Aftermath of the Iraqi Elections

· Wednesday, March 10, 2010

What kind of coalition government will emerge from Iraq's March 7 national elections? Initial reports indicate Prime Minister Noori al-Maliki's supporters won a plurality of the vote (perhaps a third), with former interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi's "secular list" in second place. An Iraqi political analyst I spoke with said post-election political negotiations are underway, and the new coalition arrangements will clarify by early to mid-April.

Whether dubbed horse-trading or camel-haggling, the post-election process of parliamentary coalition building is another signal that open, democratic politics -- with its frustrating uncertainties, compromise and concessions -- are emerging in Iraq. The violent whim of the dictator no longer rules.

"Emerging" is the operative word. Iraq's institutions remain fragile. Corrupt business practices and bribery threaten public trust in the nascent government. While the Iraqi Army has demonstrated increasing self-sufficiency in conducting internal security operations (beginning with Operation Charge of the Knights in March 2008), police forces (especially local departments) are at best iffy organizations. Though Iraqi Kurdish leaders express strong support for the Baghdad government, complex and potentially violent administrative problems (the city of Kirkuk, for example) are unresolved.

External enemies threaten Iraq. The Khomeinist thugocracy controlling Iran fears Iraq's democracy, for it gives Iranian opposition Green Movement activists a Middle Eastern model of palpable democratic political change. So the mullahs meddle, with guns and money. Iranian intelligence agents definitely support Shia Arab gangsters in Iraq and may well aid Iraqi Sunni extremists. The Iranian nuclear weapons program is as much a threat to Iraq as it is to Israel --perhaps more so, since the Iraqis are the Iranians' ancient antagonists.

Baathist Syria continues to provide a haven for "former regime elements" -- bigshots in Saddam Hussein's horrid tyranny. The tyrant's exiled minions have cash filched from the Iraqi people during the dictatorship. There is reason to believe they help both pro-Saddam and al-Qaida terrorists in Iraq.

Indeed, terrorist bombs (most detonated in Baghdad, so television crews could cover the sensational carnage) scarred the elections, but the Iraqi people went to the polls. Iraqi voters once again waved ink-stained fingers, as they did in January 2005 when Iraq conducted its first national election and the Iraqi people demonstrated they were prepared to die to forward Iraq's liberating political experiment.

It is regrettable that so many privileged citizens in free societies dismissed and denigrated those groundbreaking elections. The 2010 elections provide an appropriate time for the cultural and ethnic snobs (and snob is a kind word) who declared that democratic politics were beyond Iraqi capabilities to issue a series of abject, groveling apologies. The most reprehensible faction in this defeatist crowd is the ignorant clot of hard-left propagandists and faculty-club chumps who swore the Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein's vicious tyranny. The election serves as a teaching moment for these purveyors of fascism and inhumanity.

Given Iraq's democratic promise, the external threats it faces and its internal fragility, the Obama administration must reconsider its "hard and fast" withdrawal timetable for combat forces.

The turmoil in neighboring Iran, which began in June 2009, is reason enough for Obama to offer to amend his August deadline. There are other issues as well, such as ensuring adequate defense of Iraqi air space. The Iraqi Air Force currently flies prop planes and helicopters. Let the new Iraqi governing coalition make the decision about the retention of combat forces.

Treating the Iraqis as allies capable of assessing changing conditions would be truly smart diplomacy. Iraq needs a reliable American partner, and to promote genuine peace in the Middle East, America sorely needs a democratic Iraqi ally.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

MichaelSSEC

President Obama has proved that he fundamentally misunderstands the nature of what is happening in Iraq AND in Iran.

While Iraq enjoys Democracy for the first time in history, Obama ignores the realities of the situation to press forward with his arbitrary withdrawal timetable. Unbelievable as sounds, once again the Left is striving mightily to haul defeat right out of the jaws of victory. Just when the gutsy Iraqis are succeeding in the goal we gave thousands of lives to achieve for them, Obama and his radical administration is working to abort that success and give the forces of corruption, tyranny and thuggery the conditions they require to retake the country.

Just as the lives spent in Iraq are beginning to bear fruit in the form of a spreading "virus" of Democracy -- Iranian pro-Democracy demonstrators cite the situation in Iraq as direct inspiration for their demands -- President Obama refuses to support the demonstrators, names Ahmadinejad as the "rightful, duly elected ruler of Iran," and basically tells the protesters to shut up and go home. How can it possibly be that the President of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA turns his back on liberty? How can it be that he sides with tyranny?

He's done it before. Last year, President Zelaya of Honduras declared himself exempt from Constitutional requirements that he step down after 1 term, thus making himself a de facto dictator. The country's supreme court ruled him an outlaw, and ordered his ouster. He apparently expected the support of the Honduran military, but did not get it -- they ordered Zelaya arrested. He fled the country, but astonishingly Obama supported the undeniable would-be dictator against the Constitutional government of Honduras. He even went so far as to order SecState Hillary Clinton to impose economic sanctions on Honduras until they restored Zelaya to office! When public outcry, begun by Conservatives like Dennis Prager telling the whole story, exposed the facts of the case to the American people, Obama finally relented -- and then tried to act as though he had simply been concerned that Honduras followed its own Constitution!

The man despises liberty, sides with ruthless dictators and tyrants and does everything he can to undermine Democracy wherever he finds it. There has never been a more radical, dangerous friend of tyranny in the White House. America is slowly waking up to the insanity of this administration. His poll numbers reflect that awakening. But knowing he's a nutjob does nothing to help the Iraqi people, the Iranian dissidents, or the rest of the Democratic nations struggling to remain free.

Posted March 10, 2010 at 7:20:34 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund