The Right Opinion
Tilting at the UN Windmill
Those of us who believe the United States would be best served by pulling out of the United Nations and starting up a more morally and politically serious clubhouse for morally and politically serious nations are often accused of tilting at windmills.
The phrase "tilting at windmills" was inspired by Cervantes' novel "Don Quixote," and it means to fight something that doesn't really deserve to be fought. Quixote mistook the windmills of the Spanish countryside for ravenous giants and set out to vanquish them. ("Tilting" is a jousting expression, in case you didn't know).
Well, let's review some recent evidence.
The U.N. has been working hand-in-glove with the Chinese government to make the Chinese one-child policy as efficient and ruthless as possible. "Our conclusion is that the (United Nations Population Fund) is directly responsible for forced abortions and forced sterilizations in China," Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, recently told Congress in prepared testimony.
Of course, not everyone dislikes the one-child policy. Vice President Biden has supported it, and President Obama restored UNFPA's funding when he took office. So let's move on.
Lots of people like the Internet, right? Well, good news! The U.N. wants to take it over. The International Telecommunications Union, a U.N. organization, is secretly debating proposals to claim jurisdiction over the Web and take it out of America's hands. The major forces behind this push: authoritarian regimes eager to censor their domestic Internet and monitor their citizens. Russia and some Arab countries, reports the Wall Street Journal's Gordon Crovitz, want the power to read private email. Others want to tax cross-border Web traffic. And countries like China are working hard to bribe, bully or barter votes in favor of the U.N. takeover.
You see, that's what dictatorships do at the U.N.: work to make the world safe for dictatorships. The most brutal regimes on the planet are constantly trying to get on or game the Human Rights Council so they can spend all of their time condemning Israel and blocking any attempts to censure their own regimes.
Not everything the U.N. does is evil. Some of it is just incompetent. The whole of what passes for the "international community" has been trying to enforce sanctions on Iran and North Korea. But nobody at the U.N.'s intellectual property agency told them so, it was revealed earlier this month, so they went ahead and gave North Korea and Iran computers and IT equipment.
A few days later, the invaluable human rights group UN Watch reported that Iran was elected to the U.N. Conference of the Arms Trade Treaty, despite having just been declared guilty -- in a U.N. Security Council report! -- of illegally shipping guns and bombs to Syria.
Speaking of Syria, which is currently violating agreements to not murder its own people, it recently had a big victory at the Human Rights Council. Syria co-sponsored and passed a resolution pushed by Cuba (and supported by the usual Legion of Doom nations) to establish a "Right to Peace." The document is a lot of boilerplate until you get to the part where it says "all peoples and individuals have the right to resist and oppose oppressive colonial, foreign occupation." This is Middle East-speak for "It's OK to blow up Israelis."
Now these are all just recent news items. But you can play this game any time you want because the U.N. always provides fresh hells for us to marvel and laugh at.
For example, the United Nations website tells us that there is something called the Open-ended Ad Hoc Working Group of the General Assembly on the Integrated and Coordinated Implementation of and Follow-up to the Major United Nations Conferences and Summits in the Economic and Social Fields. Who among us doesn't sleep better knowing the OAHWGGAICIFMUNCSESF is working for us?
Alas, the U.N. website notes, "The Ad Hoc Working Group was last active during the 57th session of the General Assembly in 2003." In other words, the ad hoc open-ended working group is so open-ended it hasn't met in nearly a decade.
But that's the great thing about the U.N.: It never fails to surprise us with its predictability.
I'm beginning to think the U.N.'s defenders are the Don Quixotes, only in reverse. Where the critics see the reality of the ravenous giant, the U.N.'s defenders can only see a harmless windmill converting hot air for the good of all mankind.
(C) 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

7 Comments
Tex Horn in Texas
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 11:48 AM
As concerns the U.S., the UN is a very dangerous organization. Made up of terrorist nations as well as "benevolent" nations, their goal is to govern the world. And our current leadership is directing our country that way. Who are the primary supporters? Obama, Hillary Clinton and the State Department, and all "one world" supporters, which are many of our country's wealthiest citizens. At this time, the UN is trying to pass international laws that would negate the U.S. Constitution, the first target being our right to bear arms. Remember, we must be disarmed for them to succeed without a war. I encourage all to write their representatives and urge them to vote against the attempt to disarm us...that is, if your representative isn't "for" the UN's attempt to ride us of our Constitutional rights. If they are, vote them out, or we will be living in a world is which our power is equal to that of, say, Venezuela.
OKBecky in Tulsa, OK
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child has been in limbo in the U.S. Senate since 1995. It seems like it would protect children from abuses, but what it would really mean is the end of parental rights to make decisions for their children. It would mean that some government bureaucrat interposes himself (or herself) into family life, being a "spokesperson" for the "voiceless child" against abuses such as spanking, chores, religious instruction (indoctrination), and limitations on sexual freedom. It is currently under consideration in the Senate for ratification, so learn more about it and call your senators!!
http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={53D4DCA7-5899-4242-B244-54A253AFC137}
OKBecky in Tulsa, OK
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM
This is unrelated to the content of the article, Mr. Goldberg, but trying to read "OAHWGGAICIFMUNCSESF" to my 4-year-old son has given us both quite a good laugh. He is now rearranging about 7 letter magnets and practicing his phonics, based on how I showed him to do it with "OAHWGGAICIFMUNCSESF."
Howard Last in Wyoming
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 7:50 PM
Who are the biggest supporters of the UN, why the Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral Commission and Biderberg Group members . That would include most of the Presidents this century and all of the Secretary of States. Reagan was not a member but, George Schltz and Alexander Haig were/is. So is it any surprise that we are in the Ultimate Foreign Entanglement. Just Google CFR members and watch the list of traitors that come up.
Ct-Tom in NC
Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM
I suggest that we quit the UN and pay their relocation expenses. (Was it Krauthammer who suggested that Kinshasa would be a good home for it?) It would be a great "investment" for us.
Howard Last in Wyoming
Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 5:55 PM
Ct-Tom, instead of paying their relocation expenses, why not buy artillery shells to use on the House of Babble on the East River. Fumigation will cost too much.
Dane in Chile
Sunday, July 15, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Just stop funding it. I read that the U.S. provides 25% of the UN´s funding. That is taxpayer money.