Wednesday Chronicle
They're Coming for Your Guns
The Foundation
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. ... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants." --Cesare Beccaria, quoted by Thomas Jefferson in Commonplace Book
Editorial Exegesis
Sen. Feinstein explaining her 1994 gun ban"What happened in Newtown is not an occasion for a national political 'conversation.' It is an occasion to reflect on why we have political conversations at all. ... It is easy, and in moments of despair such as Friday quite understandable, to scream 'more' to gun control, 'more' to the morass of airport-style security that is spreading its way across our institutions, 'more' to the diagnosis and institutionalization of the mentally ill. But it is much harder to write the laws that would have guaranteed Adam Lanza could never find a gun, or enter a school by force, or go without what diagnosis, treatment, and supervision he might have needed. And hardest of all to write them in such a way that the republic we'd be left with would still look like America in the ways we value most. This is not so say such laws cannot or should not be written -- in the field of mental health, in particular, we think there are commonsense reforms that might make tragedies such as Newtown less likely -- but merely to caution humility and care in their crafting. The need for humility is especially acute in the case of gun control. The irreducible challenge the Second Amendment poses to gun restrictionists is that it does not bestow upon the people a right they previously lacked. It proscribes the government from infringing upon a right the people already have. It is not that the people are allowed to arm. It is that the government is disallowed to disarm them. The practical consequence of living for nearly two-and-a-half centuries under the almost universally benevolent protection of the Second Amendment is a society in which there are hundreds of millions of guns, in which 47 percent of families and nearly as many Democrats as Republicans own guns, and in which the dissent over the sacrosanctity of gun rights is heard largely because of the overrepresentation in the media of the coastal, urban Left. Those upset with the order of things are welcome to try, and doomed to fail, to repeal the Second Amendment via the constitutional process. But the guns of America aren't going anywhere any time soon, and generic calls to 'do something' -- even insofar as doing something is desirable -- must reckon with this fact." --National Review
Upright
"The key fallacy of so-called gun control laws is that such laws do not in fact control guns. They simply disarm law-abiding citizens, while people bent on violence find firearms readily available. If gun control zealots had any respect for facts, they would have discovered this long ago, because there have been too many factual studies over the years to leave any serious doubt about gun control laws being not merely futile but counterproductive. ... Yet many of the most zealous advocates of gun control laws, on both sides of the Atlantic, have also been advocates of leniency toward criminals. In Britain, such people have been so successful that legal gun ownership has been reduced almost to the vanishing point, while even most convicted felons in Britain are not put behind bars. ... Guns are not the problem. People are the problem -- including people who are determined to push gun control laws, either in ignorance of the facts or in defiance of the facts. There is innocent ignorance and there is invincible, dogmatic and self-righteous ignorance. Every tragic mass shooting seems to bring out examples of both among gun control advocates." --economist Thomas Sowell
"The rifle that Lanza used, a .223-caliber Bushmaster M4 carbine, is legal under Connecticut's 'assault weapon' ban, and the federal law used the same criteria. ... Any gun that can be used for self-defense or other legitimate purposes also can be used to murder people. Guns like Lanza's, modeled after the Colt AR-15, are among the most popular rifles in America, with an estimated 3.5 million sold since 1986. Only a tiny fraction of them are ever used in crimes. ... FBI numbers indicate that rifles of any kind (not just 'assault weapons') are used in less than 3 percent of murders. Even killers with multiple victims are much more likely to use ordinary handguns than 'assault weapons.' I use those scare quotes because the very term 'assault weapon' was invented by the anti-gun lobby as a way of blurring the distinction between semi-automatic firearms, which fire once per trigger pull, and machine guns such as the selective-fire assault rifles carried by soldiers." --columnist Jacob Sullum
"An industry devoted to serving the public's right to know gives twisted and evil men the means of becoming known. This problem is not obviously amenable to a solution, and it certainly is not amenable to a legal one. A regime of media regulation that would be both effective at preventing mass shootings and consistent with the American Constitution is no easier to imagine than a regime of gun regulation that would meet the same criteria." --Wall Street Journal columnist James Taranto
The Gift of Liberty
For last-minute shoppers, there is no better gift than the gift of Liberty. Help ensure that your loved ones will continue to enjoy the blessings of Liberty that our Creator has bestowed upon us, even as tyrannical statists begin yet another assault on that Liberty. Please make a secure online donation today to The Patriot Post's 2012 Year-End Campaign. If you prefer to support us by mail, please send your donation with our printable donor form.
We have $90,155 yet to raise in just 12 days!
"Fellow Patriots: I have decided to throw my support behind you even though money is tight (and getting tighter!). My wife works three part-time jobs, and I am a full-time minister who has to work a part-time job as well trying to make ends meet. We are not discouraged, however, because God always provides! I just want to say a huge THANK YOU to all of you and I want to help in a tangible way. God bless you in all your hard work and may He meet your every need." --Semper Fidelis, (USMC, Ret.)
Demo-gogues
Gun grabbers unite: "On the first day of the new Congress, I intend to introduce a bill stopping the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of assault weapons as well as large ammunition magazines, strips and drums that hold more than 10 rounds." --Sen. Dianne Feinstein on plans for a renewed ban on rifles that look scary
"How does something like [Newtown] happen? Because a person with impaired judgment had access to firepower that should be outlawed. There is no reason why these assault magazines -- and that's what they are. We've got to call them what they are." --House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
"I was just giving the White House a heads up that the gloves are off on my side, and I was going to do everything I possibly could. If that meant embarrassing everybody, that's what I would do. ... We owe it to those families, and to our own children, to do something about our nation's problem with gun violence." --Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY)
"We need people, just ordinary Americans, to come together, and speak out, and to sit down and calmly reflect on how far we go. I'm going to be holding a hearing after the first of the year, in about two weeks or so, on this constitutional question [of guns]. That's the starting point." --Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL)
That was then: "If you are a law-abiding gun owner you have nothing to fear from an Obama administration." --Barack Obama in 2008
Belly laugh of the week: "The truth of the matter is that my policies are so mainstream that if I had set the same policies that I had back in the 1980s, I would be considered a moderate Republican." --Barack Obama

Dezinformatsia
Most of the leftists speaking loudest on gun control don't have any clue what they're talking about. Here are a few examples of what we call "non compos mentis" on guns:
"Why should anyone own an assault rifle? We need to be realistic about the 2nd amendment..society [sic] has changed, views have changed. Write all the feel good laws you want, it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact. [A] Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon." --MSNBC's Ed Schultz on Twitter
"Respectfully, the founding fathers aren't here anymore. We are the founding fathers of this country now. Things change in America.... The idea that we need to be stuck in the mud of a different generation because some dead people think that's the way we oughta [sic] live 200 and some odd years later, I'm not there." --Ed Schultz
"If someone who has a mental issue did not have access to guns that should only be available in war zones, we would not be dealing with this. Who needs an armor-piercing bullet to go hunting? Who needs an assault rifle to go hunting? You can't even use the prey that you kill with an assault rifle if you indeed do it. No one needs an assault rifle to go out and shoot a deer. No one needs an assault rifle that's capable of shooting 10, 20, 30 rounds off at the same time to shoot a duck, or to shoot quail. It does not make sense. ... We need to get guns and bullets and automatic weapons off the streets." --CNN's Don Lemon
"Should Jared Loughner have been able to obtain 30 rounds of ammunition to kill six people and wound Gabby Giffords, or should there be limits on high-magazine clips [sic]?" --Daily Beast's Howard Kurtz
"Why does anyone need an AK-15 [sic]?" --Fox News' Bill O'Reilly
That's racist: "After 9/11, we turned this culture upside down. We doubled our defense budget. If this [school shooter] had had, I'm sorry to say this, but if he had had an Arab name, people would be going nuts about what we ought to do right now." --CBS's Bob Schieffer
"People will long remember what Barack Obama said in Newtown...his Gettysburg address..." --Obama's biographer David Maraniss
The sycophants: "He obviously won re-election. He won re-election despite higher unemployment rate than anyone had to face in 70 years. He's the first Democrat to actually win two consecutive terms with over 50 percent of the vote. That's something we haven't seen since Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And he's basically the beneficiary and the author of a new America. A new demographic, a new cultural America that he's now the symbol of." --Time Magazine editor Richard Stengel on naming Obama "Person of the Year" again
Newspulper Headlines:
So Much for the War on Drugs: "Marijuana Not High Obama Priority" --ABCNews.com
We've Always Found Obama Pretty Trying: "Boehner Is Trying, Obama Is Not" --Washington Post website
Shortest Books Ever Written: "The Case for John Kerry as Secretary of State" --The Washington Post
Questions Nobody Is Asking: "Can Facebook Make You Fat and Poor?" --LiveScience.com
News You Can Use: "Willie Nelson Interview: Don't Fret About the End of the World" --Daily Telegraph (London)
Bottom Story of the Day: "Obama Shows Weakness, Again" --BuzzFeed.com
(Thanks to The Wall Street Journal's James Taranto)
Village Idiots
Alpha Jackass: "It's time that we as a city have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a state have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a country have an assault weapons ban. And I would hope the leadership in Congress now will have a vote of conscience. It is time to have that vote." --Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who presides over a city with a near-gun ban and the highest murder rate in the nation
"I don't know what the gun would've done. I can just tell you that if you have a gun in your house, you are something like 22 times as likely to shoot a friend or a relative as somebody trying to assault you. Guns kill people. They don't belong in schools. They don't belong on campuses." --New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg when questioned on whether the Sandy Hook Elementary principal should have been armed
"I hate to say it, but killing is our way. We began America w/ genocide, then built it w/ slaves. The shootings will continue -- it's who we are." --filmmaker Michael Moore
Beware: "[W]e cannot do what we did in 2008, which is vote and then go back to sleep, you know, um, because the real work is -- is coming up. I mean, we've got a fiscal cliff crisis going on, we've gotta, you know, uh, you know, deal with our education system, we have to deal with the environment, we need comprehensive immigration reform. All of that has to happen, and we're dealing with -- four years is not a lot of time, you know. And the truth is, is that we've got two strong years where we've gotta get a lot done." --Michelle Obama
Lap dog: "I really love Barack Obama. ... I love Barack Obama. What a great man. I'm so lucky to have voted for that guy." --comedian Louis C.K.
Short Cuts
"If you believe the availability of guns is the problem, then you must be ENRAGED at Obama over Operation Fast & Furious." --Daily Caller contributor Matt K. Lewis
"If Chris Matthews could carry Barack Obama's next child, he would." --Media Research Center's L. Brent Bozell
"House Republicans and Democrats stayed deadlocked over whether to cut spending or raise taxes to save the economy. If they send us over the fiscal cliff, they will still get paid. Their salaries are guaranteed under the Americans with No Abilities Act." --comedian Argus Hamilton
"So people are acting pretty set on gun control, but all their ideas are things that do nothing but pester law abiding gun owners. ... So idea: Let's just pretend to pass gun control. The people who most want it won't know the difference between an actual law being passed and absolutely nothing being done, so can't we just say we passed a bunch of laws and pretend everyone is safer? We'll call it the 'Super Deadly Gun Ban Act' and it will ban fully-automatic bolt action shotguns and armor piercing hollow points and any magically enchanted guns. And then all the dumb people will cheer, 'We is safer!' So it's the same result as an 'assault weapon' ban, but no enforcement costs and no petty intrusions on liberty. If people want useless things done to make us all feel safer, can't we all just play along?" --humorist Frank J. Fleming
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
289 Comments
Alan in Washington, D.C.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:10 AM
For a clear perspective, two items are necessary to inflict dangerous acts: A. Intent (by a prospective perpetrator) B. Methodology to inflict (Using a gun, a knife, a bomb, etc.) It's not that easy to ID item A above. Identifying item B is relatively easy. Remove the easy for obtaining killer weaponry.
G Dub (Capt USAR Fld Arty - Ret) in Lee's Summit, MO
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:15 AM
I have just read a very strong piece on this situation by our Friend, Thomas Sowell. Please read: http://patriotpost.us/opinion/15938 . . . and remember, each time a Left wing legislator wishes to ban something it is almost never for the reason that they piously state.
Rod in USA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Remove the easy. Yes, let's do that. Wow. What a dumb thing to say. But yes we can! Let's remove all guns... and knives, and spoons and forks. Let's remove anything that burns and outlaw cars.
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 5:14 PM
And ban school busses responsible for MORE deaths each year than psychotics shooting up schools! Public education is the problem!
wjm in Colorado
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM
Liberal policies allowing the insane to wald freely among us, and light sentences for criminals, that is the problem. An inanimate object can, by its very nature, never, ever, be the problem.
TMR in Lebanon, ME
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:13 PM
For a clearer perspective, then us pass a law banning death. That way everyone lives forever.
Death is the only stopping us!!!
TMR in Lebanon, ME
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:14 PM
Correction: "...then let us pass a law.... "
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 5:26 PM
Correction...
Let us get rid of all lawyers. politicians, and other non-productive leeches
T. in Austin, Texas
Friday, December 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM
AGREEABLE. you just named two of the three GREAT LAIRS. lawyers and politicians, now can you name the other one? why don't we just make a resolution to outlaw liberals and all domestic terrorists, oh yes i forgot, they are the ones in charge of my country right now, we have to wait until we get a REAL AMERICAN in the White House. i'll not get angry if they quit being so stupid.
PB in Kansas
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:32 PM
Agreed. So let's get rid of the real killer of our citizens and ban or significantly increase the restrictions on driving. Cars kill people and the spoon made me fat!
Sandra in CA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 5:55 PM
And water! Let us not forget to ban water! How many mothers have drowned their children in bathtubs and lakes in the last few years. Lakes! Let us ban lakes.....and bathtubs!
Chris W. in Nova
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM
Let's treat drunks with cars the same way we treat guns... BAN CARS and Alcohol; since that worked so well the first time around.
Ban ONLY work on the people that would not and do not do these terrible things. LAWs do not stop criminals. Criminals break the laws; so what will more laws do to this kind of acts?? make them more illegal or Illegaler.....
JWH in "Republic of Texas"
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Remove the easy? I say yes and immediately. REMOVE THE IDEA AND USE OF GUN FREE ZONES! Don't give the killers any idea that anyplace is safe for them to conduct their madness.
enemaofthestatistquo in Monroe, GA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 8:25 PM
Ban Camo, Camo Control NOW.
ironsights556 in Oneida TN
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 4:47 PM
So we need to get rid of all guns, knives, and bombs? Too bad someone hasn't thought of that in Iraq and Afghanistan, would have saved thousands of lives banning IEDs.
Rev J Curran in Ohio
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:11 AM
If goverment take our guns them all the bad people will own them. Allow the schools to arm a few people, and let it be know enter here and your a dead person. Leave or guns alone
Howard Last in Wyoming
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM
Ask the experts, like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc. gun bans work.
Ken in Mountain Home, AR
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Amen to that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rod in USA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:28 PM
You are 100% right. I am amazed by the people who do not get it.
1) outlaw guns and only outlaws will have them (they won't obey the law). Hmm. We outlawed illicit drugs, but you can still get those. Prohibition did not work either.
2) The government (some portions or members of it) would love you to be outlawed. The 2nd ammendment protects individual citizens FROM their government.
3) Check the studies: The most dangerous places are "gun free zones" or other places with the toughest restrictions on gun ownership. The safest places? Those plases where it is easier and encouraged to carry. Think about it: Would you try to mug somebody if you thought they might shoot you because they might be carrying a concealed pistol? No. You would prey on the unarmed instead.
Again, liberals are morons who ignore ore deny the absolute facts and elementaryt logic in favor of a fantasy world.
enemaofthestatistquo in Monroe, GA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM
Banning work, Works 8*)).
Charles in Texas
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:18 AM
I couldn't let them have my guns, for then I would become a servant, and not a citizen. I will however, let them have the ammunition, should they come for the guns. The ammunition will be pretty hard to collect though, it will be moving at about 2,700 fps.
MoeLarryCurly in CA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Charles, you'll need to get to the range and practice to ENSURE they collect your ammo at 2700fps. :-P
Clarence De Barrows in Walnut Creek, CA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:47 PM
Way to go Charles!
Matt in Saint Paris OHIO
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:51 PM
I'm with you Charles! There is only about 3 million Feds including the military. The vast majority of the military will not obey orders to harm US citizens. There are over 100 million gun owners. I thinks they would be ill advised to try confiscation. It won't happen in my "Burg."
Sandra in CA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 5:59 PM
Maybe our troop wouldn't fire on us but the UN troops wouldn't flinch. Do you know that foreign troops are being trained in house to house combat in our own Country?
MNIce in Minnesota
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:47 PM
They'll do it a few weapons at a time, slowly, subtly, so that by the time the majority catches on, it will be too late. At least that's what they hope to do with incrementally tighter restrictions on gun ownership.
There is an old Arab proverb, "If you let the camel's nose in the tent, the rest of him soon follows." The Romans said it more succinctly, "Principiis Obsta … Finem Respice," that is, "Resist the beginning ... Consider the end." Give the camel a very sore nose!
Mike Robertson in Pantego, TX
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM
I read that you believe that guns are not going away soon, however President Obama has not let the Constitution stand in his way so far, and I don't see any reason he will change. Look for an Executive Order in the very near future taking away part, if not all, our 2nd Amendment freedom.
Jeff B. in DFW
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:46 PM
What you say is very true... but, such an EO or even legislation will not be recognized by many citizens. Which, will lead to many not recognizing the legitimacy of the government. The true believers think they have it in the bag now and that if "they" produce and edict or pass some legislation that we're bound to obey and go along like good sheep. Their actions may have a much more deep and widespread impact than they intend or forsee.
Mandy in Glens Falls, NY
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:57 PM
Mike, Obama is smart enough to know that something like that will spark all out civil war. There is another, much easier way to enact full blown gun control - have control of both houses of government. Obama doesn't have to do anything about gun control or anything else right now. He and the Lefts focus are on capturing the House. The debt crisis debate isn't about the debt crisis at all. It's about demonizing the Republican Party in the minds of average Americans so that Obama can capture the House in 2014 - and, btw, it's working. Once Obama captures the House he'll have Carte Blanche to do anything he wants, including rewriting or eliminating whole sections of the Constitution, stripping away individual rights, declaring Marshall Law, imposing a draft (great way to get rid of a large segment of the population so that it will be easier to institute full blown gun control) and installing himself as permanent dictator of the USSA. The American people, and in particular, the Military, will be powerless to do anything about it, because it will all be achieve legally with the full consent of the House and Senate and the required ¾ of the states legislators (who just happen to be Democrats). Capturing the House is the easiest way for the Totalitarians (let's call them what they really are) to achieve their goal of enslaving the American people in one fell swoop. Don't think any of this can happen? Think again! We didn't think Obama could be re-elected either.
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM
Mandy,
That is a brilliant analysis of the situation and it gives us time to prepare for the worst. The Republitards are nothing more than the other arm of the New World Order and the left hand knows exactly what the right hand is doing. At least we have until the 2014 elections ;-)
God's Speed!
SKW223 in Denver,CO
Sunday, December 30, 2012 at 11:18 AM
What exactly, are we doing to prepare? Planning bug out scenarios? Setting up Resistance Camps? What? And don't say, "Write to your elected officials." Everyone knows they don't listen...
Kevin in Michigan
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 5:00 PM
Interesting possibility - however I'd point to a substantial portion of veterans are/would be Oath Keepers, and large parts of the active duty would not participate, and actively go against those orders.
Part of enlistment Oath is to defend the country from enemies, both foreign and domestic.
Joe Redneck in Maine
Thursday, December 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM
Actually the Oath is to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Those who would pass laws to deprive us of our 2nd Amendment and God given rights would be considered domestic.
Phil Lucas in Sovereign State of South Carolina
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Come for the guns, stay for the fire fight!
MNIce in Minnesota
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:52 PM
That's why they want to limit magazine capacity - they want an unfair advantage over the citizens.
Carol in Bethel, Ohio
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM
Regarding the 2nd Amendment, I would like to add that, while 47% of the population owns guns, it is harder to identify those like me in the 53% -- I don't personally (at least, not yet!) own a gun, but I am in total support of the 2nd Amendment and believe that if you are a legal citizen without some sort of felony conviction or obvious mental challenge preventing you owning a firearm, you should be able to purchase one. And no, I do not support the ban on assault weapons -- while the need for one may not be obvious today, there might come a time when we would appreciate some of the citizenry having them!
