo

I hope no one is offended by this Polish joke. How many Pols does it take to screw in a light bulb? 546, if almost half are not screwing to the LEFT.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 10:31:36 PM


enemaofthestatistquo

I hope no one is offended by this Polish joke. How many pols does it take to screw in a light bulb? Too Late! ZERO, they've all scurried under the woodwork when the light turned on.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 10:33:13 PM


leemcgee

Wishing the left-media out of existence doesn't seem to be working.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 7:38:03 AM


Bill in Arizona

I think the GOP should refuse to do debates unless they get a conservative moderator or at lease get equal time for a conservative moderator.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 10:36:46 AM


Nelson

I think it is totally moronic for the candidates to accept positions in these so-called debates. But as America has been doing for years, we support our enemies, hurt our friends and undermine our freedoms.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 11:21:15 AM


Bess

Actually I am tired of it all. The more debates, no matter who the sponser, the more confused I am as to who should be president. So I am on my knees praying. I think that is the best solution going.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 11:28:36 AM


Terry

I'm tired of the left media, period.The liberal left is a group of anti-American traiters, and need to be treated as such.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 12:43:07 PM


Robert Nixon

media reminds me of the media of Russia during the Cold War. They have no idea how to bring us an unbiased statement. They are owned by the left their controlled by the left. And as I have watched them I realized that they are not to be trusted.

Robert Nixon

Posted February 24, 2012 at 3:06:35 PM


Larry Reams

Yes I'm tired of all the "debates." These are "made for TV" witch hunts and don't really inform voters of which candidate is best but rather which candidate performs best that night before the camera.

A completely different format is needed. It's called a Job Interview. There is a group in Houston who pioneered this concept very successfully. It has been used in a Congressional race for the 2010 election, several county races in 2010, and recently in the upcoming race for the US Senate from Texas. Even Mike Huckabee used our approach recently for the presidential candidates.

You can get more information at www.allianceofconstitutionalpatriots.com It needs to attract national attendion and become the new standard. The Job Interview needs to replace the TV debate. Thanks.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 11:39:50 AM


Thomas

"Too Much Information: "Ron Paul: Why Can't We 'Put Into Our Body Whatever We Want?'" --KIRO-TV website (Seattle)"

Why is the 'voice of essential liberty' disparaging a question of individual rights put forth by a champion of liberty?

Posted February 25, 2012 at 4:57:22 PM


James Wright

I am very tired of seeing the liberal media cajole the Republican candidates into making stupid statements. Why these candidates hold themselves out to the kind of ridicule they receive totally escapes me. In fact, it makes me wonder if any of them are fit for command. 20+ debates and not a single issue has been resolved yet. They need to quit beating on each other and deal with the real problems: an apologetic white house that is addicted to the citizens' money, non-existent foreign policy (unless you count bowing as policy), and an obvious hatred for our military.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 8:25:16 PM


MP

Will republicans never learn to have their own, or at least not liberals, forming and asking questions in their debates? Also, could we limit the debates to a half a dozen or less? If non-liberals are asking pertinent questions about relevant issues, it is not necessary to have a dozen or more debates! I didn't hear much about the economy or energy, nothing about the the border or illegal immigrants. Due to the rino republicans running the show, it appears Romney will be buying the nomination when most republicans want a conservative. Do I hear third party? And I don't mean Ron Paul.

Posted March 21, 2012 at 4:49:44 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund