The Right Opinion
Shorten the School Year
Vincent Gray, who is the mayor of Washington, D.C., which has some of the worst public schools in America, has an idea he believes will improve them: Keep children there longer.
"It is time for us to get rid of what I think is an agrarian concept," Gray told a Washington radio station this spring, "and that is the days, in the 19th century, when it was thought that children had to get home early to help out with the chores, when they had to get out of school in June and go back at the end of the summer to help out with the farming.
"Well, we are long past that era at this stage, and I think we can improve outcomes for children by expanding that," said Gray. "So, my first step is to look: Can we take a few schools, extend the day. Take a few schools, extend the year."
"We have found that school ending at 3 p.m. does not work for anyone," Gray said elsewhere, according to the Washington Informer.
He would like to see kids stuck at school as late as 5:00 p.m. -- and not so they can practice basketball or the spring play.
"By having an extended school day, we can have after-school programs that can help our students academically," the mayor said.
This is akin to deciding that since a little bit of poison has not sickened the child, perhaps a larger dose will do.
When I was in elementary school, I hated attending class. But I learned things there.
However, I did not have the misfortune of attending an inner-city government-controlled school operated by overpaid members of a teachers union. I went to a Catholic school operated by Dominican sisters.
I remember learning the multiplication tables. The sister stood at the front of the classroom with large flashcards and made us go over them and over them -- until every student knew them by heart.
We learned vocabulary and spelling the same way: rote memorization.
We sometimes learned history and social studies by outlining the textbooks -- writing out by hand the first sentence of each paragraph in the book. By the time we finished outlining a text, we knew what it said.
And we did this work in the classroom, during normal school hours, which began at 8:05 a.m. and ended at 3:00 p.m.
After that, we bolted for the door and did not look back.
We did not need vast homework assignments because we did vast amounts of work at school. That was the entire purpose of those seven hours from 8:05 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The late afternoon was well-deserved playtime.
So was summertime. Nine months in a classroom was long enough. When the days grew longer and sunnier, it was time to be outside running around in the fresh air.
We played basketball. We played football. We played hide-and-go-seek. We played with our dogs. We traded baseball cards. We walked around the neighborhood and visited with our friends.
You could do that in those days -- way back in the 1960s.
The inherent nature and learning potential of American children have not changed since then. But our society has. Today, public schools think they have better things to do than make children learn the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic by sitting them in a seat and teaching it to them. Many parents think they have better things to do than parent their own children.
Parents who like the idea of a government-run school keeping their child in class until 5:00 p.m. every day and incarcerating them in school 12 months a year are not looking for an education so much as a full-time, taxpayer-funded babysitting service.
Public school teachers are not going to get any better at teaching children that 3 times 3 is 9 and that cat is spelt c-a-t if they get nearly full-time custody of American children.
What they will have is more time to indoctrinate kids into their way of looking at life.
We need to rebuild a country where kids can safely walk around their own neighborhoods after school and play with their friends -- having learned earlier that day a sufficient additional measure of reading, writing and math. We need to rebuild a country where kids can spend the entire summer any place but in a classroom. We don't need to lengthen the school year, we need schools that are good enough to let us shorten it.
But that will not happen as long as government's role in education extends to anything beyond giving parents an unfettered choice in where their children go to school.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

10 Comments
India in GA
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 8:50 AM
I schooled my kids at home this last year through an online public school. Typically, in the online school, lessons for an elementary school student take 4 hours to complete. That includes, on a daily basis, Math, Language Arts, Science or History (on alternating days), and P.E. We have no "homework"; all of the kids' assignments are completed during our regular school day.
My state requires that kids be in school for 180 days. Based on my experience this year, (and from years past when my kids were in the local public school), that could probably be cut by at least two weeks without taking time away from lessons.
My 8-year old nieces are in school for SEVEN HOURS every day. They get 30 minutes for lunch and 30 minutes for "recess". What are they doing for all that time? Too much of the focus of the traditional public school is just herding the kids from point A to point B, with TOO LITTLE FOCUS on LEARNING!
Andy in Raleigh, NC
Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 12:41 PM
We homeschool through some easily available curricula. Didn't use the online schools yet, because we're trying to limit screen time for the kids. Kindergarden took us about 1 hr / day 1st grade about 2 hrs/day 2nd grade about 2.5-3 hrs /day. Our 7 yr old just finished 2nd grade, reads at 8th grade level, math at 6th grade level, writes at 4-5th grade level. All classwork is completed during that time. We try to spend 1-2 hrs playing outside = P.E. grin. The traditional classroom setting wastes TONS of hours, mostly on discipline, useless crap, and shuttling from place to place. We did the cost comparison with private school (2 kids school age + 1 newborn), and chose to continue homeschooling again next year.
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM
If we taught the kids instead of indoctrinating them, the future of the country wouldn't be so bleak. Liberal lemmings are marching over the cliff of Marxist Failure.
David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 1:54 PM
India in GA is right. Parents need to shorten the time their children spend in school - to zero. Performance of home schooled students on standardized tests makes this clear. And don't kid yourself - home schoolers spend far less than seven hours daily doing academic work. To accomplish this, parents must sacrifice income and all the niceties that it brings to be with their kids all day. Most aren't willing to do that, sadly.
KN in Arkansas
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 2:20 PM
"I remember learning the multiplication tables. The sister stood at the front of the classroom with large flashcards and made us go over them and over them -- until every student knew them by heart."
Ah the memories. K-12 I attended a Catholic school operated by the good Sisters of St. Joseph. Rote memorization, diagramming sentences, long division, calculating square root by hand, logarithms, proving theorems, and outling texts by hand, absolutely. And learn we did.
And the neighborhood. On any given Saturday or day of the summer I could leave the house before my parents got up and not be back until dark and they never worried a bit.
SMA - 1969
Terry Webb in PEARLAND
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 6:32 PM
Today's "educational" experience bears NO relation to our education of the "Olden Days" of 20 or 30 years ago. I retired from the private sector 8 years ago, at 58, for the sole purpose of utilizing my experience in the business world as an intermediate (7-8 grades) teacher. In my ignorance, I wanted to prepare students for secondary education, college, and beyond to the reality of the real world of private competition. As a teacher in the "barrio",I have witnessed a reluctance to become proficient in the English language because , "My parents don't speak English and my dad makes $20 and hour!". "I don';t need math because I don't use it now." "Science is hard and it makes my head hurt.". I'm not talking about the 20 to 30 percent that "get it" and have family support. I do not teach these. I'm talking about the kids that still pledge allegiance to Mexico. I will NOT GIVE UP! These kids are NOT stupid. And, I am encouraged by the kids that come back from high school to say that they are going to college. And the beat goes on.
Andy in Raleigh, NC
Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM
Keep up the good work. Wow!
Rebecca Emmons in Tulsa, OK
Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 2:21 AM
A lengthy study by the National Association of Scholars points out that the radical partisanship of our universities has led to the abandonment of rigorous education and academic training, in favor of indoctrination and "activist" training programs. Our college students are spending less time studying, doing less writing, and reading fewer academically rigorous books than any previous time in our history, and our university system has dropped from its first place ranking because of the dumbed down course offerings.
Colleges complain that high school graduates are not prepared to read, write, or analyze at a college level, but who is teaching the high school students? Who is teaching the elementary children? Graduates from education schools and other colleges. If our teachers can't teach, it is increasingly because they have not been given anything approximating an education. I don't want my children imprisoned in such a system, especially since I have my own college degree.
DM in Las Vegas
Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 7:01 AM
Public school teachers are not going to get any better at teaching children that 3 times 3 is 9 and that cat is spelt c-a-t if they get nearly full-time custody of American children.
Spelt? Seriously?
http://grammarist.com/spelling/spelled-spelt/
KarenS in CA
Saturday, June 16, 2012 at 10:11 AM
We also home school our two children and are loving it! Our 10-year-old daughter recently took her first standard test and excelled in just about every subject. Apart from the clear academic benefits, we have the opportunity to instill our morals and values, as well as encourage close relationships with each other. We get to take vacations and field trips when other children are still in school.
One comment I have for India in GA: the online home school curricula are simply "school at home." In exchange for giving parents some monetary benefits (e.g., a "free" computer, internet service, and cash for curriculum), they have all the government regulations and very little freedom.
I would encourage those who are considering online "home school" programs to consider carefully that these programs are merely extensions of the government. After you become dependent on the freebies, the government takes them away and you are stuck teaching the things that the public schools are teaching, with all of the oversight that comes with accepting public funds.