The Right Opinion
The Battleground States That Will Decide the Election
A tight race, but Obama's huge margins of victory in key swing states have vanished.
Now that the debates are over, the most significant information Americans will get regarding how the candidates are doing will be from the polls. If those polls are any indication, it is Republican challenger Mitt Romney who has been the beneficiary of a bump that most likely came from his obvious win in the first debate, followed by two debates in which no clear cut winner emerged. This week Romney moved above 50 percent in his favorability rating with the voters for the first time. Yet it is no secret that this election will be decided by 11 battleground states. Those states are Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin. The current polling numbers, according to the Real Clear Politics website (RCP), which averages the polling data from a number of independent sources, reveal an incredibly close and intense race between the president and Mitt Romney. Of particular note is that President Obama has seen his once-huge margins of victory against 2008 challenger John McCain virtually vanish. Yet it is far from certain that this will translate into a victory for 2012 GOP nominee.
In Colorado (9 Electoral College votes at stake), where Obama beat John McCain by 9 points in 2008, the race is a virtual tie, with only two-tenths of a percentage point separating the candidates. If there's any momentum evident at all here, it is due to the first debate, which was held in Denver. Prior to the debate Obama had a three-point lead. Colorado has been a historically Republican state, but a growing Latino population in one of the fastest growing states in the nation has moved it towards the Democratic column. Like most states, the economy is the number one issue, but environmental concerns are also important.
In Florida (29), RCP gives Romney a 1.8-point lead in a state Obama won by 2.8 points in 2008. The issues in this state revolve around the economy, as unemployment remains higher than the national average. Two voting blocs, Jewish Americans and the elderly, will likely have enormous influence on the outcome. Their concerns include, among other things, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Israel. Another factor is the reality that Florida was one of the hardest hit states in the nation with respect to the housing crisis. That crisis has abated somewhat, but substantial numbers of Floridians remain underwater on their mortgages.
That Iowa (6) remains a tight race is relatively surprising, since Obama won the state by a 9.5-point margin in 2008. Currently the president maintains a lead of two percentage points there. Despite a large population of evangelical Christian voters, Democrats have carried five of the last six presidential elections. The issues that concern Iowans are healthcare, due to the nation's fifth largest number of residents over 65, federal subsidies of certain crops, and renewable energy sources, of which Iowa is a net exporter.
Michigan (16) currently leans Obama by five points, despite a landslide 16.4-point victory in 2008. A Romney win here would be a big upset, given that Michigan has voted Democrat in the last five presidential elections, and remains a state where union workers, especially those in the auto industry, remain tried and true Democrats. The only thing likely to change that dynamic between now and the election would be unequivocal evidence that the economy is stalling -- or that GM is irrefutably headed for bankruptcy again. Neither scenario seems likely to occur before November 6th.
Nevada (6) is a state where the race has tightened in recent weeks, with Obama holding a 2.8-point lead in a state he won by 12.5 points four years ago. Nevada has both the highest unemployment rate and the highest home foreclosure rate in the nation, thus jobs and real estate values are the most presiding issues. Immigration reform is also important in a state where more than a quarter of the residents are of Hispanic origin.
New Hampshire (4) is another state where the race has tightened considerably in the last two weeks, despite a 9.6-point Obama victory in 2008. On October 6th, the president was up 50-44. As of yesterday that lead had been narrowed to 1.4 point margin. Key issues in New Hampshire are the residents' dislike of taxes, debt and big government, favoring Romney, and their liberal attitude towards social issues, including abortion rights, and a 2010 law legalizing same sex marriages, that favor for Obama.
In North Carolina (15), where Obama eked out a razor thin 0.3 percent victory in 2008, the move has been solidly in Romney's direction, from a dead heat three weeks ago to a 5-point lead. On Monday, Democrat campaign strategist Paul Begala admitted to CNN's Wolf Blitzer that the Obama camp had given up on the state where Democrats held their national convention. Considering that North Carolinians have voted Democrat only twice in 40 years (Carter was the other winner) and economic issues dominate, it is a move fueled by campaign spending allocation issues.
Ohio (18) is a state where the president's lead has fluctuated from a high of 5.5 points to 1.9 points currently. Obama beat McCain by almost five points in 2008, and like Florida, Ohio is one of the key states that could tilt the election one way or the other. No Republican has won the presidency without winning Ohio. The key to taking the state is winning the working class vote, which can only happen for Romney, who has trouble connecting with such voters, can convince them Obama's economy is worse than the one he would create. Ohio's current unemployment rate is 7.5 percent, down from 9 percent last year. Obama wants to convince Ohioans that he's responsible for the drop. Romney wants to convince them that Republican John Kasich should get the credit. Whoever wins that argument will likely win the state.
In Pennsylvania (20), the president's lead has narrowed from almost nine point to 4.8 in a state he carried by a comfortable 10.3 percent margin in 2008. Pennsylvania has gone Democrat in the last five presidential elections. Labor union members and the elderly comprise the nation's fourth highest percentage of both groups, yet the vote here likely comes down to major urban centers where Obama reigns supreme, versus the suburbs and rural areas where small business owners are feeling the economic pinch, and the administration's environmentally driven "war on coal" works in Romney's favor.
Virginia (13), is another state where the race has tightened, from a five-point Obama lead in September, to a 48-48 dead heat. Virginia is traditionally a red state whose only Democratic presidential vote in the last 40 years went to Obama by 6.3 percent in 2008. The key to winning this state likely comes down to whether or not Obama can maintain the coalition of minority and college-educated people he won in 2008 -- and get them to turn out in the same numbers -- or Romney can siphon off enough disaffected voters. Three third party candidates could also affect the outcome.
In Wisconsin (10), a state Obama won convincingly by almost 14 points in 2008, a 6-point lead as of two weeks ago has dwindled to 2.7 points. Wisconsin's travails over the past two years have been well documented, and no other battleground state has seen more erosion for the president than this one. Yet Wisconsin hasn't gone Republican in a presidential election since the 1980s. Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan's selection as the VP candidate may change that dynamic, but the state was polarized by the fight between Gov. Scott Walker and government employees. Unions are itching for revenge, yet it remains a reality that given a choice, Wisconsin voters opted to keep Republican Scott Walker in office. Which faction turns out the most voters on November 6th will likely be the key.
The overall key is momentum. Romney generated a considerable amount of it after the first debate, but reality suggests he must keep the pedal to the metal if he hopes to prevail on November 6th. While the overall voter preference leans his way, the the battle for 270 electoral college votes is another story altogether. RCP's average -- minus the toss-up states which include all of the above except North Carolina which "leans Romney" -- the Republican challenger holds a 206-201 edge in Electoral College votes. Yet if all the toss-up states stay exactly as they are now, Obama prevails with a 281-257 margin, and is re-elected. It's going to be a long two weeks.
Arnold Ahlert is a columnist for FrontPage Magazine.

14 Comments
Tan in Philadelphia
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 8:35 AM
It is inconceivable to me that anyone would vote for a man who stole auto bailout money, (millions) then closed the Delco plants, also would tell employers to threaten their employees with the threat of being fired, to vote for him (Mitt Robme) this man is a serious threat to not only the nation but the world!!
Old Sarge in Hinesville, GA
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 10:15 AM
And exactly who stole auto bailout money? Governor Romney had absolutely nothing to do with the auto bailout. Odumbo made sure his union cronies got the best end of the deal and the shareholders of GM and Chrysler got the shaft. it doesn't surprise me one bit that you would make such a statement because obviously you are too stupid to research the issue before making such an absurd statemenet. Typical clueless liberal telling lies and hoping everybody believes them. This is the United States of America and not the old Soviet Union where telling lies was a way of life. However, as you are one of the clueless ones then you see nothing wrong with lying. Your Messiah, (Odumbo) is a master at it and like mindless sheep you go along with it.
Ready4AChange in Illinois
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 10:38 AM
But, it is OK for our President to take the taxpayer's money to bail out GM and to waste it on "green" energy companies that are now belly up? Really?
billy396 in ohio
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 1:51 PM
Everything that Obozo touts as an "achievement is a lie. He says that he "saved" the auto induatry. He merely ignored federal bankruptcy laws, gave the United Auto Workers Union billions of taxpayer dollars, and took over the companies, giving the UAW 66% of Chrysler and 30% of GM, while installing Ed Whitacre as the new President of GM (A man with absolutely zero auto industry experience (a past President of AT&T and major Obozo campaign contributor). This is a horrible reflection of the other auto company loan from the federal government, where Lee Iacocca asked for a loan, got the loan, started building minivans, and paid back the loan with all the interest before due. The taxpayers will NEVER get back the billions that they own in GM stock, as the stock will nevr reach the $53.00 per share price that would enable that process. The United States government has no legal, Constitutional authority to take ownership interests in private corporations, inluding auto companies, banks, insurance companies or "green" energy boondoggles. That's what Socialist and Communist states do. The fact remains that 79% of the "stimulus" funds went to Obozo campaign bundlers. Over half of the "green" energy companies that taxpayers were robbed for have already gone bankrupt. The government knew (they were warned), before ever forking over one dime of our money, that Solyndra was a flawed business plan, and that it would inevitably go bankrupt. Obozo GAVE over $70 billion dollars of your tax dollars to prop up the UAW pension funds. That's even more tax money that he used to buy votes. Our electoral college is a flawed system. If a man gets the majority of the votes, he should win the election, period. The electoral votes are all that matter in the end. Obozo has divided this country like no modern President before him. He has used the U.S. Treasury as his own personal piggy bank and issued openly unconstitutional "Executive Orders" to buy even more votes, whether you're talking about his refusal to allow the "Justice" Dept. to enforce the DOMA, which was passed by a huge bipartisan majority under Bill Clinton, or his pandering to illegal immigrants with his "dream" act. The fact that no media coverage exposed these illegal executive orders is even more evidence that our "media" in this country are partisan propagandists.
Gordon in Boise
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 11:11 PM
Agree with your comment in general but take issue with throwing out the Electoral College. The idea there was to have a president elected with broad support across the country. Smaller states who assign electoral votes on the basis of overall total vote winner are essentially saying we don't care who our president is, we'll let New York and California pick one for us.
Bo in From Texas
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 10:11 AM
@Tan in Philadelphia. It is inconceivable that anyone would vote for a man who tells boldface lies on a daily basis, has concealed by executive or court order all of his personal history, and has spent more money in 3.7 years than any three previous presidents combined, putting my children and grandchildren in debt for taxes, a condition that did not exist before Obama was elected. How about his non-reaction to Islamic attacks on our properties, personnel and citizens? How about his skipping national security briefings on a regular basis? How about his inability to keep any of his promises, including his promises to Democrats like you? How about his wife and kids running up multi-million dollars expense for vacations paid by the taxpayers? How about his opening the borders to Islamics, Mexicans, and other aliens who seek to milk this country for its benefit, but contribute little, if anything to its value? How about his weakening the military so much that even his own Secretary of Defense was about to have a heart attack?
Ted in Cleveland
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM
This election is a clear choice - could not be clearer! It basically boils down to a choice between a candidate who belives in continued addiction to and dependence upon an ever expanding, intrusive central government, and one who favors a small, efficient federal government with most resources, accountability and control returned to the states, local communities and individuals. Personally, I am not sure the latter can even be accomplished because we have been spinning out of control for 5 decades to get to this point. But if we ever want any semblance of what America once stood for, we must begin now. Another socialist election cycle will be much too late... May God forgive our arrogance and ignorance.
demsarerats in Oregon
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 2:23 PM
The unspoken factor, Drat counties will try to steal the election. I expect the final result will turn on how much vote fraud there is.
Anton D Rehling in Olympia, WA
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM
demsarerats in Oregon I agree, voter fraud will determine this election, It paid a big part of 2008. I believe the liberal polls are a set up for massive voter fraud that will return Obama to the oval office.Then what?
mya in new york
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 5:35 PM
All you guys who keep on calling obama a dumbass and saying nasty things are idiots. If mitt romney is elected you all will regret it. He doesn't care about any of you guys unless you are millionaires or billionaires. The igorance of some of you are amazing. Romney will set the country back and mostly likely even further our problems with other countries and increase our debt and weaken our economy and increase poverty while the rich keep more money in their pockets. Do some real research on the man before you vote for someone not fit to be our president.
Anton D Rehling in Olympia, WA
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 5:54 PM
Myr, So suffer from a complete lack of understanding. Please educate your self on the difference from Free Markets and free enterpise, personal rights and freedom and simply put tyrannical socialism.
Robinius in Broomfield, Colorado
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 11:28 PM
Mya, you are right! All of us idiots regret Obama was elected in 2008 and will regret it more if he is elected in 2012. My "igorance" is amazing? Perhaps you can explain the gold ring he wears on his wedding finger. You know the one with the engraving "There is no god except Allah." The ring he has been wearing for 30+ years while professing to be a Christian. Who's "igorant" now?
wjm in Colorado
Thursday, October 25, 2012 at 11:40 AM
Maybe, mya, you should do some research on Chairman Obamao. Start with the movie 2016, a factual account of Obamao and his ideology. Then do some reading, like David Limbau's "The Great Destroyer". Your emotional attachment to a marxist statist will kill our Republic. Chairman Obmao is not fit to be a bathroom attendant.
Tod the tool guy in Brooklyn NY
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 6:40 PM
Does mya stand for missing your angle? Romney has wisdom, business savvy, and integrity; three things O'man definately lacks. Just play the 2008 tapes of O'mans speeches---his own words condemn him! Romney's Bain Capital, saved Dunkin' Donuts, Toys-R-Us, and Staples right in NYC, alone! In Jersey, Bain saved Burlington Coats.