Monday Brief
The Navy Is Not an Anachronism
The Foundation
"To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." --George Washington
Re: The Left
USS Enterprise with escorts and an auxiliary"[Barack Obama is] certainly not a very good debater. He showed it again [last] Monday night. Obama lost. His tone was petty and small. ... That spirit led Obama into a major unforced error. When Romney made a perfectly reasonable case to rebuild a shrinking Navy, Obama condescended: 'You mentioned ... that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed.' Such that naval vessels are as obsolete as horse cavalry? Liberal pundits got a great guffaw out of this, but the underlying argument is quite stupid. As if the ships being retired are dinghies, skipjacks and three-masted schooners. As if an entire branch of the armed forces -- the principal projector of American power abroad -- is itself some kind of anachronism. 'We have these things called aircraft carriers,' continued the schoolmaster, 'where planes land on them.' This is Obama's case for fewer vessels? Does he think carriers patrol alone? He doesn't know that for every one carrier, 10 times as many ships sail in a phalanx of escorts? Obama may blithely dismiss the need for more ships, but the Navy wants at least 310 and the latest Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel report says that defending America's vital interests requires 346 ships (versus 287 today). Does anyone doubt that if we continue, as we are headed, down to fewer than 230, the casualty will be entire carrier battle groups, precisely the kind of high-tech force multipliers that Obama pretends our national security requires?" --columnist Charles Krauthammer
Government
"The Obama Administration's disregard for the law has struck again -- and this time, it's encouraging others to violate the law at taxpayer expense. ... The law in question is called the WARN Act, and it requires that federal contractors send employees layoff notices 60 days before a plant closing or mass layoff. The inconvenience: Massive defense spending cuts under sequestration are scheduled to hit on January 2, 2013. Defense contractors affected by the budget cuts would have to issue notice letters to employees by November 2 (four days before the election) to meet the January 2 start date for the spending cuts. The penalty taxpayers would pay: Employers who violate the WARN Act are liable to their former employees for 'back pay for each day of a violation' and 'benefits under an employee benefit plan,' as well as a penalty of $500 for each day that notice has not been sent to the local government where the layoffs will occur. As an example, Lockheed CEO Bob Stevens has said that 123,000 of his employees would receive layoff notices. If companies fail to meet the WARN Act's deadline, lawsuits from employees could result -- but the White House has provided a taxpayer-funded guarantee as a way to counter their fears of enormous litigation costs. This guarantee is not only unprecedented but also potentially unlawful. ... This is the ultimate abuse of the President's executive authority: inducing federal contractors to violate a federal law and promising to use taxpayer funds to reimburse them for any resulting liability that they incur for violating that law. Refusing to follow federal law has become the hallmark of this Administration, but the White House's latest arrogant, unlawful ploy goes even further and may end up costing the American taxpayer a great deal of money." --Heritage Foundation's Hans von Spakovsky and Amy Payne
For the Record
"The third-quarter GDP report was a nasty October surprise for a nation desperately in need of more jobs and higher take-home pay. The U.S. economy grew just 2.0% from July through September. At the current pace, the economy will grow just 1.8% this year, the same miserable pace as last year. ... As it is, the weak recovery has put the U.S. into a deep, deep hole: The weak report leaves the economy on a growth path far below its potential. This is the 'output gap.' ... If the recovery had been stronger, putting growth back on its traditional pace, cumulative GDP over the past five years would have been roughly $10.3 trillion higher. Or what if the Obama recovery had been as strong as the Reagan recovery? GDP this year would be $1.5 trillion higher than it is currently. Let's say from here on out, the economy [grows] at trend, say 3% of so. Because we never had those powerful 'catch up' years of above average growth -- say, 4% to 7% as in the Reagan recovery -- GDP levels will be lower in the future than they would be otherwise. GDP in 2037 will be some $5 trillion lower. And cumulative GDP losses over those years will be close to $100 trillion. ... The Great Recession never really ended. It just morphed into the Long Recession. And the Long Recession continues." --American Enterprise Institute's James Pethokoukis
Insight
"I don't know who started the idea that a President must be a politician, instead of a businessman. A politician can't run any other kind of business, so there is no reason why he can run the U.S. That's the biggest single business in the world." --humorist Will Rogers (1879-1935)
The Patriot Post Needs Your Help
Fellow Patriots, our 2012 Annual Fund campaign is now underway. In these last days before the most important election in a generation, The Patriot Post's voice is needed more than ever to keep the great heritage of our constitutional Republic front and center. Please join us in this noble cause.
Like many mission-based organizations, we typically raise nearly half of our budget in the last two months of each year. We also realize how precious resources are at this critical juncture. That's why we have not increased our budget this year. But we must raise approximately $355,000 before year's end. These funds ensure that our dedicated team of editors, writers and support staff can continue to provide The Patriot Post, free of charge, to the kind of grassroots leaders that make our country great.
Another important fact also bears repeating: We are not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization. Nor do we accept any online or e-mail advertising. Our operations and mission are funded by -- and depend entirely upon -- the voluntary financial support of American Patriots like YOU!
Please, if you have the ability, take a moment to support The Patriot Post online today by making a contribution -- however large or small. (If you prefer to support us by mail, please send your donation with our printable donor form.)
Opinion in Brief
"We all say Ohio, Ohio, Ohio. But it's all still Denver, Denver, and the mystery that maybe isn't a mystery at all. ... Why was the first debate so toxic for the president? Because the one thing he couldn't do if he was going to win the election is let all the pent-up resentment toward him erupt. ... Whatever his policy choices, whatever general direction he seemed to put in place he was The President, a man who had gotten there through natural gifts and what all politicians need, good fortune. What he couldn't do was present himself, when everyone was looking, as smaller than you thought. Petulant, put upon, above it all, full of himself. ... [I]n some utterly new way the president was revealed, exposed. All the people whose job it is to surround and explain him, to act as his buffers and protectors -- they weren't there. It was him on the stage, alone with a competitor. He didn't have a teleprompter, and so his failure seemed to underscore the cliché that the prompter is a kind of umbilical cord for him, something that provides nourishment, the thing he needs to sound good. ... People saw for the first time an Obama they may have heard about on radio or in a newspaper but had never seen. They didn't see some odd version of the president. They saw the president. And they didn't like what they saw, and that would linger." --columnist Peggy Noonan

The Gipper
"Freedom is something that cannot be passed on in the blood stream, or genetically. And it's never more than one generation away from extinction. Every generation has to learn how to protect and defend it, or it's gone and gone for a long, long time." --Ronald Reagan
Culture
"I want to explain to you just how extremist the media is on abortion and just how much spinning in favor of killing kids the media does. According to Gallup polling, roughly a quarter of the population supports Richard Mourdock's position on abortion -- that the only exception in support of abortion should be the life of the mother. According to Gallup polling, roughly a quarter of the population supports Barack Obama's position on abortion -- any time during pregnancy until the moment of delivery. ... When the media chooses to report stories about abortion, the media consistently chooses to report stories like Richard Mourdock's statement and Todd Akin's statement, both of whom believe that children conceived as a result of rape are still human beings entitled not to be ripped apart in utero and scraped out of the womb or whatever procedure the child killers use these days. ... These members of the media have a vested interest in painting the pro-lifers as extreme and themselves as in the mainstream, despite an equal percentage of Americans agreeing with both sides. ... Then, of course, they also shape the news." --RedState.com managing editor Erick Erickson
Reader Comments
"Regarding Mark Alexander's column, Romney v Obama, Adult v Adolescent, if you bought a car from a dealer and it turned out to be nothing like the advertisement, would you buy a second car in four years from the same dealer? If you loaned a great deal of money to someone for a deathly sick friend and then found out the money was spent on other things, and wasted on terrible investments like untenable green energy scams, would you offer to loan them more money? Then why in the world would anyone, including Colin Powell, ever vote for Obama a second time? My mother always said, 'Once burned, twice shy.'" --Old Desert Rat in Las Vegas, Nevada
"The simple facts are that the perfect storm of 2008 is gone, this presidency has been the worst in our history and everyone knows we're not better off than we were four years ago. Romney will get his mandate." --Mac in Arizona
"Your observation that 'Romney should end every speech at every stop between now and November 6th with this bottom line: "Obama can't be trusted,"' nails it. Just maybe the squishes running Romney's campaign will figure that out." --Demsarerats in Oregon
"After reading the Friday Digest on national security, I must say, not to downplay the importance of the economy, but national defense has always been my number one concern -- always was, always will be -- for without it, you won't have to worry about the economy." --Namvet_68 in Pennsylvania
"When I heard the president's retort comparing the U.S. Navy ships to horses and bayonets, I heard a commander in chief who is woefully ignorant of the role the U.S. Navy plays is projecting U.S. might in an unstable and hostile world. His presuming to lecture Governor Romney about submarines and aircraft carriers merely underscored his monumental ignorance!" --Patrick in Houston
"Aircraft carriers still need minesweepers, anti-submarine escorts and other surface vessels to protect them, and tankers (for jet fuel) and other transport vessels to keep them supplied while at sea. Submarines also sometimes need the assistance of other vessels to carry out their mission. Large-scale amphibious and littoral operations are still impractical, if not impossible, with only aircraft carriers and submarines. I am appalled that Mr. Obama still doesn't have a basic understanding of naval operations after nearly four years running the White House." --MNIce in Minnesota
Political Futures
"White House records show dozens of radical Islamists have made hundreds of visits to the White House since 2009. ... Many visits have taken place this year. The potential security breaches were revealed in a new report by the Washington-based Investigative Project on Terrorism following a year-long probe. ... The meetings have coincided with homeland security policy changes the White House guests and their front groups have clamored for, including purging language such as 'radical Islam' and 'war on terror' from the government's official lexicon. The administration also recently censored Islamic references in thousands of pages of counterterrorism training materials used by the FBI, Homeland Security and Pentagon, while firing many of the trainers who wrote or used the materials. Former FBI special agent John Guandolo, who after 9/11 investigated Islamic terror groups from the bureau's Washington field office, told IBD that the same suspect Islamist figures who have penetrated the White House have also successfully lobbied to purge the names of hundreds of high-risk Islamists tied to the Muslim Brotherhood from the U.S. no-fly list." --Investors Business Daily's Paul Sperry
The Last Word
"They had eyes in the sky, ears on the ground -- and emails in the pipeline within minutes after the attack on Benghazi began. They watched and listened in real time, as terrorists stormed the compound, firing rocket propelled grenades, mortars and AK-47 rifles. An email sent during the seven-hour long battle that claimed the lives of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, and agent Sean Smith is entitled, 'Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.' Add it all up and the conclusion is inescapable: the Obama administration is embroiled in the biggest scandal since Watergate -- and a thoroughly corrupt mainstream media has tolerated a blizzard of lies about every bit of it, hoping it won't derail the president's re-election. ... We now know that either a decision was not made to rescue the four Americans who were killed -- or that one was made to abandon Mr. Stevens and three other Americans to their attackers, based on risk assessments the State Department, White House and Pentagon refuse to make available to the public. Despite that stonewalling, the reality that we had military resources as little as an hour away in Italy -- and the reality that the last two Americans who died, had managed to survive six hours into the attack, has also been made public. ... If this isn't the Mother of All October Surprises, then nothing is. And if Americans are vapid enough to give this poser of a president four more years, they deserve everything they get." --columnist Arnold Ahlert
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
143 Comments
Dennis P Deegan in Fort Wayne IN
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:42 AM
The big part missing in this whole Navy issue is the Sailors and Marines stationed or deployed on these ships. Less ships mean more deployments for our Sailors and Marines!!!! Which equals to more hardships for them and their families. I was one of these Marines 30 years ago and was damn glad that we had a President like Regan who put our military first and built our Navy up to 600 ships. To add to this I was a Marine on board the USS Inchon LPH-12 and were stationed off of Beirut Lebanon.
Retired Navy Squid in Nine Mile Falls WA
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM
What can we expect from a Commander in Chief who can't even pronounce CORPSMAN. No understanding of our Navy, or or for that matter, any of the other services. This guy is the best thing our enemies have going for them and he must be defeated in November.....GO NAVY!!!!!!
Bill Graves in Battle Ground, WA
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 1:25 PM
I absolutely agree. Our adversaries see a weakened Navy and respond accordingly. I retired from the Navy in 1994, and both of my older brothers served before me. We all recall the extended deployments to the worlds hotspots because of fewer ships and personell. The Med, Indian Ocean, Western Pacific. The deployments are not only extended, it is reason for less time at home with family because predployment work-ups (mini-cruises) are accelerated. A Sailor or Marine might have a one year turn-around beteween deployments, but six months of that time is scheduled for training and detachments. And then the ship that is supposed to relieve you on station breaks down, and you are on station for an even longer period. Yes sir, that is a real incentive to re-up. The worlds troubles just get worse when we relax our guard. President Carter should have known better as he was a commisioned officer in the Navy, but strategic reallities seemed to escape him, as they do our current CIC.
BC in MD
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:46 AM
What a sad ass BO is.
56hornet in TX
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:46 AM
and I read recently that the weapon of the future willl be laser, (in the next 2 years) and this will be on more active ships. Not large carriers................
Arnold H Nelson in Chicago IL
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:01 PM
Wow! "... the weapon of the future willl be laser, (in the next 2 years) and this will be on more active ships. Not large carriers..............." Amazing! You actuallly read that? Who knew?!?!?
Bruce R Pierce in Owensboro, Ky
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:54 AM
The person that told General Ham to "stand down" three times, then relieved General Ham for not standing down should be tried for treason along with the person that relieved him. Refusing to send help is giving "aid to the enemy". No more proof is needed or further questions asked.
Dan in grants pass ore
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:54 AM
The Prsident keeps talking about "roads and bridges" Why should we spend borrowed money on infrastructure rather than defense in the form of ships. Throughout history, he who controls the sea control the world. We need to be able to protect our shipping lanes. As a former tin can sailor, I suggest the President ride out a couple of typhoons in the South China Sea...that might just humble him just a tad. it sure did me.
R.K. Sprau in L.C. N.M.
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM
There isn't enough money to go around. W/O an infrastructure to move supplies, no one is going to have the supplies build ships or fly planes, or anything else. the problem is what is important. this is what happens when you cut taxes, deregulate (which we need) and charge 2 wars. Now the hard choice will have to be made. Should we have safe planes, or a bridge collapse. Should we build more ships and no roads?
Geo in Ponte Vedra bch,
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM
R.K. in L.C, I got a good idea, Why don't we stop wasting so much money on entiitlement programs for People who are undocumented, moochers, Pakastan, Saudia Arabia and all the other countries who want us DEAD and the numerous other programs developed by a crooked Congress who only feed themselves and the GREEN B/S programs this a-ho in DC has spent it on and mabybe we could have military hardware and roads?????
RVN 65-67 in SE AZ
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:17 PM
It is an exercise in futility to attempt intelligent discussion with RK. His thought construction, thus his speech, is most often disjointed to the point of incomprehension. A good man, I suspect, but in a conversation where word are the tools of choice, RK is basically unarmed.
R.K. Sprau in L.C. N.M.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 12:24 AM
It's called taking a round.
Hopeless in Amerika
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 8:17 PM
Be nice, AZ! RK is right. Besides, "...but in a conversation where word are the tools of choice..." you have a mismatch in plurality so the old adage "people who live in glass houses should not throw stones" applies here ;-)
George B in Jacksonville FL
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 9:38 PM
Geo to Geo, yes, thats true.
R.K. Sprau in L.C. N.M.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 12:19 AM
IIll vote for that
R.K. Sprau in L.C. N.M.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 12:20 AM
I'll vote for that
Arnold H Nelson in Chicago IL
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:55 AM
The two greatest wars in history were 1914 and 1941. They are not called 'World Wars' as a publicity stunt. We've had wars in the following 66 years, but nothing near world-class. Why? The world's most successful, prosperous nation in history has maintained 12 aircraft carriers ('planes land on them.') They can move at 60 miles per hour, two of them can reach any place in the 73% of the world covered in sea water in 8 days, then destroy everything in sight. Result: after two world wars 25 years apart. no world wars in 67 years. Today that threat can be dismantled by a bozo whose most outstanding lifetime accomplishment has been 6 pre-teen years plodding thru the mud of Indonesia.
RVN 65-67 in SE AZ
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM
Well, and accurately said, Sir! Thank you, Arnold Nelson.
The American in Columbus, Ohio
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 1:54 AM
I just wish that po bastard would've stayed there!
James R. Slay in Melbourne, FL
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM
The remark reveals ignorance and incompetence, dangerous characteristics, indeed, for a commander-and-chief.
Craig Kinard in Pasadena, CA
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 11:58 AM
A few more items on the Navy: Any fleet can be in one ocean at a time. Since our interests lie in regions bounded by ALL oceans, we need adequate fleets in all areas, Pacific, Mediterranean, Atlantic, China Sea, etc. Oh, and not all ships are at sea all the time; many are in port for maintenance, and some even in drydock for major repairs.
Mary Madsen in FL
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:01 PM
Krauthammer was SO correct! It's about time SOMEONE publicly mentioned the insulting condescension of Obama to infer Romney wasn't 'in the know' as far as our naval vessels are concerned. That kind of attitude actually is covering up ignorance (and hostility!)
Bob Weekley in Great State of NJ
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Being from a family of Navel Patriots that believes that a strong defensive posture is the surest way to a secure and stable offensive response, I was offended by the statements by our clownmander & chief. One only needs to see the progress that China has taken in recent years to bolster their Naval fleet, to recognize the eminent threat thy pose to not only the immediate area, but to the world at large. Being a nation that believes in helping our allies in their time of need, we need a strong Navy to enable us to take the steps necessary to be anywhere in the world in force to enforce our treaties and compacts, as well as give aid to anyone, anywhere when they ask for our help. That's the way we roll...... GO NAVY !
wjm in Colorado
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 11:22 AM
China is also getting a space program up and running to send a man to the moon that our Obamao has abandoned. We should never have stopped our space program, our astronauts are now hitch hiking to the international space station, while Obamao throws money down the rathole of failed bankrupt green ventures.
RICARDO36 in EDGEWATER, FL.
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Deport OBAMA and his PUPPET MASTER, SOROS! END OF STORY, CASE CLOSED!
travelingpaul in Grand Rapids
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Being basically a cynic, could the current emphasis on the hurricane be an attempt to get voters to forget about Benghazi? The press is in on it as well.
Shoot in Michigan City In.
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM
All I can say is ovomit and mumbling joe should both be removed from office and tried for treason hilliary should also, I am sending a contribution because unlike T/H, The Patriot Post is still free of all adds I would rather contribute than try to read while there are adds flashing Please Keep up the good work!
Mary Anne Garber in North Canton, OH
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:08 PM
This man is an incompetent coward at best and a traitor to this nation. We need to ask the question, he didn't provide help for those brave men and lied about the cause, WILL HE PROTECT US WHEN WE ARE IN TROUBLE???
RVN 65-67 in SE AZ
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 9:31 PM
Mary Ann, Benghazi is a glaring response to your question. The answer is, NO! We, the people, if we had any competent representation in the Congress, the man would have been dissed, long ago. There, really, is the problem. The Congress. The Socialist Democrat Party of North America should be on the "no fly" list. Problem is, other snakes would come up from the ashes.
Palmetto Patriot in SC
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 3:59 AM
As much as many of us would like to see Obama impeached and charged with treason, it won't happen. Even if the Republican House of Representatives voted to impeach, it would end just as Slick Willy's impeachment did. Yes, he (Clinton) was impeached, but the Senate didn't have the cajones to find him guilty, so Clinton stayed in office. Does anyone really think that the Democrat Senate under Harry Reid would find Obama guilty and have him removed from office even if the House voted overwhelmingly to impeach him?
Mike Settles in Vancouver, Washington
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:10 PM
Regarding "Bayonets and Horses": I take "bayonets" as a simile for "boots on the ground," without which no tin-pot dictator takes any threat seriously. You might reach much of the world by carrier aircraft, but without divisions of soldiers, the real threat of force is hollow. Each time there appears to be a "peace dividend," the Army and Marines take the biggest cuts - because corporate bottom-lines aren't involved. Then the soldiers who are first sent return in an inordinate number of body bags because DoD cut "divisions," ammo and parts for ground forces. See "Korea", post-Vietnam, and post-Gulf War I for examples. Yes, we need warships: How else do you get soldiers/Marines to where they need to be to fight? Technology: Good stuff, but can't replace boots on the ground - MacNamara found this out with his electronic fence across the 17th Parallel in S. Vietnam: Not enough troops to stop the NVA which the electronic "trip wire" showed were infiltrating south.
Son of Liberty in Colorado
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM
Apparently you don't know a whole heck of a lot about the Navy. Having served for 20 years on active duty in the Navy, I was at the "Tip of the Spear" on many occasions! That Tip that I refer to is a carrier group, and contrary to what you may think, we don't make it a habit of hauling Marines or Army personnel to their destinations on carriers. Carriers are there for one reason which is probably better than any platoon of grunts in a situation. That reason is to provide overwhelming firepower in support of a mission! In the past before the current Vagina in Chief, whenever there was a situation stirring somewhere, the President would usually park a carrier group in the vicinity and that would calm the situation down very quickly, as a carrier is nothing more than a mobile airfield equipped with planes and bombs, missiles, rockets, guns and all the rest of the good sh*t that goes boom. Marines are transported to their destinations via Amphibious Groups with a MEU (Marine Expeditionary Unit) which we call the Gator Navy, I served in that as well. The Army usually flies by either Air Force transport or civilian airliners. Any questions?!
RVN 65-67 in SE AZ
Monday, October 29, 2012 at 9:46 PM
Son of Liberty, thank you for your service, and that same thanks to all others with military experience. Me included. I take exception to your generally intelligent comments. Marines! I like Reagan's comment, "Some folks wonder all their lives if they have made a difference. Marines do not have that problem." My military history is Navy Reserve, 38 plus years. 26 plus years on active duty for WWII, Korea, RVN. Turned me down for Gulf I. Point? Yes, all you say is accurate, but in the final analysis, the final cleanup, it is the "boots on the ground" that do that work. The Marines are Naval Infantry. They are vital! It is important for this Republic to keep in mind that technology, advanced vessel construction and manning is a part, but only a part, of the overall power projection (should be) of the United States of America. Thank you, again, for your service. Semper Fi!
Son of Liberty in Colorado
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 4:51 PM
Marine - I meant no disrespect to the Corps! I tend to have a lot of respect for Marines as I understand how they think, and 99% of them are very patriotic down to earth people - my kind of people. I was merely explaining to the other guy that the Navy is not there as a taxi service for the Army and Marines, and that we have special ships designed to haul Marines (amphibs) and the PRIMARY mission of the Navy is "FREEDOM OF THE SEAS". Thank you for your service brother.
"We few, we happy few, we Band of Brothers, For he that fights with me this day will be my brother Be he ne'er so vile, and this day will gentle his condition." Shakespeare - Henry V