Searching for Intelligent Life on the Left

· Monday, March 8, 2010

It’s easy to see why liberals are convinced that they’re superior to conservatives. For one thing, in nearly all cases, professors in the liberal arts and members of the mainstream media are left-wingers. But you don’t have to be very intelligent or even the slightest bit honest to make one’s living in either field. To be a liberal arts professor, the major prerequisite is a willingness to endure sitting in classrooms from the time you’re six years old until the day you die. Once you’re into your post-graduate years, you merely have to concentrate on your specialty, be it Elizabethan poetry or the mating habits of the loon. That hardly bestows genius status on anyone. In fact, if you spot one of these bores headed your way at a cocktail party, my advice is to either feign a case of the vapors or grab your hat and go home.

The requirements for working in the mass media are even less stringent. You merely have to be hired. If you work in front of the camera, it goes without saying that you do have to have nice hair.

While I acknowledge that being a member of these professions is not absolute proof that one is an ignoramus. But neither is it a sign of superior intellect. Least of all is it an indicator of wisdom.

In fact, just about the only thing one can garner about these people is based, not on their occupation, but their politics, which shows them to possess the intellectual curiosity and independent thought of sheep.

There is a reason, after all, that liberals will unquestioningly accept all sorts of claptrap. For instance, like small children covering their ears and chanting, “Can’t hear you!” they ignore the fact that the earth’s temperature has been declining over the past decade, that Al Gore has been lining the pockets of his parka with bald-faced lies and that the East Anglia emails, aka Climategate, prove that academics, along with “scientists” affiliated with the United Nations, have been promoting the global warming hoax for their own selfish purposes.

Liberals want to expunge the Second Amendment from the Constitution even though the data proves that wherever law-abiding citizens, and not just the criminal element, carry concealed weapons, the crime statistics quite logically decline. Because liberals ignore facts about guns just as they do about freezing temperatures, even as their teeth are chattering like castanets, they refuse to debate the opposition, preferring to merely debase them.

Liberals don’t even question their like-minded politicians when folks like Obama, Pelosi and Reid, insist that it is possible to add millions of people to the Medicaid rolls, lower the minimum age for coverage to 55, and simultaneously cut costs without affecting care for the elderly. I do seem to recall Obama’s stating that a massive savings would come about through the elimination of medical fraud, but you can forget about a true blue left-winger ever asking him how he intends to go about it; or why, after all this time, he hasn’t even begun.

Liberals can be counted on to oppose drilling for oil in ANWR because they’re so concerned about the caribou and about spoiling the ecological state of frozen tundra. The fact that drilling for oil in Alaska would no more bother the caribou than drilling in Texas annoys jack rabbits, and that anything that affects frozen tundra would obviously be an improvement, doesn’t faze these blowhards in the least. But, then, neither does the fact that ANWR is nothing more than a tiny speck in our largest state, or the indisputable fact that the overwhelming majority of Alaskans are in favor of drilling.

But, of course, there aren’t a lot of academic pinheads residing in our 49th state and the only time the MSM types ever set foot within a thousand miles of caribou is when they head north, panning for dirt about Sarah Palin.

If the only thing that those on the Left lacked was intelligence, it would be bad enough, but that wouldn’t necessarily make them insufferable. But their ignorance is compounded by their snobbery. I mean, when egotistical lunkheads like Joy Behar, Jon Stewart, Chris Matthews, Henry Waxman, Bill Maher, Janeane Garofalo, Barbara Boxer, Barney Frank, Keith Olbermann, Al Franken and Danny Glover, are convinced that they are intellectually superior to Charles Krauthammer, Andrew Breitbart, Glenn Beck, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved, Rush Limbaugh, Jonah Goldberg, Ralph Peters, Michelle Malkin, Ronald Radosh, Dick Morris, Ann Coulter and Bernie Goldberg, you have to wonder if they also believe that the moon is made of blue cheese. But, of course, if it were, Al Gore would be out peddling Uncle Al’s Roquefort Dressing.

But worst of all is the belief widely held by liberals that they are nicer and far more decent than those Americans who happen to be conservatives; you know, the poor besotted folks that those compassionate liberals are only too happy to label fascists, Nazis, racists and astroturfers. Their conviction seems to be based in large part on the peculiar notion that if you object to Obama’s transformation of America from thriving free-market capitalism to state-run socialism, you must be a bigot. However, when they dismiss Condoleezza Rice, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Ward Connerly and Clarence Thomas, as oreos and Uncle Toms, that merely proves that they, rather than DNA or pigmentation, can truly determine racial identity.

Ideologically, these moral cretins embrace the beliefs of Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh and Che Guevara, and physically embrace the likes of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez.

These self-anointed intellectuals are people who think that those who believe in God and Jesus Christ, those who “cling to their guns and their religion,” are a lower form of animal life, while they, themselves, have no problem whatever accepting Obama as a messiah and, in the past, deifying the likes of Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

Let’s face it, when you kneel in a church, you’re accepting that there is something greater and wiser than yourself in the universe. When, on the other hand, you kneel to a left-wing politician, you’re merely emulating Monica Lewinsky.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

ILEANA

Burt, as always, you are hilariously witty and right on target describing the "scholarship" of liberal locusts. I cannot think of anyone more artful in his political prose than you.

Posted March 8, 2010 at 12:10:40 AM


Sammy

Burt, I wish one of these days you would just come right out and tell us what is on your mind. Tell it like it really is. LOL. Right on man.

Posted March 8, 2010 at 9:55:58 AM


g.wegmann

Pope John Paul II said this: "Stupidity is also a gift of God, but one mustn't misuse it”

This is apt advice to give to Liberals of any ilk, be they teachers, politicians or pundits!

Posted March 8, 2010 at 10:11:07 AM


William McCrindle

Burt,

You have made my day, the last comment was a hoot, hope you don't mind my sharing this column with everyone I see today. Brilliant!

Posted March 8, 2010 at 10:12:23 AM


Duke of Earl

Burt,

All of the leaders of the communist countries have named their nations as the "Peoples Democratic Republic of ....." Yet there is no democratic function available to the people. Our dear liberal government, press and educational system are despaerately trying to force that system on the rest of us. The communist system is predicated on the equality of all in the same manner. Yet, as George Orwell stated, "some pigs are more equal than other pigs."

The pigs in the communist countries are never elected to their offices. However, in the United States, we do elect our pigs; and, they receive the choicest slop to feed on. The rest of us have to wallow in the mud looking for something to live on. The rest of us are forced to rely on the benevolence of the pigs in the marble building to keep the wolves away from our straw and stick houses.

The real question should be: Who is more stupid; the pig who feels our pain and has our best interests at heart? Or, the people who elect the pigs and follow their lead?

Duke

Posted March 8, 2010 at 10:48:47 AM


Burt Prelutsky

Dear Readers: I'm glad to see you are all so wide awake and in good form this early in the morning. I never realized That Pope John Paul II was such a witty fellow, Mr. Wegmann. I will give him credit if I ever have call to use that line.

Mr. McCrindle: I have no objection to being quoted. While you're at it, please tell them to order my new book, "Liberals: America's Termites." I can use all the help I can get.

Regards, Burt

Posted March 8, 2010 at 12:47:18 PM


RiverKing

That last paragraph is beautiful! There ought to be a bumper sticker in there somewhere or maybe a pair of them.

Posted March 8, 2010 at 1:33:53 PM


Brian

Hey, Burt, don't beat around the bush, tell us what you *really* think! You keep speaking out like this in public, and Team Obama is likely to call for a boycott of YOU. What I can't figure out, though, is why these liberal lunkheads think they can implement a system that has consistantly been proven an abject failure, without hitting the same stumbling blocks every other oligarchy has hit. Do these educated idiots really think they know better, and that they can make a system of socialism work when all the other socialist nations in world history have failed? These are the kinds of thoughts that enter your head when you spend your whole life in academia, and never have to hold a job in the real world. It's funny how people who have to work for a living have a completely different outlook on life compared to those who have that lovely little piece of job security known as "tenure".

Posted March 8, 2010 at 4:05:42 PM


Howard Last

Burt, did you help write "Animal Farm"?

Posted March 8, 2010 at 5:27:28 PM


Burt Prelutsky

Brian: Like you, I keep wondering why left-wingers assume that a system that has failed everywhere it's been tried--be it China, Cuba, the Soviet Union, Cambodia--will work this time. Two things come to mind. One possibility is that liberals are certifiably insane; while another is the president's megalomania. When Obama said that the reason that the health care transformation bill would go through this time when it didn't under the Clintons is because he makes all the difference, he was voicing the sort of egotism that's gone hand-in-hand with despots down through the ages. Or reason three: both of the above.

Regards, Burt

Posted March 8, 2010 at 10:05:50 PM


Burt Prelutsky

Mr. Last: You're far too cryptic for me. I don't know if your comment is a dig or a compliment.

Burt

Posted March 8, 2010 at 10:47:19 PM


terry goodwin

I love the article Burt. To bad it is so true. I know a couple of those Idiots, one a Brother-in-Law, a Nephew, Neice two step Daughters and on and on. Yes they are Teachers and Lawyers! I beleive Ann Coulters book, though I haven't read it, but the title is correct " if Democrats had any Brains they would be Republicans". Im not either but I sure can see the difference. Power thats all it is about. Nothing to do with right or wrong but pure power. I kneel to nothing, I beleive in individual strength,knowledge and self sufficency, yet I help those I can and want to,not those who demand it! You are owed nothing in this world other than what you attain on your own. A Right is not a Carte Blanch ticket,you have to earn what you get.

I have seen the pictures of the ANWR oil project and can tell you it is out in the middle of nowhere and will not affect anything of value. But the Enviro's will stop anything because they are funded by the Govt. We have been saying for 50+ years about energy independence and where are we, because of these groups. In Minnesota we changed a Highway to save a couple of acres of Prarire Grass. Unbeleivable! While they are "Saving the World" who will be left to enjoy it?

Posted March 9, 2010 at 11:52:54 AM


Burt Prelutsky

Terry: Alexander the Great allegedly wept because he had no new worlds to conquer. The Enviros to whom you refer would weep if they had no new worlds to destroy. Unlike Alexander, who was honest enough to make it all about him, these hypocrites pretend that they are out to save the planet and every creature, no matter how lowly, that crawls or slithers across it, when, in fact, they are merely out to destroy industry and the economy.

Burt

Posted March 9, 2010 at 12:43:57 PM


MichaelSSEC

Liberalism is indeed a self-indulgent, self-serving, self-absorbed, self-aggrandizing ideology equal parts theology and mental illness.

How else could we have the wholesale industrial slaughter witnessed during the 20th century, virtually all of it caused by Leftist governments (USSR 20 million murders, Hitler 6 million murdered, China 60 million murdered, Cuba hundreds of thousands murdered, and the list goes on) yet modern Liberals not only excuse their ideology from any blame whatsoever, but actually try to shift blame to their opponents! It wasn't Leftist ideology that killed all those people, it was Right-wingers! In school I was taught that Fascism and Communism were Right-wing, that the definition of Right-wing was any authoritarian political system, and that it was the Left who saved the world from the evil Right-wing zealots who wanted to kill us all. It was like an episode of Get Smart, with the bloodthirsty Kaos on one side and the affable good guys on the other.

Many Conservative pundits have observed that Liberals adore beautiful words and fine intentions, while retaining an infinite capacity to excuse or ignore the most despicable ACTIONS in history. That's why they still speak of Marxism as though it had nothing whatsoever to do with the 100+ million souls murdered under Marxist regimes.

Even the way they graphically represent government is both dishonest and self-serving. They typically draw a pie chart, with themselves at the top. Then they depict Fascism at the bottom down the right side and Communism at the bottom down the left side. So they paint themselves as the opposite of all bad things, but they have to totally lie to do it. They're not the OPPOSITE of Communism or Fascism, those things were merely off-shoots of Socialism. Orwell would have laughed right out loud.

Of course, they MUST lie in order to paint themselves as not merely innocent of slaughter but actually as the Saviors of Humanity! No magic trick of a scale such as that could be pulled off in the harsh light of honesty. Only in the shadows of revisionist history, media propaganda, and ownership of academe can such a thing be done. Thank goodness for talk radio, FOX News and the Internet or we'd never stand a chance against those odds.

Excellent column as always, Mr Prelutsky!

Posted March 9, 2010 at 4:15:18 PM


Howard Last

Burt, the comment was a compliment. Animal Farm is the best explanation of communisim or Nazi's there is. I saw a cartoon version that followed the book exactly when I was about ten and I had to read the book in high school (now it is probably banned).

Posted March 9, 2010 at 6:19:45 PM


Burt Prelutsky

Thank you, Mr. Last, for the compliment and for putting it in words even I can understand. Regards, Burt

Posted March 10, 2010 at 4:02:17 AM


James Gover

Excellent Burt. Just excellent! I love the humor you employ in exposing the sheer idiocy of the modern liberal mindset.

As humorous and ridiculous as these Liberals are, what I really fear however, is the "Progressive." The average comtemporary "Liberal" (academians, media mouthpieces, hollywood glitzoids, etc.) are merely "useful idiots", as Mr. Alexander is oft fond of describing them, to the more isidious "Progressive." The Progressive ideology is the real threat to Americanism and Liberty. Even the moniker of their political and socio-economic ideology - Progressive - is a smoke screen, leading the useful idiots and uninformed to believe their principles are rooted in the progress of society and the human condition.

Alas, it is quite the opposite. They are clearly rooted in policies of regression. For when we blow away the smoke screen and peel back the layers of subterfuge, we find they are simply Statists (the Marxists, Maoists, Fascists, and other state centered and ordered societal ideologies you point out the Liberals as ultimately embracing). The European monarchies our forefathers rebelled against were just Statists of a more ancient order, and the Progressive/Liberals of today simply want to return America to a contemporary and blended version of those State Ordered Societies. And there is nothing in the way of progress about it. It is always, and ever will be, about power of the state and control of the people. They've been doing it by degrees over recent decades, but of late, we see their impatience and the erosion of Liberty has become noticeably accelerated. And there lies my fear.

Keep up the good work Burt. Appreciate you.

"But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." ~ John Adams 1775

Posted March 11, 2010 at 10:20:46 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund