Monday Brief
The Firearms Equality Movement
The Foundation
"[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." --Tench Coxe
Inspiration

"[A] growing number of firearm companies have suspended the sale of guns to states, counties, cities and municipalities that restrict their citizens' rights to own them. In just two weeks, the number of companies participating in what has been named the 'Firearms Equality Movement,' has more than tripled from 34 companies to 118. The Police Loophole lists every company and links to the statements that each has released regarding their new policies. Wilson Combat, a custom pistol manufacturer located in Berryville, Arkansas, joined the movement on February 28 stating the following: 'Wilson Combat will no longer provide any products or services to any State Government imposing legislation that infringes on the second amendment rights of its law abiding citizens. This includes any Law Enforcement Department, Law Enforcement Officers, or any State Government Entity or Employee of such an entity. This also applies to any local municipality imposing such infringements. ... Wilson Combat will in NO way support the government of these states or their anti-gun agenda that only limits the rights of law-abiding citizens. Wilson Combat will continue to supply any product and/or service they can legally sell in these states to all non-government affiliated citizens.'" --CNS News' Gregory Gwyn-Williams Jr.
Re: The Left
"The House Republican Study Committee (RSC) has launched a Second Amendment Initiative for the 113th Congress under the leadership of Indiana Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Third District) to counter ... President Barack Obama's 'out-of-touch agenda' on gun control. In a press release, RSC Chairman Rep. Steve Scalise (R-Indiana) asserted that the president's 'radical anti-gun agenda is a threat to our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.' ... The president ... has reined in major gun prohibition groups to concentrate on pushing new measures, including so-called 'universal background checks' and a ban on so-called 'assault weapons' and their original capacity magazines. ... In exchange for what amounts to obedience to the Obama agenda, these groups, Politico reported, have 'a voice in the discussions, a role in whatever final agreement is made and weekly meetings at the White House.' ... But House Republicans may stand in the way with this newly-created Second Amendment Initiative. 'As the President continues his aggressive gun control campaign,' Rep. Stutzman said in a statement, 'Republicans need to stand and defend our right to bear arms now more than ever. ... The RSC's Second Amendment Initiative will help equip conservatives in Congress to defeat the President's crusade for ineffective and unconstitutional gun controls.'" --author and gun-rights advocate Dave Workman
Government
"Back in the Nineties, everyone was worried about militias and survivalists, who lived in what were invariably described as 'compounds,' and not in the Kennedys-at-Hyannis sense. And, every so often, one of these compound-dwellers would find himself besieged by a great tide of federal alphabet soup, agents from the DEA, ATF, FBI and maybe even RRB. There was a guy named Randy Weaver, who lost his wife, son and dog to the guns of federal agents, was charged and acquitted in the murder of a deputy marshal and wound up getting a multimillion dollar settlement from the Department of Justice. Before he zipped his lips on grounds of self-incrimination, the man who wounded Weaver and killed his wife, an FBI agent named Lon Horiuchi, testified that he opened fire because he thought the Weavers were about to fire on a surveillance helicopter. When you consider the resources brought to bear against a nobody like Randy Weaver for no rational purpose, is it really so 'far-fetched' to foresee the Department of Justice deploying drones to the Ruby Ridges and Wacos of the 2020s? ... In the Droneworld we have built for the 'war on terror,' we can't see the forest because we're busy tracking every spindly sapling. When the same philosophy is applied on the home front, it will not be pretty." --columnist Mark Steyn
Essential Liberty
"Anonymous administration insiders claim that the president personally approves every name on the White House kill list. According to the tortured language of an undated 16-page Justice Department white paper that was leaked, 'it would be lawful for the United States to conduct a lethal operation outside the United States against a U.S. citizen who is a senior, operational leader of al-Qa'ida or an associated force of al-Qa'ida without violating the Constitution.' ... Most troubling, the white paper reduces due process to a determination made by 'an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government ... that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States.' Though the document lists other restrictions -- e.g., capture must be infeasible -- and purports to limit 'lethal operations' against American citizens to those involved with al-Qaida 'in a foreign country,' it does not define 'imminent threat' and is silent about killing citizens here at home. In short, it raises more questions than it answers. What about American citizens, overseas or here, believed to be affiliated with other threatening organizations besides al-Qaida -- such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Jihad? Who decides whether capture is feasible or not? Do we really want to establish a precedent that an American president or any 'informed, high-level official of the U.S. government' can serve as chief prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner for American citizens? If so, who will hold him or her accountable?" --columnist Oliver North
Opinion in Brief
"The genius of Rand Paul's [filibuster] effort was similar to the partial-birth abortion fight -- it focused on a narrow, rare circumstance so outlandish that supporting it marks you as a kook. That only works, of course, if your opponents stick to their outlandish position -- that, for instance, it's okay to deliver a full-term baby backwards, then crack its skull open and vacuum out its brain. The administration walked right into this problem when Eric Holder repeatedly refused to say the president was prohibited by the Constitution from assassinating Americans in the United States when there was no attack imminent. Unlike the partial-birth abortion issue, the White House has finally conceded the point, but the political damage to Obama has been done. And the filibuster's energizing and uniting effect for conservatives and libertarians is also a fact. People who Stand with Rand will disagree -- among themselves and even with the senator -- about many of the specifics of our policy on drones. I, for one, think Awlaki had it coming and if there's any more like him hiding in Yemen or elsewhere, kill them too. But the Senate, or part of it at least, has finally stood up and said there really is a limit to a president's power -- that we're still a republic, not a principate." --National Review's Mark Krikorian
The Gipper
"I think all of us are agreed that war is probably man's greatest stupidity and I think peace is the dream that lives in the heart of everyone wherever he may be in the world, but unfortunately, unlike a family quarrel, it doesn't take two to make a war. It only takes one, unless the other one is prepared to surrender at the first hint of force." --Ronald Reagan
For the Record
"One thing nearly everybody agrees upon is that the 'sequester' is a silly sideshow to the real challenge facing America: unsustainable spending on entitlements. ... The system we are trying to perpetuate was created for the explicit benefit of the so-called greatest generation, the most coddled and cared for cohort in American history. I don't mean to belittle or demean the heroic efforts and sacrifices of those who served in World War II. But the idea that a whole generation deserves credit for what only some did is little more than an attempt to buy glory on the cheap. One of the egalitarian precepts that all Americans are supposed to subscribe to is the idea that one citizen isn't more worthy than another, simply by accident of birth. If you stormed the beaches of Normandy, you are due praise and honor. If you were simply born the same year as those who stormed the beaches, you're no more deserving of praise than someone born of any other generation. ... I have neither the space nor the inclination to pronounce on what was good or bad about all this. But as Washington grapples with the legacy costs of the 'greatest generation' ... it is at least worth recognizing that the government and the culture designed to benefit one generation has come at the cost of those that come after it." --columnist Jonah Goldberg

Political Futures
"Barack Obama knows how to do one thing: elect Barack Obama to public office. ... Obama certainly doesn't know how to govern effectively; take away a Congress that will rubber-stamp the Democratic agenda and he flails about. He's so bad at this, in fact, that when confronted with a situation where all he had to do was do nothing to fulfill a campaign promise (the tax cuts) we somehow ended up with a situation where Obama gave in on 98% of those tax cuts and voluntarily signed up to take the blame for the AMT fix. In short: Obama was woefully unprepared for the Presidency, and he hasn't really spent the last four years trying to catch up. Instead, he goes from situation to situation either trying to recast the problem in ways that he does have some skill in (permanent campaigning for office), or else... flail about on the scene while hitting people's buttons quickly and/or at random, in the hopes that eventually the laws of probability will allow him to bull on through anyway." --Hot Air's Allahpundit
Reader Comments
"Obama's 'Republican Sequester' 2014 Endgame was an excellent column and right on the money. I agree with everything Mark Alexander stated including going on the offensive. Each and every so-called sequester action should have a response from Congress. This should be a PR nightmare for the POTUS and Democrats if done right. That includes bills to actually cut what should have been cut instead of letting the POTUS do so." --David in Lonsdale, Minnesota
"Mark, I fear we've passed a tipping point. I fear that we have too many 'useful idiots' on the 'federal plantation' living amongst us which may prevent tipping the scale back in favor or Liberty and Rule of Law. We must trumpet our horns and clash our cymbals. We can no longer be the 'silent majority' because I fear we are no longer a majority. We need to be a 'squeaky wheel' and pursue the 'grease.' We must prevail or die trying. In the words of Samuel Adams, 'If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom -- go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!'" --Mike in People's Republic of Maryland
"Mark Alexander's analysis of the Obama strategy for the sequester is correct. The Republicans are continually on the defensive. They must turn the tables. They must take credit now for the stock market records, any increase in GDP, any drop in unemployment, and any other good news that comes along. It should all be because they stood up and delivered spending cuts when the president did not want them. They should also be on the offensive for more cuts, and making the right cuts. Don't let the president pick and choose which cuts he makes to make the sequester look like a bad thing. You mentioned some cuts to his use of Air Force One and the like. Yes, do those kind of things; lots of those kind of things. Jam the airwaves with action items and horn blowing." --Kent in Cuba, Missouri
"Regarding Friday's Digest and government ammunition purchases, it seems pretty clear to me that this is an attempt to control supply by buying up as much available capacity as possible. It's gun control by other means. They really are trying everything in their power to enact that agenda, even if (I hope) it can't pass through more appropriate legislative channels." --Michael in Knoxville, Tennessee
"I understand the requirement that armed federal officials must have so many rounds per month used at the practice range. This makes sense to me. What I do not understand is why these rounds are new and not significantly cheaper reloads. And why all the hollow-point rounds?" --Wardeman in Mid West
The Last Word
"Joshua Welch -- a boy, wouldn't you know; no good can come of these turbulent creatures -- who is 7, was suspended from second grade in Maryland's Anne Arundel County last week because of his 'Pop-Tart pistol.' While eating a rectangular fruit-filled sugary something -- nutritionist Michelle Obama probably disapproves of it, and don't let Michael Bloomberg get started -- Joshua tried biting it into the shape of a mountain, but decided it looked more like a gun. So with gender-specific perversity he did the natural thing. He said, 'Bang, bang.' ... The [school] said 'one of our students used food to make inappropriate gestures' and although 'no physical threats were made and no one was harmed' the code of student conduct stipulates 'appropriate consequences.' The [school's] letter, suffused with the therapeutic ethic, suggested that parents help their children 'share their feelings' about all this. It also said the school counselor is available, presumably to cope with Post-Pastry Trauma Syndrome. ... Government is failing spectacularly at its core functions, such as budgeting and educating. Yet it continues to multiply its peripheral and esoteric responsibilities, tasks that require it to do things for which it has no aptitude, such as thinking and making common-sense judgments. Government nowadays is not just embarrassing, it is -- let us not mince words -- inappropriate." --columnist George Will
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
177 Comments
LEO in Pensacola
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM
Now if we can only get the biggest two/three to join in.
Sam in Sarepta, LA
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM
Yes .. ALL firearms AND ammunition manufacturers get on the list. Even more important, stop selling to ALL state and federal agencies .. make the only exceptions, our military and we civilians ...
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 7:28 PM
Clearly, Sam, you are not a firearms manufacturer being offered a government contract to produce weapons or ammunition at inflated prices with taxpayer dollars!
freedixie in Tulsa, OK
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:10 AM
What these gun and ammo manufacturers also need to do is include the federal government's various agencies on their lists. The Feds have purchased about 1.6 billion rounds of ammo recently. Cut them off and let us buy what we need. I don't think the ammo companies are participating in this move, but they should.
CWS fan in Park Ridge, IL
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM
Ammo and firearm companies want to stay in business. They need revenue to do this. You are dreaming if you think that they would refuse these high volume transactions.
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:48 PM
"You are dreaming if you think that they would refuse these high volume transactions."
You are delusional if you think for a minute that they would turn down these incredibly lucrative government contracts (using YOUR money of course ;-)
MAH in wisconsin
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 9:28 AM
Don't the Feds also regulate through licensing and permits the manufacture and sale of ammo?
Tina in Sugar Land, Texas
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:11 AM
Need your help, please. Over the weekend, a story surfaced on Facebook. The story was from the dufflebag blog site - evidently a satirical site primarily. "News" was that nidal hassan (murderer of 14 people at Ft. Hood in Nov. 2009) had been promoted by the Army to the rank of LTC. Can anyone at the Patriot Post confirm? I don't understand why anyone would be humorous or satirical about such a tragedy. I am calling my elected officials in DC to try to get to the bottom of this. If anyone at Patriot Post can investigate, I'd appreciate it.
Faith Wooldridge in Il.
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM
As of Dec. 12, 2012 The New York Times was still listing him as Major. He is still awaiting Court Martial.
Craig in Emeryville
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:53 AM
I highly recommend snopes.com as a resource to do your own research of odd things that show up in forwarded emails or Facebook posts.
In this case, for example, there's no truth to the rumor at all. It was satire.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/hasan.asp
Mary in Colorado
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM
Don't believe Snopes on any issue involving the government or Obama. They are connected to Soros!
Craig in Emeryville
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 3:48 PM
Sigh. Snopes is not connected to Soros. They are very scrupulous about being politically neutral. This accusation seems to come up periodically from conspiracy theorists who aren't happy with actual evidence. They aren't funded by anything but the ads on the web site. It's a mom and pop outfit, but very honest.
If you can find actual evidence of a leftward bias on snopes, please present your evidence.
Please do use snopes before forwarding emails or facebook stories.
mark in massachusetts
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 4:24 PM
A lot of people think snopes is the last word."Oh,snopes said it was true,so it has to be." Wrong! I've seen so-called true stories proven false.Don't believe everything you read.
Craig in Emeryville
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 6:15 PM
No one source should be trusted blindly, of course. But I have been part of the skeptical movement for years, and was using Snopes long before that. I have yet to find them substantially wrong on anything. They are very careful.
If you have evidence of something they were wrong about, please present it. Vague accusations are not evidence.
MAH in wisconsin
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 9:34 AM
'Conspiracy Theorists' are also 'informed voters', as opposed to 'low-information voters'. At least people are questioning what they hear and read. I heard the same theory but am not convinced Soros isn't behind Snopes. A 'Mom and Pop' debunking network sounds as goofy as Soros backing a major internet information site.
Craig in Emeryville
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM
Informed voters are people who study the issues. Conspiracy theorists are people who tend to see dark forces behind ordinary events. They often believe the government is eerily competent at keeping impossible secrets. They include the 911 Truthers, those who believe in FEMA death camps, the shooter on the Grassy Knoll, a shadow government run by the Illuminati and/or the Rotschilds, or even that the government is hiding information about space aliens in order to keep us hooked on oil.
It's all nonsense on stilts, and so is the rumor that Snopes is controlled by George Soros. If you believe that it is, in the complete absence of any evidence, you are behaving as a conspiracy theorist, not an informed voter.
I'll note that nobody has posted a single example of them being wrong, or even biased, about anything. I'm not saying it couldn't happen, but that I've never found them wrong about any of the hundreds or perhaps thousands of things I've checked on their site.
wjm in Colorado
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM
I would like you to explain the counterfeit social security number used by the fraud in the White House. There is no way that someone born in Hawaii could have that number, issued in another state, and Peviously issued to another person, something that has NEVER happened before. That is a FACT JACK!
Craig in Emeryville
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Oh, yeah. And Birthers. Thanks for the reminder of another set of conspiracy theorists.
The easy way to spot a conspiracy theorist is that they will never change their minds based on evidence. Instead they will make up evidence, use special pleading, or confirmation bias to shore up their belief. At this point anybody who thinks Obama wasn't born in Hawaii is simply ignoring the data.
Which, of course, plays right into Obama's hands. He and his supporters can (rightly) dismiss the Birthers as nuts, and thus distract from the actual damage being done by his policies and incompetence. While you sniff around made-up Social Security numbers he's busy wrecking the country.
I'm sure he appreciates your help.
bill in ohio
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM
As far as FEMA camps, I don't believe in FEMA "DEATH" camps, but I have seen documented evidence of FEMA and Homeland Security setting up camps and taking over control of a closed shopping mall, The video evidence of this is available online. When the Homeland Security personnel were approached and asked what they were taking into the closed shopping mall, they got very defensive and threatened the reporters with arrest if they didn't clear the area. Camps ARE being set up. We can't say with any certainty what they are being set up for, but they do exist. My guess would be that they're for eventual use if American citizens get to pushy about the LAW. Barack Obama has been held above the law by his supporters since day one. He's NOT Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President because he's NOT a "Natural Born Citizen" as required by the Constitution. This has no bearing on whether he was born in Hawaii or not. The definition of "Natural Born Citizen" is a person who was born to TWO parents who were BOTH American citizens. The founders required this for a very important reason: to keep anyone out of power who might not have the best interests of the United States at heart. This is a fact. Obama cannot legally hold the office. However, he's been ignoring federal law, house rules, subpeonas, Senate rules, and states' rights since day one, with complete impunity. His supporters hold him above the law.
Craig in Emeryville
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM
Uh huh. Please show documentation or evidence for any of the above claims, including your definition of "natural born citizen". Note that "there is video on line" is not evidence. Links to credible video might be.
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 7:31 PM
"At this point anybody who thinks Obama wasn't born in Hawaii is simply ignoring the data."
What data? Citation please!
Craig in Emeryville
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 7:53 PM
How about a birth certificate?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp
If a birth certificate isn't enough for you, you're a conspiracy theorist.
Birthers are wasting their time, and making conservatives look stupid. Besides, the turkey is already in his second administration. How about concentrating on repealing Obamacare and reining in spending rather than whining about stupid conspiracy theories?
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 8:09 PM
OK, how about Natural Born Citizen?
Was his father a United States Citizen?
Craig in Emeryville
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 11:56 PM
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause
Do note that "natural born citizen" is not defined in the constitution. The definition you seem to be hinting at and/or hunting for is one possible opinion, but even the Supremes haven't weighed in on that.
You really want to make birtherism your hobby horse? What a waste of time. Have fun helping Obama, because that's all you're doing with this.
Craig in Emeryville, CA
Tuesday, March 19, 2013 at 1:07 PM
For any still clinging to the notion that Snopes is run by Soros or has a left-wing bias:
http://skeptoid.com/blog/2013/03/16/trusting-the-internet/
WCB in Phoenix, MD
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:40 PM
The site in question is a satire site. The story is false. The officers named do not exist. No worries. The Army would not promote an officer who is awaiting trial. The board would never consider him. Not even the ARMY is that screwed up. ;-) (Just a little ribbing from a former rust picker)
tdrag in North Augusta, SC
Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 5:10 PM
It wouldn't surprise you, would it?
Mephisto in Las Vegas NV
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM
Not selling firearms to guv't entities is all well and good, but what about ammunition? It's very expensive now for civilians to find ammunition for their shotguns, handguns and rifles because the guv't has bought most of it. Why not stop selling ammunition that is more 'people' oriented to the guv't, also.
Military contracts, however, would be exempt.
bill in ohio
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 1:00 PM
It's not just the government buying up all the ammo. Whenever ammo becomes available, the people (in Ohio at least) are buying it as fast as they can and hoarding it, wisely. I urge everyone who cares about liberty to buy guns and ammo and to learn handloading, because it may very well come down to that. This Commie in power does NOT have our best interests at heart. Why else would he provide the terrorist group the "Muslim Brotherhood" with tanks and F-16 fighter jets?
Robert Bell in Florida
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:20 AM
Wilson Combat,I applaud you. Thank-You for taking a stand against anti SECOND AMENDMENT Politicians. I for one salute you and hope more companies will join you. Bravo!
mcknife in Washington State
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:28 AM
I think it is now time for all firearms and ammunition manufacturers to stop selling to the Federal Government as well. 1 Billion cartridges to DHS SSA and the USFS is a bit unnerving!
Craig in Emeryville
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Folks, don't panic about those ammo purchases. When you divide them out among the number of officers it adds up to a decent weekend at the range. For once the government was saving us some money by buying in bulk for a discount.
A better question is why the Department of Education needs armed officers. (Or needs to exist at all.)
Hamilton in IL
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Craig,
I think you're being a bit naive if you think the government is looking out for our budget and trying to save us money.
The government virtually always buys in bulk, so these recent purchases are no different.
The related article in the previous Patriot Post said, "The DHS's order is expected to last for at least five years, and it was placed up front primarily as a cost-saving measure." The real question here is how does this add up as a cost-saving measure when the government is buying ammo in large quantities at a time when we have ammo shortages and prices are high?
Sandra in CA
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 2:50 PM
And why hollow point? This bullet was not made for target practice but for killing men.
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM
In fact, Sandra, the hollow point bullet is banned by the Geneva Convention as "unsuitable" for war. How is it then that the United States government agencies have ordered over 2 Billion bullets for use "internally"?
tdrag in North Augusta, SC
Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 5:16 PM
Sandra, all police agencies in the US use hollow point ammo because the bullets stay in the intended target. Full Metal Jacket rounds, as used by the military, will penetrate a human body and possibly hit an innocent bystander. Also, a person hit by an FMJ round is not always disabled or killed when the round passes through their body and can keep attacking. Hollow points are designed to "bloom" when they hit a human thus causing more damage internally leading to quicker death.
Kathy in WTexas
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:02 PM
I was just about to say the same thing! Those companies with the Federal contracts are the ones who need to stop selling. Let the people buy the ammo, not the feds. At least make it a fair fight.
MAH in wisconsin
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 9:40 AM
I, for one, wouldn't mind paying a higher price for ammo if I knew it was because we citizens were being offered unlimited purchases as a priority over 'administrative-based' federal agencies and their contracts.
Senator-Blutarsky in Texas
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM
That is the core issue........the rest is well-intended showboating, IMO
But 'twill never happen...................the big boys are corporate animals and will not turn down a mega$$$ contract
Don Griffith in Florida
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:31 AM
Makes a lot of sense to me. This may be the start of the reining in of the federal government and getting them to be more responsible to the people who pay their salary.
Hamilton in IL
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:33 AM
On Rand Paul's filibuster...
Everyone should understand and keep in mind that while the subject matter of Rand Paul's filibuster was singular, the purpose and meaning for the filibuster has a much broader scope. We're talking about the People's opposition to and fight against dangerous precedents in government abuse against us. Indeed, all our misery over big government has come from generations of bad precedent encroachments by government. Every time a bad precedent is allowed to stand, as insignificant as it may seem to be at the time, in and of itself, it chips away at our liberties, and also sets the stage for acceptance of the next encroachment. We're now suffering from the current sum total of generations of these encroachments. And the sum total of these encroachments is what comprises "big government".
Git R Dunn in Alabama
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:22 PM
". . . it chips away . . . "
PROGRESSIVE
MAH in wisconsin
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM
Interesting division among 'Republicans'; a party made up of those who are not all 'Republicans' but other patriots like Rand Paul, forced to announce their party affiliation to survive in leadership positions. Moreso today than in recent times we are in desperate need of the ability to stretch our wings without the constraints of the Republican establishment-those who brought us John McCain and Mitt Romney to run a serious campaign against Obama. The drone filibuster pushed out front some very important conservatives we need to support over the Republican establishment, who continue to living in the shadows with secret agendas and questionable affiliations across the aisle. I know this is a little off-subject but since someone else brought it up....
Hamilton in IL
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM
MAH,
I don't think you're off-subject at all, with respect to the overall political meaning of Rand Paul's filibuster. And I agree with you. The make-up of the Republican party is perhaps in an extended state of flux, lagging behind where it should be.
I think it's true that many conservatives don't fully identify with the GOP. I hate to rely on labels but to be "conservative", one really should be thinking more along Rand Paul's lines.
The Democrat party is much more united in their goals of bigger government while the Republican party seems more undecided, or less tunnel-visioned, or more willing to compromise - however you want to describe it.
And this is the lagging state of flux: If conservatives want conservatism in a party, as a directly opposing force against the Democrat liberalism, they either need to wait for the Republican party to evolve in that direction (if it ever does complete that metamorphosis), or they need to join the Libertarian party.
Right now, in our generation, in our ideological struggle against the big-government nanny-state, we need to push for the opposite; we need to get government out of our faces. You see the dirty little secret is that the political polar opposite to the Democrat party is actually the Libertarian party, not the GOP.
wjm in Colorado
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 12:29 PM
The old establishment RINOs need to go. When they run as Democrat Lite, they loose. Karl Rove has proven his ability to fail in that regard. If the Republicans want to remain relevant, they need to embrace the Conservative Cause and not try to negotiate with the Marxist Traitors who have taken control of the Democrat Party. McCain and Graham spoke against Paul, and exposed their own idiocy.
Barack Obama in Washington, D.C.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM
WORD
Hamilton in IL
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 10:54 PM
I just knew I was on the right track, Barack!
Thanks!
Gary Townley in Cincinnati, Ohio
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM
They should do the same thing concerning ammo!
Kurt Simmons in St. Louis, Missouri
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM
Good for the gun manufacturers for doing what the United States citizenry should have done YEARS ago. That's right, stop doing business with the governments that illegaly try to take away our rights. We should ALL be thirty years deep in a refusal to pay taxes to these usurpers. We should also not be buying the liberal-based newspapres and magazines that help the usurpers and cloud the issues. We should also be watching the major media newscasts only long enough to find out who their sponsors are so we can boycot them too.
THUMPER in FERGUS FALLS, MN
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM
Kurt, I agree with you 100% as to make things happen, just stop enabling them th monetary support. Once they don't have finances, they will listen! It was once suggested that all the states that voted Liberal be able to get only supported by their own state income! Within 2 weeks, they would be shutdown and come crying back for help to the conservative states that are the only TAX PAYERS!
Julia Berry in Dallas, TX
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:45 AM
We The People still can make an impact! Saying NO to the ones who do not uphold our Constitutional rights - the 2nd Amendment rights - is a perfect beginning! APPLAUSE!
Roger in Reno in Reno, Nevada
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Most rank and file police officers are pro 2nd amendment as am I. Photo ops with anti gun chiefs of police standing behind politicians are BS. Most, if not all chiefs of police, are appointed by the mayors of the city they represent. To keep their jobs, they must toe the line with the politically correct. My question is: are these manufacturers of firearms also denying sales to individual officers?
WCB in Phoenix, MD
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM
Sorry to say but ...YES, THEY ARE! Welcome to the no double standard zone.
Bruce in Lake Elsinore
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:47 AM
The goverments ammo suppliers is the key to making this movement work. There are none on here who would want to see our military weakend but stopping sales to all non military goverment agenceys will get someones attention.
JackBootedThug in Texas
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:48 AM
This is all well and good, and a good start. But I wonder just how much business these companies do with any state, local, or federal entities? Until the big guys (Smith&Wesson, H-K, Colt, Glock, Springfield, Kimber, etc.) take the same stand, then this action is only window dressing at best.
And as far as the Colorado situation goes...Magpul, pull up stakes and head down to Texas...we're always looking for like-minded sorts to come join us.
WCB in Phoenix, MD
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 12:48 PM
Gotta start somewhere. The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step.
Jay Davidson in Greenwood Village, CO
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 11:48 AM
I appreciate the gesture, but cops don't make policy or political decisions. How about directing the fight to those Chiefs and Sherrif's who support the Soviet Socialist Democracy of America.