June 18, 2014

No Intervention in Iraqi Civil War Without Congressional Authorization

On Jan. 12, 1991, with 370,000 U.S. troops already deployed near Iraqi-occupied Kuwait, and a U.N. deadline for Saddam Hussein to withdraw from that country only three days away, the U.S. Congress voted on whether to authorize President George H.W. Bush to use force to reverse Iraq’s annexation of its neighbor. The Senate voted 52 to 47 for war – with Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa among those voting no and Democratic Sen. Al Gore of Tennessee among those voting yes. The House voted 250 to 183 for war – with three Republicans voting no and 86 Democrats voting yes.

On Jan. 12, 1991, with 370,000 U.S. troops already deployed near Iraqi-occupied Kuwait, and a U.N. deadline for Saddam Hussein to withdraw from that country only three days away, the U.S. Congress voted on whether to authorize President George H.W. Bush to use force to reverse Iraq’s annexation of its neighbor.

The Senate voted 52 to 47 for war – with Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa among those voting no and Democratic Sen. Al Gore of Tennessee among those voting yes.

The House voted 250 to 183 for war – with three Republicans voting no and 86 Democrats voting yes.

The senior Bush then launched a congressionally authorized – and, thus, constitutional – war.

Eleven years later, President George W. Bush sought congressional approval for a second war against Iraq.

On Oct. 10, 2002, the House voted 296 to 133 to authorize it. Six Republicans voted no; 81 Democrats voted yes. The next day, on a 77-to-23 vote, the Senate also authorized war. Democratic senators Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Harry Reid and Joe Biden all voted yes.

Nine years later, on Dec. 14, 2011, President Obama announced he had successfully completed that war and all U.S. troops were leaving Iraq.

“Indeed, everything that American troops have done in Iraq – all the fighting and all the dying, the bleeding and the building, and the training and the partnering – all of it has led to this moment of success,” said Obama. “Now, Iraq is not a perfect place. It has many challenges ahead. But we’re leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq, with a representative government that was elected by its people.”

“This is an extraordinary achievement, nearly nine years in the making,” Obama said of the way he ended that war.

Two and a half years later, Iraq is in the midst of a sectarian civil war that pits a Shiite-dominated government against a Sunni terrorist group that sprang from al-Qaida.

On Monday, Obama notified Congress “that up to approximately 275 U.S. military personnel are deploying to Iraq to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.”

The Defense Department has moved an aircraft carrier, a guided-missile cruiser, a guided-missile destroyer and an amphibious transport dock ship into the Persian Gulf.

These ships, says Rear Adm. John Kirby, the DOD spokesman, give “the commander in chief additional options to protect American citizens and interests in Iraq, should he choose to use them.”

But does Obama have the constitutional authority to use them? Yes and no.

If these forces are needed to protect Americans in Baghdad or elsewhere in Iraq – as military forces were needed on Sept. 11, 2012 to protect Americans in Benghazi, Libya – Obama can use them to defend and extract our people.

But he cannot unilaterally decide to intervene in Iraq’s civil war.

As has been noted in this column before, the Framers of the Constitution intended to give Congress control over the use of military force except when the president needs to “repel a sudden attack.”

The war power came up in the Constitutional Convention on Aug. 17, 1787. The language in the draft presented to the convention said Congress shall have the power “to make war.”

Pierce Butler of South Carolina suggested an alternative. “He was for vesting the power in the president,” James Madison recorded in his notes on the proceedings.

With considerable passion – and wisdom – the convention rose up against this idea.

Madison and Elbridge Gerry offered an amendment. They “moved to insert ‘declare,’ striking out ‘make’ war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.”

“The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence war,” agreed Roger Sherman of Connecticut.

“Mr Gerry never expected to hear in a republic a motion to empower the Executive alone to declare war,” Madison recorded in his notes.

George Mason “was agst giving the power of war to the Executive, because not safely to be trusted with it,” Madison reported.

The convention sided with Madison, Gerry, Sherman and Mason. It voted to give the president the power to repel an attack but not initiate U.S. involvement in a war.

As the history of the last quarter century demonstrates, a Constitution that vests Congress with authority over war may not always make our political leaders wiser in the use of force, but it does make them accountable.

Obama ignored the constitutional authority of Congress when he unilaterally intervened in Libya’s civil war. Congress must not let him usurp that power again.

COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


The Patriot Post and Patriot Foundation Trust, in keeping with our Military Mission of Service to our uniformed service members and veterans, are proud to support and promote the National Medal of Honor Heritage Center, the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, both the Honoring the Sacrifice and Warrior Freedom Service Dogs aiding wounded veterans, the National Veterans Entrepreneurship Program, the Folds of Honor outreach, and Officer Christian Fellowship, the Air University Foundation, and Naval War College Foundation, and the Naval Aviation Museum Foundation. "Greater love has no one than this, to lay down one's life for his friends." (John 15:13)

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

Please join us in prayer for our nation — that righteous leaders would rise and prevail and we would be united as Americans. Pray also for the protection of our Military Patriots, Veterans, First Responders, and their families. Please lift up your Patriot team and our mission to support and defend our Republic's Founding Principle of Liberty, that the fires of freedom would be ignited in the hearts and minds of our countrymen.

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2024 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.