The Right Opinion
Restoring Respect for the Constitution
Americans must renew appreciation for their protective pact
John Adams got everything right except the date. "The Second Day of July 1776," he wrote to his wife, "ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with [Shows], Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more."
Americans commemorate the Declaration of Independence on July 4. But there's certainly room on the calendar for another celebration, even if a somewhat subdued one.
Monday, Sept. 17, marks the 225th anniversary of the signing of the nation's second great founding document, the Constitution that provides Americans with limited government. Constitution Day never became a day off from work, and it's hardly marked with pomp and circumstance.
That's fitting, though. Unlike the Declaration, the Constitution never aimed to stir hearts or encourage uprising -- quite the opposite.
The Constitution was drafted more than 11 years after the Declaration. The United States had won independence but was struggling under the weak Articles of Confederation.
The Founding Fathers wanted to draft a document that would provide an effective but carefully limited federal government. Through a series of compromises, they did just that.
They designed three branches of government -- legislative, executive and judicial -- that would check each other. If one tried to usurp too much power, the others would have an interest in bringing it back into line. Just as competition brings down prices in economics, competition would tend to keep any particular branch of government from acquiring too much power.
Appropriately, the most powerful branch would be the legislative. That's where all laws would be written and where all spending bills would originate. So the Constitution further divides Congress into two branches. In the House of Representatives, every member would stand for re-election every two years. In the Senate, six-year terms would promote more deliberation. These two forks of the same branch would provide further checks, preventing the rash use of Congress' great power.
The Constitution has held up well for more than two centuries, with only occasional modifications (the 27 amendments) through the years. Of course, people used to be a bit more serious about the idea that the Constitution said what it meant and meant what it said. Any 21st-century celebration of the Constitution should take note that the country is no longer keeping faith with its constitutional principles.
Today, most "laws" actually are rules and regulations enacted by bureaucrats in government agencies, not statutes passed by elected lawmakers. Even when Congress does pass legislation, such as the Dodd-Frank financial reform law or Obamacare, lawmakers leave many blanks and expect rule-makers to fill them in.
That means the bureaucracy, peopled with federal "experts," essentially exists as an unelected fourth branch of government. It has limited accountability to the actual elected branches -- and no accountability to voters. That's not right. Lawmakers need to reclaim their constitutional role.
So should judges. The founders wrote that the judiciary would be the "least dangerous branch," in part because judges wouldn't have the ability to enforce their rulings without support from the other two branches. But today's liberal judges often enact laws rather than interpret them. Fealty to the Constitution would require judges to return to their traditional role and stop legislating from the bench.
Finally, there's the presidency. As chief executive, a president has crucial responsibilities. But presidents lack the power to enact laws or to determine that some laws won't be enforced. Our constitutional framework of limited government requires a president who will actively use his granted powers but also recognize the strict limits on those powers.
After the Constitution was complete, Benjamin Franklin noted that it made the country "a republic, if you can keep it." This Constitution Day, let's honor the framers and respect their work by changing America's course -- and returning to our constitutional roots.

10 Comments
Capt. Call in New Mexico
Sunday, September 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM
The Constitution, the Bible, and the fear of God are the only reasons the United States of America still exists; and with the egregious disregard for both by all three branches of government we are a nation in deep decline. The Obama Administration has elevated disdain for the Constitution and criminality into an art form. Only God can help us now. The question is, why should He? We have, through our dereliction of duty attempted to remove His influence, first in government, and then in all of public life. "God bless America?" Yes! But we should be seeking His forgiveness imprimis!
RD in Fort smith
Tuesday, September 18, 2012 at 6:28 AM
You are right. The only promise we have is that God is forgiving. However he is not blind.If we repent we cannot go back and do the same things and expect forgiveness or change.Like printing more money to get us deeper in debt. Apply that to America being like the rest of the nations.Godless and just downright lost.
Gordon in Boise
Sunday, September 16, 2012 at 11:50 PM
Many, if not most, of the problems we face as a country today can be traced to our straying from the wisdom the Founders left us in the Declaration and the Constitution. If we're to return to our Constitutional roots, we must examine and correct some of the amendments that have done damage to the Founder's vision. In particular, the sixteenth amendment has enabled the central government to grow way beyond the Founders intent. Even worse was the seventeenth amendment. People forget the federal government was a creation of the individual states. By removing Senate seats from the control of state legislatures, the individual state governments no longer have a direct say in the operation of the federal government they created. It is not surprising that a century after this amendment, the states have essentially become operational subdivisions of the federal government, which has had the effect of concentrating power in a way the Founders sought to avoid. We now have an upper and lower House of Representatives instead of a House and Senate. This eliminates one of the major checks and balances originally contained in the Constitution.
JeFtFotF in Chantilly, VA
Monday, September 17, 2012 at 8:45 AM
The Founders understood human nature and the purpose of the law, and crafted the Constitution accordingly. As John Adams said in an address to the military in 1798: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." We must keep working to restore a healthy understanding of human nature and law as God describes them, and our need and respect for the Constitution. For the Foundation (1 Cor. 3:11) of the Founders ><>
Ted R. Weiland in Nebraska
Monday, September 17, 2012 at 11:34 AM
JeftFotF, any nation's constitution and government benefits from moral Christian citizens, even those nations whose constitution are not based upon Yahweh's morality as found in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-9) - such as the United States of America. However, when such constitutions are not based upon Yahweh's law, it is inevitable that such nations will become more and more immoral and corrupt, being they do not have a Biblical standard to fall back upon. Case in point, the United States of America today.
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to Yahweh's moral law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments). Take our Constitution Survey at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/constitutionsurvey/constitutionsurvey.php and receive a free copy of the "Primer" (an 85 page book, normally $7 plus shipping) of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
Robert Alexander in Texas
Monday, September 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM
Truth is that if you're a biblical Christian who has spent any considerable amount of time looking at Yahweahs Laws, Statutes, Judgments and implementing them into ones life, the more you will have a perfectly complete disdain view of the "BIG-C".
Luke 16: 13 ¶No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
John in Canada
Monday, September 17, 2012 at 2:47 PM
"Restoring Respect for the Constitution" is a useless venture, for the Constitution is built on, at the very least, an implicit (if not explicit) rejection of the commandments of God Almighty. No, let's just come out and say it: It IS an EXPLICIT rejection of God's Law because of the simple fact that it raises up another law in place of what God has commanded. In following God, we have life, new life purchased for us by the only-beggoten Son of God, Jesus Christ, on the cross. In turning aside from God, we bring His judgments upon us, our families, and our nations. This should be a FEARFUL thought indeed! Let us rather return to the Lord God Almighty and obey His statutes, commandments, and judgments as individuals, families, communities, and nations. Herein lies our only hope of rescue from the current social-political mess we all face.
Captain Jim in Kansas
Monday, September 17, 2012 at 10:08 PM
Well, said John. (I borrowed some of your comments for another post). Most folks do not realize that our early (1620-1700) civil organizations were based on Scripture alone. This is the governmental system [Theonomy] that gives the most freedom/liberty and opportunity than any other system: it is decentalized, moral, and free. Study our early history and one will find that, contrary to popular perception, society under Yahweh's laws actually works as long as the people are responsible and obedient. This does preclude, therefore, polytheism and idolatry as permitted by the US Constitution Article 6, the first amendment, etc.
JeFtFotF in Chantilly, VA
Monday, September 17, 2012 at 6:39 PM
Each of us is responsible for obeying God's law, or accountable for when we do not. Civil government is a balancing act, in which we derive laws and rules from a standard so those who believe in God (and believe in different ways) and those who don't can try to live in peace, try to protect our persons and property from those who would take, damage, or destroy them. We owe God our obedience over all else, and yet it is not we who obligate others to do this. Christ is King, and as Paul wrote, a believer's citizenship is in heaven, and while we are here we should do what we can to promote life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in accordance with holiness, righteousness, and walking in the light and truth of God's Word.
Ethan in Harris MN
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 8:39 PM
It is only natural for the Colonists, who were comprised almost entirely of Christians, to use Holy Writ as a basis for governing their daily civil affairs. What other choice would there be if everyone around you was a Christian and you desired to establish order? Why appeal to another authority source? Problems in American took root when the U.S. Constitution usurped His Commandments, Statutes and Judgments.