Friday Digest
Immigration Bait and Switch
"The bosom of America is open to receive not only the Opulent and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all Nations and Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation of all our rights and privileges, if by decency and propriety of conduct they appear to merit the enjoyment." --George Washington

A group of eight senators -- four Democrats and four Republicans -- announced Monday their outline for immigration reform. A bipartisan group of House members is likewise working on a deal. On Tuesday, apparently unable to find a microphone in Washington, Barack Obama took a $1.6 million flight (not including other expenses) to Las Vegas to make his own case before immediately returning to the capital.
Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Bob Menendez (D-NJ), Michael Bennet (D-CO), John McCain (R-AZ), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) released their Bipartisan Framework for Immigration Reform, which has four prongs: 1. A "tough but fair path to citizenship ... contingent upon securing our borders"; 2. reform the current legal immigration system; 3. expand and strengthen the employment verification system to prevent the hiring of illegal workers; 4. and improve the process for admitting future workers. At first read, it sounds reasonable.
The sudden push is thanks to the election. Republicans are facing the fact of once again losing the Hispanic vote in a blowout and are looking for love in all the wrong places. But merely signing on with Democrat legislation isn't going to win the Hispanic vote for the GOP -- not when so many Hispanics in this country are low-income workers who believe in big-government redistribution.
Of course, Democrats are always eager to pretend to make a deal, only to make it so "comprehensive" and unpalatable in the end that the GOP rejects it and, voila, Democrats can scare voters about racist Republicans all over again. They're already signaling to their base that talk of enforcement is just smoke and mirrors to pacify the GOP base. As Chuck Schumer said, "We are not using border security as a block to a path to citizenship. [The trigger] will not be a barrier to giving citizenship to the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in our country."
Charlie Brown, Lucy, football.
And we've seen this movie before. In the 1986 amnesty (and similar legislation passed in the 60's and 70's), enforcement was promised and never delivered. So here we are, 27 years later, hearing the same promises -- legal status first in exchange for promised (if that) enforcement later. Schumer admitted, "On Day One of our bill, the people without status who are not criminals or security risks will be able to live and work here legally." Once illegals obtain even provisional legal status, it's game over, and the idea of it being "contingent upon securing our borders" is just window dressing.
The proposal includes some positive enforcement provisions, including better tracking of people entering and exiting the country, which would indeed be an improvement. Eight years after the 9/11 Commission highlighted this dangerous gap in security, it's certainly about time. Restricting the soon-to-be lawful probationary immigrants from receiving federal benefits is also good -- at least in theory. But does anyone think that the same nation unable to keep them out in the first place will successfully keep them off the public dole?
Advocating for the bill in a Las Vegas Review-Journal op-ed, Marco Rubio wrote, "It's not a good idea to have millions of people permanently trapped in an immigration status that keeps them forever at a distance from our society." It would be positive if legal status leads to true assimilation instead of cultural segregation. He added, "[W]hat we have now is de facto amnesty." He is correct, but only because of a lack of enforcement, and it doesn't mean amnesty should become law.
We believe Rubio, a likely presidential contender in 2016, is attempting to negotiate in good faith, looking for a workable solution in a Democrat-controlled capital. He isn't naive or disingenuous, and he promised to oppose the bill if what Schumer says comes to pass. One of his fellow senators, Texas Republican Ted Cruz, said, "To allow those who came here illegally to be placed on such a path is both inconsistent with Rule of Law and profoundly unfair to the millions of legal immigrants who waited years, if not decades, to come to America legally."
Ensuring that enforcement is front and center in a series of small packages is the way we should go. Reject the "comprehensive" approach that leads to all manner of ill conceived and ill-advised provisions that make matters worse, if they have anything to do with the subject at all. Physically controlling the border and clamping down on employment is critical, though it's sure to be thwarted by a lawless administration that has, for example, refused to complete the border fence mandated by 2006 legislation. (A fence might make it harder to traffic guns to Mexican drug cartels.)
Once the border is secure, or even simultaneously with working toward that, we can streamline the legal immigration process so that illegal entry is a less attractive alternative. On the other hand, suffering through another four years of Obamanomics will do plenty to cut off the flow of illegals. Think about it: Who wants to come here now?
Quote of the Week
"Illegal immigration is a curious subject: It is one of the few domains in which the authorities entrusted with enforcing the law feel obliged to negotiate the most concessionary terms and conditions with those who are breaking it, as though law enforcement were an embarrassing inconvenience. But the rule of law, national security, and economic dynamism are not mere pro forma matters -- they are in fact fundamental, a reality lost on our would-be 'comprehensive' immigration reformers." --National Review
The BIG Lie
"When it comes to border security, I think anyone who looks at this honestly will note the tremendous strides we have made in the past four years in protecting our borders. In fact ... our borders now are more secure than they have ever been in history." --White House Press Secretary Jay Carney
Actually, as we noted above, it's the Obama economy that has kept illegal immigration at bay.

Government and Politics
Obama/Feinstein: Obfuscation and Vilification
The Obama/Feinstein legislative assault on defensive weapons was formally introduced into the Senate this week, albeit without the bold registration requirements that Feinstein originally proposed -- registration being necessary in order to eventually legislate confiscation.
But the gun confiscators have no intention of relinquishing the momentum they shamefully constructed on the caskets of children -- using a genuine tragedy as fuel for an emotionally driven campaign to advance a politically disingenuous gun-control agenda.
Feinstein's bill begins, "To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes." That pretty much sums it up.
Don't miss the rest of Mark Alexander's column.
Two quick notes about breaking news: A 14-year-old student opened fire in his Atlanta school Thursday, but was stopped by an armed school resource officer before anyone was killed.
In Turkey, a suicide bomber attacked the U.S. embassy, killing a security guard at a checkpoint. Where are the calls for capacity limits on suicide vests or bans on assault bombs?
Also, join the critical push for American Patriots across this great nation to pledge: "We, the People, affirm that we will support and defend Liberty as 'endowed by our Creator,' enshrined in our Constitution and empowered by its Second Amendment, against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Please take a moment and join the 36,000 of your countrymen who answered the call. Share it with your family, friends and colleagues via social media and email, as well.
Sign the 2A pledge!
This Week's 'Braying Jackass' Award
"[I]t is true that the vast majority of gun deaths in America are not the consequence of the use of an 'assault weapon.' But that begs the question of whether assault weapons have any real utility either in terms of any sporting or self protection needs." --Joe Biden
Because they are not generally used in crime, we should ban them. Got it.

Judicial Benchmarks: Obama Appointments Unconstitutional
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled last Friday that Barack Obama's Jan. 4, 2012, "recess" appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) were unconstitutional because the Senate was actually in session when those appointments took place, and, therefore, the president did not secure the required advice and consent of that body. The ruling also puts into question Obama's appointment under similar circumstances of Richard Cordray as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Because the ruling leaves the NLRB without a quorum, it immediately vacates an NLRB decision against Noel Canning, the soda bottler and distributor who brought the lawsuit upon which the Appeals Court ruled. Some 200 other decisions the NLRB has made since the beginning of 2012 are also in danger of being tossed out.
The court had some choice words about the behavior of the Obama administration for blatantly overstepping its constitutional boundaries. Chief Judge David Sentelle pointed out that the Constitution makes clear distinctions about what defines a recess and what defines a session: "[T]he appointments structure would have been turned upside down if the president could make appointments any time the Senate so much as broke for lunch," he wrote. Sentelle and other legal scholars who supported Noel Canning argued that the president only has the power to make emergency appointments during clearly defined recesses, and they must be reviewed at the end of the current session. He can't just postpone controversial or objectionable appointments until a recess and then push them through at his leisure.
The White House will surely appeal to the Supreme Court. For its part, the NLRB is acting as if it's business as usual. "The Board has important work to do ... [and] we will continue to perform our statutory duties and issue decisions." In other words, courts are only to be obeyed when their decision agrees with the Obama agenda.
New & Notable Legislation
The Senate passed 64-34 an extension of the debt ceiling into May, matching last week's House-passed extension. The budget battles will continue over the ensuing months, as Democrats try to tackle the debt by taxing and spending more and Republicans put up token resistance before caving.
The Senate approved a $50.5 billion aid bill ostensibly for victims of Superstorm Sandy this week. Nine Republicans joined 53 Democrats in supporting the package. Ironically, this bill raises total spending on Sandy to over $60 billion and effectively wipes out tax collections expected this year from the fiscal cliff tax hikes. The bill then went to the president's desk, becoming the latest in a long line of spending resolutions that have no offset.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) tried to offer an amendment that would trim an amount from discretionary spending equal to the cost of the bill, but his colleagues would have none of it. His amendment was defeated because, according to Democrats, three-dozen similar disaster aid bills have been passed over the last two decades with no such offsets. Why should that be changed now? It's unclear exactly how much pork was included in the bill for states and programs that had absolutely no connection to the storm, but the bill was originally $17 billion.
From the Left: Menendez's Problem With Planes and Prostitutes
Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) is working hard to cover his tracks. The FBI this week raided the offices of Dr. Salomon Melgen, Menendez's travel companion and a major campaign donor. It's unclear if the raid was related to allegations that Menendez flew on Melgen's private plane to the Dominican Republic where he allegedly had sex with underage Dominican prostitutes. The senator denies these deeply disturbing allegations, of course, but, suspiciously, Menendez waited until after the raid to repay $58,500 for three flights to the DR. His chief of staff called the delay in repayment "sloppy" and "an oversight." Sure thing -- those flights just happened to slip under the radar until the FBI raided the jet owner's office. Either way, the timing is rather inconvenient for Menendez, who is set to become chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee now that John Kerry is headed to the State Department.
Economy
Income Redistribution: About That Stimulus...

"The U.S. economy posted a stunning drop of 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter, defying expectations for slow growth and possibly providing incentive for more Federal Reserve stimulus," reports the Associated Press. It's the first drop in GDP since 2009, though for all of 2012, growth was 2.2 percent, which was up from 1.8 percent in 2011. Meanwhile, job growth trudged along, with the economy adding 157,000 jobs in January and headline unemployment going up to 7.9 percent -- higher than January 2009, oddly enough. Real unemployment remained at 14.4 percent, as 169,000 Americans dropped out of the labor force, brining that number to 8.5 million since Obama took office.
Boy, the $800 billion stimulus and the Fed's repeated "quantitative easing" (read: bond buying and money printing) have worked magic! Nearly $6 trillion in debt to get the economy going again, and instead it's shrinking and unemployment is stagnant. Look for Obama to propose more of the same in his State of the Union address.
Of course, the so-called "recovery" is and has for four years been laughable, and the economy is stagnant and shrinking because of the explosion in federal spending. The trajectory is unlikely to change now that most Americans are taking home less pay thanks to Barack Obama's tax increases. But the White House, as always, is pointing fingers elsewhere -- namely at House Republicans. "Our economy is facing a major headwind, and that's Republicans in Congress," said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, adding that the GOP is to blame for sequestration and the debt ceiling standoff. "This is political brinkmanship that results in one primary victim. That's American taxpayers and the American middle class." Shameless.
Meanwhile, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, better known as "The Stimulus," included a provision that required the Obama administration to submit quarterly reports detailing the spending and progress of the $800 billion package. Yet the White House hasn't submitted any reports since summer 2011 when that report revealed that for every $317,000 in stimulus money spent, only one new job was "created or saved." The return on investment has grown progressively worse, so the Obama team decided that it was no longer politically expedient to keep the public informed about the abject failure of the much-lauded stimulus. We suppose that's why Obama is also disbanding his once-ballyhooed "Council on Jobs and Competitiveness." It's no longer politically useful.

Regulatory Commissars: Imaginary Biofuels
The zealotry of Barack Obama's Environmental Protection Agency is causing the administration to lose a number of court cases. The most recent decision, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, held that the EPA cannot punish the oil refiners for their noncompliance with the EPA's Renewable Fuels Standard, though it left the standard in place. The standard required cellulosic biofuels to be purchased by fuel refiners, importers and blenders and then blended into our fuels. Unfamiliar with these biofuels? You're not alone. Only about 20,000 gallons were ever produced despite EPA's outlandishly optimistic projections of 8.7 million gallons in 2012. Rudimentary mathematics is a skill continuing to elude the Obama administration -- the EPA's projection was overstated by roughly 99.77 percent. Scoring accuracy of about 0.23 percent is a spectacularly failing grade even for a Renewable Fuels Standard created by a Democrat-controlled Congress in 2007. Meanwhile, the EPA responded to the court ruling by nearly doubling the mandate for 2013.
Consistent with Obamacratic doctrine to misdiagnose problems and apply the wrong remedies, EPA is punishing the consumers required to buy a fictional product instead of the imaginary producers. In a way, EPA's biofuels fantasy isn't all that dissimilar to ObamaCare, which punishes the customers (both participants and non-participants) with outrageous taxes. We can only guess what further regulatory wonders the EPA will inflict before the Obama regime is forced to leave office.
Around the Nation: Pennsylvania Next in Line for Right to Work
With Indiana and Michigan becoming Rust Belt success stories of throwing off the shackles of closed shops, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its Republican majority government may prove the next battleground in Big Labor's decline on the American political landscape. But the Keystone State's union culture may prove a tougher nut to crack than those of other states. Besides the obvious threats and bluster from unions that dominate the cities, a number of GOP lawmakers were beneficiaries of union contributions. And Republican Gov. Tom Corbett is reportedly "lukewarm" to the prospect of Pennsylvania's becoming a right-to-work state.
The legislators who introduced the bill tout the job growth in right-to-work states compared to those with closed shops. And the time may be ripe for applying a crippling blow to Big Labor, as only 7 percent of the private-sector workforce remains unionized. Public-sector workers now make up the vast majority of union membership in America, and it's their dollars and volunteers that now provide the political muscle behind maintaining the status quo. The two most recent state converts, though, prove that victory over the unions -- and freedom from coercion so that workers may choose to join or not -- is possible even under the most unlikely of circumstances.
Illinois Suffers Credit Tumble, Postpones Bond Sale
The state of Illinois postponed a scheduled bond sale this week after its credit rating was downgraded to among the lowest in the nation; a ranking on par with California as the two most financially troubled in the union. Big Labor played a hand in this fiscal debacle. "Our problem," said Illinois Treasurer Dan Rutherford, "is that we have not substantively and fairly addressed the state public pension issue." The credit downgrade will cost the state's already-overburdened taxpayers an additional $95 million in interest on the $500 million bond sale.
While the purpose of the bond sale was financing school construction and transportation projects, it's the $96.8 billion of unfunded pension liabilities that concerns those who grade the state's financial situation. Moreover, the state has $9 billion in unpaid bills, according to state Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka.
Even though Democrats rammed through a "temporary" income tax increase in 2011, its expiration in 2015 looks more and more doubtful as the state searches for ways to quench its thirst for our money. Illinois has lived on a virtual credit card for decades, using bonds to put off making difficult choices required in the private sector. Current Gov. Pat Quinn and his predecessor Rod Blagojevich -- both Democrats, of course -- issued pension bonds, selling $15 billion worth of debt rather than addressing the issue with reforms.
Security
Kerry Confirmed, Hagel Next
John Kerry once testified that U.S. soldiers had "raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan," among other horrific crimes. That was, of course, in 1971 after his return from an unusually brief seven-month tour in Vietnam. True to form, Kerry in 2005 chastised American soldiers for "going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, women." We have long called for him to be prosecuted for acts of treason.
Apparently, however, time really does heal all wounds, because this week the Senate confirmed Kerry as the next secretary of state by a jaw-dropping 94-3 vote. The three Republicans who opposed were John Cornyn and Ted Cruz of Texas, and Oklahoma's James Inhofe. Kerry promised to implement "President Obama's vision for the world," which is just one more reason why he should have been rejected.
To take Kerry's place in the Senate, Massachusetts Democrat Gov. Deval Patrick tapped his own former chief of staff, Mo Cowan, for the job. Cowan will serve as a placeholder until the special election in June. Cowan is black, so is he just a "token," or does that label apply only to black Republican senators like South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott? That's a rhetorical question, of course, but, obviously, Democrats couldn't allow the only black senator to be a Tea Party conservative.
The other cabinet position to be filled soon is secretary of defense, for which Obama nominated former Sen. Chuck Hagel. The hearing was little short of a disaster. Hagel seemed woefully unprepared to deal with questions about his previous statements on, for example, Israel and the "Jewish lobby," and he gave flat-out wrong answers about administration policy on major issues like Iran's nuclear program.
More to the point, Obama means to take the military down several pegs, and Hagel might be just the man to do it. The Army will bear the brunt of budget cuts, losing at least 75,000 soldiers and much equipment. The Marines will also face significant troop cuts. The Navy is coping with its smallest fleet since 1916, and the Air Force has never flown older planes. Hagel has described the military as "bloated," so it's unlikely he'll do anything to correct these problems. While Obama crows that a "decade of war is ending," he should use the opportunity to retool and upgrade our fighting forces, not further decimate them.
Warfront With Jihadistan: West Expands African Involvement
As Barack Obama's "decade of war" continues to end only in his mind, reality continues to intrude. France's drive against Islamists in Mali continues, and it appears that the French and their African allies are making significant gains. On Monday, French troops liberated the city of Timbuktu from the Islamist terrorists and Touareg rebels who have controlled the fabled city for 10 months. With this victory in hand, France may reduce some of its offensive operations. President François Hollande said that French troops might stop their northward advance, leaving their African allies to pursue the Islamists into their bases in the northern desert.
Interestingly, the U.S. military will provide aerial refueling for French attack jets and also plans to build a new unmanned drone base in Africa, allowing an expanded surveillance and strike capability against al-Qa'ida fighters and other militants in northern Mali. A U.S. defense official said three U.S. KC-135 tankers flying out of Morón Air Base, Spain, would provide the aerial refueling to French aircraft, including tactical jets and bombers. This operation is expected to last months. And two Obama regime officials said the Pentagon is eyeing the West African country of Niger as a possible Predator drone base. The drones would supposedly be unarmed, but they could be quickly armed if required. Of course, this development would substantially escalate America's involvement in the African war, coming soon after Obama declared an "end to war" in his inaugural drone last week. All of this looks suspiciously like an expansion of the same War on Terror that Obama and his leftist cadres have denounced almost from the start.
Culture
The 'Gay Leaders Ban'
An enterprising employee of the Boy Scouts of America leaked a memo regarding a proposal to abandon the organization's proscription on homosexuals serving in leadership positions. It is our assumption that leak was an end-run around a couple of board members who were going to bushwhack the national board with this proposal at their meeting next week. Needless to say, that memo set off a firestorm of protest from tens of thousands of rank-and-file BSA members and leaders from across the country.
Two members of the national board, James Turley (CEO of Ernst & Young) and Randall Stephenson (CEO of AT&T who is slated to become president of the BSA national board), are leading the assault against the current policy prohibiting homosexuals from serving in leadership roles.
These wealthy corporate executives appear to be more interested in dictating BSA policy that comports with their corporate bottom line than with the mission of Scouting. Clearly they are completely out of touch with the grassroots BSA membership across the nation.
Our publisher, Mark Alexander, is both a Scoutmaster and member of his regional Executive Council. He is also the father of an Eagle Scout, and a younger son progressing toward the same rank. Responding to the controversy, Alexander wrote a "Letter to an Eagle Scout," addressing objections to the proposed policy raised by his son, now a Cadet at the Air Force Academy. That letter has been circulated to the BSA national board and staff, and published across the nation. You can read it here.
Climate Change This Week: Natural Fluctuations
"Is global warming less extreme than feared?" That's the question ecofascists now face after another embarrassing blow this week. The results of a Norwegian research project show that land and ocean temperatures have flattened since 2000. In stark contrast to predictions by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Norwegian study now projects temperatures to rise by 1.9 degrees Celsius by 2050 -- 1.1 degrees below the IPCC's forecast of 3 degrees.
So what's their reasoning for the change? "The Earth's mean temperature rose sharply during the 1990s," says University of Oslo professor and project manager Terje Berntsen. "This may have caused us to overestimate climate sensitivity. We are most likely witnessing natural fluctuations in the climate system -- changes that can occur over several decades -- and which are coming on top of a long-term warming." How about that -- natural fluctuations.
Of course, the Norwegians' paper predictably discusses the complexity of manmade emissions and the challenge it presents in accurately predicting global warming. But the message here is simple: The writing on the wall is so blatantly obvious now that greenies should have no choice but to soften their projections of doom and gloom. But don't expect that to stop Barack Obama from calling for more draconian energy and economic measures. After all, we don't want to "betray our children and future generations." Forward!
Village Academic Curriculum: School Choice Week
The third annual School Choice Week took place this week, sparking thousands of events for parents, students, teachers and other choice advocates. School Choice Week also celebrates the many successes of school choice programs, most notably equalizing the playing field for children of low-income families. No surprise, there were no congratulations from the White House; in fact, there was no comment at all, for the very simple reason that school choice is historically part of the conservative agenda. And we thought leftists were all about "choice."
School choice is a beacon of hope in an education system that has continued to decline. For example, in both Washington, DC, and Milwaukee, students who participate in school programs are far more likely to graduate than their public school peers. Studies also show that their parents are far more satisfied with their children's education when they've had a say in how and where that education takes place. In fact, a major tenet of the school choice philosophy is to give voice to parental concerns and priorities, things normally proscribed by the educational bureaucracy. School choice's success, however, has made it a target of those on the Left who prefer to kowtow to teachers unions and fan the flames of class warfare. Teachers' unions give an awful lot of cash to Democrats, in large part to prevent choice and better education.
And Last...
Everything is racist. The sooner we learn that, the better off we'll be, apparently. To illustrate sinister racism in the classroom, a Portland, Oregon, school administrator at a majority-minority district made an example of a lesson taught by a teacher involving a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. "What about Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches?" she asked. "Another way would be to say: 'Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, do you have anything like that?' Let them tell you. Maybe they eat torta. Or pita." The administrator is thus leading a re-education camp for teachers to disabuse them of their "white privilege" and help minority students achieve more.
Meanwhile, a Volkswagen ad for the upcoming Super Bowl has the Professionally Aggrieved seeing spots. The ad features a white guy from Minnesota encouraging his co-workers to lighten up and be happy -- all with a Jamaican accent. We come to find out that this is thanks to his Volkswagen, and the cheer spreads when he gives others a ride. Nothing brings out your inner Jamaican like German engineering. But we fail to see the racism here. Of course, if he'd been eating a peanut butter and jelly sandwich...
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
154 Comments
wjm in Colorado
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:13 AM
So here we are, 27 years later, hearing the same promises; insanity, doing the same thing and expecting different results. The marxist statist traitors are only expanding their base, more useful idiots of the collective, voting for free stuff, and getting indoctrinated at the public school child abuse programming centers.
wjm in Colorado
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:16 AM
Whats next for Scouting? Merit badges for fashion or hairdressing? Keep the sodomites out of the Boy Scouts, or end the program. Earnst and Young and AT&T might warrant boycotting should they persue this misadventure.
Mark Alexander in Tennessee
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 3:11 PM
By way of followup to my Letter to and Eagle Scout, I will be shocked if the national BSA board does not defeat the proposal to remove its proscription against avowed homosexuals after the massive national protest from its rank and file leaders and members. But then, as is often the case with national government, religious and civic "leadership," most are insulated from the those they, ostensibly, serve. Consequently, too often their actions are wholly inconsistent with their constituents -- on the theory that they know better than us...
Thus, if the BSA board passes this measure, and straps the responsibility for enforcing this restriction on Councils nationwide, then every Council, chartering organization, Troop, sponsor, donor, and even Scout, will become subject to being labeled "bigots" by homosexual advocates in their Council area. Even if just one homosexual protests against a Council, that will be trumpeted in the local media, and the result will be a challenge to every organizational and support level of that Council.
For the record, over the past four years, Barack Obama has been signing Eagle certificates, even though for the first three of those four years, he opposed homosexual marriage and open homosexual military service. Last year, Obama reversed his position on both counts. That leaves one to question from whom does the BSA national board take its orders...?
Some have suggested if the BSA board passes this measure to shift the burden to local Councils, Scouting as we know it will be over in a decade. I must respectfully disagree -- it will be over in a year, not ten...
Hamilton in IL
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:22 PM
Mr. Alexander,
I was under the impression that BSA Board was considering this proposal at the behest of a small cadre of the BSA's well-heeled donors. I was further assuming those donors' motivations were from a 'personal opinion' perspective. But now you seem to be saying that the Obama administration is somehow pushing those donors' buttons. Are those donors somehow getting their nuts squeezed by Obama? This would be an extremely perverse malfeasance, if true.
If this is not true, then the BSA Board should simply decline the coercive financial support of those donors, and then the BSA can shrink a little as a result of the lost revenue. Shrinking is better than dying. Or, as is often the case, interested parties will step up to make up the shortfall.
Accordingly, if the Councils think there could be some traction to your allegations, then they should immediately construct a cohesive communication network among themselves in preparation to do whatever it takes to oust the existing Board and form a new one.
BJ Cassady in Caldwell, Kansas
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:22 AM
Before getting to the illegal immigrant problem...this will mean the end of the GOP party at least as far as a presidental bid goes...forever. Also, this will ensure the treasury is kaput with handouts to the poor. We need qualified, skilled workers not welfare people who will further drain the system.
w2004r-hwha@yahoo.com in Richardson, TX
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Illegals might be offered guest worker status. But they should never be offered citizenship unless they voluntarily leave the US and apply through normal citizenship procedures. Awarding citizenship to illegal immigrants is like giving the criminal the keys to car he stole. This is nothing more than a typical democrat scam to buy more votes from another government-dependent class of citizens.
MajorStu in Peru, IN
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 2:23 PM
Ask the European social democrat countries how well their guest worker programs have worked, now that a generation or more have grown up as 2nd class citizens - recall the car fires around Paris a while back. South Africa had an effective guest worker program. They called it apartheid.
Hamilton in IL
Saturday, February 2, 2013 at 12:02 AM
I have yet to hear someone give me a cogent argument for why we need guest workers. How can it be that America, a great nation with an historically strong economy, which has lost jobs lately due to government regulations and industries getting shipped overseas, should have a problem finding American citizen workers? Could this be because we're paying American citizens not to work while we allow illegals to come in and take their jobs?
Accordingly, I'm against guest worker programs, as I'm against amnesty and a fast track to citizenship.
Obama has tried to wave his arms and gloss over the "illegals" problem by saying something like, "... the fact is that they're here". (and we can't get rid of them and we therefore have to accommodate them).
