Options
My State of the Union Address
· Monday, February 15, 2010
Although I much prefer pointing out the shortcomings of others, honestly compels me to confess my own. In my case, my mortal sin is envy.
As I sat home watching Barack Obama deliver the latest of the 6,897 speeches he’s given since assuming the presidency, and trying to figure out if Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi had made a friendly wager as to which of them could stand up the most times in 90 minutes, I realized that I wish that people would respond like trained seals for me the way they do for whomever happens to be the commander-in-chief.
Even though I like to imagine that my readers are laughing, nodding in agreement and applauding on cue, I realize it’s at best only a boyish pipedream. Still, I was raised to believe that in America, anything is possible.
With that in mind, let us continue.
Recently, I learned that in California schools, they use history textbooks that devote 55 pages to the glories of Islam, roughly one page to Christianity and a single line to Judaism. What’s more, there are days set aside during the semester when the children are expected to show up dressed as Muslims. I believe that, for extra credit, the kids are encouraged to perform honor killings. (laughter and applause)
When President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, he said that he was planning to donate the 1.4 million dollars to a charity to be named later. So far as I’m aware, he still hasn’t named the lucky charity. Which may be the reason that rumors are going around that the recipient of his largesse is the Society to Enhance Michelle’s Wardrobe and Spare Her Having to Wear Oprah’s Hand-Me-Downs Foundation. (general laughter)
Liberals, who never had a kind word to say about Dwight Eisenhower, the man who twice saved us from having Adlai Stevenson in the White House, never weary of repeating his dire warning about the military-industrial complex. I always found it peculiar that Ike decided to make that remark as he was leaving the White House in 1961. Funny how differently General Eisenhower felt about that particular complex when he was waging war against the Nazis two decades earlier! (applause)
During the State of the Union speech, it was pretty obvious from their stern looks how the Chiefs of Staff felt about Obama’s promise to do away with their don’t ask/don’t tell policy, but harder to read the nine Supreme Court justices when he told the world how he felt about their reversal of the clearly unconstitutional McCain-Feingold bill. There are few things more entertaining than watching a guy who received upwards of a hundred million dollars in campaign contributions from left-wing union bosses announcing how terrible it would be for corporations to taint the election process by giving equal amounts to conservative candidates. This, by the way, is the same political hack who first said he would accept public funding of his presidential campaign, but then changed his mind once he discovered how deep he could dive into the pockets of George Soros, the SEIU, ACORN, the UAW, defense attorneys and Hollywood airheads. (applause and occasional shouts of “Hear! Hear!”)
Speaking of paying for political favors, inquiring minds want to know if Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu have to return their bribes now that ObamaCare has been given the big thumbs down by one of Obama’s very own death panels. (laughter and applause)
The other day, while thinking about the fact that things such as the Copenhagen global-warming fiasco; the East Anglia Climategate scandal; Obama’s absolute lack of transparency; his packing his administration with lobbyists and tax cheats; the lock-outs of Republicans by Pelosi and Reid from the legislative process; the trashing of the Tea Party participants by the Democrats; and the insistence by Obama that conservatives sit down and shut up; are either ignored or sanctioned by the mass media, I found myself wondering what actually takes place at an editorial board meeting at the New York Times and the Washington Post. Do these left-wing elitists really, as I suspect, just sit around and ask one another which major news stories they won’t cover in tomorrow’s edition? (laughter and applause)
Finally, Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner are obviously babes in the woods when it comes to the world of high finance. As our national deficit soars in the general direction of Jupiter, I have come up with the obvious solution. I suggest we borrow every last dollar we can squeeze out of the Chinese. Then, when they finally refuse to lend us another red cent, we go to court and declare bankruptcy. (laughter)
I say, screw China! (laughter)
And God bless America! (standing ovation)
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Lyn Nofziger, "North Star" of the Reagan Revolution: "The Patriot not only does the best job of putting important news, policy and opinion in proper context, but also of cutting down to size the pompous praters and propagandists on the left." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























MichaelSSEC
"I found myself wondering what actually takes place at an editorial board meeting at the New York Times and the Washington Post. Do these left-wing elitists really, as I suspect, just sit around and ask one another which major news stories they won’t cover in tomorrow’s edition?"
If only that were a joke. How dismaying it was to discover in the 90s that what we'd always suspected turned out to be far worse than we'd ever imagined. The media weren't merely biased. They were consciously dishonest, to the point of literally conspiring to kill stories that would hurt their pet Liberals.
When the Clinton-Lewinski story was dropped into the lap of Newsweek, the editors are said to have called an emergency meeting. They weren't trying to decide which reporters to assign to the biggest story of the decade, or choose the cover art for the biggest scandal since Watergate, or even to discuss how large the story should be. It was a total scoop, as no other media outlet had the story yet, and it would make Newsweek a LOT of money in boosted sales and ad revenue.
So naturally, the emergency meeting was devoted to the hand-wringing question of whether or not to KILL THE STORY OUTRIGHT. That's right, they had the story of the decade dropped in their laps, which would earn them millions of dollars, and their first thought was to kill it and help cover it up. That's the depth of the media's perversity.
Does anybody believe that if President Clinton had been a Republican, Newsweek would have contemplated killing the story?? Of course not. They would have run it and they would have been right to run it because it was news.
Instead, Newsweek did indeed kill the story. I have to assume that SOMEBODY on the editorial staff had the wit to suggest that they might as well run it because someone else would break the story. It couldn't be contained no matter what they did, so they might as well get the credit for scooping the free world on the biggest story in years. But even that sensible suggestion (assuming it was even made) could not carry the day. Newsweek killed the story.
And a BLOGGER scooped the entire mainstream media with the biggest political scandal in 20 years.
So yes, I wish it were just sarcasm to suggest that the mainstream media routinely holds meetings to decide which stories they will run and how they will spin them -- and which stories they will kill outright because they are "game changers." The NY Times did it during the 08 campaign, helping candidate Obama deceive the American people with a flat-out lie that he was not involved in any way with ACORN -- when in fact he had done legal work for them for years. The Times had paid for the story, and then killed it because it was a "game changer" in their own words.
The Leftist media is now Public Enemy Number Two, right behind the administration of their Messiah, Chairman Maobama. What those two groups of people are doing to America can only be described as Treason. And they should all hang for it.
Posted February 15, 2010 at 10:19:21 AM
Alex Torello
Wouldn't it be just dandy if Burt had a national audience to deliver his on-the-mark observations.
Only then, would many sleepwalkers "get it."
Posted February 15, 2010 at 11:17:55 AM
Burt Prelutsky
Dear Michael & Alex--Thank you. I don't seem to attract a lot of comments, but I must say the ones I get are choice.
Regards, Burt
Posted February 15, 2010 at 1:09:31 PM
Ruth Ann Wilson
"When President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, he said that he was planning to donate the 1.4 million dollars to a charity to be named later. So far as I’m aware, he still hasn’t named the lucky charity."
I remember remarking the day of the Haitian Earthquake to a friend, Reckon, Hussein will be donating his "Peace Prize" to the Haitian "effort"!!!!! (LAUGHTER)
NO, as usual, He used OUR MONEY "to make" Washington look benevolent. Then they scream to the people, "Give, Give".
I don't "feel" benevolent when I was "FORCED" to give at the Office.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted February 15, 2010 at 3:54:37 PM
mbt shoes
Great sharing this.
Posted May 6, 2010 at 1:06:50 AM