The Right Opinion
Our Business-Hating President
This week, President Obama spelled out just how much he hates American business in an off-prompter moment in Roanoke, Va. If "you've been successful," said Obama, "you didn't get there on your own. You didn't get there on your own. I'm always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out here. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there."
So, according to Obama, it wasn't your brains or your work ethic that made you successful. What was it? Obama continued: "There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
In other words, the government did it.
Now, if Obama were merely saying that without roads and bridges it would be more difficult for businesses to function, he'd be right. If he were saying that we all need great teachers, he'd be right. If he were saying that businesses require a law and order society to thrive, he'd be right, too.
But he wasn't saying any of that. Because if he were saying that, we'd all presumably earn about the same amount of money. We'd have the same amount of success. After all, we already pay trillions to guarantee decent teachers for our students, good police and firefighting forces, and decent roads.
And yet we don't. Some of us are more successful than others. So if that inequality still exists, despite government providing for basic communal needs -- and if inequality can't be explained by personal decision making -- then something else is needed.
More government.
This is the philosophy that underlies Obama-ism. We shouldn't be proud of our success, says Obama; it's not our success at all. We didn't build it. All success is reliant on the helping hand of government. If you have liberties that allowed you to create a company, that's the largesse of the government, not some innate human right. If you have freedoms that allowed you to make the most of your abilities, that's thanks to the government, not thanks to your own choices.
And if there's inequality, that, too, is thanks to the government. The government is a cruel master -- it taketh, and it giveth away. According to Obama, it's the government's job to balance individual success and collective needs. If there's inequality, that's a clear indicator that government just isn't doing enough.
The truth is that all the government-provided roads in the world don't create the conditions necessary for individual success. As Dennis Prager has pointed out, the USSR had roads. So does Cuba. In Mussolini's Italy, the trains supposedly ran on time (Actually, they didn't, but Obama thinks they did). Somehow, these states were not economic powerhouses, and individual entrepreneurship didn't flourish.
The reason that you are successful is that we instituted a government on the basis that all men are created equal in their rights -- and that a government that violates those rights forfeits its reason to exist. It is not the government's job to create equality. It is the government's job to build roads and get out of our way so we can drive into a better future. Obama doesn't understand that, which is why we're currently motoring in reverse, off a fiscal and philosophical cliff.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

8 Comments
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 9:47 AM
The Marxist Statist Islam Loving Liar must go. If you vote Democrat, you commit treason.
JTG in Indiana
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 9:49 AM
Imagine how a petty Chicago punk like Obama can speak like a mini-Soros while his democratic sheepling carry his water. This country was built around individualism and evidence of that is everywhere you look. Individuals make things work while government screws up everything to prohibit it working to the fullest extent.
Right Side of Ohio in Ashland, OH
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 11:00 AM
"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
This is yet another glimpse of how Obama sees the world through socialist-tinted lenses. Who does he think the 'somebody' is that invested in roads and bridges? To him, that somebody is 'Government, the Great Giver' that has graciously donated money for infrastructure. Can someone please remind this dunce that the government has NOTHING? The somebody that invested in those roads is the taxpayer! We should not be saying 'thank you so much for these wonderful roads, government' like Obama wants, but rather we should be saying 'you better build some goddamn roads and bridges--that's what we are paying you for!!'
mark in massachusetts
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM
Tank yo O' great black hope! I guts to member to votes for u in the lection sos I kin stay in my project aparmint.Da gubmint es so gud to mee.I jes luvs da free fone,da free partmint,da free food and da free hos! member,vote fo' obama to kep getin free stuf! Luv,Aunt Zoonie in South Boston projects!
pete in CA
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 1:49 PM
The first roads in the U.S. were constructed by private parties in order for them to get the fruits of their labor from farm to centralized place of sales (market). It wasn't until much later that gubmint figured out they could make a fortune by convincing the driving and working public that it would be in their best interest to have a national network of highways, designed, laid and maintained by a central committee and overseen by hundreds of gubmint agencies in fed, state, county, city, and other forms. Complete with serial tax increases and unions, and all for our own good.
JAC in Texas
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 4:27 PM
A prime example of the difference in success can be seen in the Middle East: Israel and the Palestinians essentially inhabit the same area of the world. Which people are economically successful and have done the most with what they have? Which people still have a stone age economy and live in squalor and bitterness? The industriousness and hard work of the people in Israel have made them successful.
Scotch62 in O-town, FL
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM
Yes, Mr. President, lot's of people work hard. But some people look forward and see a need in the marketplace. They RISK their own money or assets to borrow money to pull together the resources (facilities, raw materials, and WORKERS) to produce that good or service. Often they do not take pay until the enterprise turns a P R O F I T........This phenomenon only occurs if the customers of the enterprise are WILLING to pay more than the cost of all the resources, wages, energy and TAXES. I know P R O F I T sounds awful mean and exploitative, but really it is proof of economic efficiency. This is the ONLY WAY capital or wealth is created and it is ONLY created by those willing to take that risk. They are called ENTREPRENEURS, and they only take that risk if there is that profit reward. If the business can't sell the service or product for the cost of resources, these resources are wasted and it eventually goes out of business. If taxes are high and entrepreneurs lose money or can make no more than by just working hard, nobody takes these risks and there is NO growth of capital and no wealth creation. The government on the other hand creates nothing. They get wealth by taxing, borrowing, or printing more money to pay for those roads and bridges...taxes paid for by that whole evil PROFIT thing. NO Mr. President, having the Fed print a few trillion more won't help anything except create the ILLUSION of wealth creation and with more dollars per unit of production in the economy, EVERYBODY's money is worth LESS, including your beloved middle and working class people. You can talk all you want to try to get re-elected, but these are the facts. CLASS DISMISSED.
Jay in Dayton
Thursday, July 19, 2012 at 12:08 AM
If Obama wants government to take the credit for successful businesses, will he also accept the blame when his onerous government regulations cause businesses to fail? I'm not betting he will.