!!! Memo to Chicago's homeless: Find Obama's house and break into it. Walk in and just stay there. It may take some time but hang in there. Eventually you'll get free lodging, a job as the hired help, and a permanent address.
jbetatum in NM
Sunday, February 3, 2013 at 2:12 AM
I hate to be the one to break this news to you but, there are jobs that good old Americans will not take. One example is agriculture. A lot of the labor in agriculture is physical, smelly, demanding and no, you can't make union wages working in a small, family dairy. So yes, they get workers from other countries. I know one dairyman that has brought in workers from South America, South Africa, the Netherlands, lots of different places. They come eager to work and eager to see the US. They also come with respect for the owner and his property. They take of the equipment and the animals. And they don't quit after a week or two.
As to paying them to not work, absolutely and it's called welfare and unemployment. Where is the incentive for them to work? Yes, part of the unemployment funds are paid by the employers but I can promise you, there is no way there's enough money in the kitty from employers that pays for 52+ weeks of unemployment. The taxpayers are picking up the bulk of that one.
Skip in Seattle
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:30 AM
Perhaps it is time to pass another law that temporarily prohibits for ONE YEAR, ANY person's right to vote, if within one year of an election that person has received food 'stamps', tax money for housing assistance, or any other type of unearned assistance from the Federal Government.
Rich Ellison in Stafford, VA
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:36 AM
I wish someone could explain this to me.
Article. I. - The Legislative Branch Section 9 - Limits on Congress “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”
Doesn’t this apply to legislating amnesty for criminal invaders? By the way Section 10 prohibits the States from passing any ex post facto law.
Brian in Virginia
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 2:32 PM
I'm no lawyer, but I thought ex post facto (after the fact?) means you can't pass a law and then prosecute someone who "broke the law" before it became law. A bill of attainder is similar in that it is a legislative act that pronounces someone guilty without benefit of trial. This amnesty bill would be the opposite of that: making a currently illegal activity legal, although the basic principle is the same.
Kurtis D. Davis in Braggs, Oklahoma
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:40 AM
What would happen to the price of gasoline and other necessities, if all the people in Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, and Arkansas suddenly quit buying such vital resource, along with all others??? Think the price might go down (supply and demand)??? Well consider this---the number of illegal immigrants now approaches the combined populations of those four States mentioned. Think illegal immigration does not get in your pocket???
John in Wichita Falls Texas
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:46 AM
My wife came to the U.S. on a Fiance VISA. We married and followed all of the rules. This process cost me thousands of dollars which I gladly paid so her immigration was legal. After we were married I brought her children to the US so our family could be complete. I have followed the rules and waited for the years it has taken this process which still isn't complete yet. The thought that illegals will get priority over our legel process burns me up.
Will I get a refund for all the time and money I have paid following the law?
Rich Ellison in Stafford, VA
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM
If you switch to the democratic party I’m sure they will get you a refund. Buying votes is their specialty.
Dennis Anderson in Tucson
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 2:56 PM
So true!
Senator_Blutarsky in Texas
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 5:22 PM
so things get righteous under RepubliCON administrations?
Please show me where.
That is a problem for lemmings " Repube=good, Dim=bad"
Hate to tell ya bucko, but both SUCK.
Vote fraud has been equally rampant in both parties, and the GLOBALIST agenda marches forward regardless of which party label, holds the White House
Rep. Wright Patman's book 'A Primer On Money', which exposed and critiqued the activities of the Federal Reserve and central bankers, remains the only government-issued publication ever officially ordered out of print from publication by the U.S. Government [after Rep. Patman died, in 1976]. Ron Paul ran for congress in 1976, determined to continue the work of Wright Patman.
"In the US today, we have in effect two governments. We have the duly constituted government, then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve, operating the money powers which are reserved to congress by the Constitution." - Rep. Wright Patman, D-TX
Hamilton in IL
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:40 PM
Senator_Blutarsky,
Which of the Founders said something to the effect that our Union will be sunk when and if those in government realize they can enrich themselves via the public purse?
Our Constitution is a wonderful document but no governmental system is any better than the angels or scoundrels who manage it.
As far as enriching themselves via the public purse, members of both parties have the same opportunity to do that. I think it's inaccurate to conclude that either, or both, parties, in toto, suck. Each politician should be evaluated individually by their records - by their statesmanlike qualities, or lack thereof.
Rifleman in Nawth Jawja
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:48 AM
In 1908, at the age of 15, my Dad arrived at Ellis Island from a tiny, Greek, Eastern Mediterranean island, having crossed the Med and the Atlantic alone in "Steerage Class" -- as they thcalled the fusty belly of that ship then.
He was one of 2,000,000 immigrants who had to pass muster at Ellis Island that year.
He spoke but one sentence of English.
