The Right Opinion
John Roberts Is a Super-Taxer
In the hours following the Supreme Court's decision to ratify Obamacare, Romney got $4.6 million in donations from 47,000 individuals. The tide is with him. The Supremes are a game-changer.
But Romney has to make the case. He needs to link the anemic jobs and economic situation to the Obamacare tax, spend and regulate fiscal drag. And he has to add to that mix the dangers to our freedoms embodied in Justice John Roberts' expansion of the power to tax our personal behavior.
Scott Rasmussen says the idea of Obamacare repeal has held steady at around 54 percent ever since its passage in March 2010. This reveals the dynamic political opportunity that Romney has. Again, it's a three-pronged attack: the anemic economy, the Obamacare costs that are stifling the economy and the John Roberts expanded power of taxation that will bring us more mandates, more entitlements and less personal freedom, all of which will further cripple the economy.
One way of looking at Roberts' slight-of-hand decision to vote in favor of Obamacare is that a tax is a tax is a tax. As a non-lawyer, I see the Roberts vote as a massive expansion of federal government taxing power. Just what we don't need.
Supply-siders like myself argue that when you tax something, you get less of it. With Roberts throwing in with the liberals on the court to expand federal tax powers, we now face the massive threat of ultra-slow economic growth in the U.S. for years to come.
The Roberts court has served up a "tax mandate" that is more powerful than the still-limited Commerce Clause regulatory mandate. Roberts has created a huge new loophole. Instead of new purchase mandates, we'll have new purchase tax mandates.
This expanded tax power could force me to eat broccoli if the government so chooses, or make me put solar panels on my home. Gov. Bobby Jindal now worries about the people who "refuse to eat tofu or refuse to drive a Chevy Volt." Not because of the Commerce Clause, but because of the new tax-mandate clause. You'll be taxed heavily if you don't do what the government wants you to do.
And don't we have enough taxes already in this country? And what about the tax threats that are coming down the road?
Repealing the Bush tax cuts and adding on the Obamacare tax hikes will produce outrageous marginal tax rates of roughly 45 percent for successful earners, dividend investors and small-business owners. In other words, European-style taxes, which suggests anemic European-style growth.
Americans for Tax Reform estimates that Obamacare contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and small businesses. Investor's Business Daily says this comes to a $675 billion tax hike over the next decade. Steve Moore of The Wall Street Journal editorial board cites Congressional Budget Office estimates that roughly 8 million (or 76 percent of) middle-class taxpayers earning less than $120,000 a year will shoulder the new Obamacare tax mandate authorized by Roberts.
And this whole panoply of Obamacare taxes is already one big drag on the economy. Just in recent days, revised gross domestic product came in at 1.9 percent, and real consumer spending was essentially flat. Job growth has slowed markedly, as have new factory orders. Economists on Wall Street are looking for only 2 percent growth this year. The Fed is so worried about the economy it might launch another counterproductive quantitative easing.
Meanwhile, health care premiums are going up, not down. Mandated one-size-fits-all health services and insurance will incentivize businesses to pay the fine and push employees into the state exchange systems. And this will drive up the subsidized entitlement even more.
The CBO now estimates that Obamacare spending will hit $1.8 trillion over the next 10 years. That's a number that started out at only half as much. But that's what happens when you install European-style entitlements. You threaten to bankrupt the nation's finances. Or you threaten to literally tax us into perpetual subpar growth and high unemployment.
And that's the case Romney has to make. But he has to hammer away, day by day. He needs to make these points if we're to end the malaise.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

14 Comments
dannyc in CA
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 1:02 AM
what does kudlow think of todays stock rally? If it was negative he would have blamed the kenyan socialist! the wingnuts will be first horse at the trough for extending medical for 26 year olds and pre esisting conditions. and I won't even get started about corporate welfare!
Ct-Tom in NC
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 8:33 AM
Congress has ALWAYS had the power to tax anything and everything. The restraint on them is that they have to face the electorate on a regular basis, and most people (so far) aren't crazy about taxes. All Roberts' ruling does is remind us that the power is with us: If you don't like the legislation, get rid of the legislators and get better ones.
The bright side: It is the beginning of the end of using the commerce clause to justify every govt. intrusion into our lives. This is a very good thing.
Now, let's get to work and throw the bums out!
Adrien Nash in Crescent City, CA
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM
You completely missed the point. There is no TAX! It is a penalty. Government may be able by contorted illegitimate logic to penalize the citizens of each and every state for what they doif it's something they should not do, but the federal government has no authority to penalize people for not doing something, for not entering into an expensive contract just because some statist political group wants them to be a part of something they don't want nor need. What next? Can the federal government penalize us for not smoking, -which reduces their cigarette taxes? Why not? They now can penalize for what you do and also for what you don't do. Either way you are their slave. How does that saddle fit you? No so comfortably? Too bad, you better get used to it because you'll be wearing it for the rest of you life, as the government rides you all the way to your grave. Thank you Big Government! Where would we be without your saddle and bridle to keep us in line and obedient to your every dictate. Excapees from Soviet tyranny must be in shock to see such totalitarianism imposed by a Court established to defend the rule of law and the principles of individual liberty, but which has not again done just the opposite.
Jim in Alabama
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 8:53 AM
"...Congressional Budget Office estimates that roughly 8 million (or 76 percent of) middle-class taxpayers earning less than $120,000 a year..." Typo ??? I bet there's more than 10 million of them...
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 11:16 AM
I suppose that the queer in the White House can tax us if we don`t all become queers.
Fed Up in Philly PA
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Our Country’s and a lone Veteran Patriot’s Obituary, June 2012
We Americans became so apathetic and squeamish, fat and lazy, caught up daily in our big screen TV's, Hollywood stars, nice cars, social media and other feel-good niceties, that in the end, we did nothing about the creep of autocratic Socialism into America.
We were all spellbound sheep following the communist’s pied-piper to our country's and constitution's demise.
Our younger generation was brain-dead, unmindful of the freedoms they lost and continued to lose after the fall of Capitalism and freedom on June 2012.
Most everyone else had cowered, secluded themselves, and accepted without a fight America’s new fate, without the will to really fight.
For me, I was getting older and tired, and was just a lone veteran and patriot who loved his country and constitution; but I could not continue to fight the monstrous dictatorial government on my own. And sadly, no one else did what was needed to reverse its devastating course.
With little support to change course, I had to ‘sign off’ once and for all. I could not do it on my own - my resistance to the policies thrust down once free American’s throats, and passed into law by the authoritarian government people elected in 2008, was just too much for one patriot to bare. I too became the “model, conforming” citizen like everyone else. I decided to live out the rest of my years the best I could for my family, until my coming passing.
At this time past, I wept for our country and its future, I weep for future generations, I weep for my children, grand-children and future generations; but I especially weep for the men and women who gave up their lives over the past 236 years, all for what we have finally become this year, 28 June 2012, a Socialist Nation.
I am hopeful a new generation reading this has woken up, recalled and contemplated what it was like to be in free-America, during past generations before freedoms stolen away, forgotten decades ago, and perhaps, just perhaps, took the courage, and ACTION, we did not to do something about it. If you haven’t, perhaps now is the time. Take matters into your own hands, for we did not, and we got what we deserved.
I tried, I really did. I am so, so sorry!
Sincerely,
Once Free-American Patriot, Veteran, Brother, and Father
Army Officer (Ret) in Kansas
Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 10:35 AM
I was on a brief overseas trip when the Supreme Court approved Obama-Care. For anyone who still holds to the ludicrous belief that electing Republican presidents matters, I point out that the deciding vote and majority opinion were by Chief Justice Roberts - a supposedly conservative jurist appointed by our most recent Republican president.
When I left the U.S. was a republic - I'm not sure what I returned to. No - that is not hyperbole.
I told my traveling companions that the U.S. was now in the same position as the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. - the year the empire was finally broken. Sure, it took a while for the whole thing to come unglued, and vestiges of the Roman Empire remain even to the present day - but just as surely as Rome fell on September 04, 476 A.D. when Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustulus, the United States of America ceased to exist as a republic on June 28, 2012, when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts deposed the United States Constitution.
This was not a "shrewd move" by Roberts. It was nothing other than the absolute victory for statism that the hard left understands it to be. Forget the crackpot rationale Roberts gave in his majority opinion - this does NOTHING to roll back the use of the Commerce Clause as a blank check for government power. The law stands - THAT is what matters. Not only did the Roberts court NOT provide any checks on the Commerce Clause (the weasel-wording in his opinion means nothing since he voted to uphold the law), but the SCOTUS gave Congress ANOTHER tool that is even more powerful - the power to create any mandate they can think of under the Tax Clause. Since the Supreme Court now considers Congress's taxing authority to be unlimited - they may mandate ANYTHING by simply "taxing" anyone who fails to comply.
To the hopelessly naive conservatives who still pin their hopes on the Republican Party: the game is over - and we lost. Pretending that this has a silver lining because it will arouse the base is as stupid as the coach of a football team down 75-0 at halftime telling his players that they're doing great because the other team will now be complacent.
I left the Republican Party years ago because they differ from the Democrats only in the pace of our destruction. As of June 28, 2012 I stand officially and finally vindicated.
sunforester in left coast
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 8:11 PM
Ct-Tom, you see Roberts' strategy too, and it is an excellent one. Roberts gave we the people the chance to redeem our mutual fate. If in November we vote for tyrants who subsequently tax us to the limit of their imaginations, then we get what we deserve. If we throw the bums out, then we ourselves must choose to empower only those who swear on their grandchildren's futures that there will be no more free rides, handouts or other similar forms of corruption that have transformed our country in the past several generations into the penultimate disaster we all face.
Roberts pulled a fast one on our political elite, and for that he has my deepest admiration and respect. By letting them have their cake today, and cutting off all chance of cake tomorrow without our consent, he has restored our freedom to choose our future. Always remember that Congress can tax us infinitely, but we hold the reins of Congress. We will now only get the government that we want. Decide carefully.
M Rick Timms, MD in Georgia
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 10:55 PM
On the one hand I think Roberts is making a point that the "power to tax" is a legitimate means for the elected government to obtain wealth from working Americans to use for purposes that the elected government deems necessary. While I would have prefferred for him to have simply ruled on the constitutionality of the mandate as an abuse of the commerce clause, and not tried to repair and massage the bill into constitutionality by "empowing" the tax authority of the Congress. Now it seems, that the Congress can make us do anything by simply "taxing" us on our failure to comply -- buy a Chevy Volt, or put up solar panels ( or at least turn over your thermostat, washer dryer, and water heater to the GE green energy control system). Be careful who we vote for! And that is the problem. Maybe Roberts has looked around and witnessed the dumbing down of a dependent America, which also seems to be acquiring the work ethic of and sense of entitlement of the European socialists. He sees the criminal neglect of our border security and the active effort to help illegals vote in this next election. He sees that this is our last chance to pull back from the brink a socialist majority.
So on the other hand, if Obama is a "tax law", it can be repealed with only 51 votes in the Senate, rather than 2/3 rds. Anyone remember how they manipulated the rules to make it a "Budget Reconciliation Bill" sense it could not pass the Senate with Scott Brown newly elected - to stop it. Funny how the Democrats haven't been able to make a budget since then!
Who knows what Roberts was thinking- but we all know what we have to do in November.
Army Officer (Ret) in Kansas
Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 1:43 PM
There is not the SLIGHTEST CHANCE that Obama-Care will be rescinded by political means. The "one-party-pretending-to-be-two-party-system" makes that impossible. Too many liberal rubes LIKE this, and too many conservative rubes still think the Republicans will fix this if we just give them one more try. The political will to stop the juggernaut is simply not there. Even JFK understood that, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." I could say that the will of a small contingent willing to "water the tree of liberty" might tip the scales, but I don't believe that anymore, either: the American people have lost the desire to be free if it means they must face the responsibilities and consequences of that freedom.
Nonetheless, Obama-Care will fall, but the bullet that kills it will be mathematics - not politics or revolutionaries. The system CANNOT survive much longer. In the U.S. alone, we would need 16 trillion dollars just to get back to the point of being broke. Europe is worse off than we are, and everybody else that matters is at equal or greater risk than that. When the bottom falls out - and it will - it's going to get ugly, and society will no longer be able to afford expensive liabilities like socialism, feminism, welfare for layabouts, single mothers, ... and Obama-Care.
dannyc in CA
Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 10:29 PM
who pays for your medical welfare officer? oh a double stantard! typical of wingnuts!
Army Officer (Ret) in Kansas
Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 10:46 PM
Who pays for my medical care? I do. Thanks for asking. Oh the idiocy of libtards! Go away and play with your barbies: the adults are trying to talk.
Holmes Simons in FL
Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:36 PM
The inalienable rights of American citizens have been revoked by the egotistical rantings of one pseudo-intellectual judge in an pathetic attempt to exhibit the superiority of his legal acumen above that of his peers, and, by his singular effort, he has destroyed and repudiated the legacy of individual freedom that is the very foundational principle upon which the Federal Government was created to defend and protect.
So, before one jumps on the bandwagon glorifying the shrewdness of Justice Roberts in advancing conservatism, please consider these two simple facts:
1) The inherent fallacy of the so-called “Commerce Clause”, upon which Congress has relied for years to regulate any and every aspect of economic activity, was upheld; but it cannot be used to regulate “economic inactivity”, such as one not purchasing health insurance.
2) What then can Congress use to regulate “inactivity”? What else but its UNLIMITED power to tax.
What kind of personal behavior falls outside the categories of “activity” and “inactivity”? None, whatsoever! Therefore, the ramifications of ruling by the Supreme Court that the ACA is constitutional grant Congress, a group of corrupt cowards, by one means or another, the power to regulate everything and everyone.
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, human rights that the Founders considered to be given to an individual by God, are now completely subordinated to the whims and fancies of godless, manipulative politicians.
Let’s hear it for InJustice Roberts: YEA!!!!!
Let’s hear it for God: BOO!!!!!
Let’s hear it for the American Citizen: FU.
JD in Arkansas
Monday, July 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM
So time to buy the sailboat. Here's to the Privateer lībertās aut mors! Soon to be raiding the Caribbean.