Options
A Tale of Two Debates
· Saturday, March 3, 2012
Tonight, I watched the GOP Presidential debate from Mesa, Arizona. Last night, I attended a Congressional debate here in the San Fernando Valley. There was a world of difference between them. The biggest difference is that I got a big kick out of last night's event, even though the candidate I'll be voting for hasn't got the slightest chance of winning. His name is Mark Reed, and he's a bright, attractive, well-spoken fellow. In many parts of the country, even in many parts of California, he'd be a shoo-in. He suffers from only one drawback; Reed happens to be a Republican.
Last night, he had to enter the lion's den. Not only did he have to contend with two U.S. congressmen, Howard Berman and Brad Sherman, but the event took place in a synagogue, so nearly everyone in the overflowing audience was a Jewish liberal. To be fair, nobody booed Mr. Reed, but that was mainly because the rabbi reminded everyone to be on their good behavior, and because the audience knew that Reed was essentially irrelevant.
What made the evening so entertaining for me is that one liberal was, for the first time in his political life, being forced to tell the truth about another liberal. It was sheer heaven listening to these guys insult each other. There was none of that phony "With all due respect to my distinguished colleague" blather. These guys wanted to bludgeon each other to death with their microphones.
The reason behind this mortal combat was that California's congressional lines were redrawn after the last census and what had previously been safe liberal districts for Sherman and Berman had been turned into a single district that will be covered in blood before the primary vote in June determines which of them goes back to the House and which one goes back home.
Honesty compels me to confess that I have been friends with Howard since our days at UCLA. But as he knows, I will be voting for Mark Reed. At present, Brad Sherman is my congressman. If I had to choose between them, I would vote for Berman, not only because he's an old chum, but because so far as it is possible for a liberal to be a man of principle, I believe he is one. For one thing, he backed the invasion of Iraq. Whether you agree with that decision or not, a great many Democrats opposed it for no other reason than to make political hay at George Bush's expense.
For another thing, Brad Sherman joined the likes of Henry Waxman and Maxine Waters in voting to continue funding ACORN with taxpayer dollars. And that was even after we had all seen the videos of ACORN employees trying to help someone they believed was a pimp finance a proposed brothel to be filled with underage girls from Central America.
That brings us to tonight's GOP debate. As usual, I found Ron Paul alternately amusing and alarming. One minute, you find yourself being charmed by his apparent good nature; the next minute, you're asking yourself "Did he really say the world has nothing to fear from a nuclear Iran? Or did he mean that someone has invented a new, clear iron?"
Rick Santorum still strikes me as a guy born to be a college cheerleader, although it appears that this lengthy campaign has taken a toll on his hairline. It seems to be receding at the speed of light. I recall that during the 1961 baseball season, as he pursued Babe Ruth's home run record, the pressure became so great on Roger Maris that his hair began falling out in clumps. I fear that if the primary race lasts into June, Santorum could wind up as bald as I am.
As usual, I was impressed with Mitt Romney. I know that some people resent his looks, his height, his hair and his money. By" some people," I mean others besides myself. But just because someone looks and sounds presidential, I don't really think that should be a liability for someone who deserves to be the President.
That brings us to Newt Gingrich. Although I have sat through all of the debates so far, which adds up to about 498 hours I'll never get back, I finally focused like a laser on what Gingrich was actually saying, as opposed to the glib way he has of saying things.
I don't know why after all this time it finally hit me. After all, it has been his constant mantra throughout the campaign that he's the guy who reformed welfare, balanced the federal budget and, through his Contract with America, gained control of the House for the GOP.
That being the case, it seems to me that the most sensible solution is for Romney to be the President and Gingrich to run for Congress and once again become the Speaker.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Former Senator Fred Thompson: "Thanks to The Patriot for your considerable efforts to hold back the 'Clintonistas' while I was in the Senate. The Patriot's message provides a critical touchstone for those inside the Beltway who have forgotten who they serve." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Arnold Ahlert: Catholics vs. Obama
- Michael Reagan: White House Website Gone Wild
- Ken Blackwell: I'll Have Another
- Jeff Jacoby: The Peace Process Battered Israel's Reputation
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Bad/Good Idea of Removing Assad
- Michael Barone: Cocooned Liberals Are Unprepared for Political Debate
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Great Debate
- Cal Thomas: The Media's Religion Deficit
- Larry Elder: Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still
- Ben Shapiro: First, They Came for Cory Booker
- Ann Coulter: Figures Don't Lie: Democrats Do
- Burt Prelutsky: A President Not Fit for Man or Beast
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























Howard Last
I do not watch the debates because they are a waste of time. In general the participants say what the audience wants to hear, not what they actually believe. Case in point Romany. While he was governor of Taxachussetts he pushed gun control and socialized medicine. Now he say he is pro gun, yea pro gun like Upchuck Schumer is pro gun. About the only candidate that says the same thing every time and voted the same way is Ron Paul. Instead of shoes the candidates should wear Flip-Flops.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 12:22:40 AM
Patriot LEO
In before the Council on American/Ron Paul Relations and Ron Paul Defense League show up...
Glad that I wasn't the only one who noticed that Mr. Santorum seems to be suffering from a rapidly-receding hairline... However, I would point out that, as in your own case, Mr. Prelutsky, being bald simply makes one appear more distinguished... Perhaps it will increase his appeal to those who are shallow enough to care about a candidate who 'looks' Presidential?
As a fellow American of Jewish descent, I am frequently confounded by the unswerving support that so much of the Jewish community lavishes upon the Democratic Party. What will the Occupier-in-Chief have to do, to demonstrate his utter disregard for Israel and, ultimately, his utter contempt for the America that we conservatives hold so dearly?
In any case, your columns are always the highlight of the Patriot Post, and your candor is ultimately refreshing and welcomed. Thank you, as always, for your patriotism and willingness to speak the truth.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 12:31:47 AM
Jon Salkow
He should be supporting Susan Shelley instead of Mark Reed. She's the constitutional conservative Republican in the 30th race.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 12:42:22 AM
Burt Prelutsky
Howard: I think the flip-flop label is getting a bit tired. I was a Democrat. Now I'm not. It matters to me where people wind up, not where they start. In order to get elected in Massachusetts, a man can not run or serve as a true blue conservative. Reagan would not have passed your litmus test when he was governor here in California. He twice raised taxes and signed the most liberal abortion bill in the country. Nothing I've heard Romney say in the debates--unlike you, I actually tune in--suggests he is any less conservative than you are.
Patriot Leo: I'm afraid that I, with my Hawaiian shirts and tennis shorts, and Santorum, with his corny sweater vests, are anything but distinguished looking, but thanks, anyway. I'm always glad to encounter a fellow Jewish conservative. Perhaps we should develop a secret handshake like the Masons.
I'm afraid that most of our fellow Jews put their radical left-wing agenda ahead of any concern over Israel. That is why so many young Jews, particularly those on college campuses, align themselves with the Palestinian scum calling for Israel's extinction.
Burt
Posted March 3, 2012 at 12:54:47 AM
Patriot LEO
If it were only confined to young Jews (as tragic as that remains), our country might not be perched atop the precipice over which the liberal meatheads are gleefully poised to launch us all; sadly, the liberal disease is running rampant among the vast majority of students from all backgrounds at our nation's institutes of 'supposed' higher education.
Does it not seem somewhat ironic that American Jews seem to be a sort of polar opposite to those that live in Israel? Whether it is the deeply-ingrained sense of societal responsibility (and, indeed, a patriotism not unlike our own) or the moral conservatism of the devout, Israel's Jews hold far more in common with conservatives than do the Jews that live in our own country. While the threat of constant annihilation has to factor heavily into Israelis' grave sense of responsibility, one would think that the freedom and history of this country would yield a similar sense of patriotism among our country's Jews.
In any case, so long as we have voices in the wilderness such as yours, Mr. Prelutsky, there is hope for all of us.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 2:04:22 AM
mac
Burt,
I'd love to witness your secret handshake, of course I like watching the Three Stooges reruns on occasion, too.
I suspect that many people who call themselves Jewish or Catholic or what-have-you do so simply because their parents were of that group. It doesn't mean they are of the devout, active members or have even attended services in the last 10 years. Someone should ask Pelosi when her last confession was, now there's a spot for the proverbial fly on the wall.
I sometimes wonder what kind of religion folks like Maxine Waters, Henry Waxman and their fellow Democrats are inclined to attend. I can't help but think it would have to have some Satanic ritual involved.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 9:19:35 AM
wjmccrindle
Burt, maybe the Demoncrats will so muddy each other that your guy can actually win? After all, the naysayers see Obama winning due to the republicans doing the same thing in the primary. I am inclined to think that Obama is so flawed that there is no way he can win. I hope my optimism pans out, and good luck to your candidate.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 9:56:47 AM
Patrick Jones
I know that folks change their minds as they age. Heck, in high school, I carried a copy of "The Communist Manifesto" in my pocket.
Coming from a technical background, it almost hurts to hear "Company Spokesmen" try to describe an incident at my nuclear plant. They are mouthing words with absolutely no understanding of their meaning.
I get the same pain when Gov. Romney speaks of conservatism. I think that is what many conservatives are picking up when he speaks.
Posted March 3, 2012 at 3:12:57 PM
Burt Prelutsky
Patrick: I listen to Romney and he sounds fine to me. Could I improve his speeches? I could and I have offered my services, but his people have thus far ignored me. Perhaps they'll be more receptive if he loses Ohio on Tuesday.
Patriot LEO: I'm afraid that even in Israel, liberals are very numerous and have a good deal of influence.
wjmcrindle: I share your optimism. I still don't see any way that Obama can win in November.
Burt
Posted March 3, 2012 at 3:47:25 PM
mac
Burt,
There is no way Obama can win in a normal election. His rating is below 50%, he has the worst record of any President, he just tossed off the Catholic and other religious voters and he's pissed off private sector union members who were counting on the Keystone pipeline.
I think that cockroach thinks he has an ace in the hole to the tune of over $1 billion. No one knows where hundreds of billions went of the stimulus money went. It became the biggest slush fund for a campaign in human history.
He has nothing to fear.
No one questions his fake birth certificate.
No one asks why his SSN fails E-verify or why he has a Cennecticut SSN when he's never lived there.
These are very simple questions.
Is the FIX in?
Posted March 3, 2012 at 9:45:42 PM
mac
WTF, indeed?
Posted March 3, 2012 at 9:47:10 PM
Burt Prelutsky
mac: I'm not sure what you mean by "the fix." Clearly, the media has protected him from the git-go, but I think his days in office are numbered. And the number is not five more years. More like 300 days.
Burt
Posted March 4, 2012 at 12:04:44 AM
mac
Burt,
Pardon the poor grammer/spelling in the above rant.
I'm just concerned that somehow that charlatan will steal the election. Chicago politics can best be described as being the lowest form of sewer filth and he's obviously going to have some major money and the best in underhanded political chicanery.
He really must fail.
Thanks for your 300 days, I needed that.
Mike M.
Posted March 4, 2012 at 7:39:56 AM
MARINE
It sounds like 'your' canidate in Ca. has the same problem as your presidential canidate does Burt---you are not going to beat Barry at the booth. He has to be stopped from running ie;mac.
Posted March 4, 2012 at 10:42:36 AM
Tex Horn
I'm still looking forward to receiving $10 (5 each) from you and Mac, Burt.
Posted March 4, 2012 at 11:52:46 AM
mac
Tex,
I will honor my bet.
I may want a recount to verify, though.
Project Vote, along with the Justice Dept. are preparing lawsuits in key states attacking voting registration laws. I think they want all welfare recipients to be automatically franchised to vote - no questions asked. No matter how many times they'll vote, or how many decendants they'll represent.
This could get messy, which, given the Obama background, somehow doesn't suprise me.
Posted March 4, 2012 at 12:12:44 PM
Burt Prelutsky
Jon Saklow: I will be attending this Tuesday's debate between Shelley and Reed. Maybe I'll change my mind, but I doubt it. I have been told that Ms. Shelley is very much a pro-abortionist. My visit to her site neither confirms nor denies this, which I find odd, as she seems to declare a position on every other issue under the sun.
Burt
Posted March 4, 2012 at 12:34:44 PM
Ragweed
BUrt,
I believe I read into your column that Romney "deserves" to be president? You know better than that!
Nobody deserves to be president. They have to earn it with a record or opinions, or spend their way into it.
Romney, having canned moderate talking points and opinions, and stammering, hesitant rhetoric, has certainly not endeared himself to me.
I must admit however, that his response on the Huckabee show to the man whose son was an injured vet, was heart-warming and I hope a picture of the real Romney.
Posted March 5, 2012 at 1:16:23 PM
Howard Last
Ragweed, like Dole, Ford, etc. deserved to be President.
Posted March 5, 2012 at 3:36:57 PM
p3orion
"I suspect that many people who call themselves Jewish or Catholic or what-have-you do so simply because their parents were of that group." -- Mac
I think the same could be said of many Democrats.
Posted March 5, 2012 at 11:02:04 PM