The Right Opinion
Eddie Haskell Brooks
New York Times columnist David Brooks is the Eddie Haskell of the Fourth Estate. Like the two-faced sycophant in "Leave It to Beaver," Brooks indulges in excessive politeness while currying favor with political authority. He prides himself on an oily semblance of maturity and rational discourse.
But the phony "conservative" back-stabber, who has spent the last four years slavering over Barack Obama like a One Direction groupie and trashing the tea party like an MSNBC junkie, isn't fooling anyone.
Lately, Brooks has been given to dispensing passive-aggressive advice to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. His column this week titled "Thurston Howell Romney" called Romney "a kind, decent man" -- and then shredded him to pieces as a "country club" elitist who "doesn't know much about the culture of America," "knows nothing about ambition and motivation," and is "running a depressingly inept presidential campaign."
Eddie Haskell Brooks, along with fellow GOP bubble-dwellers Peggy Noonan and Bill Kristol, eagerly piled on Romney over his "secret video" remarks contrasting the nation's makers and takers. Liberal outlets embraced these chin-pulling tools -- elevating them as "key" Republican voices who speak for the right.
Despite the best efforts of the Democratic-professional media complex to gin up faux-rage over Romney's remarks, however, several polls show that voters agree with Romney's fundamental critique of the indulgent Democratic politics of victimhood, identity and dependency. Yep, Brooks has the pulse of mainstream America -- direct from his hallowed bubble at the Fishwrap of Record.
Brooks shares all he knows about "ambition," "motivation" and the "culture of America" through regular appearances with the insular clique of conservative-bashing snobs at taxpayer-supported "PBS NewsHour." A cursory glance at Brooks' biography shows that he has spent the majority of his life in New York City and Washington, D.C. He has worked for a raft of employers from The Washington Times to The Wall Street Journal to The Weekly Standard to The New York Times.
But unlike Romney, Brooks has never actually run a business of his own, managed a massive private entity, governed a state or overseen a campaign for national office.
He does have quite an impressive record, though. If by record you mean sucking up to empty suit Barack Obama, mocking grass-roots conservatives as "teens" and defending his cocktail party mates in establishment journalism.
In 2009, the liberal New Republic published the bodice-ripping "story behind the Obama-Brooks bromance." The magazine reported that "two days after Obama's 'The Audacity of Hope' hit bookstores (in 2006), Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was 'Run, Barack, Run.'"
Brooks also recounted his first encounter with his Democratic crush. "I remember distinctly an image of -- we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant," Brooks said, "and I'm thinking, a) he's going to be president and b) he'll be a very good president."
The purported conservative columnist's public display of affection for the radical Democratic candidate bordered on obscene. "I think he's more talented than anyone in my lifetime," Brooks gushed. "I mean, he is pretty dazzling when he walks into a room." Brooks revealed that he considered Obama's Chicago campaign mastermind David Axelrod a "hero." Axelrod returned the love, calling Brooks a "serious public thinker" in an era of "insipid, instant commentary and one-hour news cycles."
In the fall of 2008, Brooks swooned over Obama's Ivy League "achievatrons" taking over Washington: "Already the culture of the Obama administration is coming into focus. Its members are twice as smart as the poor reporters who have to cover them, three times if you include the columnists. They typically served in the Clinton administration and then, like Cincinnatus, retreated to the comforts of private life -- that is, if Cincinnatus had worked at Goldman Sachs, Williams & Connolly or the Brookings Institution."
Wait, he wasn't not done:
"So many of them send their kids to Georgetown Day School, the posh leftish private school in D.C., that they'll be able to hold White House staff meetings in the carpool line. And yet as much as I want to resent these overeducated Achievatrons (not to mention the incursion of a French-style government dominated by highly trained Enarchs), I find myself tremendously impressed by the Obama transition."
Less than three years later, Brooks acknowledged he had been an "Obama sap." He admitted that he fell for the administration's stimulus propaganda:
"When administration officials called around saying that the possibility of a double-dip recession was horrifyingly real and that it would be irresponsible not to come up with a package that could pass right away, I believed them. ... But of course I'm a sap. When the president unveiled the second half of his stimulus it became clear that this package has nothing to do with helping people right away or averting a double dip. This is a campaign marker, not a jobs bill."
Not just a sap. A willing tool, too. Brooks copped to sitting on Obama's private admission to him that the "shovel-ready" promise was a crock. "The projects just didn't exist. They couldn't do it. They couldn't find them," he said on "PBS NewsHour" -- more than a year after Obama told him.
Gee, Wally, why isn't Eddie Haskell Brooks giving this corrupt administration and its Titanically inept "achievatrons" the business?
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

35 Comments
Jerry Fair in Huntington Beach
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 9:11 AM
David Brooks is a thoughtful level headed even handed gentleman. You Michele Malkin on the other hand are nothing but a paid right wing flame thrower who owes your sole to the GOP so your opinions are always skewed to support their incomprehensible psychobabble. Stick to immigration. You still have a shred of credibility in that area and only in that area.
wjm in Colorado
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 9:23 AM
And you Jerry have no credibility whatsoever. You and Brooks are idiots, of the marxist Lenin useful kind.
mark in massachusetts
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 9:36 AM
Michelle might be a right-wing flame thrower (in your leftist opinion) but you're obviously a left-wing flamer.Liberalism,homosexuality and socialist-fascist tendencies are all signs of serious mental illness.Seek help!
Esteban Cafe in The World 9ok, Singapore)
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Sir, had Msr Brooks not slavered over your man, he too would be a paid paid right wing flame thrower.
Geoff in St. Charles, MO
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 11:09 AM
More drivel from Jerry the Fairy.
rab in jo, mo
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 11:38 AM
Jerry,
Please refrain from bong hits before you post. David Brooks' conclusion that Odumbo would be a great president based upon the crease in his pants, hardly makes him "thoughtful" or "level-headed". It makes me think that Mr. Brooks might be an habitual user of MDMA.
Alex in Union NJ
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 4:05 PM
Jeez...what a douche.
KN in Arkansas
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 5:05 PM
@Jerry; "...who owes your sole to the GOP..."
Sole? Seriously?
Ed Watts in San Jacinto, California
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 9:12 PM
Shoe, Jerry! Er, Uhh... I mean, "Shoo, Jerry!"
The American in Columbus, Ohio
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 5:32 AM
Wow! Why the hell did you have to bring fish into this discussion (sole)? What a dick.
Old Sarge in Hinesville, GA
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Have you noticed that when the liberal's can't dispute the subject they immediately start calling names and using terms that have nothing to do with the discussion? They always attack the intelligence level of those who dare tro voice an opinion that doesn't agree with them. I would rather be an uneducated red-neck with common sense that an over educated idiot that can't see the truth when it hits them in the face.
Gregory in Yakima Wa.
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM
I know you kids don't want to believe it but when party elders, proven loyalists such Mr. Brooks, Ms. Noonan and William Krystol take a dump on the Republican candidate, there is something happening far more interesting going on than an unctuous sit-com character.
Your oh so precious Mitt Romney is gotten himself lost like a city slicker in Death Valley. We're witnessing a candidate self inflict like a scorpion that taps poison into its own head. It isn't the fault of those who report what they know and see, it isn't the media or liberals, it isn't the Democrats.
Mitt is losing the election, self destructing at an ever accelerating pace. That election is now less than 60 days away but it has become a side show to Mitt's free fall. Mitten's gift of gaffe is the answer to this question: How did a wealthy, handsome, businessman and former governor lose to a black president managing a lousy economy?
mark in massachusetts
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM
I'm sure you'll be back here after Oblowhole gets buried on November 6th. Or as Mooshell said,November 2nd. Dumb as rock that one. How's you buddy Dan Savage doing?
mark in massachusetts
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 10:35 AM
If Romney does lose it's only because the people on the government tit don't want to lose their cow.It's also because mentally-challenged individuals such as yourself are allowed to vote.Yeah,the Democrats,they sure are smart. Their poster-child should be Hank "Guam" Johnson. Man,that boy dumb! That and Waters,Reid,Schumer,Leahy,Kerry,Boxer,Lee,and the rest of the short bus and we have us a combined IQ of about 88.
The American in Columbus, Ohio
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 5:38 AM
Mark, you shouldn't short change the folks in the short bus. They likely have a higher IQ!
Alex in Union NJ
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 4:10 PM
First off, he's not losing. He's ahead, but the leftist polls over-sample Democrats. Second, the only reason Obama might win, is the same reason he won in the first place: Media Malpractice.
You must get paid by the DNC to write this tripe. I can't believe you have a real job.
The American in Columbus, Ohio
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 5:35 AM
Gregory, I thought you were dead! What's up with that?
Ed Watts in San Jacinto, California
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 9:14 PM
What? A Cleveland steamer now?
Really, Greg...
Ed Watts in San Jacinto, California
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 9:20 PM
Oh, yeah...
...Your poor punctuation makes your ill-considered ideas unsuitable for publication.
Gregory in Yakima Wa.
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 11:28 AM
I'm guessing most of you know what's happening and I certainly understand that you don't like to look foolish by admitting. But maintaining a mental facade, an on-going delusion to block out political reality makes you look even more foolish. You appear as children that cover their ears and yell "LALALALALA" to block what they don't want to hear.
Come on, we're friends, let's get on with the process without the dragging and screaming. Let's move from denial and anger to rationalizing and acceptance. It's not so bad. You'll have Barack Obama to hate for four more years. You'd just end up hating Mittens if he were elected anyway.
Let's move on and see if we can help our more stubborn friends see the light. You'll feel good about yourselves and that's important too.
Rod in USA
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 12:58 PM
Four more yeas of Obozo will put you in chains.
mark in massachusetts
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 2:35 PM
You're insanity is overshadowed only by your refusal to answer my questions.Why? Am I too much for your peabrain to engage in a battle of wits? I'm waiting!
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 5:04 PM
Mark, I`ve told the jackoff from Yakima that he shouldn`t try to match wits with the others on here because he`s only half equipped. Apparently that`s too deep for his little brain to process.
mark in massachusetts
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 2:45 PM
You're F#%@ed in the haid!
Ed Watts in San Jacinto, California
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 9:38 PM
We are NOT friends; I don't even know you. Further, my friends are, for the most part, pretty good writers.
You, sir, are not.
Old Sarge in Hinesville, GA
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Greg, As usual you keep spouting the party line. By the way, Obama is not the first black president. He is the first mixed-race president as far as we know. I realize that he can do no wrong in your eyes and Romney can do nothing right. Like most liberals you don't seem to understand just how bad this man has been for the country. His party had control of Congress for two years and did absolutely nothing.except to spend money that we didn't have. The Senate has not passed a budget in almost 4 years. But in your eyes and your fellow do-gooders it is all the Republicans fault. You are the one that needs to growup and realize that Obama is not the second coming. If the Republicans ran a goat for President I wouid vote for it because it couldn't do any worse than Obama and his minions have done! Hell, it might do a better job!
Tex Horn in Texas
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Gregory, dude, you're back. And you say: "How did a wealthy, handsome, businessman and former governor lose to a black president managing a lousy economy?" Well, he hasn't yet lost, but it is good to hear you admit it is a lousy economy. Your only misstatement is that he is "managing" it. And it seems that lately, for every misstep Romney may make, Obama responds with yet another. And as he so often reminds us, he is the President. Of what, I have yet to determine.
jksisco in irvine, ca
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Michelle, as always, separates the wheat from the chaff. Brooks should just admit that he's a closet Liberal, any casual reading of his writings will confirm it. What Mitt Romney said is true and it's only a gaffe because most liberal talking heads say it is, but who cares what they say. If Romney somehow loses the election, which I find highly unlikely, it will be because of a left-wing media conspiracy, a group of hacks that forgot a long time ago what it means to be objective. I mean seriously, if a Republican had been presiding over an economy that was still at 8% unemployment, had been involved in such dubious endevours like Solyndra, or Fast and Furious, the media outrage would have been deafening, and non-stop.
Rod in USA
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM
David Brooks.... Sounds like Bertram Scudder to me. In fact, there are a lot of Scudders out there in the MSM today.
Which way to Galt's Gulch?
Rod in USA
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 12:38 PM
Anticipating the question:
Most of you probably recognize the reference to Bertram Scudder from Ayn Rand's novel Atlas Shrugged. Click here if not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListofAtlasShruggedcharacters
Miss Kitty in Missouri
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM
I would like to see the difference in an election where photo ID is required, and the exact same election where is wasn't. I have a feeling Al Franken wouldn't be in the Senate, and we might have had a different president. It's water under the bridge now, but we can push for that, and other meaningful reforms such as FairTax.
Ready4AChange in Illinois
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM
AGREED Miss Kitty!
demsarerats in Oregon
Friday, September 21, 2012 at 7:07 PM
Brooks is a worthless phoney who probably loves to see others write about him.
Robinius in Broomfield, Colorado
Saturday, September 22, 2012 at 2:29 AM
David Brooks is a RINO. So is Peggy Noonan. I haven't read Brooks for 3 years and stopped reading Noonan a couple of weeks ago. Haven't missed them yet! Is rhe Patriot Post still posting Peggy girl's columns? I wonder who they''ll vote for? Hmmmm...
The American in Columbus, Ohio
Sunday, September 23, 2012 at 5:53 AM
All I can say or think is GROSS,!! Yuck! Please wash your hands! Anything! Now, even worse than that douchebah MSNBC Mathews, why the hell is David Brooks thinking about the crease in Obummer's Pants? Gross! A tingle up my leg seems almost OK. Nope! It isn't OK. Yuck!
Brooks also recounted his first encounter with his Democratic crush. "I remember distinctly an image of -- we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant," Brooks said, "and I'm thinking, a) he's going to be president and b) he'll be a very good president."