Kevin in Michigan
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 5:49 PM
Good point - one that the anti-gun movement wants to ignore when they claim majority of American's agree with them. Majority of my neighbors don't own guns, but definitely are in your camp of supporting the 2nd.
James Pogue in OK
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:22 AM
"Sometimes the solutions are just too damn obvious for intelligent elite's to grasp."
"I have seen a lot of people too smart to get it, but I have not seen anyone too dumb to get it.".
Subject: School Violence
We spend billions on Airport Security Presidential Security White House Security Diplomats Security UN Security Senate and House Security Banks Security In addition, a laundry list of "High Risk" targets.
Why have we not addressed School security? Is it not a priority worth politician's attention? Perhaps it is more about "Gun Control." Gun Control is not about GUNS. it about Control.
Why don't we install METAL DETECTOR'S in schools?
I may be wrong, but I do not believe we have had any planes high jacked since airports have installed detectors.
We say that there are too many guns. I say there are too many politicians' that are unwilling to do what's right.
Too many politicos that have stood by wringing their hands and demanding more gun control.
It is not the guns that kill children it is the SICK idiots and Criminals that are killing them.
Stop them at the door!
If the Congress and President are unwilling to do what it takes, it makes a very good argument for HOME SCHOOLING. If I had school age children, today they would not spend another day in public schools.
Get your minds off the GUNS and develop a plan to stop the killer's at the school doors.
Diane in Tx
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:31 PM
I'm sorry, James, but your solution of metal detectors would have done absolutely nothing in Newtown, unless an armed guard was standing next to it. I read the timeline reported and the shooter announced his presence by shooting the glass in the doors. Small towns can't afford airport style security. The real solution is to stop creating 'gun free zones', aka target rich environments. Concealed carry should be allowed everywhere. 'An armed society is a polite society.' You are right that the only way to keep your kids safe is to school them at home, unless we can change the law.
Kirk in Maryland
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:35 PM
1 - Many big city schools have metal detectors already. 2 - Who would man the additional stations? 3 - Who would pay for them? 4 - In the case of the Newtown shooting, the shooter broke a window to enter the school. The school had a security system, which he by-passed. A metal detector would have made zero difference. 5 - Home Schooling - great idea.
Susan in NC
Saturday, December 29, 2012 at 9:17 PM
If the principal at Sandy Hook had been armed, she could have shot Lanza in the hall and saved all those children. Instead, she lunged at him with her body and died.
Mandy in Glens Falls, NY
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM
I wonder what would have happened if this monster went into the school where the President’s children are educated? I’m sure the Secret Service would have stuffed a bullet in this punk’s ass long before he could have killed a single kid in the classroom. So when Obama agrees to disarming the Secret Service protecting his children, then he can lecture us about gun control.
Mark in Chicago, IL
Friday, December 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM
"Why don't we install METAL DETECTOR'S in schools? I may be wrong, but I do not believe we have had any planes high jacked since airports have installed detectors."
I wish this were the case - then 9/11 would never have occurred. Now, after 9/11, I don't think any idiot with a knife will be allowed to take a plane again ... too many passengers (and count me in) are all to ready to follow the example of United Flight 93. We may be cut but that plane is NOT being taken and used as a weapon.
Ultimately, a physical barrier like a set of locks, a locked security vestibule, etc. are only effective beyond a delaying measure if you have some firepower to support it. The metal detector will deter the casual gun in the school, but a madman is more than willing to kill the operator of that metal detector.
Keith Allison in Yakima, Washington
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM
Idiots want to outlaw all guns, but legalize drugs. Guns kill quickly, but drugs kill very slowly and usually only after they've destroyed your mind and body.
Ready4AChange in Illinois
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:44 AM
FINALLY - someone sane from Yakima!
Bob Bryant in Milton, Georgia
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:24 AM
A weapon will not fire if neglected. However a mentally ill person may if also neglected or not properly maintained.
R.K. Sprau in L.C. N.M.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 8:31 PM
You hit the problem on the head yet with budget cutbacks, be prepared for more embassy killings and mentally ill playing for real life video games. This is a fact.
MNIce in Minnesota
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM
It's time for our governments to quit blowing our money on golf courses, luxury items* for "poor" people, and high-risk-low-payoff green schemes and start doing their first job - keeping evil people in line.
(*A cell phone is a luxury I cannot afford - why am I required to pay a universal access charge to give it to other people?)
Joyce in Missouri
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:25 AM
If they ban semi-automatic or automatic guns, what's to stop them from banning all guns. Then we wind up like Germany did before WWII.
Chris W. in Nova
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 12:11 PM
Ahh, but they only want to ban gunes and hi-cap magazined from non LEOs and military. So if we do not need them because they are only to kill people, I understand the military, but then why do the ploice need them?? so they can kill lots of people at one time?? who?? the "citizens" of course as we protest the loss of our rights and become servants/slaves of the government................
Andy Bell in Katy, Tx
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:31 AM
Hide and watch. This knee jerk reaction is the beginning. Total weapons bans are not off the table by a long shot. Disarming America is a goal of every enemy we have including liberals. It will take awhile and some of our politicians will stand firm but if history is a guide, they will buckle under wink and nod trade offs that are "good for America". We will be sold out and you and I will become the law breakers, the side of society that is considered ugly and harsh, uneducated, and disdained. Wait.....we already are.
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 4:33 PM
The Gun Ban Is Working In Australia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RDWltHxRc&feature=player_embedded
CARROLL CALVIN in LOUISIANA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:33 AM
GUNS ARE TOTALY INCAPABLE OF INFLICTING HARM, ONLY THE PERSON THAT PICKS UP THE GUN CAN DO THAT. WE WILL NOT ACOMPLISH ANYTHING BY LETTING POLITICIANS, WHO GENERALLY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT GUNS, PASS A NEW GUN LAW. WE HAVE PLENTY OF LAWS ON THE BOOKS NOW, BUT THEY ARE NOT PROPERLY ENFORCED.
Robert in Alabama
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM
Truth about gun control if you WANT TRUTH. http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/6.1/gunfacts61screen.pdf We knew they would come,Molon labe.
K. Simmons in St. Louis
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:40 AM
Maybe Obama-care will get these nut cases off of the streets for good and all.
MNIce in Minnesota
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 12:57 AM
Yeah, the treatment-effectiveness/cost containment panel will decide it's cheaper to keep them doped to a near-comatose state than to deal with their problems.
popham in Boston, Ma.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11:41 AM
The mere idea that the White House and liberal left are raising all these "gun control" issues is repulsive in light of the fact that all the victims of Newtown have not even been laid to rest. To quote Mr. Erickson of the Redstate website: ".....the ghoulish and depraved left, using tragedy as an opportunity.....". The hypocrisies and double standards permeate all the liberals' comments, leading us to the one common denominator, that liberalism is tantamount to giving ignorance a political voice. Good luck, America.
Rod in USA
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Frankly, I think it entirely possible that Sandy was staged in order to re-juvenate the gun control (confiscation) initiative. Why else would they take to the airwaves with their talk so soon?
More realistically it was not. But un-deniably those who are stoking the conversation before the first funeral are absolutely pathetic excuses for human beings.
The real issue is moral decay promoted by -- liberals and Hollywood.
Radio Randy in Colville, WA
Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 2:20 AM
Although I don't wish to publicy state that I prescribe to the theory, the same thought had crossed my mind...in fact, I had previously considered the 1989 Stockton schoolyard shooting as being staged as a prelude to the Brady Bill and Clinton gun bans. As I recall, that was the time the term "assault rifle" came into common use with our media.
Though it has the look of a radical "consiracy theory", just recall what our government did in the Fast and Furious scandal...then it doesn't seem nearly so far fetched.
On a side note, I have to wonder how the administration would be handling the situation if it were determined that a Fast and Furious gun had been used at Sandy Hook...
Susan in NC
Saturday, December 29, 2012 at 9:26 PM
Moral decay along with violent movies and video games. Let's find out why all these 20 year old males are given psychotic drugs and then proceed to steal parents guns.