The Answer Man

· Thursday, July 7, 2011

Although I try to maintain a self-imposed schedule of writing three articles a week, sometimes even that's not often enough to keep up with newsworthy events.

For instance, Anthony Weiner is long gone from Congress, but now I'm worrying about where he'll turn up next. I mean, one day Eliot Spitzer was the disgraced governor of New York, but did he go into hiding? He did not. The next day, he was co-hosting a TV show. One day, Van Jones, a self-identified Communist, was a disgraced White House czar, and the next day he had an appointment as a "distinguished visiting fellow" at Princeton. Charley Rangel was a disgraced congressman one day, and, well, a disgraced congressman the next.

In the case of Weiner, I suppose he could cash in on his notoriety by becoming a male stripper. But it might make even more sense if he joins the missus working for Hillary Clinton. The Secretary of State, after all, has a great deal of experience as an enabler of the sexually deviant, and I'm sure could easily make room on her staff for the New York Flasher.

The news has been full of Greece's financial meltdown. As usual, the Greeks are going hat in hand to the more solvent members of the European Union to bail them out. I'm not saying that the Germans, for instance, shouldn't lend a helping hand, but I suggest they demand half a dozen of the prettier islands as collateral. Greeks, as a rule, are very nice people, but why should anyone trust a socialist nation to get its financial house in order?

And, believe me, I'm not letting America off the hook. If we're going to keep borrowing money from China, I say we should put up places like San Francisco, Berkeley and Oakland, as collateral, and then encourage the Chinese to foreclose.

In the same way, I think the world is plain loco to keep throwing money at Africa. I can see the attraction for people who enjoy going on safaris or seeing how human beings lived a few thousand years ago -- sort of the continental equivalent of Williamsburg, Virginia, where tourists get to view the daily life of our forefathers -- but, basically, where Africa is concerned, western nations just keep throwing dollars and euros they can't really afford into a very large sinkhole. But, perhaps, I have come up with a solution. I suggest that rich people adopt places like Ghana, Chad and the Ivory Coast. People adopt unwanted babies, not to mention stretches of California freeways, all the time, so I see no reason why the liberal likes of Bill Gates, George Soros and Warren Buffet, don't take over the care and feeding of countries unable to handle the job on their own.

I saw where John Kerry and John McCain agreed that America should be taking sides in Libya's civil war. To me, that makes about as much sense as taking sides when Al Capone and Bugs Moran were fighting over turf in Chicago. It really is a shame that McCain wasn't a Democrat for all these years. Perhaps then he'd have devoted more time to reaching across the aisle and voting with the Republicans.

I also saw that Barney Frank and Ron Paul have set aside their differences in order to promote the legalization of marijuana. Not only am I not the least bit surprised, but it explains so much about their respective political beliefs.

Speaking, as we were, about Anthony Weiner, some people were terribly upset when they learned that in spite of the sordid circumstances leading to his resignation, he stands to collect over a million dollars from his congressional pension. At first, I, too, was outraged. But then it gave me an idea how we might finally put an end to congressmen and senators growing old on the job.

Years ago, I recall that a concert of composer John Cage's pain-in-the-ear music was held in New York City. What made it noteworthy was that tickets sold for five dollars, but for every hour a person could endure the pain, he would get a dollar back. If the poor saps remained for the entire concert, it would cost them nothing but their sanity.

So, how about if members of Congress receive 100% of their pension if they quit after one term, but only 50% if they stick it out for a second, and nothing after that?

What, I ask you, could possibly improve Congress more than installing a revolving door?


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Michael

"I also saw that Barney Frank and Ron Paul have set aside their differences in order to promote the legalization of marijuana."

This is a common misconception. Ron Paul just wants to remove the criminalization of drugs from the federal level. States are free to regulate/ban drugs as they see fit.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 9:10:10 AM


kj

Ron Paul refuses to participate in the Congressional pension program.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 9:50:06 AM


Tex Horn

Burt, the American people have it within their power to create the "revolving door" you speak of if they had the good sense and willingness to do it. They could start with the 2012 election.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 10:14:17 AM


Anton D Rehling

We can fix it at the next election, 2012? If anyone believes that those pukes in congress will suddenly begin to adhere to their constitutional restrictions at the next elections has their head up their back side to put it mildly.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 11:11:19 AM


J Henry Jr

Ron Paul may be a flake sometimes, but over the years I have come to respect him more and more for his good ideas. I used to think he was about 50% whacko, but as we ran out of money, the GBLT, minorities and public sector unions took over and the foreign wars dragged on and on I have come to think of him as only 5% or 10% nuts. Now compare that to President Commie who is 95+% anti-American and delusional, Ron Paul is looking pretty good. I'd take Ron Paul over Romneycare any day of the week.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 11:12:28 AM


Tom

Our really smart congressmen spent billions on a "War on Drugs," which spawned highly financed drug trafficing rings. Oh yes, Ron Paul is the whacko for wanting to take away their financing?

Posted July 7, 2011 at 11:34:16 AM


SJvet

Unfortunately, we'll once again see our landscape tarnished with "Ron Paul for President" signs and bumper stickers long after the next election.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 12:04:06 PM


e. m. kljajic

Burt: Some gems in today's column that, in spite of the actual gravity of the situation, managed to lighten up my morning. By the way, our congress person for life manages to stay in office because to remove him would probably mean having to vote for someone with a D after their name. Oops--have to find the off button on the remote--the potus is about to begin his usual string of pauses and uhhs. Regards from Alaska.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 1:06:14 PM


Holmes Simons

Burt, I have lost all respect for Ron Paul. He should not even share the same air with Barney Weiner, I mean, Frank, if BF held the key to the debt crisis solution. Who would have ever thought that Barney might take a hit from time to time. Some deviants don't need to be high to enjoy perversion. As for A. Weiner, I hear NBC has offered him a reality show broadcasting directly from the Congressional Gym with the catchy name "Pecs and Peckers". Dick's Sporting Goods has also offered him a position as corporate spokesperson, or tweetperson. I can't remember. But you're right, maybe he would be better off as Hillary's liason with the Muslim Brotherhood. A whiny-ass, loud mouth Jew is exactly what is needed to bring a positive solution to the Arab Summer. Better yet, tie him naked to the masthead of the Gaza Flotilla lead ship, his member pointing directly at Israel with a placard stating "A Message from President Obama". I mean, how hard could it be? Peace on Earth.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 2:33:57 PM


Tex Horn

Anton D Rehling,

I stated that the American people has it within their power to create the revolving door in 2012, not that I believe the politicians " will suddenly begin to adhere to their constitutional restrictions..." I suspect you are right on that point. Now, what are you going to do about it?

Posted July 7, 2011 at 2:40:32 PM


p3orion

"If we're going to keep borrowing money from China, I say we should put up places like San Francisco, Berkeley and Oakland, as collateral, and then encourage the Chinese to foreclose."

Burt, can we throw in Detroit and Chicago too? Not much good has come out of either lately.

Holmes Simons-

You are putting a disturbing amount of thought into how to deal with Weiner.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 3:22:25 PM


Ol'Joe

Burt, your wisdom is astounding. The present norm in American politics seems to be insanity, guided by the pursuit of money, power and self-interest. When people on the Hill develop a backbone, then, maybe there is a chance it will work, but no matter how reasonable your term limit suggestion is, I doubt they would consider it as helping the country and bringing it to the floor.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 5:26:47 PM


MichaelSSEC

"If we're going to keep borrowing money from China, I say we should put up places like San Francisco, Berkeley and Oakland, as collateral, and then encourage the Chinese to foreclose"

OMG that was unvarnished GENIUS. One of those "Gee, wish *I'd* thought of that one" ideas. We could rid ourselves of debt, chuck out one of the major Socialist parasites, and plague the ChiComs with a perpetual-destruction machine all in one fell swoop! Nice done, sir!

Posted July 7, 2011 at 5:38:24 PM


cepat2

Burt - the idea of San Francisco and Berkeley being swapped is a great one. The two stipulations are these:

1. Marin County, home of Barbara Boxer, must be included in the deal. That would take out Boxer, Pelosi, and Fienstein in one fell swoop. Hell, we ought to pay them to take it off our hands.

2. The Chinese can never, ever, ever give them back...ever. Remember Daymon Runyon's "Ransom of Red Chief"? Then you get the idea.

Great article.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 6:42:35 PM


Robert of Prague

Burt;

Thank you for brightening my very special day w/ your hard hitting & witty piece. Although, reading re: the commie V. Jones at Princeton (formerly a Christian U), I almost lost my lunch.

The whiny-wiener working for the termagant Hillary'd be delicious. Just picture the duo during a 'conversation': Scene one: A.W. refuses to do her bidding; scene two: A.W. slithering, zigzagging, begging & then cowing as dishes & curses fly around him. Don't you wish that Hillary'd be as deviant as Catherine the Great & he'd give her in turn a deadly STD? Two buids w/ one tryst.

Btw, Burt, you're wrong (your comment from last week) re: Hillary as a better POTUS than the impostor 'O'. She's a hardcore closet Marxist, militant feminist, vicious & vindictive & deviant - she tried in Beijing at a 1996 Women's conf to push five genders on us through the UN & global abortion on demand paid by the US taxpayers. People who helped to kill it were Mormon & Muslim NGOs. Lastly, she was one of the uber-lib lawyers who brought down Nixon.

Great reader comments also, as usual. Especially H. Simmons' A.W. heading the 'Gaza flotilla'. Are there any sharks out there? Even if, they wouldn't bother w/ such a tiny morsel.

I forgot to mention, my special day ain't my b'day but celebrating today 41 years of freedom. Of course, just as I awoke, I thanked God for my Liberty & for being an American.

Posted July 7, 2011 at 7:45:53 PM


Burt Prelutsky

Robert: Happy re-birthday. Glad you could join us in the greatest nation ever devised by the mind and guts of man.

Ron Paul fans: I would think you would prefer to see him continue to win House elections and forget about running for president. After a while, when you make one bad showing after another, you become something of a running joke, a latter day Harold Stassen.

Regards, Burt

Posted July 7, 2011 at 8:06:35 PM


Richard Ryan

Ron Paul is never going to be elected president of this country.The only thing he will accomplish is to draw off votes that would otherwise go to a Republican.Paul has some good ideas and instincts, but unfortunately he is mostly a wrench in the spokes of the machine that could elect a Republican. Too bad, as even a RINO like McCain would be superior to a Communist thug like Obama.

Richard Ryan

Lamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman

Posted July 7, 2011 at 10:28:52 PM


Burt Prelutsky

Richard--I agree with you. But so long as Rep. Paul doesn't run as a third party candidate, he won't harm the GOP nominee.

Burt

Posted July 8, 2011 at 12:08:46 AM


Howard Last

The problem is many of the so-called Republicans are wanna be democraps. They do everything the communists (oops democraps) do, but at a slower rate. You even have republicans (small r) praising Joe Stalin's best friend FDR. When was the last time, if ever, you heard a republican say social security is unconstitutional?

Posted July 8, 2011 at 12:59:51 AM


Burt Prelutsky

Howard: The problem is that it wouldn't solve any problems to say that Social Security is unconstitutional. Like suicide, it was a permanent solution to a temporary problem, but after three quarters of a century, it's not going to go away. Also, I do not understand why when people compare the two parties, they pretend that it is inconsequential if terrible things happen quickly or slowly. I will always vote for slowly.

Burt

Posted July 8, 2011 at 1:12:48 AM


James Foy

If you've been fed lies over several generations, then after a while the truth will seem preposterous. I'm not sure who I'm paraphrasing.

The entire "War on Drugs" is an effort to militarize the police and a wedge issue to attack the 4th Amendment. Remember that Prohibition just made the government bigger and the gangs richer--the same results we've gotten with the "War on Drugs".

For similar results see "The War on Poverty", "The War on Terror", etc.

Concentrated power in the hands of the government is bad for the citizens, no matter who is doing the distilling.

Posted July 8, 2011 at 12:59:55 PM


Tom

Burt, No comment about BO's false birth cert. Mathematically proven to be false and I'm finding few, if any, comments from any news source. What gives? Maybe Trump was onto something. He made it an issue, so something had to quiet the crowd by producing a document.

Posted July 8, 2011 at 5:30:53 PM


Burt Prelutsky

James--I agree that the war on drugs has been and continues to be a disaster. It merely leads to violence, corruption and mind-boggling profits for criminals. I am enough of a libertarian not to care about what other people sniff, imbibe or shoot into themselves. My only demand is that when and if they commit crimes while being high, they are not allowed to plead that they're victims of a disease and therefore not legally responsible for their acts.

Tom: Perhaps because I have no problem with the foreign-born being allowed to run for president,

Obama's place of birth is the least of my objections to him. I realize what it says in the Constitution, but inasmuch as politicians, not to mention Supreme Court justices, ignore the sacred document all the time. When Obama presents us every day of the week with excellent reasons why he shouldn't be re-elected, I prefer to concentrate on those reasons rather than whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya. I did hear today that the Boston Globe reported that after Barack was born, his dad tried to arrange to have him taken in by the Salvation Army. So now we know what his father's dreams were actually all about.

Burt

Posted July 8, 2011 at 7:58:51 PM


Case Ace

82% of respondents wish that all members of Congress were replaced...Uhh...errr...except for our guy!

Posted July 8, 2011 at 10:09:32 PM


DavidMac

Burt: Maybe a revolving Congressional door isn't a bad idea, but it (Congress) is like a kid in a candy store (give a child $100 and he'll spend it all buying candy.) They are allowed to buy votes through appropriations, grants, regulations, the tax codes, etc. (not to mention plain old bribery).

Our system is far from perfect, but it's better than whatever's in second place.

Posted July 10, 2011 at 12:57:35 AM


RedCar

I didn't write this. I wish I had.

There once was a weirdo named Wiener

Who had a perverted demeanor.

Forced from the Hill,

For acting like Bill,

Now Congress is one wiener leaner.

Posted July 10, 2011 at 6:11:16 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund