A Presidential Rerun

· Thursday, January 26, 2012

Summertime is usually when TV networks air repeats of shows we've already seen. In his State of the Union Address Tuesday night, the president got a five-month jump on the summer season by re-running a class-envy video he has broadcast more times than local stations have shown episodes of "The Andy Griffith Show."

Instead of a credible assessment of the state of the union, which is not good, the president delivered a slightly toned down campaign speech. We heard more of the same about how "the rich" aren't paying their "fair share" in taxes.

There was an unserious nod to government overspending to which he has massively contributed. Why should those of us who work for a living give more money to a government that under Democrats and Republicans has been such a poor steward of what we have already provided? Confiscating all of the wealth of Mitt Romney, Warren Buffett and every other billionaire and millionaire in the country would have a negligible effect on the national debt, unless government decided to live within taxpayers' means.

Having Warren Buffett's secretary, Debbie Bosanek, in the gallery with first lady Michelle Obama was cheap theatrics. If the president doesn't think it "fair" that she pays a higher tax percentage than her boss, let him ask Congress to lower her percentage with a flat tax. Bosanek may pay a higher tax rate, but Buffett pays a lot more money to the federal government.

President Obama wants four more years to continue the policies he's inflicted on us the last three years. Why would anyone believe that his policies, which are not succeeding and can't succeed, will miraculously work given more time?

In his 2009 State of the Union Address, the president promised to "cut the deficit in half" by January 2013. He is headed in the opposite direction to the tune of $4 trillion in additional spending and a debt that exceeds $15 trillion. If he breaks that promise, should he be held accountable?

In his address to Congress, the president spoke of the need to create jobs, but he has rejected one of the easiest methods of creating jobs by opposing the Keystone XL pipeline project in order to curry favor with environmentalists. Some estimates put the jobs potential at 20,000. Canada, meanwhile, is threatening to sell the oil that could have been ours to China. The president will create jobs in China, not America.

This president has squandered a great opportunity. As the country's first African-American president, Barack Obama had the chance to lead poor African-Americans out of poverty by encouraging them to embrace the principles that would allow them to become self-reliant instead of stoking envy of the successful. He had that responsibility. He has failed to live up to it. That is a tragedy, not only for him, but for those he left behind.

Envy has never created a single job, put a family back together, encouraged a man to provide for his children or endowed young women with the kind of self-regard that would encourage them not to create children they too often neglect. The state of many poor African-Americans remains how it has been for years -- too many fatherless children, too many uneducated, hopeless women and too many men in prison. President Obama might have done something about that beyond more government programs and handouts. Tuesday night, he spoke of no more government handouts. Which ones will he cut?

Optimism, self-regard and the economic, social and spiritual principles that built and sustained America, offering opportunity, not guaranteed outcome, are what the president should be stressing. Government is not our keeper. We are our own and our neighbor's keepers. Addicting more and more people to government and the view that others owe them a living is the worst form of covetousness. In case the president missed it in Jeremiah Wright's church, there's a commandment against coveting your neighbor's property.

(c) 2012 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

mmccrindle

Barry Soetoro is a liar. He has no integrity and believes the American voters are stupid. In that stupid part he may be on to something.

Anyone with half a brain can see his policies are a dismal failure and that he has no plans to change his agenda of crippling our country, of which he has an ingrained hatred.

Class envy is his last trump card and with his self contributed billions of dollars of stimulis money he can buy this election.

I thought we could weather this charlatan but I very well could be mistaken.

If he gets back in kiss this republic good-bye because we certainly cannot weather the morons who vote for him.

Posted January 26, 2012 at 8:43:35 AM


Pat

A fellow college classmate of Mr. O's says the prez knows exactly what he is doing. He is using a socialist model to collapse the economy, increase the size and reach of the federal government, decrease our national defense, in a plan to collapse this republic, making it ripe and ready for takeover by "progressives" some of whom are card carrying Communists. Or some who face Mecca 5 times a day.

Posted January 26, 2012 at 11:26:10 AM


KN

"[I]n 2009, Obama took itemized deductions of $514,819, a foreign tax credit of $59,372, and a deduction for interest on his home of $52,195. He was also able to take a deduction for $49,000 he contributed to his self-employed retirement fund. If he had not taken these deductions, he would have paid taxes on an additional $675,386, which in his income bracket would have meant he owed somewhere in the neighborhood of $200,000 more in taxes at the top marginal tax rate of 35 percent. Furthermore, he instructed the Nobel committee to donate his entire $1.4 million Nobel Prize directly to 10 charities, thereby avoiding the necessity of declaring the money as income on which he would have owed an additional $490,000 in taxes. If the president is so appalled at the rich and their ability to hire accountants to take advantage of each and every deduction, why doesn't he simply take the standard deduction on his tax return, like most Americans?" --columnist Linda Chavez

"Obama said. “I can afford it. Warren Buffett, he can afford it." Well write a check. Better yet - don't claim any deductions and pay your taxes based on your gross income. Anyone who feels they don't pay enough - just write a check for more and leave the rest of us alone. Along with writing a check why don't you get the 47% who don't pay a single dime in federal income taxes to cough up some money.

Posted January 26, 2012 at 11:53:44 AM


Howard Last

According to the Constitution, equal protection clause, and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 (before the 16th amendment) everyone is entitled to the same benefits. So why should citizens pay different amounts? We need a true flat tax where everyone pays the same exact amount. It would have an added benefit of no tax forms to fill out and no huge IRS. Doing anything else is pure class envy.

Posted January 26, 2012 at 12:37:53 PM


A.R. Nash

Obama is a Commodore 64 computer stuck in a feedback loop. He can't get outside of his cycle of obsession with black liberation theology's central focus on "economic justice". It's an ideology around which his world-view revolves and he's determined to fulfill his youthful dreams of being the messiah that finally brings justice to the land. He has a super-hero complex and the villains are those fat-cats who don't pay more than the rest of us. He needs to vanquish them and if he doesn't do that with higher taxes then he will have failed at his quest to bring "justice" to the land. How juvenile is his mental orientation. Reality doesn't matter, only his idealistic pursuit of "leveling the playing field".

Obama has a great faith in the power of inspiring words spoken with conviction but their impact on the young, naive, optimistic, and idealistic is quite different from their impact on the disillusioned and hopeless. I was smart enough to not abuse myself by watching his propaganda address but I'll bet that no one got a thrill up their leg due to his well-worn leftist talking points, not when he has failed to do anything effective and legitimate.

Posted January 27, 2012 at 1:43:27 AM


karl anglin

Brillant writing Mr. Thomas!

During the 2008 campaign, when

I saw Obama at a town meeting

in Florida where he promised assistance

to a black woman who claimed she

in dire straits, I knew the direction

that he would take as Presdient.

I suspect the sermons Obama really

paid attention to where the ones in

which Jeremiah Wright was bad mouthing America.

Posted January 30, 2012 at 12:20:37 PM


Terry Lee Moser

Well, Mr. Thomas, what do you think President Obama or any other President should do? It's one thing to be critical; it is another to propose some specific solutions.

The ball in now in your court. If you were President, what would you do?

Posted January 30, 2012 at 3:01:24 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund