The Right Opinion
Upward Mobility Barriers
Let's pretend that we have the political guts to expand economic opportunities for people at the lower end of the economic spectrum. What vested interests should be attacked, and what economic regulations should be targeted for elimination?
It doesn't take a lot of money to become a taxi owner-operator and earn more than $40,000 a year. One needs a car, an insurance policy and ancillary interior equipment to make a car a taxi. In New York City, to be a taxi owner you'd have to purchase a license -- called a medallion -- that in June 2012 cost $704,000. New York's Taxi and Limousine Commission restrictions that generate such a license price outlaw taxi ownership by people who don't have access to a $704,000 loan. By contrast, in Washington, D.C., the annual fee for a license to own a taxi is $125. I'll let you guess which city has more taxis per capita, cheaper fares and more black taxi ownership.
For decades, the Institute for Justice has been successfully bringing suit against egregious taxi regulations. Last year, it filed suit, Ghaleb Ibrahim v. City of Milwaukee. In Milwaukee, a taxi license costs $150,000. The suit will be argued before the Milwaukee County Circuit Court in December 2012.
Taxi regulations such as those in New York, Milwaukee, Chicago, Boston and other cities just didn't happen. There are vested interests who benefit from keeping outsiders out and therefore enrich both companies with large fleets and single taxi owners at the expense of would-be owners and the riding public through higher prices.
Suppose you are affiliated with a poor congregation and wish to sell them caskets as did the Rev. Nathaniel Craigmiles. Casket retailers neither perform funerals nor handle dead bodies, but the state of Tennessee required anyone selling caskets to be a licensed funeral director, which takes years of costly training, including learning how to embalm. The Institute for Justice brought suit, Craigmiles v. Giles, and successfully got the law repealed. The institute has attacked and is attacking similar regulations in other states.
What kind of money does it take to get into the business of African-style hair braiding? The main inputs are the skills and a place in which to braid. However, in some states -- such as Utah, Minnesota, Mississippi, Ohio and California -- a person had to spend thousands of dollars in tuition and anywhere from 1,500 to 2,000 hours at a cosmetology school to obtain a beautician's license. Safety is not an issue, because African-style braiders do not use chemicals, shave or give facials. Most of what's in cosmetology school curricula is irrelevant to hair braiding. As a result of Institute for Justice lawsuits on behalf of hair braiders, a number of restrictive state licensing laws have been struck down or repealed by state legislators under the threat of suits. Nonetheless, hair braiding restrictions remain in some states.
As I have documented in my recent book "Race and Economics" (2012), historically, occupational licensing and economic regulation have been used to keep blacks out of particular trades. For example, the Plumbers, Gas and Steam Fitters Official Journal, in January 1905, wrote, "There are about 10 Negro skate plumbers working around here (Danville, Va.), doing quite a lot of jobbing and repairing, but owing to the fact of not having an examination board (licensing agency) it is impossible to stop them, hence the anxiety of the men here to organize." Black scholars Lorenzo Greene and Carter G. Woodson said, "A favorite method of barring (Negroes) from plumbing and electrical work was to install a system of unfair examinations which were conducted by whites."
Today we don't hear racist intentions for restrictive economic regulations and licensure laws, but the intentions behind those laws do not change their effects. Their effects are to prevent people with meager means and little political clout from getting a foothold on the bottom rungs of the economic ladder. Politically, it's preferable to give handouts than attack these and many other vested interests.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

9 Comments
Bo from Texas in Texas
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 12:16 AM
Licensing seems to more harm than good. Look at the number of incompetent lawyers, physicians, and other so-called professionals who often no better performance than a well educated high school student. Licensing seems to be a huge protection racket promulgated by the unholy alliance of those who would suppress free enterprise, and clueless or paid off government officials. Freedom is to allow consumers to appraise the competence of who they hire. The free market has always prevented the idiot plumber, the crooked lawyer, and the malpracticing doctor from remaining in business for very long. The internet provides a quick check on anyone who has attained even the smallest notoriety. Taxi licenses should cost a pro-rata share of the cost to a municipality of administrative duties to assure safe service to the general public. That is all.
tod-the tool guy in brooklyn N.Y.
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 7:22 AM
"Mr. Romney, TEAR DOWN those upward mobility barriers!" and follow the Reagan blueprint.I was tradesman, when Reagan was President, and I made profits, dividends, and Capital gains, after all, that's the American Way of doing business! Punishing wealth crushes the upward mobility that the Judeo-christian Founding Fathers bestowed upon US(A)!!
India in GA
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 9:23 AM
"In New York City, to be a taxi owner you'd have to purchase a license..."
At this point, I knew a big number was coming...
"...that in June 2012 cost $704,000."
...but I was shocked nontheless.
How can anybody look at that figure and not know that it is the result of "vested interests"?
Bill in Texas
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM
I will give you a crazy one in regards to the taxi medallion in NYC. I heard from my father-in-law who lives there that in the last 5 years or so, someone put one on Ebay or some online site, and sold it for almost 1.5 million, and the City denied the sale.
India in GA
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 9:35 PM
:/
India in GA
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 9:36 PM
Oops, I meant to type "Yikes!", too.
Kevin in Michigan
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 9:27 AM
Race & Economics, just finished reading - excellent reading. In today's world w/ websites like Angie's List that allow folks to rate suppliers, let alone word of mouth, licenses are just barriers to entry.
pete in ca
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 2:22 PM
I'm in a small town in CA. I know of nearly 20 private braid and nail shops run out of homes. None are licensed, so pay no money to licensing agencies, no business taxes, and probably squeeze their real tax burden for all it's worth. None of them will ever be rich and famous, but the do have a marketable skill. IF CA every gets smart, they will get rid of much of the licensing requirements, and these ladies can openly advertise, build their businesses, afford to pay full taxes - and not least of all, get off the dole. Yes, they collect welfare, unemployment, food stamps, ebt cards, and every other 'freebie' they can get from obama.
MikeEcho in Orting, WA
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 4:50 PM
A good topic. I don't know the taxi business but I do know the contracting construction business, at least in WA. state. It's fairly easy to get a contractors license and they are not terribly expensive. But you must post a bond and show proof of insurance. Assuming the person has the tools of the trade and a place to work, he/she could create an LLC and start work for as little as $1500.00. There are exceptions where proof of expertise is demanded and the testing is rigoress, electricians for example. I would expect a taxi driver to know the city, be free of accidents (not scare the hell out of me), keep his cab clean and smoke free, and be friendly and helpfull. Does this fit the NYC profile? You are absolutely right about about the cost being a barrier to upward mobility. Sometimes a person must move in order to make a better life for himself and his family.