He took jobs washing dishes; showed silent, black-and-white films at night in a local theater while he studied his texts; graduated from the "Gymnasium," as they called it then; gained entry into the University of Louisville Dental College and graduated in 1924.
He learned about The Dollar and its power; learned about self-reliance applied and rewarded by this Nation; understood The Promise of America's Golden Door; understood the absolute necessity for Law.
He practiced for 55 years, sent money back to his relatives; matriculated my two sisters and me through college; established a financial, spiritual and personal legacy for the three of us and for our seven children and his nine great-grandchildren.
He memorized the letters of The Founders; understood what Jefferson and his peers gave to the world; quoted freely from Shakespeare, from both the Greek and English Testaments.
He loved this nation with a passion bordering on the religious and often told me that this Nation was God's gift to humanity; that it must be zealously and fiercely defended and guarded.
Decades later, his powder-blue eyes would tear up and memories of his first glimpse of Lady Liberty standing in New York harbor with her torch held high.
Only in America, he taught us, was The Promise of men's freedom given.
Only in America, could men be truly free -- if they chose to be so. Hailing from the Old World, Dad had seen what always happens when the Law degenerates into a series of fluctuating and unpredictable rules and directives.
Dad loved this Nation and its Constitution because that Document was an ideal blending of individual initiative tempered by Law.
So long as it is obeyed, that Document will remain protection for and of Freedom.
So long as it is obeyed.
Billy in ILL
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 1:32 PM
Amen!
TRW in Redwood City
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 1:54 PM
my grand parents didn't speak their native languages in front of the kids, unless they were fighting, as they were AMERICANS NOW!!!!
Tarymelon in Il
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Mine, too! My mom and dad spoke czech to them,but not to us for the same reason. This is America!
John in Texas
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM
My Father made sure we didn't lose our native language of Afrikaans when he brought our family to America. As we naturally learned English here, he saw to it that we kept both languages distinct and didn't blur them together when we spoke. Knowing both of these tongues has helped me innumerable times in my life, and I always know that if I return to South Africa, I will still be able to speak with all of my relatives there. I don't see any value in throwing away your first language unless you are unable to learn English without doing so.
Senator_Blutarsky in Texas
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 5:25 PM
Obeyed.............how naive`
Civic Belief #1: The Congress was given few specific powers. All else was left to the States and to the people under the 10th Amendment. Ample checks and balances protect the Republic from federal tyranny.
Civic Belief #2: The Federal Government has become so powerful only because despotic officials have overstepped their strict, constitutional bounds.
If #1 is true, then how did #2 happen?
"The Constitution has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it". Lysander Spooner, No Treason (1870)
Think about that. By either the Constitution's purposeful design or by its unintentional weakness, we suffer under a federal colossus which takes a third of our lives and regulates everything from alfalfa to xylophones. This is Freedom? So, why aren't Americans free? Perhaps we weren't really meant to be!
Quit worshipping parchment - you were sold out long ago
Gary White in Kellogg, Iowa
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Rubio is just another in the long line of Rhino's wanting to be President. He will cave and say it's not my fault, we just have to do something and another 20 million welfare recipients will magically appear. Oh but the economy disappears and the government collapses and people walk off the job because the paper fiat currency will no longer purchase anything. Does anyone recall Wiemar Germany or Argentine or Confederate funny money . When their is no backing all paper fiat currency eventually collapses.
Ralph Sorrell in Freeport, Fl
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:49 AM
We do not "need" comprehensive reform. What would be simplist and untimately supported by Republicans but not the Democrats, would be a guest worker program. Pass this in the House and watch the Senators squirm!
JtC in TX
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:50 AM
Kery confirmed. The limp-di*k "republicans" strike again . . .
JtC in TX
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Kerry. Sorry (not to him, to my fellow patriots).
Kathy in AZ
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:50 AM
Everything this gang of 8 is telling us is lies, lies, lies - business as usual in DC. As usual the rule of law means nothing since they are the ones who pick and choose which ones get enforced. We are the slaves and they are the masters and play by their own rules.
Rifleman in Nawth Jawja
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Biden said that lives can be saved by curbing firearms without restricting the right to bear arms.
-- from 1984:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously and accepting both of them...To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies – all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink, it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth."
Only to Obama, Biden and the Democrats is it possible to restrict the Second Amendment without restricting it.
OregonBuzz in Oregon
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Close the border. Enforce the law as it stands. Make corrections or additions to the existing laws as needed. If you are here illegally, without a visa you will be sent home and you may apply for citizenship through the channels provided in existing law. Anything else just reaffirms the existence of the Democrat voter entry portal to the south.